{"id":132476,"date":"2010-10-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-05T02:14:23","modified_gmt":"2016-10-04T20:44:23","slug":"sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya &#8230; vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya &#8230; vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n<pre> A gas'\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 06\"' DAY OF OCTOBER, 2d()fm\"%\u00ab.D[dD\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.-N}'i\\N\u00abD  A\n\nREGULAR SECOND APPEALd:\u00abe\u00bbzo;1722 D'F,@20o9 A \nBETWEEN: A A A \n\nSri. Neelakanta Shivacha1\"\\;{2'1'~w.-SWaimijede'; .,_ , \nAithandahal1iJangam.a Mud;  *  f  .. \nAithandahallivillage, \" V' '\nKasaba Hobli, A        \nBangarpet\"\u00a3'a1u1&lt;.:,  _ _      \n\nKD1ar--563        ...APPI-ELLANT\n\n(By Shriv.&#039;VM&#039;  &#039; A\nAND: A A   A \n\nI.  _K.N.x R.u&quot;dr&#039;a&#039;ppaV&#039;\n &#039;S.\/Q Naujappzi;  _____ .. c\n\u00ab _ &quot;Aged a.bD1J_t 76 years,\n~  at Aithandahalli viiiage,\n._ &quot;-&#039;.__Baf:gEufpet...Td1uk,\n&#039;  K0l;1_1f\u00a5\u00a76d3 114.\n\n Mariswamaiah\n. A &#039;D--.S&#039;\/0 Basavaiah\n&quot;  Aged about 62 years,\nGPA H&lt;}lde:&#039;0fJar1gama Mutt,\nResiding at Aithandahal\ufb01,\n\n2\n\n\n\nBangarpet Taluk,\nKola: -- 563 114.\n\n3. Sri. Sampath Kumar\nS\/0 Gurulingappa,\nAge Major,\nResiding at Karikere village,\nRobertsonpet Hobli,\nBangarpet Taluk,\nKolar -- 563 114.\n\n4. Sri. B. Veerabhadrappa\nS\/0 Basappa,  _\nResiding atAithanda.hallivi1lanre;= 0&#039; _\nBangarpetTalL1k, &#039;     V  &quot;  \nK0lar--~ 563 114.  &#039; &quot;  *\n\n5. Sri. Venkateshappa  I V \nS\/0 Venkatara:jn&#039;a;3appa,&#039;:- _  \nAge    \n\nResiding at Hij;2;iKunda&quot;&#039;V?iI1age\n&amp; Post, Ban garpet&#039; T a&#039;i~;.1l_&lt;;&#039;. \n\nKolar 4;5\u00a73,j1 14.    . ...RESPONDENTS\n..---(By  V Ba;s&#039;ava_raj\u00ab&#039; v. Sabarad, Advocate for\n\n Caveateaf\/Re&#039;sp_endent No.2, Shri. K. Ravishankar, Advocate for\n\n&#039;Resp0&#039;1ic1e23t Q I U ..\n\n   is filed under section 100 of Code of Civil\n\n Pr0ced&quot;ure,&quot;-.0 1908 against the judgment and decree dated\n\n .f4,.09.2009 &#039;passed in R.A.N0.l5l\/2002 on the file of the\n\n Atdditvional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), K.G.F., allowing the appeal and\n\n0  sxetting aside the judgment and decree dated 18.04.2002 passed in\n\n2  \u00ab.O.S;--jN0i265\/1992 on the file of the 1&quot; Additional Civil Judge\n  .(J_r,\u00a7n), KGF.\n\nZ\n\n\n\nThis appeal coming on for Orders this day, the &quot;Court\ndelivered the following: - 7 \n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Heard the learned counsel for the appel:la.nt&#8217;:.i.af11d the,<\/p>\n<p>respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The substantial quesgt:i.on of~that would arislelfo-rl&#8221;wig<\/p>\n<p>consideration is:~ ._ _ _ 2<br \/>\n&#8220;Whether Vtlriex loweti&#8221;&#8216;a&#8217;pp&#8217;ellate_ Court &#8216; was<\/p>\n<p>justified in proceedi&#8217;n_g~ tos.dlecree&#8217;the.VVsuist while<\/p>\n<p>allowing the app&#8217;l&#8217;ic&#8217;at_ion &#8220;fo&#8217;r__ anienldrnent to<\/p>\n<p>  \u00bbv thaitilr C the &#8216; \u00abdf\u00e9roperties belonged to<br \/>\nKkithandaha llii &#8220;Jan Mutt?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>The answer straiight away_woii.ld be that the lower appellate Court<\/p>\n<p>.&#8212;.was n_ot1:ja:s_t&#8217;i&#8217;r&#8221;ised in&#8221; &#8220;no.t.___relegating the parties to the trial Court as<\/p>\n<p>an adld&#8217;itio&#8221;r1_alrissue&#8217;-.arose for consideration, which had to go to<\/p>\n<p>trial.&#8221;{llherefore:;..V_tli:e lower appellate Court summarily allowing the<\/p>\n<p>amendmenttend also decreeing the suit results in the proceedings<\/p>\n<p> bei,.11&#8217;J. short-circuited.