{"id":130783,"date":"2008-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008"},"modified":"2014-03-27T05:47:17","modified_gmt":"2014-03-27T00:17:17","slug":"ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira … vs Employees Provident Fund … on 18 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira … vs Employees Provident Fund … on 18 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT QF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL\u00a3)F?:ET.\n\nDATED THIS THE 1361 my OF NOVEMBER    \" \n\n3EFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. Jusrzcrg\ufb01  B{)PANN\u00a3;: =  J \n\nWRIT PETFTION No.1+'-537\/2%)\u00e9?\u00a25\"\u20ac:L \" ' \" %%\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nms TULSE CHITRA MANQERA MARATHA1..-LI\" . ._\nBANGALORE, REPRESEN'I'E_D\"B;Y'._l'I'S;_=   \nPROPREETOR SR! SUBBARAO c\ufb01awm' \"\nAGEDAB{}U'\u00a7'65YEARS      \n\n g ' *  -;,.'PETETIONER\n\n(By -991}; av  rm': 1., ADV. ,1\n\nEMFL\u20ac}\u00a5.EES iimwasnf'-mi':\u00a7D ORGANISATION\nmarsgcram ASSI$'7--37AN'I' FROVIDEHT FUND\n\n'V \" 'EOMVMESSEQNER, BHAV\":SHYAN\u00a3DHI BHAVAN 7\n RAJA ma MORAN ROY ROAB, BANGALGRE 25\n REPRESEWED .,B\"1'. rrs Assxsmm\n\nPR0-tzInE~m*.;=fuxm'coMM:ss1oNER\nA    RESPONDENT\n\n {By \u00e9ra; '\u00e9zasfa R mnmmcmn, ADV.,}\n\nV, A' * 4_ THIS VLF. FILED UNDER Ai'1'?iCLES 226 AND 227 OF THE\n '-C\u00a3?\u00a7~IS'i'I'1'i}'I'IOI~I OF' INDEA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER\n.  DA'TE;'iJ 13.'? .2005 PASSED BY THE APFELLATE TRXBUNAL VIBE\n\n A!'11\"(--E; QUASH THE ORDER PASSED 8'!' 'THE RESPONDENT\n\n  = m'rE.t> 25.10.2000 VIBE mxus.\n\nThis Writ Petition oomfmg on for hearing, this day, the\n\nCourt made the following :\n\nE\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The petitioner is calling in  <\/p>\n
25\/30.10.2000 passed by the V’auir;m:\u00a7:iqr ”<\/p>\n
Employees Provident Fund
\nAct, 1952 (hereinafter Ieiegjedgct’ and
\nthe order dated 13.7.2065  Tribunal
\nunder the said    ”   V ”\n<\/p>\n
2. In  towards employees<\/p>\n
pIOVidc\ufb01t   as oontemplatul under
\nSection ‘?’Ai\u00a7.upf the  herein appeared before<\/p>\n
the    certain ciocuments. The<\/p>\n
” V. “v’n’:,._tl1e  Of\ufb01eer hm sought \ufb01at further<\/p>\n
   to the establishment to line! out with<\/p>\n
 ta  ‘jzquazutum of the contribution to be paid.<\/p>\n
  ‘Though  the petitioner disputed the applicability “of<\/p>\n
   itself, the position with mgard in the applicability has<\/p>\n
been aeoepmd by the petitioner in View of the fact that<\/p>\n
 oermin mncmnts i.e., Rs.1,08,833\/~ has been paid by the<\/p>\n
petitioner. In this Iegant cm the available records, the
\n3<\/span><\/p>\n
authority has quemti\ufb01ed the total   <\/p>\n
after deducting \ufb01e said amount  $55′  ‘the:  ‘gin <\/p>\n
further mount of R3.1,84,4+41\/~ :’:ms%._A#pa\u00a5\u00e9h3e”*Vby’%<\/p>\n
establishment V _<\/p>\n
3. Against the
\nthe pctitioncr herein had  m No.16(6)\/O1
\nhcfam am Empsgegs   Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
The ‘I’11’buna3-I   has noticed’ that<\/p>\n
insofar    _tl_1~eWAct, the same does not
\narise at  “a=tage_ ‘  the quantum, it has only
\nnoizicegi -the  \ufb01gder Section 7A and disposed the
\n   a perusal of the order passed by the<\/p>\n
 which is Empuwed at Ann:-xurc-E to the<\/p>\n
  ‘  s\ufb01ciuki ‘mdic:atr: that the aaxd’ order insofar as nouvcm” ‘ g<\/p>\n
  “:L:\u00a3i\u00a32c:\u00e9ij;\u00a7p}icabiBt}r of the Act is no more in dispute. But, with<\/p>\n
 to the quanu\ufb01cm” non’ of the amount in an enqu11y’<\/p>\n
 4 under Sec\ufb01on 7A of the: Act, the Tribunal has not conaidcsmd<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\nG<\/p>\n
the same in detail to come to the conclusion as__t6″\\\u00e9l:cf_h \u00e9:g  H<\/p>\n
the older datm 25\/30-10-2000 is jnst:i\ufb01ed crV.A4_j3s.r;t.’~A.\/,::i11 ‘\u00ab  <\/p>\n
normal circumstance, it would in T <\/p>\n
aside the said order t9 that exlsnt     V<\/p>\n
the Tribtmal. However, before’ so, a.   the
\norder dated 25\/30-Iemizigeo   mg the
\nquanti\ufb01cation    the enquiry
\nunder      though the
\ncstaiziishmcz\ufb01  dbcuments before the
\nauthoiiif\ufb01f, the ‘- gi\ufb01t oonsidczr the smc to he<\/p>\n
aompiete.   \u00e9\ufb01fho\ufb01ty has further obscured that<\/p>\n
 thouigilg  the  are not available, there is no other<\/p>\n
 G\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 fs:>bvA1″At1ts:VA:V\u00e9x:1_t11o1’ity except to pmecaad with the matter to<\/p>\n
