{"id":133503,"date":"2009-03-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009"},"modified":"2014-03-11T17:32:10","modified_gmt":"2014-03-11T12:02:10","slug":"hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
\" V.  - Age-:1 a\u00e9bmgxf: 46 years,\n\n   N.Jay*-azjx\ufb01jll,\n\n   are residing at N03,\n\n\ufb02ew\n\nIN THE HIGH coum' or mmarmm AT EANGALO_RE\nDA.TED THIS THE 30TH BA'? or MARCH, 2009. j _\nBEFORE  V V\n\nTHE HOWBLE ne1R..I:.rs'r:c:__E3 '.3. rawitfi .  \"\n\n \n\nWRIT PETITIOH 119.4130 o1\u00e9'\u00bbA:zo<J\u00b0:'..   vi'  '&\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nffaje\ufb01 Ismail Shari\ufb01, ,  .\nS] 0. Hajee Mohammad Usm--aI1,_ I\nAged about 40 years,  A =\nResidi1:igatNo.3,   V\nNa\ufb01\ufb01aramsingh Lam:  1\n\nCivil Station, H  g5" _. _ 3  _ \nBangaiore - E3651} (Krill.    _  _   '  PETITIOHER\n\n(By Sn:  v'Adv, \u00a35: " \nLegal Axisg, AdvsI}*'._--vV    \n\nAND:\nL P. Nagaraj, '4 'V\n\nsg.o.i,_chickpa1appa,,_ ____ H ,\n\nS] <1.ChiCk_piHgppa,\nAggd abo1;tj?\u00a53 years,\n\n  H 3,? 9' Cilickpillappa,\n _ \u00e9'sgea'_\u00ab about 4 1 years,\n\n" '-'Nandaxamsingh Lane\nCivil Sfatisn,\nBaxzgaiore -- 560 O0 1.  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
{By Sri P.Arun Kumar, Adv.)<\/p>\n
…..2….\n<\/p>\n
This Writ Pettiticzn its \ufb01le\ufb01 under Articles 226 63 22′? of the
\nConsiifu\ufb01on of India praying to set aside the order \ufb01ateci
\n19.02.2007 vi-de Annexum\u00e9? passed in (3.3. No.16849\/32Q_2″.<_Jn
\nthe file of the XXVI Add}. City Civil 85 Sessions Judge"at"-}\\\u00a2IayTQ<\/p>\n
Hall, (CCH No.20), Bangalore passed 0111.5. No.3  ~ _\u00bb__ <\/p>\n
This Petition coming on for    b <\/p>\n
this day, the Court; made the fo}}ow:i:::1g:–.:
\n0 R I) E____23_. '<\/p>\n
E. In this writ petition, g3e'\u00a3itio'iic%'_V'M'is_   order
\ndated 19.02.2007 pass\u00a23,_in :'\ufb011_s'f. r~.:g1.,'5 %s49\/2o'd2'%" a\ufb01owing
\nI.A.No.3 \ufb01led by the piain\ufb01\ufb01fg\u00e9nd  defence of the
\ndefendant with a dir\u00e9cgfion  the.:.\u00e91efe1A\u00a7t{a"r.t_.\u00a7<$\u00abvacate am} deiiver
\nthe mssessiani. bf _:iE;;:; \ufb01S:i1it  ism\ufb02\ufb01ses Within' a month
\nfrom the dizift\u00e9mtif   <\/p>\n
2.  07.04.2001 This Court has<\/p>\n
granted an  Vc\u00a71fd\u00e9:~~.v_b’of–“pL:stay cf the: impugn\u00e9d rmier on<\/p>\n
 ‘Subs\ufb01ciu\ufb01atiy, by Way of an agaplication I.A.No.1,<\/p>\n
jgicztitir\ufb01iaxj sought for amendment of the writ petition<\/p>\n
   so as?’  Va \u20ac\u00a7hjai1.3feuz1ge to an order passed earlier in 1:11:53 suit by .<\/p>\n
 4:23;:   be1aw on 18.08.2005 din:-cting the<\/p>\n
  gge\ufb01\ufb01aner herein to deposit arrears of rent fmm July,<\/p>\n
 _ EGO?’ date of passing of ‘\u00a3116: arcier and keetp on deposi\ufb01ng<\/p>\n
“i”JV’;vi:f3H\u00a73.\u00a3{}.{? till the disposal of the suit as and when the rents<\/p>\n
J6<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
bL:.’.amc:-: due at the rate of Rs.3,000\/~ per month, subject to<\/p>\n
dettzrmination of 1116336 pro\ufb01ts after recording the \u20acVjv’];.-(Vi.V\u00e9_ii\\1\u00ab(V%\u00e9\\’v”<\/p>\n
Though this appiication for amendment of the  ‘<\/p>\n
been filed on 97.06.2007, the same i3~~not  <\/p>\n
application is \u00e9irected to be considcxt\u00e9d    <\/p>\n
Baatter.\n<\/p>\n
3. Counsel for the 1)etit:iV<:\u00ab;'*1v.1;-,:?;'  $16 otgdr\u00e9r passed
\nstriking o\ufb01' the defence on  at the rate: of
\nRs.5,()OO\/~ per   ::\ufb01}v\u00e9:ix5;r1"is'i\u00abuz1sustaina13ie as