\n<\/p>\n<p>_ V 1::\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3. To briefly narrate the facts\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs had \ufb01led a suit for permanent .ijr1juneti&#8211;on<\/p>\n<p>restraining the defendants from disposing of the-jsuit..sC&#8217;he&#8217;dtile V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>properties. It was claimed that plaiintiffsp iyereljideyotees <\/p>\n<p>Ithandahalli J angarna Mutt and they areilmerniaers <\/p>\n<p>The suit was being presented inka&#8221;representative eapacity on<\/p>\n<p>behalf of the devotees ofjjppthe  Jangama<br \/>\nMutt is said to be__a braaesheiolfe Srishaila Maha<br \/>\nSamasthana,  thse  granted the suit<br \/>\npropertiesni      rnaintenance and support.\n<\/p>\n<p>The in&#8217; addition to the lands given to it.\n<\/p>\n<p>The lands are4.une,nfra.ne&#8217;hised\ufb01with no right to dispose of the same<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; =  fat\/:(i&#8217;\u00ab!.1rE(_):f any persons&#8230; \u00abThe first defendanbappellant, seeking to<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Sswa.iriije&#8217;eAe:of. the said Mutt did not have any right or interest<\/p>\n<p>in tl:ellipropel11j{_.*ilt was alleged that revenue entries and revenue<\/p>\n<p>d.ocumei1tS_l1were surreptitiously changed in his personal name and<\/p>\n<p> _had&#8211;.m.ade an attempt to dispose of and alienate the properties,<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; = which warranted the filing ofgg suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>The first defeadant&#8211;appellant herein having entered<\/p>\n<p>appearance filed written statement denying the allegatia,n&#8217;s._ia-nd<\/p>\n<p>questioned the maintainability of the suit. While  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>that Ithandahalli Eangama Mutt was a:~b&#8217;rai*i\u20ach of S.riil\\li&#8217;if11n1afnaG.i,<\/p>\n<p>Srishaila Maha Samasthana, Gulur, it was &#8220;c1_aimed&#8217;_t_hat\u00bb. inso15a1:_as._VV<\/p>\n<p>the suit schedule properties were&#8221;&#8221;concerned;\ufb02iey}were his V<\/p>\n<p>personal properties and didiiot  further<br \/>\nstated that the land was not but, it was<br \/>\nInam land of   provisions of The<br \/>\nMysore(Persorial  Abolition Act, 1954,<br \/>\nthe &#8216;had been granted the lands and he<\/p>\n<p>was in posslessiion of the &#8220;s\u00bba.i.i&#8217;ie by virtue of grant of occupancy<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;3I&#8217;__iherefore&#8217;,l&#8221;&#8216;tbeplaintiffs had no right to question the<\/p>\n<p>  by the first defeadant&#8211;appel1ant.\n<\/p>\n<p>i&#8217;  Court after a trial held in favour of the first<\/p>\n<p>defendantgappellant herein, against which an appeal was preferred<\/p>\n<p> _ and -inithe appeal, the piaintiffs chose to seek an amendment of the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>prayer to include the relief of declaration that the property did not<br \/>\nbelong to defendant. No.3, but it actually belonged to the Mutt.<\/p>\n<p>The same having been allowed the lower appellate Co1i:rt._ia],vso<\/p>\n<p>thought it fit to decree the suit without any furtheradt).   <\/p>\n<p>resulted in the present appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. The learned counse1~,..for_gthe.iap_pell_ant: woiild &#8220;assert&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>that the appellant was the~..absol~:1&#8217;t&#8217;e=ov.rner_of  property.<\/p>\n<p>Even if it could be challenged&#8217;by&#8217;jv&#8217;iirtue__.oif&#8217;tleideclaration having<br \/>\nbeen sought, the&#8217;re&#8217;fgv:a&#8217;s needafor ~.t.ri.3.l of additional issues<br \/>\nthat didlgarise.  &#8216;adopted by the lower appellate<\/p>\n<p>Court was therefore nolt&#8217;.coat_e&#8217;mplated in law and is in violation of<\/p>\n<p> &lt; the  prescrib_e_d-vln that, the lower appellate Court having<\/p>\n<p> the application and also having decreed the<\/p>\n<p>suit ,witho;rt&#039;iai.V_full \ufb02edged trial that was necessary to address the<\/p>\n<p> l&#039;-issues th.at&#039;i- arose, there is no hesitation in holding that a serious<\/p>\n<p> l&#039;\u20ac&quot;1&#039;i&quot;&#039;0,r been committed by the lower appellate \ufb01ourt in<\/p>\n<p>  proceeding  it has. Therefore, it would not even be necessary to<\/p>\n<p>\u20ac<\/p>\n<p>frame any substantial question of law to admit the appeal and<\/p>\n<p>thereafter to hear the matter at length.