{"id":130771,"date":"2009-06-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-10T04:10:07","modified_gmt":"2016-04-09T22:40:07","slug":"united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\/O Late Ramagiri … on 16 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\/O Late Ramagiri … on 16 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
rm THE HIGH Comm' 0:: KARNATAKA AT BANeAmf?\u00a7E:y_\n\nDATED THIS we 16TH DAY 03': JUNE, 20.(\u00a7\u00a7' % ;;M_T if  \n\nBEFORE\n\nms HOWBLE MR. zusrzcs AN.V=\u00a7NL5-Q\u00a3:\u00a7'P23.'L;5.'-GG$\ufb011'f\u00a7;\u00a7__A \n\nMisceilaneous First Apaeai\ufb01g. 393 _d\u00a7=  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nUnited India Ensurance {\u00a79.\"jf.td;_,  V. \" '\nBranch Of\ufb01ca, Chik$<amaga!2__.{r. "\n\nBy Regional Manager,  _  . \nUnited India Ins.u.r'?a"ra<;_e  Ltgia,  \nShankamarayarja E}iTu':!_;ii;:gA,  V  \nM.G.Read, Ban'g%:\u00ab!.cra\u00bbI\u00a76G-.jCQVI;_ _   '\n\nBy its Manager;  ;j_\n\n.J3\\PPE\u00a7.i,ANT\n\n{Ey Sajf. <;:\u00ab._ Ma;2ie\u00a7\u00a2\u00a71'A.'dv..;') J\n\n em. pawatrm;\n'Ageci 42 .y\u00a7aa\u00a7ts,\nW32. Lazav\ufb01amagiri Naik,\n\n Eshsxfar\u00e9 fxiaika\n\n., 'Aged 28 years,\n"  f\u00a3{o__\u00a3_ate Ramagiri Naik.\n\n.   __\u00a7.a%<shrr:ana Naika\n\n' Aged 24 years,\nS\/st,\nKadur Taluk, ChEkkamagaiur--\u00a3}ist.\n\n5. Lakkegowda, Ma}'or,\n\nS\/o Bukkagowda,\n\nR\/0 Bevarahatii, V .\n\nLakya Hobii, \"   ,V \n\nChEk\u00a7ENTS\n\n(By SrI.V:g5\ufb01'\u00e9s;.hvg\u00e9Vf:$3..$'i'\u00a7'\u00e9rV~:\u00a7\u00a7;*3v.':\u00a7ofa1 to R5 and Sri.\nBasavarajv Ka;f\u00e9cfe'\u00a3s;__for.,_\u00a7z5__) '  \n\n'rHzsVMi=;A is .E2L.jE:i?'c;:$3'B\u00ab&R secrxcm 273(2) OF W\nACT AGAINST \"THE _3UD\"GM'ENT AND AWARD DATED:\n\n24.9.20{).7_ PASSED IN7'MV{.\" N0. 460\/2305 ON THE FILE OF\n\"THE PRfESi\u00a7}ING 0F?I_(;ER, FAST TRACK CC}URT-II AND\n\n;_v\"'?9iACT~\u00a3V ; QHIKMAGALSR, AWARDENG A COMPENSATIOF4\n\"OFRi'3,3,.13,0.GQ\/=*--.WiTH INTEREST @ 6% PA. FROM THE\n\nD;i*\u00a7'E' _G_F' P\u00a7T1uT*\u00a3G~!x_i T\u00a7LL 33590527.\n\n \"'.'.\u00a5_'_1\"i s vagip\u00e9zail having been reserved, the Ceurt\n\n Vasaiivered the; fo\ufb02owfng:\n\nLigii\n\n    _,V_..5\u00a72s.=.sg::or:der:i:s 1 ta 5 had \ufb02ied MVC 469\/2905 against\n\n apgeiiant\/6\"' respondent and me J.K..Ramegowda<\/pre>\n
V  under Secticn 166 of the Indian Motor Vehicies Act, 1988.<\/p>\n
he said petition was aitewed by the learned \u00a3’\u00ab*\u00a7ee1_};b”e::5..’g;:”*.’..j:t\u00a5*%\u00a2-:._i: _<\/p>\n
Meter Accieent Ciaims Tribunaf-IV at  <\/p>\n
awarding compensation of Rs.3,13;,’0O{iZ\u00a5Aj;vs%\u00a71:b’:’.i.n’teresteA_’_:\ufb01t<\/p>\n
5% p.a. and directing the ap;:’ei<_Eantitsviisatisfy,..2\u00a7ige.':4e'wei'rd'..Vt<\/p>\n
