{"id":131460,"date":"2008-11-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-09-29T09:42:22","modified_gmt":"2018-09-29T04:12:22","slug":"sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C … on 17 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C … on 17 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED was THE mm mm 01%' NOVEMBER  \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE I-iON'BLE MR.Ji_iSI'ICE.A,S' \"\n\nWRIT mrmon NO. 3198l\ufb02??%'%tL$xSR_\"I'\u20ac'?:\"  \n\nBETWEEN :\n\nSR1 K P THIMMEGOWDA  \n\nAGED ABOUT 5'vi)\"Y__EE2S\u00bb'_,=   N\n3\/0 LATE Ptrrrmewoka\u00bb 4    '\nASSISTANF_Ai?\u00a5'\u00a3SAR.:\u00a7\u00a7$RTC RAM&.N.ATHPI}RA\nDEPGT. R\/0 U{){1IURU';VViLLAGE _\n\nJ01)! HA'ND:p:AxE:::3~V.PcsT,vAumaicunnamm\nHASSAN 'I'A1\u00a3LIK AND'\u00abD1S'i\"R1c'-.!f, \n\n PE'i'i'I'IONER\n\n _ (By   PYA;f'I','--A\\II)_Y.H }.\n\n\n\nTHE 'i2_iVI\ufb01f\u00e9<i(I:!xf .?\u00a3:cNrRoLLER\n\n yuzvisxotagz, omcs\n"wfgESRTGf\n%  $3291.\n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
  ~ 435.? Sri : H KARUNAKARAN. ADV. )<\/p>\n
3|<\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PE’I’I’I’iON IS FILED UNDER ARIYCLESA 1 ~
\n227 OF THE CONS’\ufb01’I’U’i’ION OF izvznla. WITH A PRAY.I_\u00ab;i?. ‘i’*.’);\u00bb _
\nQUASH THE IMPUGNED AWARE) 01′. 16.3.2006 953339. B’! ‘f’HE.L. *
\nLABOUR couwr, CHIKKABQANGALORE, xnwpn’ :z;o..j24,I2ee4,
\nVIDE ANX—A. TO THE WRIT PE’Fi’I’i0N,_UHD\u00a7S;R ‘1’–!g{E..FA(Z;’i’ fA._N\u00a3’%_~
\nCIRCUMSTANCES or THE CASE; nnzscr mm REs:?oi~:m:N”:i 10 =<\/p>\n
REINSTATE THE PE’I’I”I’lC)NER Vsmaxcx mro smvzaa wm-1*
\ncommum or SERVICE AND A1.L._c7rHER_ CONSEQU’EN’i’IAL
\nB$NEF’I’i’S, XNCLUDING FULL BACK.uVJAGES’FRC}?u\ufb01’ mm DATE
\nomazsmxssas…\n<\/p>\n
This Writ Pttitian  D1;?Vfb’I “‘\ufb01c:a3mV’:’  g, this day, the
\nCourt made the following: ‘-  1   _ <\/p>\n
Tim  “‘1ig as Assismm Artisan “m the<\/p>\n
mspondentiem 3013.   %  30.6.2002, the bus bcann’ g<\/p>\n
_. No. cntrusnad to one Sri Domain<\/p>\n
 }\u00a3zv\u00a7j11t;;za1:1vtl3;a;;A{}i\u00e9e2M,_whc: was dimhaxging his du\ufb01aca as Driver-<\/p>\n
 Dn the said’ data, when the sa\ufb01<\/p>\n
-V Driv\u00ab;\u00a7i’~c1i\u00a7t;.-(’16-nduchor was engaged in issue of\ufb01ckcts tn the<\/p>\n
H ‘A   the petitioner’ herein who was in the sad’ bus is<\/p>\n
   have unauthozisedly driven the bus and caused<\/p>\n
VT  V’ atgticient at Hassan-Bmgakm: Road, nem* Buvmahally cross.<\/p>\n
A. The said acxidcnt msultnd in the death of one person and<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
‘-\n<\/p>\n
injury to 30 others. It is in that context, the mspondcnfhad<\/p>\n
initiated disciplinary p1%dings against both   V.<\/p>\n
cum~C’onductor as well as the petitioner who’wae\u00a7\u00ab’:y:iro1f3c:i.:ti$ —<\/p>\n
Asaistant Artisan since he was not-‘aiithtpljspd _:t’:’:aj\u00bb:<\/p>\n
bus and in any event the  <\/p>\n
bus unauthorisedly and      <\/p>\n
2. In this regard,  held and<\/p>\n
on the   that he is guilty of
\nthe   honicir dame} 3.3.2000 was<\/p>\n
passed.  had questioned the tiismmsai’<\/p>\n
 _ \ufb02oxdc;’~;p3vr:  ai:”‘a}3;;lis:ahTon under Section l0(4~Aj of the<\/p>\n
 to be registacred as I.D.A.No.24_IO4 in<\/p>\n
H ”   ‘A s  The Labour Court, at the first hxatsmce, considered<\/p>\n
 \u00e9citfxectacas cu” otherwise of the domestic cnquiry and an<\/p>\n
VT Ifcemzng to the oonciuaion that the am: was flair and valid<\/p>\n
A’ had thematic: considered the matter on merits to End out as<\/p>\n
