{"id":132186,"date":"2009-07-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-01-05T02:21:48","modified_gmt":"2017-01-04T20:51:48","slug":"p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The &#8230; on 23 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The &#8230; on 23 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA.No. 2410 of 2007()\n\n\n1. P.ANILKUMAR, HSA (SS),\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,\n\n3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,\n\n4. RAJASREE.T.A., UPSA,\n\n5. L.PREETHAKUMARI,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SMT.S.KARTHIKA\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR\n\n Dated :23\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                                                            \"C.R.\"\n\nK. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, V. GIRI &amp; C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n\n                  ------------------------------\n                   W.A. No.2410 of 2007\n                  ------------------------------\n\n               Dated this, the 23rd day of July, 2009\n\n                          JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Balakrishnan Nair, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Before referring to the reasons why the Writ<\/p>\n<p>Appeal was referred to the Full bench, we will refer briefly to<\/p>\n<p>the facts necessary for the disposal of the case. The appellant<\/p>\n<p>was appointed as H.S.A.(Social Studies) in the sixth<\/p>\n<p>respondent&#8217;s school on 5.6.2000. The said appointment was<\/p>\n<p>approved by the competent authority. The fourth respondent<\/p>\n<p>was appointed as U.P.S.A. in the Upper Primary wing of the<\/p>\n<p>said school on 6.6.2001. The said appointment was approved<\/p>\n<p>with effect from the said date.      The said respondent was<\/p>\n<p>qualified for appointment as H.S.A.(Mathematics) and also<\/p>\n<p>H.S.A.(English), provided a vacancy in the latter post arose<\/p>\n<p>before 19.7.2005.      B.Ed. in English became an obligatory<\/p>\n<p>qualification for appointment as H.S.A.(English) only from the<\/p>\n<p>said date (as per Ext.P4 Government Order) and the fourth<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.No. 2410\/2007              &#8211; 2 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>respondent was having B.Ed. in Mathematics only.<\/p>\n<p>            2.    The Government issued Ext.P2 order dated<\/p>\n<p>7.1.2002,       creating a new cadre of H.S.A.(English), by<\/p>\n<p>re-allocating the periods of English allocated to H.S.As. in Core<\/p>\n<p>Subjects.    It was also ordered therein that the existing teachers<\/p>\n<p>shall not be retrenched for creation of the post of H.S.A.(English).<\/p>\n<p>The Government, by Ext.P3 order dated 16.7.2003 directed that<\/p>\n<p>existing H.S.A., if any, having qualification for appointment as<\/p>\n<p>H.S.A.(English) shall be accommodated against the newly created<\/p>\n<p>post of H.S.A.(English).      By Ext.P4 dated 19.7.2005, the<\/p>\n<p>Government ordered that B.Ed. in the concerned subject shall be<\/p>\n<p>a mandatory qualification apart from the degree in the concerned<\/p>\n<p>subject, for appointment as H.S.A. in a subject.        The fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent was appointed against a maternity leave vacancy as<\/p>\n<p>H.S.A.(Mathematics) during the period from 29.10.2002 to<\/p>\n<p>12.3.2003.     During the academic year 2004-05, one post of<\/p>\n<p>H.S.A.(English) was created in the 6th respondent&#8217;s school. The<\/p>\n<p>fourth respondent was appointed in that vacancy with effect from<\/p>\n<p>21.7.2004.     During 2006-07, there was one division fall, as<\/p>\n<p>evident from Ext.P7 staff fixation order. As per the said order,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.No. 2410\/2007               &#8211; 3 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the appellant was retained in the 6th respondent&#8217;s school. As a<\/p>\n<p>result, there was no vacancy to accommodate the fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent in the cadre of H.S.A. and therefore, she was<\/p>\n<p>reverted as U.P.S.A.. The approval of appointment of the fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent as H.S.A.(Mathematics) and H.S.A.(English) were<\/p>\n<p>rejected by the D.E.O. The fourth respondent filed a revision<\/p>\n<p>before the Government. The Government allowed the revision in<\/p>\n<p>part and approved her appointment as H.S.A.(Mathematics) from<\/p>\n<p>29.10.2002 to 12.3.2003 and allowed her to draw salary in the<\/p>\n<p>post of U.P.S.A.     from 21.7.2004.      But, the approval of<\/p>\n<p>appointment of the 4th respondent as H.S.A(English) was<\/p>\n<p>rejected. The fourth respondent filed a review petition before the<\/p>\n<p>Government. That review petition was allowed by Ext.P6 dated<\/p>\n<p>20.12.2006, approving the appointment of the fourth respondent<\/p>\n<p>as H.S.A.(English) from 21.7.2004.        In obedience to that<\/p>\n<p>direction, the D.E.O. by Ext.P10 order,            approved the<\/p>\n<p>appointment of the fourth respondent as H.S.A.(English) from<\/p>\n<p>21.7.2004 to 14.7.2006.    The writ petition was filed challenging<\/p>\n<p>Exts.P6 and P10 orders. The learned Single Judge dismissed the<\/p>\n<p>writ petition. Hence this writ appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.No. 2410\/2007                &#8211; 4 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            3. When the Writ Appeal came up for hearing before<\/p>\n<p>the Division Bench, noticing the apparent conflict between the<\/p>\n<p>Division Bench decisions of this Court in Rakhee v. State of<\/p>\n<p>Kerala, 2007(1) KLT 766 and the decision in <a href=\"\/doc\/1674915\/\">Ashalatha v.<\/p>\n<p>State of Kerala,<\/a> 2000(1) KLT 192, the appeal was referred to<\/p>\n<p>be heard by the Full Bench.\n<\/p>\n<p>            4.     Learned Senior Counsel, Smt.V.P.Seemanthini<\/p>\n<p>submitted     that   Ext.P6   order   being  one   passed    without<\/p>\n<p>jurisdiction, is liable to be quashed. It is settled position in law,<\/p>\n<p>that, the Government cannot review an order passed by it under<\/p>\n<p>Rule 92 of Chapter XIVA of the Kerala Education Rules, (for short,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;the K.E.R.