Feeiing aggrieved, this appeai hi\u00e9\u00e9te\ufb01een prefeffrevd. <\/p>\n
2. One Ramag\u00e9rivA:’.AV:i\u00a7\u00a3a.rayana Naik,
\nresident of T.B.4i\u00a7at\u00a7t,  taluk in
\nChikmagaiu\ufb01 ” and Shandy
\nbusir3essr;r}a;_rv2,A””2.\u20acr:t1’iie::;;::’tre’\u00a3eii.\u00a5:ri\u00a7’  goods van bearing
\nReQiStT3fi9\u00a5i’\u00ab  with his goods, met<\/p>\n
with a fatai””;a4_\u00a7:c:ie;ie%it_ \u00e9rfci’ .\u00a7\u00a7gr~:eumbed to the injuries, The<\/p>\n
 ls: re$gije’hd.ent i\u00e9’ h\u00a7e wif:e and respondents 2 to 5 are his<\/p>\n
Zli’-.\u00a7:i’i’AiE}cir,Vei:s3\\ ‘:fhejr~.\ufb01__ied ciaim petition tinder sectien 166 at’<\/p>\n
Ir{d.i_a’\u00a7\u00e9..Vi?\u00a7dterv_viXl\u00e9iiiieies Act, contending that, the death of<\/p>\n
V it the saiiie’ aa;{nag’:r: isiaik was due ta actienabie negligence cf<\/p>\n
dtr\u00a7_ver” ef the said vehicie wha was impfeade\u00e9 as<\/p>\n
‘.’_reS’;7endent \u00a5s\u00a3ot3 in the ciaim petition. The claim petiticn<\/p>\n
it :j’.4\u00a7%1as’icontested by the respondents therein. The appeiiant:-<\/p>\n
“insurer ccntended that the vehicle being a gases veh\u00e9cie<\/p>\n
k<\/p>\n
\/1<\/p>\n
and the decaased being a gratuitous gaassaager\ufb02t’hgawsi _<\/p>\n
iegai iiabi\ufb01ty ta satisfy the award, if any, u ‘v <\/p>\n
on the pleadings of the parties, iss\u00a7:es:.\u00a7vfar\u00e9’~fa\u00e9.s’\u00e9a”b\u00a7{‘-sstw\ufb01a_s<\/p>\n
Tribunai. First claimant depossqas
\nwas examined to establish ac’tui'”s’a.:Vabl_a nVa\u00a7–:?\u00a7jaf\u00a5ca:’fgon the
\npart :23’ the driver of thasaid.’_7aa\ufb01Ai\u00a2\u00a7:aV_._’\u00bb.: E><:\u00a5=*1  \u00a338 were
\nmarked in their exgidenca, 'b\u00e9h?va*V"respondests,
\nan authorized fa\ufb01faser*;\u00a7\u00a7ati'\u20acg_e: :of:_"Effsf"inswaranca Campany
\n5990593 35   said vehicle deposed
\nas   their evidence. After<\/p>\n
ccmsiderir\u00e9gthe o'ra\u00a5"a;r;d"d.\u00a7\u00a7\u20acumantary evidence on record<\/p>\n
with rafevranca"t,c: {ha riiraf sontentions of the parties, the<\/p>\n
has h"=a\u00a5'd tP\u00a7VajtVfi:'?\u00a7a drivsr having driven the veh\u00e9cia<\/p>\n
E'n___r'as h'sa\u00a7'd.Lnag\u00a3i\u00a7:isnt manner, Ramagiri Nayak sustained<\/p>\n
  fatai'a\u00a3\u00a7c\u00a7danf'a\u00abr\u00e9a diad later. It has further heid that, the<\/p>\n
–.%.T,”_j’;.-\u00bb_s%a\u00a7mant”bsa\u00a7*ag the wife and chiiarsn of the deceased. have<\/p>\n
 the loss, <\/p>\n
\/;.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3. I have heard Sri.O.fv3ahesh, \u00a3earned <\/p>\n
the apeeilant and Sri. Vigneshwar S.Sh\u00a7a~etr\u00a7;;~..:Eeernec\u00a3_:” <\/p>\n
courssei for the respondents 1 to 5.\n<\/p>\n
4. Sr\u00a3.O.Mahesh, c::2:1teir>:::l::e’:Ci~..>t?1aA\u20ac”,  Eas
