{"id":132996,"date":"2009-01-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009"},"modified":"2018-11-26T21:06:17","modified_gmt":"2018-11-26T15:36:17","slug":"dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
as THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQ}{\ufb02\u00a7  5   ~ .<\/p>\n
Dated this the 28″‘ day oflamsary, 2009  7  VV  <\/p>\n
Before<\/p>\n
ms I-ION’BLE MR Jvszzcs HUw%$miiA_T    A<\/p>\n
Between:<\/p>\n
Mr Dayanand Nayak, 30 yrs<\/p>\n
Sfo Sham Nayak<\/p>\n
Rh) Kaiktmjalumane _  :   –\n<\/p>\n
Mame Grama, Ajelszar\ufb01 ‘   2:   A ‘
\nKarkaia’1’a1n.k   5:  ~ ‘  _V  <\/p>\n
(By Sri K  VA;ty’.*)  ” .”\n<\/p>\n
1 Fcdxic    3  \nSfo John Menezeaa V ' 7\n\n<\/pre>\n
IRz’e;’1\\\u00ab<iari;opia, Avmce Nz\u00a7\u00a7zid.;addu
\nS}\u00a7ii'\u00abva,E  Taluk  ….. .. n<\/p>\n
2 V ' ,.B1"an\u00a2h._1\\k\u00a7~.wm*g\u00e9r .._
\n*–. {initial Iiiaiiai Iangsmf-'.mce Co Ltd
\n"Bf\u00a3mch P  Udayavani Bldg.\n<\/p>\n
I\\r{a;x:ipa1~ ~ _  Respondenm<\/p>\n
~  ; -Sn” P B  Adv. for R2)<\/p>\n
” , *  _ ”  Appeal is raw under 5.173(1) ofthe Meter Vehieles Act
\n  in set asi\u00e9e the judgment and award dated 21.4.2060 in MVC
\nT _:?90.r7s)00 by the mar, Kaxkala.\n<\/p>\n
‘I’hisFirstAppeai cmlfmgenfororders thisday, the-Colzrtdelivered
\nB\/_<\/p>\n
K ‘  fhe following:\n<\/p>\n
JUBGMENT<\/p>\n
Appeal is by the claimant seeking enhancemcnt of   H<\/p>\n
awarded by the MAUI’, Karknla in MVC 199012960.  \u00ab . ‘_ <\/p>\n
There is a delay of 50 days in  ‘ g th\u00a3~.appaa_  ‘ }.  is
\ncondoned. During the deiay   fof  on the<\/p>\n
On 22.3.2000 azt):1::a:iv2.45 :p;m’.\u00bb s=s;}1en’–:i;c,chin_1anf was travelling as a<\/p>\n
pillien rider in Vchis\ufb01\u00e9    2&5 :::”\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7a”‘\ufb01-an Byhu towards
\nKarkala, at that run; %%cg\u00a2:e%   1<?;&\u00e9o J 8996 came in a rash
\nand  .rn0tV1V*H cycle of the claimant due to
\nwhich claima\ufb02\ufb01” feii   grievous injuries. Claiming<\/p>\n
cempensaticn, petit\u00a7’4cS1t._:vVz*sra’s ;i1eav:i’;-  was contested by the Insurance<\/p>\n
ttha”~1;as’m “of”\ufb02ie’Vpleadings, five issues were  After<\/p>\n
  the accident was due to the negligence on the part<\/p>\n
‘ VV ‘\u00bb….\u00bbof the of  — KA 20 J 8996. Having so heid, it awarded a<\/p>\n
 . mmggensation ‘Rs. 1,09,940i- for the injuries and the disability w\ufb02emd with<\/p>\n
‘i  ”  Being mt satis\ufb01ed with the sane, claimant is Mfare this Court.<\/p>\n
W,”\n<\/p>\n
Heard the coimsel representing the parties.
\nIt is seen, the claimant has sustained injury on the head, eye as\u00a76’\u00bbas<\/p>\n
well as on the shoulder. He was treated at KMC Hospital,  ‘E? x ” <\/p>\n
\u00bb- Discharge Summary issued by \ufb02ue KMC Hospital reveals   K  <\/p>\n
has sustained closed head injury with a  :ei’-  with
\ncerebral concussion, with right if]   fracture.
\nThe claimant was treatedas an  Taking into
\naeeozmt the head i1Ij%’_1″1’S”,’  Rs.55,0{30i~\u00bb which
\nappears to he mmia\u00e9mg   awarded \u00a3340,090!-
\ntowards   chashgaessv He has also been awarded
\nRs.I,79(}f~\u00bb  food; for nourishment Rs.}.,200!-,<\/p>\n
eonveyame ehargeset VRs..1V,5O\ufb02?=*v_ a1?i\ufb02 V1ls.1O,O0\u00a3}i- towar\ufb01 low of amenities.<\/p>\n
  appel1as:{*s’ee:21:seL claimant has not been awarded on the<\/p>\n
1Vie’ad’loss’ef  to disability. Injury is su\ufb01ered to the head and also it<\/p>\n
 _____is note\u00a3l.1.3jk’eihe  claimant has not examined’ as to the pm-centage<\/p>\n
 Qf disabilie\ufb01 .. fia\ufb01rewser, it is deposed that there is 30% disability to the rigxt<\/p>\n
=  Veyejean\u00e9  wiii not came in the way of his earnings.<\/p>\n
_’   under the head pain and suffering since aheady claimant is<\/p>\n
 lexerlaitantly awarded, he could be awarded Rs.1S,800!- towards 2053 of<\/p>\n
‘;3s_’*’\/<\/p>\n
amenities and ansther Rs.5,(}O0\/- towards medical expenses. <\/p>\n
come be awarded on the head disability strifered as 5: has  A’<\/p>\n
functions. Further, another Rs.5,0\u20aci0f~ couidvhe’ mmg  i’ie\u00a7s}’.ofi,,& V’<\/p>\n
income ducting the period of treatment and am. <\/p>\n
Thus, claimant Wonk} be entitied\u00bbtu..I_1s.25Q0f)_6?-    I<\/p>\n
has been awarded by the Trfbunai with 6% iti$ei’i\u00e9:stAfi9m?\u00a7.tiis ;ia:je-
\ntiil deposit. Insurer shall deposit the amoum    of<\/p>\n
ihisorder.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh as THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQ}{\ufb02\u00a7 5 ~ . Dated this the 28″‘ day oflamsary, 2009 7 VV Before ms I-ION’BLE MR Jvszzcs HUw%$miiA_T A Between: Mr Dayanand Nayak, 30 yrs Sfo Sham Nayak Rh) Kaiktmjalumane _ : […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132996","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-26T15:36:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-26T15:36:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":601,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-26T15:36:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-26T15:36:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-26T15:36:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009"},"wordCount":601,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009","name":"Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-26T15:36:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayanand-nayak-vs-fedric-menezes-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dayanand Nayak vs Fedric Menezes on 28 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132996"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132996\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132996"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}