{"id":132509,"date":"2010-10-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010"},"modified":"2016-12-11T04:55:28","modified_gmt":"2016-12-10T23:25:28","slug":"r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: M.R. Shah,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/15013\/2004\t 6\/ 6\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 15013 of 2004\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo\n\t\t\tbe referred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\nR.K.TECHNICAL\nINSTITUTE (ITI) - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nPATEL\nARVINDBHAI CHUNILAL - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance : \nMR\nDG CHAUHAN for\nPetitioner(s) : 1, \nMR BHARAT SHAH for Respondent(s) :\n1, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n:  25 \/10\/2010 \n\n \n\n \nCAV\nJUDGMENT \n<\/pre>\n<p>1.\tBy<br \/>\nway of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,<br \/>\nthe petitioner-R.K. Technical Institute (ITI) has prayed for an<br \/>\nappropriate writ,direction and order quashing and setting aside the<br \/>\nimpugned judgment and award dated 20.12.2001 passed by the Labour<br \/>\nCourt, Anand in Reference (LCA) No.132 of 1992 by which the Labour<br \/>\nCourt has allowed the said Reference directing the petitioner to<br \/>\nreinstate the respondent with 50% back wages and continuity of<br \/>\nservice.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tIt<br \/>\nappears that respondent was initially appointed as daily wager peon<br \/>\nand his services were terminated on 30.11.1983 as daily wager. It<br \/>\nappears that thereafter again respondent was appointed as Peon on<br \/>\n1.12.1983 on a probation of one year and he was appointed on<br \/>\nprobation w.e.f. 2.12.1983. That thereafter, he worked upto 16.8.1984<br \/>\ni.e. hardly for 8 months and according to the petitioner management<br \/>\nhe himself abandoned the job and \/ or did not resume the duty as he<br \/>\nwas facing criminal proceedings \/ proceedings for the allegation of<br \/>\ntaking bribe of money from one student i.e. Kaushik Punjabhai. That<br \/>\nthereafter, after a period of one year, he raised an industrial<br \/>\ndispute challenging the alleged the termination and same was referred<br \/>\nto Labour Court, Anand, which was numbered as Reference (LCA) No.200<br \/>\nof 1986 and the Labour Court by impugned judgment and award partly<br \/>\nallowed the said reference directing the petitioner to reinstate the<br \/>\nrespondent with 50% back wages by holding that though respondent has<br \/>\ncompleted work of 240 days in the last preceding year and his<br \/>\nservices have been terminated without holding any departmental<br \/>\ninquiry and\/ or without any notice and\/ or notice pay and\/ or<br \/>\nretrenchment compensation. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the<br \/>\nimpugned judgment and award passed by the Labour Court, the<br \/>\npetitioner-management has preferred the present Special Civil<br \/>\nApplication  under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tShri<br \/>\nChauhan, learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the<br \/>\nLabour Court has materially erred in partly allowing the reference<br \/>\nand directing the petitioner to reinstate the respondent with 50%<br \/>\nback wages. It is submitted that as such the respondent has not<br \/>\nworked for more than 240 days in the last preceding year and finding<br \/>\ngiven by the Labour Court that respondent has worked for more than<br \/>\n240 days in the last preceding year, is considering his past service<br \/>\nfrom 23.10.1982, which could not have been considered as in fact the<br \/>\nrespondent tendered his resignation on 30.11.1983 and he was again<br \/>\nappointed on 1.12.1983 w.e.f. 2.12.1983 on a probation of one year<br \/>\nwhich the respondent accepted the same without any objection.<br \/>\nTherefore, it is submitted that as such the appointment of the<br \/>\nrespondent w.e.f. 2.12.1983 was a fresh appointment. Therefore, his<br \/>\nearlier service was not required to be considered while calculating<br \/>\n240 days.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tIt<br \/>\nis further submitted that even otherwise as such there was no<br \/>\ntermination and \/ or retrenchment by the petitioner at all. It is<br \/>\nsubmitted that in fact as the respondent was facing some proceedings<br \/>\nwith respect to taking bribe\/money from the student, he was under<br \/>\npressure and he left the village Sunav and he went to stay with his<br \/>\nin law&#8217;s where he stayed upto 1990, even as admitted by him in the<br \/>\ncross examination. Therefore, when the respondent himself left the<br \/>\nvillage and service, there was no question of any termination and\/ or<br \/>\nretrenchment by the petitioner and therefore, the Labour Court has<br \/>\nmaterially erred in directing the petitioner to reinstate the<br \/>\npetitioner by holding that the termination is illegal. Therefore, it<br \/>\nis requested to allow the present Special Civil Application.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\tPetition<br \/>\nis opposed by Shri Bharat Shah, learned advocate for the respondent.