\ngrossiy erred in fva.e\u00a7en\u00a7n’g;e-****Ve\ufb01e'””-\u00bbe_E\u00a7’ab\u00a7!ity’*~A  the
\nappeiiant\/insurer in respetf__of”‘t.heV:ec\u00a7\u00a7~\u00a7_,aA\ufb01t garr\u00e9ed in the
\ninsured geoes v.Ve4bj\u00a3f:\u00a3e  “Enact covered as
\nper  leeewed counsei, the
\njudgment..e.nd”A”ewa%\u00a7}’a}5\u00a7:.:Elf  centrery ice iaw and
\nmateria\u00a5:V’e’n  festen\u00e9ng of the \ufb01abi\ufb01ty<\/p>\n
insofar as tVf:e.”apeei.Eer:t”ie;..’e’cencerned is iieb\u00a5e to be set<\/p>\n
4_..V.eside..\u00ab.\u00a7\u00a7..ee~reed \u00a2\u20ac>Va:\u20ac3$__eH? pieced reliance en the decision of<\/p>\n
“‘Vtuh\u00bb\u00a7s;V”\u20acf_eurHtV’\u00ab.ir’:\u00ab., t’he case of umrree mom INSURANCE<\/p>\n
ce:*4\u00a7A.r<:a*% 7:;::v::_"\u00e9'e'fe vs. KRISHNAPPA AND ANOTHER<\/p>\n
   –report\u00e9d%#:r:e\u00a72e\u00e97 (4) KCCR 2313.\n<\/p>\n
    Per’ contra, Sri Vigneshwer S.Shastry, by iak\u00e9eg<\/p>\n
.  ‘*—-“\u00a7e_e\u00a7_\u20achreugh the evieence of PWJ, RWs..1 and 2 centende\u00e9<\/p>\n
 \ufb01hat, the tribunai has not cemmitted any errer er Eitega\u00e9ity<\/p>\n
in fastening the \u00a5iabi\u00a7ity en the aepeiiant, which had<\/p>\n
\\,<\/p>\n
\/S<\/p>\n
deceesee has traveiied in the vehicle as a__;\u00a7?ati:it.e_tie___”‘_<\/p>\n
passenger, the appeiiant cannot be heid iietiiejfjtei\u00e9 “= <\/p>\n
the award. On the other hand;:,__ if:.th\u00e9.\u00ab uiziehizieesetif-ih_ee.;Vii<\/p>\n
travelied in the vehicle at the*ti_h1e \u00abd’f__ttie ac.ci”t1eetV_V.VaioEn\u00a7h<\/p>\n
with his geeds by hiring the V’V\u00e9\u00a7i\u00a7_V(%t\u20ac_uf0f””\u00a7l’3i_i5$\u00a7OT\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7\ufb02\u00a7 the
\ngeocis, ie., as a cwner eif’t%he \u00bb;jVoq.t\u00a7\u00e9,:<.ti1e"atward passed by<\/p>\n
the tribunal against the ap_;:;eiiVer\u00e9t__Vt:\u00e9iu\u00a5ij~~.;\u00a7eV'\u00a7t;–eti\ufb01ed.<\/p>\n
9. PW-glisi?{ife:.pf_;t’he ‘t'”i_e:\u00e9eaV,*,=eci. She has stated
\nthat, en  ~..hu’sben.d”\u00a7 Ramagiri Naik whiie
\nreturningfrcm  s’h’eh:\u00e9’y_.’with the unsoid vegetabies<\/p>\n
in goods veh._i\u00a7cie.v  met with the accident<\/p>\n
__;which,. ‘1%:I’a’V$’AC3F3 actoeht___qf.the rash and negiigent driving of<\/p>\n
\u00ab.__{pe53:\u00a7.’V’3 3t\u00e9hieie’~~.i2_y its driver, received fatai injuries and<\/p>\n
sL{c;c;j’i%;b\u00e9\u00a7;\u00b0’_~’.,;nithe cross-examination, can behaif of the<\/p>\n
Viesure\ufb01ce”*~v:eeih;3eny, she has edmitteci as true the<\/p>\n
“3’~e:iggeet.ieh”‘macie to her, that her husbanci was tratzeilieg; in<\/p>\n
‘.’_t\u00abhe’Vie’rr’% aioeg with the vegetables by paying the charges.<\/p>\n
i teidthiieg eise has been eiiciteezi frem WI-1 he come to the<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
\ufb01.\n<\/p>\n
ccnciusien that deceased Ramagiri Naik \u00e9id mt  <\/p>\n
