{"id":133773,"date":"1998-07-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1998-07-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998"},"modified":"2017-12-23T17:21:47","modified_gmt":"2017-12-23T11:51:47","slug":"bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998","title":{"rendered":"Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 1998 VAD Delhi 325, 74 (1998) DLT 583, 1998 (46) DRJ 776<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: J Goel<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: J Goel<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>J.B. Goel, J.<\/p>\n<p>1.      This  Criminal  Revision challenges the correctness  of  the  judgment dated 4th May, 1998 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge confirming the judgment of  conviction dated 15.3.1996 of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate  convicting him under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC, but reducing the sentence  of imprisonment from RI of one year to six months and maintaining the sentence of fine.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   The petitioner was charged under Section 279 and 304A IPC that he  was driving truck No. DEG-239 on 18.6.1989 at about 5.35 p.m. near A-26,  Rohit Kunj,  Saraswati Vihar, Delhi in a rash or negligent manner he  had  struck against a cyclist causing his death.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.   The  prosecution had inter alia examined two witnesses  PW-3  Khacheru and  PW-4 Shri Jai Prakash who had deposed as eye witnesses  who  supported the  prosecution  case. The learned Trial Court believed  them,  found  the petitioner  guilty  and convicted him. The finding of the trial  court  has been upheld in appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.   Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that it is not proved on  record that rash or negligent driving of the accused was the  proximate cause  of death of the deceased or the accident was caused due to  rash  or negligent  driving  of  the petitioner inasmuch as  the  deceased  was  not crushed  under the wheel of the truck, he had fallen on stones  lying  near the  road  and  obviously medical aid was not given to  him  in  time.  The learned  counsel for the State disputes this and supports the  judgment  of the  two courts, and according to him, there is no infirmity or  illegality in them.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   PW-4 Jai Prakash has deposed that deceased Subhash was driving a cycle on which he was a pillion rider at the time of the accident; that the truck in question which was coming at a high speed hit the cycle from behind as a result of which he (PW) and the deceased fell down on the road; Subhash had profusely  bleeded  from his nose and died at spot. PW-3 has  also  deposed that  at that time he was also coming home on a cycle which was  driven  by one Braham Dev and he was the pillion rider and in their front Jai  Prakash and Subhash were also going on another cycle. He has corroborated PW-4.  He has  also  stated that the deceased on falling on the  ground  had  bleeded profusely  and  had died at the spot. They have been believed  by  the  two courts  below. PW-9 Dr. L.T. Ramani had conducted the post-mortem vide  his report Ex. PW-9\/1. He has found multiple external and internal injuries and has opined that the injuries were ante-mortem caused by vehicular accident. Obviously the deceased had died an instant death and in the  circumstances, there  was no occasion to provide any medical aid to him. The death of  the deceased was thus accidental caused due to the fact that his cycle was  hit by the offending truck of the petitioner and he had died instant death.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.   The two courts below have believed PW3 &amp; PW4 that the offending  truck driven by the accused had hit the deceased cyclist while coming from behind<br \/>\nand  have given a finding that the accident was due to rash  and  negligent driving of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>     A  motorist while driving a vehicle is under a duty to  exercise  that vigilance  and  care so as to eliminate to the extent possible  danger  and peril to others who have a similar right to use a highway. The truck  after hitting  the cyclist had not stopped immediately but had stopped at a  distance  of 10 to 15 yards as deposed by the IO. It was not the case  of  the accused  that the cyclist was in any way negligent or careless  in  driving his cycle. Obviously, either he was unmindful of the safety of the  cyclist or  was otherwise driving the truck in a rash manner. The finding given  by the  two  courts  below about the rash and negligent driving  is  based  on material on record and is reasonable and justified. This court in  revision has  no power to review the evidence. In these circumstances it  cannot  be said  that rash and negligent act of the accused was not the direct  proximate  cause of the death of the accused-petitioner. There is no  illegality or impropriety in the judgments of the two courts below and do not call for any interference. This contention has no merit and is thus rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.   Learned counsel for the petitioner has then contended that the accused should have been given the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act which  may be  given even now or he should be let off with the sentence of over  three months already undergone by him as the petitioner has been facing trial for over 9 years. Reliance has been placed on some case law.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.   Every  case  has  to be seen on its own facts  and  circumstances.  It cannot  be  ignored that accidental deaths have increased  to  an  enormous limits.  Too much leniency will not be in the interest of the public.  Loss of  human life entails misery and hardship to his dependants. Unless  there is some sort of deterance the faith of the public in the administration  of criminal justice is likely to be shaken.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.   However,  in  the  present  case the occurrence  had  taken  place  on 18.6.1989.  The petitioner is in custody after his appeal was dismissed  on 4.5.1998  i.e. he has undergone imprisonment for over 3-1\/2 months  besides the fine of Rs. 5000\/-. It will meet the ends of justice if the sentence of imprisonment is reduced to the sentence already undergone by him and  maintaining the sentence of fine of Rs. 5000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.  This petition is accordingly partly allowed. The sentence of imprisonment is reduced to the period of sentence already undergone and maintaining the sentence of fine of Rs. 5000\/- imposed with the default clause and  the other  conditions about payment of compensation of Rs. 4000\/- to the  widow of the deceased. The jail authorities be informed accordingly forthwith.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.  This revision petition is partly allowed to this extent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998 Equivalent citations: 1998 VAD Delhi 325, 74 (1998) DLT 583, 1998 (46) DRJ 776 Author: J Goel Bench: J Goel JUDGMENT J.B. Goel, J. 1. This Criminal Revision challenges the correctness of the judgment dated 4th May, 1998 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge confirming [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-133773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1998-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-23T11:51:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998\",\"datePublished\":\"1998-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-23T11:51:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998\"},\"wordCount\":1029,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998\",\"name\":\"Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1998-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-23T11:51:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1998-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-23T11:51:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998","datePublished":"1998-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-23T11:51:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998"},"wordCount":1029,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998","name":"Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1998-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-23T11:51:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhagwan-dass-vs-state-on-22-july-1998#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bhagwan Dass vs State on 22 July, 1998"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=133773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=133773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=133773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=133773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}