{"id":133490,"date":"2009-01-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-09-09T08:41:42","modified_gmt":"2017-09-09T03:11:42","slug":"k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nTr.P(C).No. 29 of 2009()\n\n\n1. K.C.JACOB, S\/O.LATE KALARICKAL CHACKO,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. K.C.TOMY, S\/O.LATE KALARICKAL CHACKO,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOSHI N.THOMAS\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.P.BALACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :16\/01\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n               K.P. Balachandran, J.\n            --------------------------\n               Tr.P.(C)No.29 of 2009\n            --------------------------\n\n                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>    Petitioner is the first defendant in O.S.No.<\/p>\n<p>74\/07 on the file of the Sub Court, Kochi.      The<\/p>\n<p>grievance of the petitioner is that the Sub Judge,<\/p>\n<p>Kochi  is  taking  a  partisan  attitude  and  that<\/p>\n<p>therefore, O.S.No.74\/07 aforesaid be transferred to<\/p>\n<p>some other court.    The reasons submitted by the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the petitioner are that though<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiff and the defendants filed draft issues<\/p>\n<p>in the suit, the court accepted only the issues<\/p>\n<p>suggested by the plaintiff; that the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>moved I.A.No.622\/08 to consider the draft issues<\/p>\n<p>submitted by him as well and that the learned Sub<\/p>\n<p>Judge, vide Annexure-V order, dismissed the said<\/p>\n<p>application holding that it is not maintainable,<\/p>\n<p>since she has gone through the pleadings of either<\/p>\n<p>side and also through the draft issues submitted by<\/p>\n<p>both sides and accordingly raised the issues.<\/p>\n<p>    2.    The  above  order  was  assailed  by  the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner  before   this   Court  filing   W.P.(C)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">TPC 29\/09                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No.15792\/08   and this   Court,  vide   Annexure-VI<\/p>\n<p>judgment, disposed of the writ petition observing<\/p>\n<p>that the fact that either plaintiff has filed a<\/p>\n<p>draft issue or the defendants have filed, does not<\/p>\n<p>mean that the court has to accept the same; that it<\/p>\n<p>is for the court to frame the material issues<\/p>\n<p>relevant and necessary for disposing of the case<\/p>\n<p>based on the pleadings and therefore, there is no<\/p>\n<p>reason to interfere with the issues framed by the<\/p>\n<p>trial court; that however, in I.A.No.622\/08, there<\/p>\n<p>was no specific prayer to frame any particular<\/p>\n<p>issue and there is no reason to interfere with the<\/p>\n<p>said    order and that  if  the  grievance of   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is that any particular issue, which<\/p>\n<p>arises on the pleadings and necessary to be decided<\/p>\n<p>for    disposing of  the  suit,   is  not   framed,<\/p>\n<p>petitioner    is at   liberty   file   a   petition<\/p>\n<p>specifically requesting the court to frame that<\/p>\n<p>issue as an additional issue and that the court<\/p>\n<p>shall consider the petition on merits and pass<\/p>\n<p>appropriate orders.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">TPC 29\/09                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     3.   Pursuant to the disposal of the above writ<\/p>\n<p>petition    vide  Annexure-VI  judgment,  petitioner<\/p>\n<p>moved    Annexure-VII  application   (I.A.No.876\/08)<\/p>\n<p>praying for an additional issue being raised to the<\/p>\n<p>following effect:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>     &#8220;Whether the court fee paid is sufficient?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Obviously, the said issue is irrelevant for the<\/p>\n<p>reason that in a suit valued under Section 37(2) of<\/p>\n<p>the    Kerala Court  Fees  and  Suit  Valuation  Act<\/p>\n<p>(hereinafter referred to as &#8216;the Act&#8217;) court fee<\/p>\n<p>payable has been paid.    The real issue should have<\/p>\n<p>been whether the suit has been properly valued and<\/p>\n<p>court fee paid.    However, the court considered the<\/p>\n<p>said issue and rendered Annexure-X order holding<\/p>\n<p>that the court fee paid under Section 37(2) of the<\/p>\n<p>Act is sufficient and proper, consequent on the<\/p>\n<p>observation made by the court below that though the<\/p>\n<p>first defendant argued that the court fee has to be<\/p>\n<p>paid under Section 37(1) of the Act, it is the<\/p>\n<p>averments in the plaint that has to be the basis<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">TPC 29\/09                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>for valuation of the suit for the purpose of<\/p>\n<p>payment of court fee in a suit for partition and<\/p>\n<p>not the averments in the written statement and that<\/p>\n<p>the plaint averments do not indicate that the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff has been excluded from possession.     The<\/p>\n<p>finding rendered by the court below cannot be<\/p>\n<p>viewed as an order passed      taking any partisan<\/p>\n<p>attitude. In the nature of the issue that was<\/p>\n<p>raised   as  desired  by  the  petitioner,  it   was<\/p>\n<p>sufficient for the court to say that the court fee<\/p>\n<p>paid under Section 37(2) of the Act is sufficient<\/p>\n<p>without observing anything about the valuation.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, the petitioner also committed errors and<\/p>\n<p>there is no meaning in raising a complaint against<\/p>\n<p>the officer concerned.   There is no merit in this<\/p>\n<p>transfer petition and the transfer has been moved<\/p>\n<p>on account of misunderstanding of the party or the<\/p>\n<p>counsel as regards position of law.\n<\/p>\n<p>     This transfer petition is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>16th January, 2009        (K.P.Balachandran, Judge)<br \/>\ntkv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Tr.P(C).No. 29 of 2009() 1. K.C.JACOB, S\/O.LATE KALARICKAL CHACKO, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. K.C.TOMY, S\/O.LATE KALARICKAL CHACKO, &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.JOSHI N.THOMAS For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice K.P.BALACHANDRAN Dated :16\/01\/2009 O R [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-133490","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-09T03:11:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-09T03:11:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":668,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009\",\"name\":\"K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-09T03:11:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-09T03:11:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-09T03:11:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009"},"wordCount":668,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009","name":"K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-09T03:11:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-c-jacob-vs-k-c-tomy-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.C.Jacob vs K.C.Tomy on 16 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=133490"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133490\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=133490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=133490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=133490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}