the goods.\n<\/p>\n
3.0. RW-2, the driver of the v;ehic’E_ e,A~”has~.svta.i’e<{<\/p>\n
on 95.05.2905 Ramagiri Naikf-1.9ad\u00e9s i_\u00a7r;i:QV"..\u00a7\u20acis:..;'vVe.h\u00e9\ufb01\u00a5e
\nvegetabies and greens _by paf;{i_EtVVfg.\u00bbv..i:?';'asVjAhis\u00e9\ufb01tsarfgf\u00e9s, for
\ntransporting them ts  and that ha
\ntraveiled in the vef\ufb01sie as; According
\nto RW-2, he_ the traffic
\nruies.  fiii\u00e9\ufb01:~~.hi':'5f"\\:.v'\u00a3hA\u00e9'"*:.?\u00bbaz;'sase<:i had consumed
\nEiquor a\ufb01a fs\u00a5E vah\u00e9cie. In the cross-\n<\/p>\n
examinat\u00a3o\ufb01V”s\u00ab.by.th’e ii\u20aca’rn.;;:4\u00a7d cczunset fer the insurance<\/p>\n
4..v..c;ompv_a\u00a7iy.:  has sdnzs\u00e9ttegd that he drove the gsods vehicie<\/p>\n
 ‘:r;n itfhe,sai:Ve’.sf..V\u00e9k:\u00a3\u00a3dsst. He has further admitted that, on<\/p>\n
thsaiz Naik pai\u00e9 the hire charges ans ioaded<\/p>\n
 his g\u00a7\u00a7%::<;is"V..:~ \u00a7*sgetabies and travetled with the gseds.<\/p>\n
 _"2fh.uAs.js%t_bs\u00a7:on'3es ciear that, the deceases hired the vehicie<\/p>\n
  purpose sf transpsrting his goods, nameiy,<\/p>\n
"*\u00ab.\u00a7V\u00a7\u00e9"g"etab3es and greens. After loadisag them, had traveiie\u00e9<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
\/\/U.\n<\/p>\n
with his geods and has met with the fate! <\/p>\n
tater succumbed.\n<\/p>\n
11. RW-1, an administrative:’offi\u00a7’er..bfAthe-tif&’s\u00a31\u00a7’e’ts*2.cei1.t_i<\/p>\n
company, has admitted that tti_e\u00ab..\\_gehieie ha;\u00a7 i3’ee:’i.’vvE.n.sVur?edv<\/p>\n
for the period from os.%o5.2oe\u00a7fta% eL;?.ot\u00e9;*g’ga\u00a7\u00a7 gm the
\npo\u00e9icy is at Ex.R-1, whie1~@r”‘as;te\ufb01V–.i;ta.e’d\u00bba\u00a3e of accident
\ni.e., 05.06.2065. …Accofriin{tj. does not
\ncover the    Ramagiri Naik<\/p>\n
had paid the-w..fe:’re:’}_:en’t!  the vehic\ufb02e. In the<\/p>\n
cross-exv’a.mi’natien;the’ti2.e’S=.etEryiittec\u00a7 that, he is not aware<\/p>\n
whether R\u00e9’t?1\u00a7 gE.riVVV’wtifevelied with his geods from<\/p>\n
..v..3evag’a\u00a7\u00a5_uehasjdyxt’t*e\u00ab-._Ba.\u00a5iawera shandy on the date of<\/p>\n
 “_ecc;ijcie_nt…:_Rw\u00e9livhad no knowledge of hiring ef the xiehicie<\/p>\n
 carrying the genes and the deceesee<\/p>\n
 ‘having ?..ra”‘$;Ve!}exd with the goods. The best evidence ceu\u00e9e<\/p>\n
  met’ evfwizhe driver, who had eoiiected the hire charges,<\/p>\n
 ~\u00ab.t;weAfr}\u00b0\u00a7\u00bbi’tte\u00e9 the wading of vegetabie genus and carried tee<\/p>\n
“–\u00ab:e%}\u00a7\ufb01er ef the geods in the vehicle towards Banawara.<\/p>\n
u ‘While they were eroceedirzg with the goods in the vehicie,<\/p>\n
1%<\/p>\n
unfortunateiy, the accicierit has taken <\/p>\n
deceased having sustained fatai injuries,\ufb01tiavsfiaterV'” <\/p>\n
