{"id":133724,"date":"2009-11-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-12T10:41:04","modified_gmt":"2016-04-12T05:11:04","slug":"kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>RSA No.4086 of 2006                                    -1-\n\n\n     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n                  AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                                 CM No.:9950-51-C of 2009 &amp;\n                                 RSA No.4086 of 2006\n                                 Decided on :28.11.2009\n\nKanwar Jatinder &amp; others                          ... Appellants\n\n                           versus\n\nSmt. Shanti Devi &amp; others                         ...Respondents\n\n\nCORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI\n\nPresent : Mr. Arun Jain, Sr. Advocate\n          with Mr. Jaivir S. Chandail, Advocate\n          for the appellants.\n\n           Mr. Ashok Bector, Advocate\n           for the respondent No.2.\n\n           Mr. M.K.Chouhan, Advocate\n           for respondents No.5 &amp; 6.\n\n           Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate\n           for respondents No.3, 4 &amp; 7 to 9.\n\n                               ****\n\n1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see\n  the judgment?\n2.To be referred to the reporters or not?\n3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?\n\n\nAJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)\n<\/pre>\n<p>           Reply filed to the application under order 41 rule 27<\/p>\n<p>CPC has been taken on record.\n<\/p>\n<p>           This appeal has been filed against the concurrent<\/p>\n<p>judgments of the courts below dismissing the suit of the<\/p>\n<p>appellants that they were entitled to inherit half the property left<\/p>\n<p>behind by Randhir Singh or in the alternative 1\/3rd share of the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> RSA No.4086 of 2006                                   -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>property left behind by Randhir Singh. The main case was based<\/p>\n<p>primarily on an alleged custom among the Rajput Chandel<\/p>\n<p>community of Ram Garh, as per which there was a custom of<\/p>\n<p>Chunda Bandh prevalent in the family. The respondents denied<\/p>\n<p>the plea of any custom and pleaded that the parties were<\/p>\n<p>governed by the Hindu Succession Act.          On behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>appellants reliance was placed on Ex. P-9 which was a letter dt.<\/p>\n<p>08.12.1954 from the Deputy Commissioner of Ambala on the<\/p>\n<p>subject of succession of Tika Jagjit Singh of Ram Garh. Learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel has relied upon a mention on the last page of this letter,<\/p>\n<p>as per which as far as ancestors of the present parties are<\/p>\n<p>concerned, the custom of Bhai Bandh and not of Chunda Bandh<\/p>\n<p>was mentioned.\n<\/p>\n<p>          As per learned counsel even if his case that the<\/p>\n<p>custom of Chunda Bandh was prevalent is not accepted yet this<\/p>\n<p>letter clearly shows that at last the custom of Bhai Bandh was<\/p>\n<p>prevalent in the family.     Learned counsel for the appellants<\/p>\n<p>further argued that the appellant had sought an amendment to<\/p>\n<p>the plaint but that had also been illegally rejected.       As per<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel the case would be covered by sub section (ii) of<\/p>\n<p>Section 5 of Hindu Succession Act, which is to the following<\/p>\n<p>effect:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>          &#8220;Act not to apply to certain properties:<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          (ii)   any estate which descends to a single heir by the<\/p>\n<p>          terms of any covenant or agreement entered into by<\/p>\n<p>          the Ruler of any Indian State with the Government of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> RSA No.4086 of 2006                                            -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            India or by the terms of any enactment passed before<\/p>\n<p>            the commencement of this Act;&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            Both the courts below have negatived this claim and<\/p>\n<p>as mentioned above had held that succession in the family has to<\/p>\n<p>be as per Hindu Succession Act since any alleged custom to the<\/p>\n<p>contrary was abrogated.        The following questions have been<\/p>\n<p>proposed:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            a)   Whether in the facts and circumstances of the<\/p>\n<p>            instant case, the approach of the ld. Lower Appellate<\/p>\n<p>            Court    in   dismissing    the        application       seeking<\/p>\n<p>            amendment of the plaint can be sustained in law when<\/p>\n<p>            the plea sought to be taken was based on the order dt.<\/p>\n<p>            26.11.1954, which is already on record as Ex.P-9?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            b)   Whether in the facts and circumstances of the<\/p>\n<p>            instant case the appellants, admittedly belonging to<\/p>\n<p>            Rajput   Chandel   community      of     Tehsil    Naraingarh,<\/p>\n<p>            predominanntly     an   agricultural      tribe,     they    are<\/p>\n<p>            governed by custom in the matter of succession?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            With regard to question No.(a) once it is held that<\/p>\n<p>custom was abrogated, this question does not arise. Apart from<\/p>\n<p>this it has to be noticed that the application for amendment was<\/p>\n<p>filed only before the ld. Lower Appellate Court and in my opinion<\/p>\n<p>in these circumstances the same is barred by delay also.<\/p>\n<p>            In my opinion reliance on sub section (ii) of Section 5<\/p>\n<p>is clearly misplaced. Letter Ex.P-9 in no manner can be deemed<\/p>\n<p>to be a covenant or agreement entered into by any Ruler of any<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> RSA No.4086 of 2006                                     -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Indian State with the Government of India. The best case of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant was that their ancestors were feudal landlords, even<\/p>\n<p>then they could in any case not be deemed to be Ruler of an<\/p>\n<p>Indian State.    In this view of the matter sub section (ii) of<\/p>\n<p>Section 5 has no application.\n<\/p>\n<p>           Consequently, this appeal is dismissed. No costs.<\/p>\n<p>           Since the main case has been decided, all the pending<\/p>\n<p>civil miscellaneous applications if any, stand disposed of.<\/p>\n<pre>November 28, 2009                           (AJAY TEWARI)\nsonia                                           JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009 RSA No.4086 of 2006 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.:9950-51-C of 2009 &amp; RSA No.4086 of 2006 Decided on :28.11.2009 Kanwar Jatinder &amp; others &#8230; Appellants versus Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-133724","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-12T05:11:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-12T05:11:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":664,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-12T05:11:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-12T05:11:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-12T05:11:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009"},"wordCount":664,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009","name":"Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-12T05:11:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanwar-jatinder-others-vs-smt-shanti-devi-others-on-28-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kanwar Jatinder &amp; Others vs Smt. Shanti Devi &amp; Others on 28 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133724","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=133724"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133724\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=133724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=133724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=133724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}