J2<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
to whether there: was any perversity in the  ‘<\/p>\n
cnquizy o\ufb02icer and with regard to.  {if   ‘<\/p>\n
punishment imposed by the   Lax <\/p>\n
Court thereafter by its
\nthe punishmcrnt  on  “T.1C:Ivf 3A
\nthcm\ufb01axe is before: this     _<\/p>\n
4.   for the parties, I
\nhave    the award
\nm;pug\ufb01\u00e9:!   Icgani, the Labour Court<\/p>\n
wh\ufb02c xend\u00e9zjzjgvv   an Issue No.1 perta1nm’ ‘ g to<\/p>\n
 _   {he domastic enquiry had noticed the<\/p>\n
  through M.W.l and the documents which<\/p>\n
_a:;3;:;’E3:hs.Ml to M42. The evidence tendered on<\/p>\n
 L  o\u00a3:tne7pea\ufb01oner as Wm was also noticed by the<\/p>\n
” H u    Thereafter, an 003511″ sting the matcnais’<\/p>\n
  been placed befone the Labour Court, the Labour<\/p>\n
 was of the View that the damask enquiry Wm<\/p>\n
 eanduc\ufb01xi in a fmr mad pmpt-.1′ masmcr and 3}} opportunity<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
41<\/span><\/p>\n
had been pmvzidccl to the petitioner. Subsequeg\ufb02y,<\/p>\n
opportunity was given to the first pmiy to Iced <\/p>\n
The first party viz., the petitioner hetrcin <\/p>\n
himself as wwx on merits and  * u<\/p>\n
Exhs.W1 and W2. Since the doa;:a\u00a2s:5g:Tc\u00e9n\u00a7;uj\u00a7y% <\/p>\n
respondent herein had not  tap  further
\nevidence in this regard. V  .  2<\/p>\n
s. =._1:a* this 9;): Labour Court pmeeedcd in<\/p>\n
assess  ,  ‘gaawaii\u00e9iblc cm rwozd to \ufb01nd out with<\/p>\n
 , ‘_ t’:Vp i;%l\u00a2  the fnxclin\ufb01 Iendemd by the enquiry<\/p>\n
  a1VA_1ti.Vthi1V\u00e9”‘*s;1baeque11t ac\ufb01mn taken by the disciplinary<\/p>\n
 Court wh\ufb02e apptmciatiag this aspect<\/p>\n
V -V of   noticed that the Drivcr–cum–Oonductor who<\/p>\n
 {iuty on the sa\ufb02 date had  ‘ himself in the<\/p>\n
   and had also smtc\u00e9l with regmd to the fact that he<\/p>\n
T  V’ ‘Was engaged in issue of tickets to the passengers and it is at<\/p>\n
” that juncture, the pcti er who was an Assistant Artism<\/p>\n
had amen” the bus Ilnautho\ufb01sctily and had  ~<\/p>\n
amend’ ant. This smtement: was also srapgnzted\u00e9 ”\n<\/p>\n
6. The contention put forth oi;   .’<\/p>\n
stating that in fact he 1:;ad,gp_;1e
\nfunction of one of his   ‘ \u00a71e  not
\ncommitted the  in  by the
\nLabour Court. While  the<\/p>\n
Labour    \ufb01nding with rcganzl<\/p>\n
in the  crf  duty after about three days<\/p>\n
and the Ea\u00e9itlgat  which the mend’ em: occurred, it<\/p>\n
   said  petititmcr was not drtivmg the bus<\/p>\n
\u00a7i1\u00a7cs if. :\ufb01sA*hat\ufb01 h\u00a2 had stain: was in be behind him, the<\/p>\n
V . ncxt datt.z.   Labour Court after no-&c1:1g’ ‘ the said end’ cum<\/p>\n
,, , ‘A    the Court had come to the conclusion that<\/p>\n
  the ‘E\u00a7quny’ Q\ufb01mr had waned” the said’ ma’ cncc which was<\/p>\n
” fav.\u00a7.i1abLe before him and had themmer come to the<\/p>\n
” conclusion. Thctmfore, the same dues not suggest of any<\/p>\n
J7<\/p>\n
.-\n<\/p>\n
IV<\/p>\n
perversity. Further the Labour Court on its  ‘<\/p>\n
apprccia\ufb01ng such and’ ermc was   ihc_  . <\/p>\n
mascara’ duct as alleged against the  ws\ufb01\ufb02 ”<\/p>\n
by him.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7. Insoiiar as   and the
\npunishment    Labour Court
\nhad also taltgeii   the ‘gecidcnt committed
\ninasmu:;:}1″as, of pcrsan and injury in
\nseveral    stated that the mattaer dates<\/p>\n