\nthe Court beiotig  inter the question
\nregarding   of landlord and tenant
\nand also   rent payable. Drawing the<\/p>\n
attentiongsf thc   the x\ufb01fitten statement \ufb01led, counsel for<\/p>\n
  Siiihnsit\u00e9  as the petitiorzer had denied the<\/p>\n
 the paxties, the Court below couid not<\/p>\n
'  '-yhave  Qffdef\ufb01nce cm the gmund that rent as directeci<\/p>\n
— \u00ab  ~ was not paid{ 1<\/p>\n
 ~ \u00a7i’\u00a7.”\u00abS’1}I)V};3OI’t 0f the challenge made to the order passed. 01::<\/p>\n
  directing payment of admitted rent at Rs.5,0{}0\/~<\/p>\n
 ‘   along with arrears, counaal subxrxits that though ‘<\/p>\n
 there is delay in filing the application making amendment and<\/p>\n
g\/%<\/p>\n
\u00a33<\/p>\n
a\ufb01hough the petititmer had not cheasen to challenge this order<\/p>\n
passed in the year 2005 soon thereafter, as the challenge <\/p>\n
to the order striking OK the defence has  <\/p>\n
order passed directing payment of rent, the deiay..i,I\u00a7V_A4_See1<\u00a7i:\u00a71g'_ti1e'   b <\/p>\n
amendment to challenge the order daied  <\/p>\n
condoned and the writ petition be eJ1oWed'a3e"there  V'<\/p>\n
the order passed by the Court beloueh\u00bb  .\n<\/p>\n
5. Counsel for the Iespondentse–s?x:i\u00a7ng}j1A. sup\ufb01or\u00e9ts kioth the<\/p>\n
orders particularly emphasizinga\ufb01   “of the petitioner
\nin laying a challexzg-;f’i:0__ the:”6I”tieij  at such a
\nbeiated stage      rents for the
\noccupa\ufb01on gjf   that the petitioner is
\nilkegally   premises without payi\ufb02g any<\/p>\n
rent despite  eheigegg \u00e9”  by the Court helew.<\/p>\n
  heaxti  counsel for the parties and<\/p>\n
  pleadings, I \ufb01n\u00e9 that the plaintiffs have<\/p>\n
  paragraph-3 of the plaint contending<\/p>\n
 e…_.i;1’te;a1ia  is an u\ufb01derstanding ‘between the plaintiffs<\/p>\n
 vide memorandurez of understanding dated<\/p>\n
   whereunder the defendant is permitted to occupy” a<\/p>\n
 V   cf the 33′ \ufb02oor of the premises for a period of 10 morxths<\/p>\n
…, 5 …,
\nfrom the date of execution of the said memorandum of<\/p>\n
understanding to onable the defendant to secure an a}t::z7t_1ot\u00a7ve<\/p>\n
accommodation and that in. the ave:-111: the defendaqiit’  go<\/p>\n
secure such an aitemative accommodation arm} the’  <\/p>\n
premises, he shall pay to the ‘a S>1’_#’.”‘[V]’].::,C’5’n”f’._I?:\u00bb”%\u00ab’<\/p>\n
month as rent.\n<\/p>\n
7. In the Written statementttvtv\ufb01ihied _ at  the
\ndefendant has contended   metotorotzdum of
\nundsrstanding dated    as the
\ndefendant was ‘r:’:1’c:”:.\u00a71;so1:aA,\u00a7.tf3ab ttift.  I plaint schedule
\nproperty as on    He conttnds that
\nthe memo;*Q1idu;%ivi;%i;  not valid and binding<\/p>\n
against th\u00e9vvtdetfcrcnda\ufb01t;\n<\/p>\n
8. In the 611161′ ;1zit;:*_\u00e9V’}o.E3″.Q\u00ab\u00e93:’:V2{)05 passed by the Court beiow,<\/p>\n
 t]:2e T\ufb01a1{C\u00a7om ha$’1ig\u00a7\ufb01y observeci that the defendant admittesri<\/p>\n
lt\ufb01leiteyzctrutivoii. of ‘sale deed. Prior to the execution of the sale<\/p>\n
e\u00a3ce:i\u00a31.._  eiiefen\u00e9ant entered into a memorandum<\/p>\n
V tvof u’11\u00e93\u00e9”:-*st;’.?:.*=fn.e?.ii:;.”::lg: data} 01.08.2001, Whomunder tho dizfondant<\/p>\n
H to  rent to the plainti\ufb01s at the rate of Rs.5,{)0{)] — per<\/p>\n
 stay in the property til} deiivczy of possession to the<\/p>\n
  Th\ufb01 Court below has hold that in the facts and<\/p>\n
._  ..\n<\/p>\n
circumstances of the eaee, it was just and proper to ___allow<\/p>\n
