{"id":132574,"date":"2008-03-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008"},"modified":"2018-02-03T19:25:34","modified_gmt":"2018-02-03T13:55:34","slug":"t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"T Manjula W\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
T Manjula W\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH cook? or KARNAIAKA, aauuanong\nDATED mars THE 14th any or MmncH{W2\u00a7\u00a73r{ wu\npnmsmxr '   HR  \n\nwas HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE:A:N;VEN\ufb01#6?\u00a7$A \u00e96WDAr' \nwaxw PETITION Nb.\u00e9ooai\/\u00e9ooa(@\ufb01f\u00a2\u00a7\u00e9)_f%j\n\nBETWEEN _ 2 ._ __ 4 % 2\n\nT.ManjuJ.a,\n\nW\/o D.Nat.a.raj, V  \nAged snout \u00abI4 years 1\nStaff Nurse,   :\nMaternity Hogpital  \u00a7  '\nPrimary Hea.:.th.._Un;fg.t, \ngl_ghn]can11;-%,  -_ 3 '\n\n---------qr -\n\nMyaore.,~'\",f\u00a3~{\"Qrj\u00a5,V',\":'.,.v?..=:3,'=-.rac.'d.1., S-r.Co-.1 eel for Res-t.)\n\n,_ :\ufb01isVw? Is FILES UEBER ARTICLES 226 a 22\" -\nma. cousrxmnou or INDIA 1\u00b0:-zmrnze 1'0 QUASH ma\n\nOREER 1'D:'li\"F'.JT).22. ' ' ET  - i'ASSED BY THE\n\n\u00bb. 6.'66'\n,'*c;v1L\" JUDGE (an.nu.) AND aura Am wzprua IN\n.rx;No.17\/2003.\n\nThis WP coming on tor further orders this\n\n~ day, the Court made the following:\n\n\n\nv .. _ 1\" ,_\n'cl 1;' A3 -Il\ufb01an Fl .34 1 'Ih: I_Tau- \ufb01dIug\u00a7_QJ' In 1-0::\nInul-L3 Kiln BIKE \\-I-I-V'-L-L IJUVIH 'UL  L In\n\nand another. To execute 'the _.\u00e9:1ecree,\u00b0} 'then'\n\npetitioner has filed ex\u00e9e\u00a7t\u00bb1on \u00a2a\u00a7e'teo.'Vijf'}\u00e9oo3 1:;\nthe court of Civil *.!.3'.1.\\rits--.'Iv.Von')'\" Tiptur.\nRespondent has   the execution<\/pre>\n
case.   objections, the
\nexecuting’  order or attachment
\non   ifitage, respondent had.\n<\/p>\n
filed  the decree to the Court<\/p>\n
of C:l.1″ri,1.”  eadag for execution and to<\/p>\n
 ..l-l. 7′. _ ‘._r >…I.’V”_.I..’;._’I __ _ _ .q -4 .|._.|..- J.–J.__…__a._ _ h.._.._\n<\/p>\n
-35-‘; ‘ WL ., 51.-aI’l:>-‘gklu ‘J I wl'”L (Jul: LII? Juwll\ufb01llk WLU’ ;<\/p>\n
1′:-hat_>shve~’ is working in Gadag, which is outicie<\/p>\n
 the v.V__.A!{.:’oca..1 lirnits of the jurisdiction of the<\/p>\n
V’ * eltecuting Court (‘riptur Court) and as ‘such the<\/p>\n
 decree has to be transferred to Gadag Civil<\/p>\n
Judge’: Court, for execution. Reference to sub-<\/p>\n
\\\/.\n<\/p>\n
0′<\/p>\n
section (4) of section 39 CBC was also and<\/p>\n
the transfer to the Court of Civil <\/p>\n
Gadag, was sought. Considering  ” <\/p>\n
application, the executing Court hiasljsesnedfthe it<\/p>\n
order dated 22.5.2005, grieving -:;n,;: .;nn<\/p>\n
transferring the aecren_ to the’ cnnr\u00a37 or. \u00e9ivil ‘<\/p>\n
agent (are Division), n;nng..3 gnenrinning the<\/p>\n
 taetition has<\/p>\n
2 . i\ufb01eerc  ‘counsel on both sides<\/p>\n
and perused;   ‘ —  ,  <\/p>\n
3’. ” Lear_ne\u00a2iv.ii”‘connsel for the petitioner<\/p>\n
contende\u00a2i” that’  his not perlnissihle for the<\/p>\n
  enecutingz court'””i:o have transferred the decree on<\/p>\n
‘=tne_fa\u00a7\u00a71i\u00a7arion filed by the respondent, by<\/p>\n
i’e;rercising..5’jurisdiction, under section 39 of CPC.<\/p>\n
Leexnetl i ‘ counsel contended that, the impugned<\/p>\n
it crater”. is ex facie illegal. Learned counsel also<\/p>\n
ul…itted. that, the snlerv certificate produced<\/p>\n
to the effect that the re-pendent bee been<\/p>\n
working in Hubli has also not been notics\u00e9d and<\/p>\n
the inpug-necl order is without jur1od1ot;l,oi::{“-hf: <\/p>\n
4. Per contra, learned oounsoj.\n<\/p>\n
respondents submitted that  vi1,ew:_< E  hf '<\/p>\n
(4) of section 39 cars, u5.e_  hhpah?:s\u00a7d.. <\/p>\n
executing Court, nrpugnhagj'-.1;ero\u00a7LnV_ia_uonptninaiile. " L'<\/p>\n
5. Point for.\n<\/p>\n
Whether the   conlnitted
\nany 11lega?Li’t:y4:- in   order?\n<\/p>\n
6.    v'”xpt*ov1.de’s that) the Court
\nwh:Lc:h—- -paouoao-d;\u00bb’:’;”‘g  ‘rray<}on the application of
\nthe neand it for execution to<\/p>\n
anothei*,__r;ov.:V_1:t' _o\u00a3. oong:ot_nt ju1*;od_;ot;-n= 11o_a.\u00a2.:l_1ng<\/p>\n
  su.n–sootion (2? provides that, the<\/p>\n
\ufb01ourtv'  passed a decree may of its own<\/p>\n
 AA rnotioni', hand it for execution to any subordinate<\/p>\n
 'v<:_o\u00a7:'rt of oonpetent jurisdiction. In the instant<\/p>\n
case transfer is not to any subordinate court.<\/p>\n
Sub-section (4) provides" that, nothing in the<\/p>\n
\\..\/'<\/p>\n
section shall be deemed to authorise the"-Court<\/p>\n