not merit.  1–A of the I.lZ).Act. Thereafter,<\/p>\n
 A the  Cotxzft–.hg\u00a7__A1.:phe1d the punishment imposed by<\/p>\n
  the app\ufb01cation \ufb01led in this regard has<\/p>\n
A  8. VT]1.\u20ac\u00a24j–.;east3ns_ indimtcd by the Labour Court and the<\/p>\n
  ‘fact that evidence ava\ufb02abke before it had been considered<\/p>\n
  ‘L-Vby.  Labour Court would indicate that the Labour Court<\/p>\n
  kept in View the  materials and had came to a<\/p>\n
\ufb01nding of iiwt. Therc\ufb02am, the same does not  H<\/p>\n
pelvcxsity so as to ca}! for  3;  V<\/p>\n
Ame’ 16 227 of the Cons\ufb01tmion of     <\/p>\n
nature of the misconriuct
\npetitioner who was not a Adm: Vl!::V*. i\u00a7n
\nhad attempted his though he was
\nnot authorised tgzf.- *dp   I death and
\ninjuly to    to the bus.\n<\/p>\n
   Hmem cannot be any
\nmisplad\u00e9d   other lighter punishment
\n\u00a330 the       <\/p>\n
5;.\u00bb jrza.-1;  is also forti\ufb01ed by a similar View<\/p>\n
  ‘A — “b,i,a’ a  Vv’Wf3\u00a7nch of Punjab and Haxyana High<\/p>\n
  of PRAKASH CHAN!) –vs- THE IABOUR<\/p>\n
mum,  AND OTHERS reponnd in 1994 LLR 447,<\/p>\n
  ‘W1A1t’:il’61’I:i  held that when charge of unauthcmzml’ dmr:’ ‘mg<\/p>\n
  f”\u00ab;g;~g.g\u00a2j’AA’_:aehic1e is proved d ‘the Labour Court also finds me<\/p>\n
.-\n<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
enqu1ry’ to be \ufb02air and pmrpcr, the te:m1:ma’  is.  V’<\/p>\n
uphdd. \u00abW-.\n<\/p>\n
Hence, oonsiclaring all the$c:’\u00bb..as\u00a7\u00a7wct\u00a73  (:f tli\u00e9’ <\/p>\n
I am ofthc View that the award  fhc  <\/p>\n
on 16.3.2006 which is  this   not
\ncall for intcr\ufb01axencc.    being devoid of<\/p>\n
357%.\n<\/p>\n
Iudqe<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C … on 17 November, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED was THE mm mm 01%’ NOVEMBER BEFORE THE I-iON’BLE MR.Ji_iSI’ICE.A,S’ ” WRIT mrmon NO. 3198l\ufb02??%’%tL$xSR_”I’\u20ac’?:” BETWEEN : SR1 K P THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 5’vi)”Y__EE2S\u00bb’_,= […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-131460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-29T04:12:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C … on 17 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-29T04:12:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1146,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-29T04:12:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C … on 17 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-29T04:12:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C … on 17 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-29T04:12:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008"},"wordCount":1146,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008","name":"Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C ... on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-29T04:12:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-p-thimmegowda-vs-the-division-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri K P Thimmegowda vs The Division Controller K S R T C … on 17 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=131460"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131460\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=131460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=131460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=131460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}