succumbed. The vehicie having bi?;en>ri3’ejarii; f{ir’~.ca–:=:yLiii\u00a7,ii .’<\/p>\n
the goods and the deceased hVazr_i”ng tfay\u00e9iied <\/p>\n
along with the Q6063 by paying ‘i\u00a7i’i\u00bbzi:e;7i’chargV\u00e9s,  i\ufb01siurance
\ncompany has been righ’i;iy._  the iiaisility to<\/p>\n
satisfy the award.\n<\/p>\n
12. Ipi. i*C’r:;\u00e9:;iirz;*;’piia (supra), the
\ndac:eased___ \u00a7[3′[\u00a7\u20ac_3r?*S;:’1.:::’;Q’  “t:t.{\u00a7:ge!vi’ad as a gratuitous<\/p>\n
passeng\u00e9sr anti Vridt’fi.r3_ ‘th’\u00e9V._\u00a7a*pacity of owner carrying the<\/p>\n
goods in  igQe’tis.””si’;ehi:\u00a7’iie’ and hence this court has:<\/p>\n
_vVai!owee\u00a7’ti1e.app\u00e9aiiiin tiie iristant case, Ramagiri Naik was<\/p>\n
:’*~.i1i:\u00a7i:’a had traveiied with his geeds, which is<\/p>\n
cl\u00e9a_r”‘ii:joir”:”fhvg%__\u00e9;;’i’t\u00a7ence sf both PW\u00bb: and RW~2. iii the<\/p>\n
 i3irCEii\u00b0i’iSt8E’iV\u00a2\u00e9$’,”.:ti’i$ tribunai is justified in heiding that the<\/p>\n
w””‘.v.44’eii:i<ie.:'=_;;e 6:: record disciosa that the decease\u00e9 was<\/p>\n
4'_'_'i,';'i_?ia'\u00a5;~*.i8i\u00a7"?'ii'i:\u00a7 in the veihicie aisng with his goods at the time 9%'<\/p>\n
Vi ::'..$'<:i;;i'\u00e9es'it and iierice the insurance ccmpariy is iiable ta pay<\/p>\n
3 "\u00e9iie cempansatian. \/,<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
13. The tribunal is justified in treat\u00e9ng the <\/p>\n
of the deceased at Rs.3000\/- per month keeping”:’t\u00e9VV’_’\u00a7>*~\u00a7J\u00a7}s:-.____”.<\/p>\n
the fact that, he was an agricu\u00e9tarist and ems\u00bb..4\u00e9j:~?s:a’\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7:ne\u00a7$u v <\/p>\n
man, doing bus\u00e9ness in the shandys. \u00a3\u00a7ff:j:;*:\u00a7%}”g’*-.\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9z\u00e9-agez,T<\/p>\n
at 45, the apprdprfate s*r*:e.:EtE;3\u00a7V\u00a7eaj_caf “”i3;.?..’._”‘V\u00a72as %3ei’*aAfsRaj.pp\u00a7’_\u00a7’;e=dV’ .<\/p>\n
and the 1059 Of depandency \u00a7id’a.:$:*b1eenV”‘ z3s’;s’eS1se.\u00e9:? A\ufb01er
\ndeducting 1\/3″‘ towa.;’ds..\u00e9_ p\u00e9%\u00a7c:r’:\u00a7\u00e93._ Eb\ufb01peras\u00e9\u00e9 do? ‘me
\ndeceased, the contributieriw \u00e9d t?;’e:’been rightiy<\/p>\n
taken at Rs.20\u20ac3t3j;,,:,\ufb01ar  Vef dependency<\/p>\n
has been cc\u00e9rrectijr’VT.ja~,.sse\u00a7$ec\u00a7.;”a;9f;_d _a_ward=ed. The ameami
\nawarded andelsfthe {:a{$v’\u00a7\u00a7\u00a5”:t5\u00a2’n_\u00e9\u00e9’.\u00e93eads is net exaessiare.<\/p>\n
The award passeda”b3{:’th&2′.’triA\u00a7.u\ufb01\u00e9i is jast.<\/p>\n
 “‘FdrjV’f’\u00a5’::e ?\u00a7;”a gJ3E._ng d\u00a7$duss%cns, the appeai is dava\u00e9d df<\/p>\n
 merif *a:iVd.d-h;e:’::%\u00a7e.ivis\u00a5 fiaf\u00e9by d\u00e9sm\u00e9sssed. No C6325;<\/p>\n
