{"id":132198,"date":"2008-12-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008"},"modified":"2019-03-09T19:51:38","modified_gmt":"2019-03-09T14:21:38","slug":"mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>                         CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                             Room No. 415, 4th Floor, Block IV,\n                           Old JNU Campus, New Delhi -110 066.\n                                  Tel: + 91 11 26161796\n\n                                             Decision No. CIC \/OK\/A\/2008\/00072\/\/SG\/0707\n                                                     Appeal No. CIC\/OK\/A\/2008\/00072\/SG\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging from the Appeal<\/p>\n<p>Appellant                                    :        Mr. R.G. Nangia,<br \/>\n                                                      7E \/ 11 East Patel Nagar,<br \/>\n                                                      New Delhi &#8211; 110008.\n<\/p>\n<pre>Respondent 1                                 :        Mr. G.R.Dua\n                                                      PIO,\n                                                      Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan,\n                                                      JNU Campus, Mehrauli Road,\n                                                      New Delhi - 110067.\n\nRTI application on                           :        17\/07\/2007\nPIO replied                                  :        08\/08\/2007\nFirst appeal filed on                        :        09\/09\/2007\nFirst Appellate Authority order              :        24\/09\/2007\nSecond Appeal filed on                       :        26\/10\/2007\n<\/pre>\n<p>The appellant has asked regarding OA nos. 1745\/06, date of decision as referred in the counter<br \/>\naffidavit, fixation of pay, and counter affidavit by KVS in OA nos. 1745\/06 which it was pointed<br \/>\nout Hon&#8217;ble Tribunal as written above in the counter affidavit by KVS.<br \/>\nDetail of required information:-\n<\/p>\n<p>S. No.     Information Sought                               The PIO replied.\n<\/p>\n<p>1.         In as much as the issue raised by the applicant With reference to this question it is<br \/>\n           herein have become final and the Hon&#8217;ble submitted that the matter of stagnation in<br \/>\n           Tribunal has adjudicated the same, therefore, increment in respect of Shri R G Nangia<br \/>\n           please provide the OA No. date of decision was considered by Hon&#8217;ble CAT Principal<br \/>\n           and between the parties (name of the parties) Bench in OA No. 2559\/03 and the same<br \/>\n           and copy of the decision as referred in the was disposed of vide order dated<br \/>\n           counter affidavit Para No. 4 in OA No. 21\/07\/2004. The applicant may procure a<br \/>\n           1745\/06.                                         copy of the order of the CAT Principal<br \/>\n                                                            bench from the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.         At  no point of time pay  was  fixed wrongly  is Reply of these questions may be given by<br \/>\n           stated in counter affidavit in OA No. 1745\/06 the KVS , RO Delhi as the pay in respect of<br \/>\n           in counter affidavit in Para 5. Therefore, all the applicant was fixed by the RO Delhi<br \/>\n           documents of fixation of pay as referred in the and the desired pay bills etc are available in<br \/>\n           counter affidavit by KVS.                        RO Delhi\/KV concerned. Appellant may<br \/>\n                                                            obtain this information from AC (Delhi)\n<\/p>\n<p>3.         In Para 5 of counter affidavit by KVS in OA -do-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>           No. 1745\/06 it was point out to Hon&#8217;ble<br \/>\n           Tribunal that whatever the pay which was<br \/>\n           required to be fixed had been fixed in<br \/>\n           accordance with rules and stagnation<br \/>\n           increments was paid to the applicant.<br \/>\n           Therefore, please provide the OA No. in<br \/>\n           which it was pointed out to Hon&#8217;ble Tribunal<br \/>\n           as written above in the counter affidavit by<br \/>\n           KVS, Please also provide the copy of the rules<br \/>\n           under which pay was fixed as stated above<br \/>\n       and also rules as referred above and also copy<br \/>\n      of the pay bill in which stagnation increment<br \/>\n      was paid as above stated in affidavit and also<br \/>\n      pay fixation papers fixing the pay fixation<br \/>\n      papers fixing the pay of the applicant after<br \/>\n      paying stagnation increment to me.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>4.    It is further stated by respondent in Para 5 OA    The Hon&#8217;bel CAT Principal bench disposed<br \/>\n      No. 1745\/06 pay and increment after being          of the contempt petition No. 08\/05 in OA<br \/>\n      satisfied that the pay and increment to the        No. 2559\/03 vides order dated 01\/08\/2005<br \/>\n      appellant was fixed in according with              and found that there is no willful<br \/>\n      direction of the Tribunal found no merit in the    disobedience on the part of respondents.