{"id":131440,"date":"2009-06-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009"},"modified":"2017-12-26T15:38:43","modified_gmt":"2017-12-26T10:08:43","slug":"smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 28353 of 2004(A)\n\n\n1. SMT.REETHA RICHARD, W\/O. LATE RICHARD\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. PAUL D'COTHA, S\/O. LATE RICHER D'COTHA,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, MINICOY,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE ADMINISTRATOR, UNION TERRITORY OF\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.L.JOSEPH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.SHAFIK M.ABDULKHADIR,SC,LAKSHADWEEP\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM\n\n Dated :24\/06\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                     C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J.\n                     ------------------------------\n                   W.P.(C)No. 28353 OF 2004\n                     ------------------------------\n             Dated this the 24     thday of June, 2009\n\n                         J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>                         &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-\n<\/p>\n<p>          1. Petitioners are the wife and son of a deceased Ex-<\/p>\n<p>serviceman, Mr. Richard D&#8217;cotha, who died on 7.8.1972. After<\/p>\n<p>retirement from Army, the SS&amp;A Board, Thiruvananthapuram,<\/p>\n<p>had selected the deceased for settlement at Laccadive, Minicoy<\/p>\n<p>and Aminidiv Islands (LM&amp;A Islands) in Union Territory of<\/p>\n<p>Laccadive, under a scheme for settlement of Ex-servicemen. By<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1 he was intimated about the selection and the deceased<\/p>\n<p>was requested to furnish certain details. Thereafter through<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P2 his willingness to move with family on short notice to<\/p>\n<p>Islands, was ascertained. Further Ext.P3 letter was issued by<\/p>\n<p>the Secretary of the 2nd respondent, permitting the husband of<\/p>\n<p>the 1st petitioner to proceed to &#8216;Minicoy&#8217; along with his family<\/p>\n<p>and to report before the Station House Officer, Minicoy on their<\/p>\n<p>arrival, within 24 hours. The Secretary of the State SS&amp;A Board<\/p>\n<p>had thereafter issued Ext.P4 requiring the deceased Mr. Richard<\/p>\n<p>D&#8217;cotha to report at the Calicult office of the 2nd respondent on<\/p>\n<p>24.3.1972 to enable to take him to the settlement area.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly the entire family had moved to the Minicoy Island<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).28353\/2004               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>during the year 1972 and settled there with effect from<\/p>\n<p>24.3.1972 onwards.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.    It is submitted that after settlement in Minicoy in the<\/p>\n<p>year 1972, the family made cultivations in the surrounding land<\/p>\n<p>having extent of about 1 Acre, and various trees like coconut<\/p>\n<p>was planted therein. According to the petitioners, they were<\/p>\n<p>taking usufructs therefrom. But shortly after the settlement, the<\/p>\n<p>husband of the 1st petitioner died, on 7.8.1972. The grievance of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners voiced in this writ petition is that, inspite of<\/p>\n<p>prolonged stay of the petitioner&#8217;s family therein for more than<\/p>\n<p>3= decades, they were not issued with any document conferring<\/p>\n<p>title on the house and the property. According to the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>the area now in their occupation is having an extent of about 30<\/p>\n<p>Cents. They have approached the 2nd respondent through Ext.P5<\/p>\n<p>representation for granting &#8216;pattayam&#8217; for the land, but no<\/p>\n<p>positive response received in this regard so far, is the complaint.<\/p>\n<p>      3.    Ext.P5 is dated 16.1.1991.        The petitioner had<\/p>\n<p>produced Ext.P6, copy of a message sent by the Deputy Collector<\/p>\n<p>of Minicoy to the Land Revenue Commissioner at Kavarathi. It is<\/p>\n<p>evident from Ext.P6, dated 1.6.2004, that the Land Revenue<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner was requested to take action to settle the issue<\/p>\n<p>after tracing out records pertaining to settlement of the<\/p>\n<p>deceased and also a copy of the scheme for settlement. But<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).28353\/2004                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>nothing turned out so far, is the submission.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.    Heard the learned counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners and the learned standing counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>respondents. Along with the counter affidavit of respondents the<\/p>\n<p>relevant extract of the scheme, by which the settlement was<\/p>\n<p>effected, is produced as Ext.R1. Clause 4(a) of Ext.R1 reads as<\/p>\n<p>follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>          &#8220;(a) Each settler will be provided with a house<br \/>\n          built by Government at cost of Rs.4150\/-. 50%<br \/>\n          of the cost of each house will be treated as<br \/>\n          grant and the remaining 50% of the cost will be<br \/>\n          treated as loan which will be recovered from<br \/>\n          the settler in the form of rent at Rs.10\/- per<br \/>\n          month. If the settler proves satisfactory, he<br \/>\n          may be allowed to enter into possession of the<br \/>\n          house after the loan has been fully repaid.