 . th\u00e9 ‘   V ‘
\nS.  as the pro\ufb01t and lo$s account and the<\/p>\n
   valimt m\ufb01ed on by the authority, the icarncd oounsci<\/p>\n
A  l ‘fs3r  petitioner contends that the same was not the<\/p>\n
   \ufb01czipmp\ufb01am document and the copies of ccrtain dcouments<\/p>\n
 are yroduoed in this petition along with a memo. The said<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
documents have bum produced to dispute    9 <\/p>\n
made by the authority in the  <\/p>\n
of the Act. In a fact of this natuxfez,   i\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9if ‘V  L\u00bb<\/p>\n
has indicatnd that the order is   .”ti1t.\u00a2A ‘\u00e9a;\\raV\u00a7}abIe
\ndocuments since all thcrf   it
\nwouki not be pmper to    which have
\nbeen ftkuzi    as ho
\nwhether the  (Z;.”\u00a3’.: I10’t. All that could be<\/p>\n
noticed  %h\ufb01i”‘7.\u00a7iC authozity has passed<\/p>\n
the o1d4$r._oi1  ivhich were avaiiable bcibm .<\/p>\n
it and the  that the cntizne material has<\/p>\n
  .h_<_{:_fqre it desgaitse providing su\ufb01cicnt<\/p>\n
cp'potftur1:;ft3r,'\u00ab..i 'l'h\u00a211:ib1'c, to the said exinnt, the petitioner<\/p>\n
 provided an opportunity to produce the<\/p>\n
V  are not m\ufb01md on before the authority and<\/p>\n
H 'A    mgthiiiityr should. be directed m rwonsidcr the mattcr by<\/p>\n
 a \ufb01ts}: enquiry. To that extent, the order datzad<\/p>\n
'T if ' :25)3o-1o–2ooo weuld have to be quashed.<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
6. However, the said opportunity to be <\/p>\n
petitioner would have to be granted after   .<\/p>\n
this mgaxd, it is diwcted that the: p\u00a2gj\ufb01onc:s’  ” ~ ‘V<\/p>\n
costs of Rs.5,000\/– by dcposia\ufb01g egzaej?  <\/p>\n
authority who shall receive tI1c’\u00a7sc:1_:g1e   fut:  *<\/p>\n
of its activiuzes. The order dat\u00a3:&\u00ab.’.i25{_30L  the
\norder dated 133.2005  The case in
\nNo. Km\/PF; 13:; CJ_RCLEj1_I._I D{)– 3.54:97.1Z\ufb01’i\u00a7{i9’V”AnncxuIe B is<\/p>\n
irestaored to bf .  “A.$si s’tf\u00a7in’t——wV: Provident Fund<\/p>\n
commissiona,   (me afresh aim
\nproviding oppahxnxqz;   and dispose of
\nthe  in    I<\/p>\n
  _ obsavations, dimdziom and<\/p>\n
  disposed 012<\/p>\n
Sd\/Q<\/p>\n
Tudg\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira … vs Employees Provident Fund … on 18 November, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT QF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL\u00a3)F?:ET. DATED THIS THE 1361 my OF NOVEMBER ” 3EFORE THE HON’BLE MR. Jusrzcrg\ufb01 B{)PANN\u00a3;: = J WRIT PETFTION No.1+’-537\/2%)\u00e9?\u00a25″\u20ac:L ” ‘ ” %% BETWEEN: ms TULSE CHITRA MANQERA […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-130783","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira ... vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira ... vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-27T00:17:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira … vs Employees Provident Fund … on 18 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-27T00:17:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":719,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira ... vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-27T00:17:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira … vs Employees Provident Fund … on 18 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira ... vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira ... vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-27T00:17:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira … vs Employees Provident Fund … on 18 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-27T00:17:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008"},"wordCount":719,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008","name":"M\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira ... vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-27T00:17:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tulsi-chitra-mandira-vs-employees-provident-fund-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Tulsi Chitra Mandira … vs Employees Provident Fund … on 18 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130783","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130783"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130783\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=130783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=130783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}