<br \/>\n      petition directions of the tribunal found no<br \/>\n      merit in the petition filed by the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Copy of direction of the Tribunal as referred<br \/>\n      above alongwith OA No. in which tribunal<br \/>\n      found no merit in the petition filed by the<br \/>\n      applicant.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.    It is stated in Para 5 by the respondent           KVS has not mentioned any specific<br \/>\n      whatever dues were required to be paid to          payment made to the applicant to this Para.<br \/>\n      applicant have already been paid to the<br \/>\n      applicant. Copy of all such payments as<br \/>\n      referred above alongwith copy of the rules<br \/>\n      which justify averments by KVS and also<br \/>\n      which justify or prove the alleged payment as<br \/>\n      correct.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.    It is stated by KVS in Para 5 applicant being      Whit reference to this Para it is stated that<br \/>\n      not satisfied with the same has approached         the matter of stagnation increment was<br \/>\n      with this Tribunal on the same issue which has     decided by CAT Principal bench vide order<br \/>\n      become final in respect of the issues raised in    dated 21\/072004 and contempt petition<br \/>\n      this applicant. Copy of the decision of the        filed by the applicant was also disposed of<br \/>\n      Tribunal as referred above in which the issues     vide order dated 01\/08\/2005.<br \/>\n      have become final as referred above.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.    In Para 6 of the counter affidavit the             With reference to this Para it is stated that it<br \/>\n      respondent states impugned orders have been        is made clear in the Memorandum No. 40-<br \/>\n      passed by taking rule position into account.       18\/2003-KVS(DR) dated 30\/03\/2005 that<br \/>\n      The copy of the rule which were taken into         his pay was fixed as per provision of rule 7<br \/>\n      account as per above referred.                     and rule 8 of CCS (Revised) pay rules<br \/>\n                                                         1986.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.    It is stated by the KVS it was demonstrated        As regard this Para it is submitted that in<br \/>\n      before the Tribunal that stagnation increment      compliance with the order Hon&#8217;ble CAT<br \/>\n      was paid. Please provide the complete set of       Principal bench KVS vide its Memorandum<br \/>\n      demonstration that stagnation increment was        dated 30\/03\/2005 has finally intimated the<br \/>\n      paid alongwith copy of the pay bill under          applicant that all due stagnation increments<br \/>\n      which stagnation increment was paid to             have been granted.<br \/>\n      applicant as per counter by KVS.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.    In Para 7 KVS States the order passed by           With reference to this Para it is stated that<br \/>\n      respondent was justified in Law. However, no       order passed by responded was justified as<br \/>\n      specific order is referred there please provide    the Hon&#8217;ble CAT has disposed petition and<br \/>\n      the copy of the law under which order was          discharged the notices in the said contempt<br \/>\n      justified.                                         petition filed by Shri R.G. Nangia.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.   It is stated by KVS that this Tribunal has gone    Already replied in reply to Para (vi).\n<\/p>\n<p>      into all issues raised by the applicant and<br \/>\n      finally come to the conclusion that KVS<br \/>\n      contention was no bereft of merit. Please<br \/>\n      provide the copy of the Tribunal&#8217;s decision in<br \/>\n      which Tribunal finally came to the conclusion<br \/>\n      that KVS contention was not bereft of merit.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.   It is stated the answering deponent carves the     With reference to this question it is<br \/>\n      leave of this Tribunal to refer the same as part   submitted that applicant may be asked to<br \/>\n      and parcel of this affidavit. Therefore, please    make it more clear as to what information<br \/>\n          provide the copy, which KVS wants to refer        is desired.<br \/>\n         as part and parcel to this affidavit.\n<\/p>\n<p>12.      Name(s) of competent authorities who have         As regards this question it is submitted that<br \/>\n         been granted power to grant increments to         as per article 24 of the Education code<br \/>\n         TGT cadre in KVS alongwith copy of BOG            (latest) the Principal of the concerned<br \/>\n         decision in which competent authorities were      vidyalaya is the vidyalaya excluding vice<br \/>\n         created.                                          Principal in the approved time scale.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.      