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. A plain reading of the juclgrneiit y_w&#8217;louI.dl:di&#8217;sc_loVse7~&#8217;the&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>error and impropriety committed. by the lower appelplate <\/p>\n<p>One other aspect, which would alsou&#8217;i*eVtjui.re tolbe_ addressed, is that<br \/>\nthough the suit was filed in ;._\u00a33&#8230;&#8221;iT.6pI&#8217;ie;S\u20acl1Ti\u00a3lli\\{\u20ac. Vvicapacity claiming that<br \/>\nthe property belongs to   Niiiti; the Mutt is<\/p>\n<p>significantly ngt  .21  _VThe  is only named as<\/p>\n<p>Swamiji of _that&#8221;Mutt\u00ab:.;\u00a7:houg_h   independent interest in<\/p>\n<p>the said &#8216;it is necessary to implead<\/p>\n<p>ithandahalli J  Sri.Nirurna:madi Srishaila Malia<\/p>\n<p>-&#8220;&#8216;Samas&#8217;th:anai,&#8217; G_pulu1&#8242;,h&#8221;asv.parties &#8212;~ either as plaintiffs or defendants,<\/p>\n<p>lsvincelitis that Ithandahalli Jangarna Mutt is only a branch<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ii   of iruhzaraadi Srishaila Maha Sarnasthana, Gulur.<\/p>\n<p>Z<\/p>\n<p>6. Accordingly, the present appeal is allowed. The<br \/>\nsubstantial question of law framed is answered in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant. The judgment and decree of the lower appellate~.C&#8217;ourt<\/p>\n<p>insofar as it decreed the suit is set aside. The\u00a7&#8221;auit:iT&#8217;sh&#8217;aiil<\/p>\n<p>remanded to the trial Court after thevanie-n.drnc&#8217;;nt the i*el_ief &#8220;of <\/p>\n<p>declaration as sought for and the  &#8216;~ltli.an:lla~haili_V<\/p>\n<p>Jangama Mutt and Sri. Nirumamadi&#8221;Srisha1la_MahaSarnasthanailV<\/p>\n<p>Gulur, shall be made parties to_&#8221;the&#8217;Vis*ui_t either inltheilcapacity of<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs or defendants and&#8217; t.he.v&#8217;l__lsLiit  proceeded after<\/p>\n<p>framing of   that rn_ay_Varis&#8217;e&#8221;i&#8217;n the discretion of the<br \/>\ntrial Court. The ..the trial Court shall be taken<\/p>\n<p>up from the stagelV&#8217;o\u00abf.Vf1&#8217;a.rr1iughaddition_al issues.<\/p>\n<p> &#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya &#8230; vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010 Author: Anand Byrareddy A gas&#8217; IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 06&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF OCTOBER, 2d()fm&#8221;%\u00ab.D[dD BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.-N}&#8217;i\\N\u00abD A REGULAR SECOND APPEALd:\u00abe\u00bbzo;1722 D&#8217;F,@20o9 A BETWEEN: A A A Sri. Neelakanta [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya ... vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya ... vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-04T20:44:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya &#8230; vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-04T20:44:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":952,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya ... vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-04T20:44:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya &#8230; vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya ... vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya ... vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-04T20:44:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya &#8230; vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-04T20:44:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010"},"wordCount":952,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010","name":"Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya ... vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-04T20:44:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-neelakanta-shivacharya-vs-sri-k-n-rudrappa-on-6-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Neelakanta Shivacharya &#8230; vs Sri K N Rudrappa on 6 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132476"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132476\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}