{"id":133629,"date":"1998-07-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1998-07-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998"},"modified":"2019-01-13T09:39:41","modified_gmt":"2019-01-13T04:09:41","slug":"municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998","title":{"rendered":"Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 1998 VAD Delhi 369, 74 (1998) DLT 808, 1998 (46) DRJ 767<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S Kapoor<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: S Kapoor<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p> S.N. Kapoor, J. <\/p>\n<p> 1.     This  CM  (M) has been filed against an order of remand in  House  Tax Appeal  No. 221\/94 for the reason that the valuation report and the  objections  filed by the respondent had not been considered. Moreover, the  most disputed  point relates to &#8220;inclusion of cost price of unexploited  portion of plot&#8221;. In this background, the learned District Judge passed an order of remand  to &#8220;re-assess afresh after considering the objection of the  appellant and in the light of the aforesaid judgment&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2.   Learned counsel for MCD Ms. Madhu Tewatia submitted that this judgment of  Naresh  Kumar  Vs. UOI,  relied upon  by  the  learned District Judge has been set aside in MCD &amp; Ors. Vs. Naresh Kumar &amp; Ors., . From the perusal of the judgment of MCD &amp; Ors. Vs.  Naresh Kumar &amp; Ors., (supra), in SLP arising out of the judgment and order of this High  Court  in CWP 937\/94, it is seen that in that case it has  been  held that  though clause (c) exempts &#8220;agricultural lands and buildings from  the levy imposed by Section 115(4). Clause (c), however, contains an  exception within  itself. The dwelling houses are excluded from the purview of  agricultural  lands  and buildings.&#8221; In paras 4, 6 and 7  land  appurtenant  to dwelling house was considered. In para 6 following observations were made:\n<\/p>\n<p>       &#8220;6.  The next question is &#8211; if a &#8220;dwelling house&#8221; is exigible  to levy  of  general tax, how much of the adjacent  land  should  be treated  as  an  integral part of the dwelling  house.  In  other words,  the  question is whether the entire land  surrounding  or abutting  a farm house is subject to general tax along  with  the dwelling house. The answer to this question is: a dwelling  house includes  within its ambit such appurtenant land as is  necessary for a proper and convenient enjoyment of the dwelling house.  The extent  of such appurtenant land is naturally a question of  fact to  be decided in each case. We have only stated the test. It  is for  the appropriate assessing authority to determine the  extent of land which can be called appurtenant land to a given  dwelling house.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.   The  order of remand is not at all affected by the above  observations any manner for no observation has been made indicating to  exclude  all land excepting the dwelling house.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.   Learned  counsel for the petitioner has further referred to  following observations of learned Additional District Judge:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;Moreover,  my attention has been drawn to case Naresh Kumar  Vs.<br \/>\n     UOI,  , wherein it has been held that it is  not permissible  for the Assessing Authority to take entire  agriculture  land for the purpose of levying property tax and only  such land  around  dwelling house which can be said to  be  reasonable required for the purpose of beneficial enjoyment of the  dwelling of  farm house can be subjected to tax. The Ld. Counsel  for  the respondent  has not been able to distinguish the aforesaid  judgment  rates of which squarely applies to the instant case  as  on perusal  of the impugned order, I find that market value  of  550 sq.  mtr.  has  been taken into consideration and  an  amount  of Rs.75,000\/-  has been added on account of unexploited portion  of the  plot added to the market value of land which is contrary  to the of the aforesaid judgment.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      On this basis, it is submitted that it would adversely affect MCD.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 5.   The  above  observation, especially the last four lines of  the  above order  are in tune with the observations of the Supreme Court. The  assessment  order itself does not indicate &#8220;whether this unexploited  portion  of the plot is land appurtenant to the dwelling house which can be said to  be reasonably required for the purpose of beneficial enjoyment of the dwelling of farm house&#8221;. The extent of &#8220;appurtenant land&#8221; is naturally a question of fact  to be decided in each case. When the learned Additional Judge  passed an  order to decide the matter in the light of the aforesaid  judgment,  he would have never intended to say that this judgment is to be followed  even if  it  is modified or reversed by the Supreme Court. The intention  is  to follow the ratio of the court of record and in case there is a judgment  of the apex court, then to follow the ratio of the apex Court. Consequently, a proper reading of the order would mean that ratio in Naresh Kumar Vs.  MCD&#8217; case  (supra), so long as it is not modified by the apex Court,  should  be followed  and  in  case it is modified or reversed then the  ratio  of  the judgment of apex Court has to be followed. It is a question of just  proper reading. This judgment cannot be read otherwise.\n<\/p>\n<p>      For the foregoing reasons, I do not find any force in the petition and with the above observations, the appeal is dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998 Equivalent citations: 1998 VAD Delhi 369, 74 (1998) DLT 808, 1998 (46) DRJ 767 Author: S Kapoor Bench: S Kapoor ORDER S.N. Kapoor, J. 1. This CM (M) has been filed against an order of remand in House Tax Appeal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-133629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1998-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-13T04:09:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998\",\"datePublished\":\"1998-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-13T04:09:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998\"},\"wordCount\":836,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998\",\"name\":\"Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1998-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-13T04:09:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1998-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-13T04:09:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998","datePublished":"1998-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-13T04:09:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998"},"wordCount":836,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998","name":"Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1998-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-13T04:09:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-corporation-of-delhi-vs-smt-sarita-bhushan-on-28-july-1998#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Smt. Sarita Bhushan on 28 July, 1998"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=133629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=133629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=133629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=133629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}