Copy of all the documents which Delhi region      In this case RO Delhi\/KVS(HQs) has not<br \/>\n         of KVS and the legal department of KVS            provided parawise comments to<br \/>\n         worked over to Sh. S Rajappa at the time of       Shri S. Rajappa, advocate as he has<br \/>\n         making thus above stated affidavit.               defended previous cases of the applicant<br \/>\n                                                           and is fully aware of the factual position in<br \/>\n                                                           the matter.<\/p>\n<pre>\n14.      Copy of the note sheet submitted along with       As desired copy of the note sheet of the file\n         draft affidavit as preferred by Sh. Rajappa       bearing No. 19-267(8)\/06-KVS (L&amp;C) is\n         Advo. For KVS to the signatory of this            placed below for onward transmission to\n         affidavit.                                        the appellant.\n15       Total number of RTI documents sent to Sh. S.      With reference to this question it is\n         Rajappa advocate for going reply of appoint       submitted that the copies of the all RTI\n         nature and has spoken before CAT. Thus            answers given to Shri S. Rajappa,\n         applicant is demanding enormous documents         Advocate.\n         under RTI Act and total number only (with\n         out documents) sent to Sh. S. Rajappa for his\n         reply.\n16.      Total number only of works have been details      Advocate wise court case register is not\n         to Mr. S. Rajappa Advo.                           maintained in L&amp;C section.\n17.      Action taken report an strictness against Sh.     As regards this question it is submitted that\n         H. M. Cavrea the than commissioner KVS,           the applicant may be asked to give details\n         DS Bist the than JC, Mr. S. Rajappa advo. Dr      of the parties in the said case alongwith OA\n         Kawal in the case of Ms Ratna Varshney OA         No. With year, name of the CAT\/Court, so\n<\/pre>\n<p>         NO i.e. along with all note sheets preferred if   that the desired documents may be<br \/>\n         any for reporting this matter to chairman         searched and provided to the applicant.<br \/>\n         KVS.\n<\/p>\n<p>The First Appellate Authority ordered:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;With reference to his application dated 09\/09\/2007 received in this on 11\/09\/2007 Shri R. G.<br \/>\nNangia resident of 7-E\/11, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi &#8211; 110008 is informed that the<br \/>\nrequired information supplied to him vide this office letter No. F. 11-<br \/>\nPIC\/07\/KVS(DR)\/48010-11 dated 03\/09\/2007 has since been signed by the higher authority at<br \/>\nthe relevant time as the authorized PIO was on long leave on account of marriage of his<br \/>\ndaughter. Therefore, the correct information based on the basis of information made available<br \/>\nto PL cell has been supplied to him and no information has been denied. He is also informed<br \/>\nthat the required information as per his requirement can not be created<\/p>\n<p>Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present.\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant : Absent<br \/>\nRespondent : Mr. G.R.Dua PIO<br \/>\nThe respondent states that inspite of a large number of queries, he has provided all the<br \/>\ninformation. His contention appears to be correct.<br \/>\n Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appeal is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                               Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                           Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                               24 December, 2008<\/p>\n<p>    (In any correspondence on this decision, mentioned the complete decision number.)\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No. 415, 4th Floor, Block IV, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi -110 066. Tel: + 91 11 26161796 Decision No. CIC \/OK\/A\/2008\/00072\/\/SG\/0707 Appeal No. CIC\/OK\/A\/2008\/00072\/SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal Appellant : Mr. R.G. Nangia, 7E [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-09T14:21:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-09T14:21:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1405,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-09T14:21:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-09T14:21:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-09T14:21:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008"},"wordCount":1405,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008","name":"Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-09T14:21:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-g-nangia-vs-kendriya-vidyalaya-sangthan-on-24-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. R.G. Nangia vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan on 24 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132198"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132198\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}