{"id":132269,"date":"2008-11-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-12-10T10:32:30","modified_gmt":"2018-12-10T05:02:30","slug":"smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Jayasheela W\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Jayasheela W\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n
EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDated: This the 125??! day ef Navember 2808 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE H()N'8LEZ MR.JUS'F\u00a7{1E v.JA<3rANNA%gf\u00e9;AVhi'T:'V'  'V'.\n\nREGULAR SECOND APPEm}Nc<.3Q8\/29:3?'  \n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1\n\n{.0\n\ngm' JAYASHEELA W1 Q"'r'<\u00a7\u00a73%N:\u00a5A?Pg T \nD\/O LATE PAPMAH     -\nAGED ABOUT 59 'ms  ' \n\nSm LAKSHM} mvij.\u00a3;;,\u00a5%;37:viUN1\u00a7:?\u00a7;?;\u00a7;;\n1:)\/0 LATF3'PAPAI}&?\u00a7'\u00bb .  'V V " \nAGED 5.E3?}_\u00a7}_'f 54; YIQS...'\n\narm'-;s\u00a7gQA\u00a7;a*FHmMMA'_'w\u00e9 LATE: PAPALRH\n\nin] C: .LA'E'E .PAPA.\u00a3.4xH- \n\nA3523 AE3{)U'?iTT'.%\u00a54. fm_sT \n\nALL  22):) J.:i\"\u00a7\u00a7.V\u00a7\u00a2i\u00a7\u00e9;r\u00e9i%\u00a2ANNAN, Anv. )\n\nAN-Q:  L\n\nA 1\n\n\" MNJAPPA 3\/ (3 HANUMAIAH\n\nAGED ABOUT '?9 YRS\n\n Rm 263, ANNAIAHAPPA ct::a:,\"'AB0I_5-'r 21 YRS\n\n10\n\nraga; to (d) ARE: R\/AT Na 1915,\n\n H m0ss,v1.;AYANAAPL.:'f\u00e9A.%AG;\u00e9AHA;2\u00a7  S\n\nYEMALUR POST, BANGAL{_2RI3 1?.   '\n\nSM'? YELLAMMA ..\n\nW\/(3 PAPAIAH \" T    \nSINCE \u00a3)E}CEPsSED, BY '\u00a7_Rs\u00a7 \nQN RECORD  \n\u00a7{RiSEi.b\u20ac.&P?E?A_-.'_ ~     .\n3\/ O iL;\\.'T\u00a7E}VTv*'\u00a3<3f\\i-;f\u00a3\/3;';I\u00a55g\u00a7%21'sEa*I4\u00a2\u00a7NMDPA\nAGED'v\u00bb.\u00bb.\u00a7E0":_\u00a3f_1'Va4_'lays "  \n\na\u00e9;-MT \u20ac\u00a7\u00a7{\u00a3';{;<;eg\u20ac3A\u00a3;:2\u00a7\u00e9,'2Ars,zA\nSwiss 13E(;E'ASED,'BY...H\u00a3\u00a7R ms\n\n{:51} i;.sz,.:\u00a7sHMa MEA'\n\n. 4:330 LA"FE vE:'NKATARAMANaPPA\n\n &,A;<;\u00a3='..U_ ABO'U'T.f+\u00a7.3' YRS\n\n  ('bi  \n\nmc.}\u00ab LA'i?E FJEBEKATARAMANAPPA\n\nAgeuw' 38 was\n\n {C "):_\u00e9A'mNAMMA\n\n1),? C} LATE YEN K251'? ARAMANAPPA\n\n 'A : 4_ AGES ABGLET 36 was\n\n' R--\u00a7 ANS 3-10 (3; to (.2) ARE:\n\nR\/Q R0262, ANNAIAHAPPA COLONY\nNEW THIPPASANBRA, BANGALGRE.\n\n\n\n11+ {EHGIESE KHABJ\nS} O ABDUL REEHAMAN\nAGE-3 ABCFUT SC} YRS\nRf\ufb01 JIGANI VIL-LAGE AND H{}8LI\nAN EKAL TALUK 562 106.\nBANGALORE DISTRICT.\n\n(83; Sri H P LEELADHAR, Ami. F'C)R=.R 1w.  . , ' ' ;\nSR: RPRABHAKAR, AEW. F=z)1R'..:2\u00bb2, 3, 4, :5? 6(a)< ~-.. \nto {(1), 9 and 1G(a} to(-:23) - V'   \nRSA FILED LI\/S;"1_{_){) R;*'ia;"{f:i1\u00a71V\u00a7:':{\u00a7\u00a2xL11'R::LE; 1 Q1?\n{SEPC AGAINST' THE .3i;:':$\u00a7>1\u00a3\u00ab*:a\u00e9:E;iz; %A_i3r..f\u00a3TRA::K (3OUR'I'\u00bbfI,\nBANGALORE f\u00a32l}'f:',1'\u00a7;;,   _3fAr\u20acv:}A.:oRE, ALLOWENG\nTHE AV\u00a7\u00e99V$A:;,._%':\u00ab\";\u00a7;f;;:g ,%,:32\u00a7iia:$'1f::ViVV 'rii;E JU{)GEME3E\\I'I' AND\n{)ECR.E:E_ .A;ii';~f'r\u00a7;_i3';3'J_'_:s\/\u00a3:\u00ab?\u20acf\u00a7; 5,NAE;\u00a3\u00a7A\u00a7.