I.A.No.2 \ufb01led by the plaiiitiffs seeking direction to depoei\ufb02\ufb02ie<\/p>\n
arrears of rent from July, 2002 till the date of  .<\/p>\n
order which is new seught to be challegriged see-k’ii1g* ii ”<\/p>\n
of the writ petition is passed based oi: t}:=\u00a7ees:taiid_i %.’z-died’ <\/p>\n
defendant in the written statemienfvis”-~:i–vis the \u00e9tssertigns made<\/p>\n
in the piaint.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9. Although. corpus_e1 f;;1-   that the
\nCerurt beiow    \ufb01ne status of the
\nparties    and also as regards
\nthe   .i f do not t]:11’11k there is any<\/p>\n
substance   file pleadings adverted to herein<\/p>\n
above  ‘p’.*\u00a7:1’a\u00a7,rai3h–4 of the Written statement make<\/p>\n
   objeeiions raised by the defendant to the<\/p>\n
 iVof.e’1Lif1derstanding is more on the ground that it<\/p>\n
i  was he: a fclecument and not on the greimd that “it was not<\/p>\n
” exeeuied xbgsa  That apart the conduct of the gxseititicmer in not<\/p>\n
i   to the order passed on 18.08.2005 and not paying the<\/p>\n
  as directed and choosing to ehaiienge the said order after<\/p>\n
    lapse of nearly two years that too when his defence was struck<\/p>\n
off by the Trial Cou\ufb01; for not paying the rent deserves to be<\/p>\n
 cated. The defendagiitj petitioner hereixz cannot have the<\/p>\n
…. 8 ..\n<\/p>\n
propose 1:0 go into t}:Lis qt}:-:s%io1:3,_ Su\ufb02ice 1:0 obsexve _4t1\u00a7ai.t, thc
\ndefendant has not paid the mats as \u00e9iztcted by the  _<\/p>\n
which has resulted in striking off his defgpce.<\/p>\n
13. in the light of the discussion  <\/p>\n
having due regani to the condzi;:1e.r 2i’\u00ab’\ufb01f\u00e9}f’i’\u20aciV\u00e9 to ” V<\/p>\n
herein above, the app\ufb01catierjp  am\u00e9ndmaviit of the
\nwrit petition does not Irequirc’:Var1\u00a7\u00a7’ ordgtzg The writ peti\ufb01on<\/p>\n
and the appiicatitra
\n‘judge<\/p>\n
PKS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009 Author: B.S.Patil ” V. – Age-:1 a\u00e9bmgxf: 46 years, N.Jay*-azjx\ufb01jll, are residing at N03, \ufb02ew IN THE HIGH coum’ or mmarmm AT EANGALO_RE DA.TED THIS THE 30TH BA’? or MARCH, 2009. j _ BEFORE V V THE HOWBLE ne1R..I:.rs’r:c:__E3 ‘.3. rawitfi . […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-133503","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nHajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-11T12:02:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-11T12:02:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1118,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-11T12:02:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-11T12:02:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-11T12:02:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009"},"wordCount":1118,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009","name":"Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-11T12:02:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hajee-ismail-shariff-vs-p-nagaraj-on-30-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hajee Ismail Shariff vs P Nagaraj on 30 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133503","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=133503"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133503\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=133503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=133503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=133503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}