<br \/>\nIt is submitted that it is not true that there was a delay in raising<br \/>\nindustrial dispute. It is submitted that the dispute was raised by<br \/>\nnotice dated 14.5.2002. It is further submitted that even present<br \/>\npetition may not be entertained as the award came to be published in<br \/>\nthe year 2001 and the petition has been filed on 14.9.2004. It is<br \/>\nfurther submitted by Shri Shah, learned advocate for the respondent<br \/>\nthat as respondent completed\/ worked for 240 days in the last<br \/>\npreceding year before terminating the services of the respondent,<br \/>\npetitioner ought to have served the notice, notice pay and \/ or<br \/>\nretrenchment compensation to the respondent as required under Section<br \/>\n25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Therefore, it is submitted<br \/>\nthat there is a finding given by the Labour Court that the respondent<br \/>\nhad worked for more than 240 days in the last preceding year and<br \/>\nconsequently when the Labour Court has passed an order directing the<br \/>\npetitioner to reinstate him in service that too denying 50% back<br \/>\nwages, the same is not required to be interfered with by this Court<br \/>\nin exercise the powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of<br \/>\nIndia.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\tShri<br \/>\nShah, learned advocate for the respondent has further submitted that<br \/>\nas such the respondent was compelled to leave the village Sunav. It<br \/>\nis further submitted that for the alleged allegation\/ misconduct of<br \/>\ndemanding bribe\/ money from the student i.e. Kaushik Punjabhai, no<br \/>\ndepartmental inquiry has been held and therefore, same cannot be<br \/>\nconsidered. It is further submitted by Shri Shah, learned advocate<br \/>\nfor the respondent that in the facts and circumstances of the case,<br \/>\ndenial of 50% back wages can be said to be sufficient punishment.<br \/>\nTherefore, it is requested to dismiss the present petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\tHaving<br \/>\nheard the learned advocates for the respective parties and<br \/>\nconsidering the impugned judgment and award as well as deposition of<br \/>\nthe respondent it appears that respondent himself, for whatever<br \/>\nreasons left the village Sunav and institution and he went to reside<br \/>\n\/ stay at his in laws<br \/>\nvillage Khabhoraj from August<br \/>\n1984 even till his deposition was recorded on 4.10.1990. Therefore,<br \/>\nit appears that the respondent left the village as well as<br \/>\ninstitution and the job and stayed at his in laws on and from August<br \/>\n1984. It appears that as some chapter case was filed in the year 1984<br \/>\n he might have left the village and might have stayed at his in laws<br \/>\non and from August 1984. The allegation against the respondent was<br \/>\nthat he was demanding bribe\/ money from the student. It is to be<br \/>\nnoted that during that period he was on probation. Considering the<br \/>\naforesaid facts and circumstance of the case and when the respondent<br \/>\nhimself left the village on and from August 1984 and even at the time<br \/>\nof recording of evidence on 4.10.1990, he was at  his in laws house,<br \/>\nthere was no termination and \/ or retrenchment by the petitioner for<br \/>\nwhich any procedure was required to be followed required under the<br \/>\nprovisions of Industrial Disputes Act. In the facts and circumstance<br \/>\nof the case, the Labour Court has materially erred in holding that<br \/>\nthere was a termination \/ retrenchment of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\tThe<br \/>\nfinding given by the Labour Court that the respondent had worked for<br \/>\nmore than 240 days in the preceding year also cannot be sustained. It<br \/>\nappears that to arrive at aforesaid finding the<br \/>\nLabour Court has considered his past service from 23.10.1982. It is<br \/>\nto be noted that services of the respondent was terminated on<br \/>\n30.11.1983 and thereafter again he was re-appointed on 1.12.1983 on a<br \/>\nprobation of one year w.e.f. 2.12.1983 and respondent accepted the<br \/>\nsame without any objection and therefore while calculating \/<br \/>\nconsidering the 240 days, his past service could not have been<br \/>\nconsidered by the Labour Court as it was a fresh appointment on and<br \/>\nfrom 2.12.1983 as probationer for a period of one year. Considering<br \/>\nthe aforesaid facts and circumstance of the case, Labour Court has<br \/>\nmaterially erred in directing the petitioner to reinstate the<br \/>\nrespondent with 50% back wages, which deserves to be quashed and set<br \/>\naside.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.\tIn<br \/>\nview of the above and for the reasons stated above, petition succeed.<br \/>\nThe impugned judgment and award dated 20.12.2001 passed by the Labour<br \/>\nCourt, Anand in Reference (LCA) No.132 of 1992 is hereby quashed and<br \/>\nset aside. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. No costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>(M.R.SHAH,<br \/>\nJ.)<\/p>\n<p>kaushik<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010 Author: M.R. Shah,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/15013\/2004 6\/ 6 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 15013 of 2004 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-10T23:25:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-10T23:25:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1328,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010\",\"name\":\"R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-10T23:25:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-10T23:25:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-10T23:25:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010"},"wordCount":1328,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010","name":"R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-10T23:25:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-k-technical-vs-patel-on-25-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R.K.Technical vs Patel on 25 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132509"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132509\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}