\n\nuA_pp\"\u00a7;Ai,\"'-'comzmc; ON\" FOR HEARING 'm:\u00a7~::\n\n\u00bb :>'AX, '\"i\".*:1;\u00a71*\u00a7..%:'.\"?.V(;';s'U1\u00a7'z' ;:)_i\u00ab:L1vEREn THE P\u00a3\u00a7LL(})W\u00a5NG:\n\nJUDGMEN1'\n\n\"Tfiis secmxd appeai is by the defendants 8 to 10\n\n iha trial sear: and they Cali in questian the\n\n  j\ufb01dgzzients saf \ufb01lm 3011115 beicaw, in as muck} as, the\n\ntrial 003211 d\ufb01creed the: suit sf {he 13'\n\n:'esp0nr:ient\/piaizltiff far partitierz and p<::$$\u00e9:5si0:1 by\n\nb\n\n'I\n\n    . \n<\/pre>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
hoiding that the piazixitiff is entitled \ufb01e 1\/ 431 share in<\/p>\n
items 1 to 3 of the suit property, whereas the lower<\/p>\n
appeilate eeurt; an appeal by the appellants A4<\/p>\n
medi\ufb01ed the juciw1e11t cf the ma} eeurt   V’<\/p>\n
the ape-ea} filed; by the appe}1ant:a**b}*.    <\/p>\n
\njudgment of the trial court $03 ef \u00ab.1<\/p>\n
share to the plaintiff in itexzle    ‘A’
\nsehedtxle, but eenflrnled eze  ‘ ‘gif-{fie tI’i:.~11
\nCourt SE) far as gen: %    plaimiiff in<\/p>\n
item”): of ‘as g-=;e’S:1e:iiuleL’_<\/p>\n
 ; At it is submitted by the<\/p>\n
iearined i:0_ uI:jse\u00a7   em\ufb01es that the etmtesting<\/p>\n
 , ‘ _\u00a73arff;ee are tfie”a\u00a7pe11ants whe are defendants 8 to 10<\/p>\n
 ‘    and as regards the other<\/p>\n
i’ee13t>.I’1\u00a71e’fii’\u00a3%\u00a7A’e1’ere eencemed, defendants 1 to 5 arid<\/p>\n
 Sqa\u00e9)” ‘.:et.’\u20ac;((1) being the branch of one Si-mjeevappa and<\/p>\n
1\/ ” {1efe.nc1ents 6-(a) {:0 6(3) being the LES of 6th defendant<\/p>\n
   gm defexzdants 12(a) tr) {(3) being the L.Rs of<\/p>\n
defendant 110.12 and also defendant 110.11 have not<\/p>\n
questioneci the judgzlent of the trial ceurt by<\/p>\n
y<\/p>\n
(0<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
prefextrixig any appeal before the lower appellate court<\/p>\n
1101* have they contested the matter by \ufb01ling <\/p>\n
Writte\ufb02 siatemetat and \u00a5Zh6I’\u20acf0I’\u20ac\u00a7 the <:aI11y parti\u00e9s' ._<\/p>\n
am aggrieved by the judgments of the coxgftg  "<\/p>\n
are the present appe\ufb02arzts 311:}-V '"t;:1*xa  <\/p>\n
such, names to other 1'esp0nde11\u00a3:; \u00e9rgciapt fe_Sp0V11\u00a71\u00e9:;it~$V'V' *<\/p>\n
2, 3, 4, 3;, 6(a) to (d), 9 a%n:: jLm(a)%%:ca '(<3-)._is
\ndispenscd with in Iftzgard \ufb01zz)"  \u00ab::%}u11Sel
\nS:r1'.R. Prabhakar had %f;:ed      <\/p>\n
3.    “i:;\u00a71\u20ac: rsiatiozzship
\nbetw\u00e9ml ‘thrs.  “11”; dispute, and $0 ai\u00e9o the<\/p>\n
fact of ofigj\ufb01alif}   prapertiss were acquired by<\/p>\n
 011::-3’.:.}f\u00a3\ufb01”i1:;:;nai*a.a;%3,….8\u00a211*7i his sen Thixnmaiah @ Chikka<\/p>\n
‘ ‘Ti*1i;1I11*:1V:a5\u00a33i*2M. ‘am his four sons iaaxneiy, I~iam;II1a,iah,<\/p>\n
Sai’:\u00a7\u20acevaf5\u00a7%a.;’ Papaiah and Vezzkatararnaxiappa<\/p>\n
 fem\u00a71i:i g\u00ab:_ \u00a5:.l’V14e gain: family and during the life 31:13 sf<\/p>\n
V’ X1″  1:0 partitien ha\u00e9 taker; place: in resqxaect (if<\/p>\n