&#8221;). On the other hand, Sri.V.A.Muhammed, learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the fourth respondent, submitted that, if Ext.P6 order<\/p>\n<p>is quashed by this Court on some technical grounds, the same<\/p>\n<p>will result in resurrection of an illegal order. So, this Court may<\/p>\n<p>decline to interfere with Ext.P6. Sri.George Poonthottam, learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel    who     appeared    for    the  sixth  respondent     and<\/p>\n<p>Sri.M.V.Thamban, learned counsel who appeared for fifth<\/p>\n<p>respondent      supported the above submission of the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the fourth respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.No. 2410\/2007               &#8211; 5 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            5. Going by the facts of the case, we feel that Ext.P6<\/p>\n<p>order is ab initio void.    The Government have no power to<\/p>\n<p>entertain a review petition under Rule 93 against an order passed<\/p>\n<p>in revision under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV-A of the K.E.R. If that<\/p>\n<p>be so, it is unnecessary to consider the point referred to the Full<\/p>\n<p>Bench. This Court will not, normally, decide a question of law,<\/p>\n<p>unless it is absolutely necessary for the disposal of the case. In<\/p>\n<p>this case, we notice that as a result of creation of one post of<\/p>\n<p>H.S.A.(English) and the steps taken for the retention of that post<\/p>\n<p>in the year 2006-07, a senior hand is going to be sent out from<\/p>\n<p>service. The appellant has service from 2000, whereas the fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent has service as H.S.A. only from 21.7.2004.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, if we accept the contention of the fourth respondent,<\/p>\n<p>the same will cause injustice to the appellant.        The learned<\/p>\n<p>author, H.W.R.Wade,      in his Administrative Law,      speaks of<\/p>\n<p>objection to granting discretion to the courts to quash or not to<\/p>\n<p>quash an illegal order. Learned author in the 6th edition of the<\/p>\n<p>said book, stated as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                &#8220;There are grave objections to giving courts<\/p>\n<p>         discretion to decide whether Governmental action<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.No. 2410\/2007                  &#8211; 6 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>         is lawful or unlawful: the citizen is entitled to<\/p>\n<p>         resist unlawful action as a matter of right and to<\/p>\n<p>         live under rule of law and not under rule of<\/p>\n<p>         discretion.       &#8216;To remit the maintenance of<\/p>\n<p>         Constitutional right to region of judicial discretion<\/p>\n<p>         is to shift the foundation of freedom from rock to<\/p>\n<p>         sand'&#8221;.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The above statement of law has been quoted with approval in<\/p>\n<p>Bugg v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1993] QB 473 and<\/p>\n<p>in R. v. Wicks, (1998) AC 92. We respectfully follow the above<\/p>\n<p>principle and hold that it is not proper for us not to quash Ext.P6<\/p>\n<p>order, which is found to be issued totally without jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p>            6.   In the result, we quash Ext.P6 order, but, it is<\/p>\n<p>clarified that it will not affect the right of the fourth respondent to<\/p>\n<p>challenge Ext.P5 in appropriate proceedings. But for Ext.P6, the<\/p>\n<p>appellant would have got the benefit of the Note in Ext.P7 staff<\/p>\n<p>fixation order for the year 2006-07 to the effect that the<\/p>\n<p>appellant, though a Social Studies hand, will be accommodated in<\/p>\n<p>the post of H.S.A.(English).        If, as a result of the subsequent<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.A.No. 2410\/2007              &#8211; 7 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>developments, the staff fixation order is revised and her position<\/p>\n<p>is prejudiced, she will be free to workout her remedies against<\/p>\n<p>the same. Ext.P10 being a dependant order, in view of quashing<\/p>\n<p>of Ext.P6 order, the same will no longer survive.  The judgment<\/p>\n<p>under appeal is set aside and the Writ Appeal is allowed as<\/p>\n<p>above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                      K. Balakrishnan Nair,<br \/>\n                                                Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                               V. Giri,<br \/>\n                                                Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                          C.T. Ravikumar,<br \/>\n                                                Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nDK.\n<\/p>\n<p>                     (True copy)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The &#8230; on 23 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA.No. 2410 of 2007() 1. P.ANILKUMAR, HSA (SS), &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The ... on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The ... on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-04T20:51:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The &#8230; on 23 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-04T20:51:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1283,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009\",\"name\":\"P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The ... on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-04T20:51:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The &#8230; on 23 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The ... on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The ... on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-04T20:51:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The &#8230; on 23 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-04T20:51:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009"},"wordCount":1283,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009","name":"P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The ... on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-04T20:51:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-anilkumar-vs-state-of-kerala-rep-by-the-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.Anilkumar vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The &#8230; on 23 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132186"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132186\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}