 _ T%:e””‘am<:\u00a7.:5n'E:':""Er; degds\u00e9i made \ufb01g; me aggeiiaszi is<\/p>\n
..\u20ac3r_der7e\u00a3\u00a5s is be tyansfarye\u00e9 Emmed\u00e9aia\u00e9gz id {ha<\/p>\n
 \u00ab.Vfri5:m'aA3V_Vfr;v:"–A\u00e92ecessa ry actien.<\/p>\n
kisj\/\u00bb<\/p>\n
Sc!\/-\n<\/p>\n
Iudqe<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\/O Late Ramagiri … on 16 June, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda rm THE HIGH Comm’ 0:: KARNATAKA AT BANeAmf?\u00a7E:y_ DATED THIS we 16TH DAY 03′: JUNE, 20.(\u00a7\u00a7’ % ;;M_T if BEFORE ms HOWBLE MR. zusrzcs AN.V=\u00a7NL5-Q\u00a3:\u00a7’P23.’L;5.’-GG$\ufb011’f\u00a7;\u00a7__A Misceilaneous First Apaeai\ufb01g. 393 _d\u00a7= BETWEEN: United […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-130771","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nUnited India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\/O Late Ramagiri ... on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\/O Late Ramagiri ... on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-09T22:40:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\\\/O Late Ramagiri … on 16 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-09T22:40:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1711,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009\",\"name\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\\\/O Late Ramagiri ... on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-09T22:40:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\\\/O Late Ramagiri … on 16 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\/O Late Ramagiri ... on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\/O Late Ramagiri ... on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-09T22:40:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\/O Late Ramagiri … on 16 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-09T22:40:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009"},"wordCount":1711,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009","name":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\/O Late Ramagiri ... on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-09T22:40:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-parvathi-bai-wo-late-ramagiri-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Parvathi Bai W\/O Late Ramagiri … on 16 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130771","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130771"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130771\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130771"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=130771"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=130771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}