\ufb01he 353111: fa_t:1\ufb02___v \u00a7_33:0perf.ie:s. It is the case 9:” {ha<\/p>\n
plaintiff who happens ta be the San of Haimmaiah<\/p>\n
that Vexxkataramajlappa, ens Qf the 50:15 Qf<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
“3
\n;\n<\/p>\n
‘F\u00a71im::Qaiah (zctmld net hava rsiixxquish\u00e9d the piaiI1t:iff”s
\nsharia in suit i1’;m11..1 of ‘A’ schedule 311$ thersfere the<\/p>\n
qumtion of tha plaintiff beizrzg net anti\ufb02czd to his Shara<\/p>\n
in suit, .it.e:::3,.1 sf ‘A’ sch\u00e9dule does not arise <\/p>\n
his further case that following ‘(ha death of   _<\/p>\n
E~ianumaia}1, the piairltiff xv:-:I1t_Va:nd   ‘Wi’tE1  <\/p>\n
\\!&I1kat;;3_1’a1:1a11appa and :h\u20ac:’efG1’ej” ?i:3\ufb01e ‘p1’aii1ij\ufb02’:”–is’:’ig’<\/p>\n
entitled ‘:01 \/~41″ share in *\u20ac1’1’~: _sI’i;1;ftt it;f:m$  .
\n4, GI: the @316? hsiifid, fahe  C:as\u00a7:  the:<\/p>\n
defemiarzts whe are  is that the};\n<\/p>\n
bei11g “*.t;h’e _   are ma \u20acXCI’L1SiV\u20acf:\n<\/p>\n
E\u00a7WI}\u20acI’$ \u00e9f”*-.1119 Vs’L\u00a7if’._1\u00a7I’:::;;\u00bb\u00a7@rty and it is thfzir spegci\ufb01c<\/p>\n
 v   1;f151_ ai; _Sa11j\u00e9:i:va.xgpa, 0113 0:” the $011 of ‘Fh\u00a7:m::1iah,<\/p>\n
 ‘ r::7\u00a7:”e*c1_,2t:%:ic’}’~ #3.;-,1feEr3as{\u00bb: deed in theft. year 1941 wiaich is 3<\/p>\n
1’*egiSt::1f\u20ac.(‘i\u00a7 fiocumani: under which the said<\/p>\n
 Sanj\ufb01awapgsa gave up his interest in the jeini: fazniiy<\/p>\n
 pri\ufb01perty in. favour of his fathar ‘1’hiII1:\u00a71a.iah and<\/p>\n
  \u00a7r0’i1:\u20acrs ‘\u00bb.fe1T1kafara1:1a11appa and Papaiah as per<\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00a7X.I}3. Later ‘1’hi1n1118ia}:1 \ufb02ied and<\/p>\n
V\u20acI1k3::az”a.111a:1appa f3X\u20aci:C’L1t{\u00a7(i 3 Hakka Nivruthi Patm.<\/p>\n
II<\/p>\n
ii}<\/p>\n
{$2136 of {\u00a316 agap\ufb01ilanis that ‘iJI?.d\u20acI’ the said CiO(31lI3’1f:I7iiZ,<\/p>\n
Venkataramanappa gave up his int\u00e9rast in the .$–2_,:it<\/p>\n
items in fzavetir of Papaiah and this was on ” 3<\/p>\n
himseif as avail as on behalf of  <\/p>\n
Th\u20ac::’}2owir’1g-.  1:.13.e    Patra. exacuted E2};<\/p>\n
V’egkaLa1’3n\u00a7a1’1\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7a Q1 his behalf a11<:i an behalf 0:?<\/p>\n
,A the }J}1fg;{11';}3\u00b0\u00a3i-,f"?iJ} favgm' of Papaiah.<\/p>\n
VA 9.,  as Sanjeavappa giving up his i}.1?{.\u20acI'(;'$t<\/p>\n
 in tl1\u00e9.,\u00a7\u00a7uit properties is concerned, iea,1:*:z1e:'1 Cc:L:r1s::'i<\/p>\n
 'x.A'I'6fCf'T1'6(i to the registersd dccument EEXIES which<\/p>\n
   __fj\u00a7\u00a7S:Ea\u00a7i31iSh6S Ishat Sanjesavagrgja gave: up his iZ'i{f33'\u20acSt in<\/p>\n
the joint: faxinily _p\u00a3'ope;r{y in favexzz' of his father
\n6<\/span><\/p>\n
E\u00bb<\/p>\n
. I<\/p>\n
1′?\n<\/p>\n
it is arguaci that the said Hakkll NiV1″L1thi Petra<\/p>\n
\u00a5:110ugf1 was not mazrkad in \u20acvi.dc::1e::\u20ac, yet QVEH if i\ufb01is<\/p>\n
pemnitted :0 ha marked in \u20ac\u00a7Vid(i11C\u20ac, it gaiiii.  \u00a7’1:\u00a7’\u00a7; ”<\/p>\n