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Relying on the above clause the respondents contended that<\/p>\n<p>there was no allotment of any land under the scheme and what<\/p>\n<p>was alloted is only a Quarter&#8211; a house built by the Government<\/p>\n<p>at a cost of Rs.4150\/-.    It is contended that as per the scheme<\/p>\n<p>the allottee was bound to pay 50% of the cost through monthly<\/p>\n<p>rent @ Rs.10\/-. But since the death of the allottee, the husband<\/p>\n<p>of the 1st petitioner, the said payment was not made so far. It is<\/p>\n<p>stated in the counter affidavit that the family of the allottee were<\/p>\n<p>permitted to stay therein even after death of the allottee, and<\/p>\n<p>that three of his children were given employment under the<\/p>\n<p>Administration, after providing free education. With respect to<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).28353\/2004               4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Ext.P6 message it is stated that the Deputy Collector of Minicoy<\/p>\n<p>had suggested consideration to give &#8216;pattayam&#8217; for the house<\/p>\n<p>allotted, and the matter is under examination.<\/p>\n<p>      5.    Considering the rival contentions it is evident that<\/p>\n<p>inspite of settlement of the family of the Ex-serviceman in the<\/p>\n<p>year 1972 under the beneficiary scheme, and inspite of his death<\/p>\n<p>during that year itself, no fair and reasonable action was taken<\/p>\n<p>from the side of the authorities to assign his family members<\/p>\n<p>with the title of the house. The representations of the family<\/p>\n<p>members in this regard has not been dealt with any proper<\/p>\n<p>response, since the last more than three decades. From the<\/p>\n<p>contentions in the counter affidavit it seems that the only hurdle<\/p>\n<p>is for allotment of any land as claimed by the petitioner. But<\/p>\n<p>there is no convincing reason for denying ownership of the house<\/p>\n<p>to the legal heirs or dependents of the allotee. Eventhough it is<\/p>\n<p>contended that they have failed to remit 50% of the cost of the<\/p>\n<p>Quarter, amounting to Rs.4150\/-, there is absolutely no<\/p>\n<p>contention nor any document to show that any demand for such<\/p>\n<p>payment was ever made, informing willingness of the authorities<\/p>\n<p>for allotment of the Quarter on payment of such amount.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore I am constrained to hold that there is laches or rather<\/p>\n<p>negligence on the part of the respondents in dealing with the<\/p>\n<p>long pending issue of a helpless widow of an Ex-serviceman, who<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).28353\/2004                5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>is settled in the Island far away from their native place.<\/p>\n<p>      6.    Under the above circumstances it is only just and<\/p>\n<p>proper that the respondents should take immediate steps for<\/p>\n<p>issuance of necessary document conveying title of the Quarter<\/p>\n<p>allotted to Late Mr.Richard D&#8217;cotha, in favour of the 1st<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, after collecting 50% cost of the Quarter as prescribed<\/p>\n<p>under the clause 4(a) of Ext.R1 scheme. While making such<\/p>\n<p>conveyance the authority concerned should specify the extent of<\/p>\n<p>land in which the Quarter is situated, the ownership of which is<\/p>\n<p>being transferred.     The 2nd respondent is hereby directed to<\/p>\n<p>complete the proceedings as above,as early as possible, at any<\/p>\n<p>rate within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a<\/p>\n<p>copy of this judgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The writ petition is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                  C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>okb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 28353 of 2004(A) 1. SMT.REETHA RICHARD, W\/O. LATE RICHARD &#8230; Petitioner 2. PAUL D&#8217;COTHA, S\/O. LATE RICHER D&#8217;COTHA, Vs 1. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, MINICOY, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE ADMINISTRATOR, UNION TERRITORY OF For Petitioner :SRI.K.L.JOSEPH [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-131440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-26T10:08:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-26T10:08:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1082,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-26T10:08:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-26T10:08:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-26T10:08:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009"},"wordCount":1082,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009","name":"Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-26T10:08:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-reetha-richard-vs-deputy-collector-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt.Reetha Richard vs Deputy Collector on 24 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=131440"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131440\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=131440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=131440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=131440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}