{"id":132958,"date":"2011-03-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011"},"modified":"2017-05-29T03:33:44","modified_gmt":"2017-05-28T22:03:44","slug":"ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"M\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n\nDATED: 30.3.2011\n\nCORAM\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN\n\nWrit Petition Nos.6064 and 6065 of 2011\n\n\n1    M\/S.B.B.CORPORATION                     [ PETITIONER  \n     REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR         IN W.P.NO.6064 OF 2011]\n\tRAJA BHANDARI  \n\tNO.3, DAVIDSON STREET  \n\tCHENNAI-1.\n\n\n1    M\/S.VIJAY ENTERPRISES                  [ PETITIONER  \n     REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR          IN W.P.NO.6065 OF 2011)\n\tVIJAY BHANDARI  \n\tNO.3 DAVIDSON STREET  CHENNAI-1.\n\n\n\n          Vs\n\n1    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT)         \n     LOANSQUARE I, ASSESSMENT CIRCLE  \n\tCHENNAI-108.\t\t\t\t\t\t[ RESPONDENT  ]<\/pre>\n<p>W.P.No.6064 of 2011:\n<\/p>\n<p>\tWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the files of the respondent in CST No.93696\/08-09 dated 11.1.2011 and quash the same as being contrary to the principle of natural justice and further direct the respondent to pass order afresh in accordance with law as requested by the petitioners vide their representation dated 27.1.2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>W.P.No.6065 of 2011:\n<\/p>\n<p>\tWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the files of the respondent in CST No.93698\/08-09 dated 11.1.2011 and quash the same as being contrary to the principle of natural justice and further direct the respondent to pass order afresh in accordance with law as requested by the petitioners vide their representation dated 27.1.2011.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\t\t   For petitioner  :  Mr.R.Senniappan\n\t\t   For respondents :  Mr.R.Mahadevan\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  Additional Government \t\t\t\t\t\t\t     Pleader (Taxes)\n \n\nC O M M O N  O R D E R\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>\tAt this stage of the hearing of the writ petitions, the learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes) appearing for the respondent had submitted that the respondent had passed  orders, on 14.3.2011, holding that there is no tax liability on the petitioners to pay tax, as shown in the impugned orders of the respondent, dated 11.1.2011. He had also placed the orders of the respondent, dated 14.3.2011, which are as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>\t&#8220;Order in respect of W.P.No.6064 of 2011:\n<\/p>\n<p>\tTvl.B.B.Corporation, No.3, Davidson Street, Chennai  1 were finally assesed on a total and taxable turnover of Rs.15866622-00 for the year 2008-2009 under CST Act in proceedings first cited.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIn letter 2nd cited, the dealers have stated that their objection letter dated 22.11.10 was not considered before making final assessment order and the tax paid was wrongly adopted as Rs.500487-00 as against Rs.510072.00. As stated that their letter dated 22.11.10 was not actually received by this office before making final order of assessment. Now they furnished a copy of the said letter wherein they stated that VAT No. of the customers had been furnished and No CST No. was in force in respect of defective C forms. They were verified and found acceptable. Hence the relevant turnover of Rs.1688802-00 is assessable at 2%. In regard to tax payment, the details furnished by them were verified and their tax paid is now arrived at Rs.510072-00.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tConsidering the above, the assessment is revised under Sec.9(2-A) of CST Act 1956 read with Sec.84 of TNVAT Act 2006 as below. <\/p>\n<pre>\n\nTurnover covered by C forms :Rs.1493752-00 at 3% Rs.44813.00\nTurnover covered by C forms :Rs.3795002-00 at 2% Rs.75880.00\nDefective C form now replied:Rs.1688802-00 at 2% Rs.33776.00\nTurnover not covered by C forms   89294-00 at 4% Rs. 3572.00\nTurnover without form C     : Rs.8800772-00at 4%Rs.352031.00\nTotal and taxable turnover  : Rs.15866622.00    Rs.510072.00\n\t\tTax due : Rs.510072-00\n\t\tTax paid: Rs.510072.00\n\t\tBalance : Nil \nOrder in respect of W.P.No.6065 of 2011:\n<\/pre>\n<p>\tTvl.Vijay Enterprises, No.3, Davidson Street, Chennai  1 were finally assesed on a total and taxable turnover of Rs.10684348-00 for the year 2008-2009 under CST Act in proceedings first cited.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIn letter 2nd cited, the dealers have stated that their objection letter dated 22.11.10 was not considered before making final assessment order and the tax paid was wrongly adopted as Rs.347602.00 as against Rs.352286.00. As stated that their letter dated 22.11.10 was not actually received by this office before making final order of assessment. Now they furnished a copy of the said letter wherein they furnished the details of CST No. and date inrespect of defective C forms. They were verified and found acceptable. Hence the relevant turnover of Rs.1352179-00 is assessable at 2%. In regard to tax payment, the details furnished by them were verified and their tax paid is now arrived at Rs.352286-00.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tConsidering the above, the assessment is revised under Sec.9(2-A) of CST Act 1956 read with Sec.84 of TNVAT Act 2006 as below. <\/p>\n<pre>\nTurnover covered by C forms : Rs.805392-00 at 3% Rs.24162.00\nTurnover covered by C forms : Rs.3351831-00at 2% Rs.67037.00\nTurnover not covered by C forms: 62180-00 at 4%  Rs. 2487.00\nTurnover without form C     : Rs.6464945-00at 4%Rs.258598.00\n\nTotal and taxable turnover  : Rs.10684348.00    Rs.352284.00\n\t\tTax due : Rs.352284-00\n\t\tTax paid: Rs.352286.00\n\t\tExcess  : Rs.      2-00 (ignored)\"\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>\t2. In view of the orders of the respondent, dated 14.3.2011, since, no further orders are necessary, the writ petitions are closed. No costs. Connected M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2011 are closed.<\/p>\n<pre>\n30.3.2011\nlan\n\nIndex    : Yes\/No\nInternet : Yes\/No\n\n\nTo:\n\n     THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT)         \n     LOANSQUARE I, ASSESSMENT CIRCLE  \n\tCHENNAI-108.\n\n\n\nM.JAICHANDREN J.,\n\n\n\n\nlan\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWrit Petition Nos.6064 and 6065 of 2011\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n30.3.2011\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court M\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.3.2011 CORAM THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.6064 and 6065 of 2011 1 M\/S.B.B.CORPORATION [ PETITIONER REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR IN W.P.NO.6064 OF 2011] RAJA BHANDARI NO.3, DAVIDSON STREET CHENNAI-1. 1 M\/S.VIJAY [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132958","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-28T22:03:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-28T22:03:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":615,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-28T22:03:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-28T22:03:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-28T22:03:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011"},"wordCount":615,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011","name":"M\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-28T22:03:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-b-b-corporation-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-ct-on-30-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132958","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132958"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132958\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132958"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132958"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132958"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}