advazzce the case 0f th\u00e9 app\u00e9*.1ia1’1′: ‘becaL1s\u00e9”-_iEhejV’_T ‘ <\/p>\n
Hakka Ni’\u00a3ii’11’i’l’1i Patra is an z11′:;i’eg’Si:er\u00e9:d ~:ci\u00a3x::\u00a71;;;\u00a7.$::’:f; <\/p>\n
and as such, the querstiq\ufb01 cf   ” Ei’:e\u00a7I’;’.e\u00a7’a\u00a7” the \ufb01akku<\/p>\n
NiVr1.1tVi:iM'”?af,f’:: b<5:i*;";ig -;a11"'1::1r\u00e9gist.i\u20acreci d0cum\u20ac:11!:, \u00e9vc\u00e9xi
\nt110i1g1i'._e:s\u00a7::cut.ed\u00ab."b\u00a7vf "'xf\u00a7=:r;1{;;;.taIa1nanappa in f8.V(\u00a71};E' of<\/p>\n
Papaiah, :tE'1z=jQ1.1\u00a2$;ti{3:fi' i::E;Vp}a.i3:1':iff baimg \u00e9isc=:11?;it1<:":d ti:<\/p>\n
  :~:\u00bbi}a1'\u20acV"i:1"'S':iit item. 1 of 'A' gchedule 'e?\u20aci\u00a71 I133;<\/p>\n
 L__Ei1fis.E;,. :V'i'ijier\u00e9f;<j'I\ufb01, 6116311 if the said daculnent Ha}-{kn<\/p>\n
\u00a7ii{;{i1t}';.i  _h::1C1 336611 \u00a73\u20acZE'i1Ii.\u00a71i\u20acd :0 b\ufb01 marked ii}<\/p>\n
 3vi\u20ac1\u20ac':L1{:H;%3~, }='e'E; it could 110%; have ci\ufb01prived Lh\ufb01 gg\u00e9ainti\ufb02"<\/p>\n
 _'Gf.,_f:"is Shara in I:\u00a7::e Suit. i'\u20ac\u20aci1T{1,1 for the aforesai\u00e9<\/p>\n
 2  1_f\u20acaa$0r:$. '}9V
\n' I<\/p>\n
13<\/span>
\n\u00a33; As far as \ufb01’::\u00a2:: 0111521′ d\u20ac’f\u20acI1d8l”}’ES art:
\nc01n:’:t::*I1<:{i, siifusze the}.–' have H035. COI'l'{\u20acS'\u00a7;(id the rzzat\ufb01er<\/p>\n
se\ufb01azzsifv \u00a3101' EH6}? have: questianeti the _}11:\u00a5g'111\u00a7311 '2…_;i:ifi_<\/p>\n
the trial c:: izztereslz e1\u00ab’Ver1 iI1 ._SL1it~: ‘i:*:.”,\u00a3\u00a7i,a.’:_;  “is<\/p>\n
concerned and ‘merefor\ufb01 {ha cizgesn\ufb01ioii Gf  \u00a7i\u00a7’1E(: iff<\/p>\n
defelldants being aggievad’ -by t191E:.,_j’i;\u20aci;g”113 \u00e9\u00a3::.:  tige VA<\/p>\n
1()*.\u00a5’\u20ac1” appallatie ceurt: does 11\u20ac3’t-aid caf::3.o_\u20act aziim. in<\/p>\n
ether words, it is dea\u00e9\ufb01gzid  ih_\u00a7:\u00bb\u00a7\u00a7i;l”1\u20ac1′ ii\u00e9f\u00e9\ufb01zdaiits<\/p>\n
have fg;_i”2:’e:::– L;f)5′ ‘?}1\u00a7\u00a7iI’> \u00a3’:1.3i1:<1 frjr  Share in the suit
\n1'3FG\u00a7)\u20acI'fi("'\u00a7-S far 'mi: \u00e9"a:Qve ';:?eas011s.<\/p>\n
 14. T%i’\u00a5::;:\u00a71’\u00a2re,: this appea} is Haw C\ufb02fi\ufb01ll\ufb01d Elf}<\/p>\n
 gf fiha piaitzti\ufb01 being entitiezd ta 1\/4%?<\/p>\n
.Sh\u00e9-376  E\u00a7g’:;1it’j:iife:11.1 caf ‘A’ schsduiae is C(3I1{:\u20acI’I”1f3d and<\/p>\n
in i?ima;%_0 f”f11e masigxzs \u00a3”\ufb02\u20ac’:I”1iZiOI}6\u20ac1 abava and {\u00a316<\/p>\n
.,Hai{_1\u00a7;u V”N\u00a7vrL1thi Patra 3133 being an Lziirrrigisiiered<\/p>\n
 cigzcument, the i\ufb01t\ufb01f\u00e9\ufb01t af ti?-,\u20ac piaintiff is. his gkzam in<\/p>\n
” {E33 suit ii:em,3 cotslsi 3110?; hav\ufb01 been i::’a11$f{::’1″e5 Papaiah. “i’E’:erx$fr:::’e,<\/p>\n
}<\/p>\n
\\ I<\/p>\n
E4<\/p>\n
ta the <\u00bb::xtm'31:T of the I\u20ac}\u00a7'V\u20acf' appeiiate cjourt. hciding 't\u00a71a'i<\/p>\n
the }uc2g"I}.a:1t of the {$3.1 C0113: in $0 far as <\/p>\n
1\/ 4211 share in suit item'; in 'A' S\u20achf:d1}i\u20ac\u00a7\u00a7"'t(\u00a7_&'\ufb01iifii\u00e9i'  <\/p>\n