which passed a decree to execute n1.1o4hVV"'deoree<\/p>\n
against any person or property outside 'a <\/p>\n
liznita of its jur1adJ.ct:i.on.f"" <\/p>\n
'7. There in no cLtapute".that the <\/p>\n
into execution was pasaveditby the or civil
\nJudge (Jr. Division')  rn\ufb01s""vexecut1on
\npetition has been    which has
\npassed   to the
\nexecution "  that, an appeal
\nhad  '—aga.'I;net the decree sought to<\/p>\n
be  'application for stay was<\/p>\n
<._.1.a:h' seetivon 1.-'51 CFC to t'r'az'1\u00a7re' 'he decree to<\/p>\n
 ._   3 Court at Gadag. As already<\/p>\n
antigen} that the judgment debtor has no right<\/p>\n
 Ag under' section 39 CPC to seek transfer of a<\/p>\n
 *  statute does not confer any right to:<\/p>\n
 the judgment debtor to seek the transfer of a<\/p>\n
decree. Executing Court by noticing the fact<\/p>\n
5\/<\/p>\n
( I<\/p>\n
that, the Jdr is residing at Gadag, and algsiojthat<\/p>\n
it is proper to transfer the decree t9.._\\thV\u00e9:'4jCourt<\/p>\n
or Civil Judge (Jr. Division) at–',4':_:Gada:g," ,.ii\u00a7;s"\u00bb <\/p>\n
passed the impugned order, "$1.31, ereroi\u00e9e  them ht<\/p>\n
jurisdiction under section "39 1'j'r:P'i:.   <\/p>\n
the order passed by tI\u00a3\u00e9_"":gxeo\ufb01ting <\/p>\n
herein is totally __ i1lego,J,VV':'anc'._iaioontrorir to the<\/p>\n
provisions containoo,"   :9 CDC,<\/p>\n
8. yearned  tggr  ‘h the petitioner
\nproducer;   ioart\u00e9iiiioate dated 27 .2.2008
\nissued.\u00bb  ” Officer, Hubli –\n<\/p>\n
Dharwad  which shows that the
\nreapondejnt  Visaiom 3 working in Chittaguppi<\/p>\n
hohgitni ,. V\ufb01uiiiyi -H-L L!h.a._rI.w.r._.. -_..h__I:_.g..rz-. Ealilte and.<\/p>\n
‘\u20ac.”‘~ti-n of Ri.5,6.-’56\/-.  the<\/p>\n
par\ufb02qai \ufb02of the said certificate, it is clear<\/p>\n
 A thatithe respondent is employed in the hospital<\/p>\n
  by Hubli – Dharwad Mahanagara corporation at<\/p>\n
Huhli. Hence the transfer order to Gadag being<\/p>\n
without jurisdiction, is also without any<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
\\\/<\/p>\n
=4<\/p>\n
justification. since the executing Court-,j has<\/p>\n
passed the order exercising jur1sdj_c_ticn44t:”~Ve. Ennut<\/p>\n
vested in it and as the illegality  <\/p>\n
the impugned order is liable’ “to-he “_ee1_:V.”  V’<\/p>\n
In the result, W1f:\u00a3t4_ Petition <\/p>\n
the inpugned order is aet’..:ea\u00a2de.V”  Court
\n1′ dirmted t\u00b0 ‘the eatectticn for<\/p>\n
recovery of the decretai   “_1.:i.n accordance<\/p>\n
with law.  costs. 1:\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court T Manjula W\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH cook? or KARNAIAKA, aauuanong DATED mars THE 14th any or MmncH{W2\u00a7\u00a73r{ wu pnmsmxr ‘ HR was HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE:A:N;VEN\ufb01#6?\u00a7$A \u00e96WDAr’ waxw PETITION Nb.\u00e9ooai\/\u00e9ooa(@\ufb01f\u00a2\u00a7\u00e9)_f%j BETWEEN _ 2 ._ __ 4 % 2 T.ManjuJ.a, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nT Manjula W\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"T Manjula W\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-03T13:55:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"T Manjula W\\\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-03T13:55:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":787,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008\",\"name\":\"T Manjula W\\\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-03T13:55:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"T Manjula W\\\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"T Manjula W\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"T Manjula W\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-03T13:55:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"T Manjula W\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-03T13:55:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008"},"wordCount":787,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008","name":"T Manjula W\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-03T13:55:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-manjula-wo-d-nataraj-vs-dr-drakshayani-s-patil-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"T Manjula W\/O D Nataraj vs Dr Drakshayani S Patil on 14 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132574"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132574\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}