plaintiff is cancemed, the said \ufb01mii:1_,g._v_\u00e9'Q\u00a25ffnQi 1 <\/p>\n
require any ini:\u20ac:rfere:1ce. in Qthcr 3Vi)\u00a7i7"'C'i':.'S;._7'i:}:}.i4\u20ac'.' 's,pe.t:::i.\ufb01cf f<\/p>\n
question of law raised for Vc0:1sid\u00e9i'.a\ufb01'@11 xvii} Ahaire \u00a30 <\/p>\n
be answered in favaur of  _\u00a7ak\u00e9\u00a7a-  fh\u00e9\u00e9glower
\nappellate court.\n<\/p>\n
The appeal i:;’:;:<3r\u00e9:f0:'g sf,\u00a3:31):"\u00e9$"" c:1isI:1issed<\/p>\n
accard\ufb01igiy ..  ii;\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/<3
\nIudg\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Jayasheela W\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008 Author: V.Jagannathan EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated: This the 125??! day ef Navember 2808 BEFORE THE H()N’8LEZ MR.JUS’F\u00a7{1E v.JA<3rANNA%gf\u00e9;AVhi'T:'V' 'V'. REGULAR SECOND APPEm}Nc<.3Q8\/29:3?' BETWEEN : 1 {.0 gm' JAYASHEELA W1 Q"'r'<\u00a7\u00a73%N:\u00a5A?Pg T D\/O LATE PAPMAH – […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132269","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Jayasheela W\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Jayasheela W\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-10T05:02:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Jayasheela W\\\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\\\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-10T05:02:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1297,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Jayasheela W\\\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\\\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-10T05:02:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Jayasheela W\\\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\\\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Jayasheela W\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Jayasheela W\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-10T05:02:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Jayasheela W\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-10T05:02:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008"},"wordCount":1297,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008","name":"Smt Jayasheela W\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-10T05:02:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-jayasheela-wo-muniyappa-vs-nanjappa-so-hanumaiah-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Jayasheela W\/O Muniyappa vs Nanjappa S\/O Hanumaiah on 25 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132269","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132269"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132269\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132269"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132269"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132269"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}