{"id":13382,"date":"2009-11-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-08-14T06:57:00","modified_gmt":"2017-08-14T01:27:00","slug":"debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 20\"' DAY OF NOVEMBER\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE.,.$UBI:'iAS'Ii'E.*. _ O'  'V\n\nM.F.A. No. 7223 of;\"'30'?)5A~-\u00a7C'I3CV1\"'    A\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1 DEBASHISH SEAMAL\u00a7\u00ab\" ' I' A \nSON OF U B SYA1~A'A.L,--. A{3E{)N{AJQR\nRESIDENT AT NO 148, 'f4'I\"H  \nDEFENCE coL0N\":',.LI\u00a7!Ai,.':2.,ND STAGE\nBANG\u00a3d;C}R':\"C--560 008 'A \"  \nREP. -BY  DULY .C0--NSf7I*I'1\"UTED\nGPA H(;L_DER A.  No.2.\n\n2 [MRS EBQ_NN}'{E QHQSH SYAMAL\n*W1EE OF.DEB_ASIjIiSH SYAMAL\nAGED MAJOR   \nRES:I&gt;INT*A'1'A.NQ\"1;4S, 4TH MAIN\n\n_ _ DEE\"EN_cE,c0LoNY, HAL 2ND STAGE\n EANGALoRE--5+30 O08\n\n. '-:3 _MIS.S\"HASHI GHOSH\n  A. v'D_A'i}C:HT\"ER OF S.C.GHOSH\n\n\u00ab 'AG~E:;.MAJOR\nRESIDENT AT NO 148, 4TH MAIN\nDEFENCE COLONY, HAL 2ND STAGE\n\n'~ _EANGALORE--560 008\nREP. BY THE: DULY CONSTITUTED\nGPA HOLDER - APPELLANT No.2.\n\n APPELLANTS\n\nO    {BY SR1. AJESH KUMAR, ADV. FOR\n\nM\/S. AKS LAW ASSOCEATES, ADVS.)\n\n\n\n1 RVENKATESH\nS\/O LATE N.R. RAJU\nAGED MAJOR \nRESIDING AT ARUNODHAYA ESTATE  \" . \nKUDREGUDI POST, KOPPA TALUK, ~  .. ._  \nCHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT-\"\"'   .. \n\n2 SUMATHI KUMAR\nWIFE OF T G KUMAR: \nAGED MAJOR   I\nRESIDING AT # 407, 6TH.._IVLA_IN *\nIST CROSS,  II STAGE\"-. \"\nBANGALORE-5650008    \n  \" RESPONDENTS\n\n{BY M \/8.: CARIAPPA;_'AN'D:VCQ'.';~tADV'. FOR R1,\nR2-- SI5:R\"gIICE 'OF NOTICE DISRENSED WITH I\n\n '43 R1 (c) OF CPC AGAINST\n\nTHE ORDER 'iDT_ '~._1'8.1II_.2'004 PASSED IN MIS.\nNO.1514.7'\/1999'-_VON  'FILE OF THE IV ADDLCITY\nCIVIL  JUDGE;':_'~._MAYQ1--~IALL UNIT, BANGALORE,\nDISMISSING THE \"PETITION FILED BY THE APPELLANTS\nHEREIN U70'  9 OF CPC FOR SETTING ASIDE THE\nORDERS DT.\" ~1._7,7.1999 DESMISSING OS NO.10430\/1996\n\n \"  _ ON 'THE FILE OFTHE CITY CIVIL COURT, BANGALORE.\n\nA \" V T_  A.  COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,\n' THE COU.R'1'~ DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING\u00bb\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p> ..   is plaintiffs&#8217; appeal against the Order dated<\/p>\n<p>M &#8216;._ 1&#8217;8;1A1.2OO4 in MISC. NO. 15147 Of 1999 passed by the IV<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217; &#8221; &#8220;Additional City Civii Judge, Mayo Hal} Unit, Bangalore.<\/p>\n<p>r%r\u00abI~f,;\/;&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>2] The said. Miscellaneous under Order IX Rule<\/p>\n<p>9 of CPC was filed against the respondents forVr&#8217;.setting<\/p>\n<p>aside the order of dismissal of suit <\/p>\n<p>in o.s. No.10-430\/1996 on they file <\/p>\n<p>Court, Bangalore.\n<\/p>\n<p>3) The suit in o.sj No. 1021936; l9&amp;16&#8217;wfasV filledlforlil&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>mandatory injunction direyc_ti:ng_ the  Nos. 1<br \/>\nand 2 to execute   favour of the<br \/>\nplaintiffs in respect of and to<br \/>\nsign and.   for obtaining<\/p>\n<p>Incoirie  Section 269 of the Income<br \/>\nTax  vsu&#8217;brfii&#8217;t \u00bb  same before the appropriate<\/p>\n<p>authority in No.37 and also for permanent<\/p>\n<p>.9 i&#8217;n_ii1n._ction:&#8217;restraining Defendants I &amp; 2 or anybody<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;-cla.iming&#8221;_&#8221;through, under or in trust for them, in any<\/p>\n<p>maiiner,  alienating the suit schedule property,<\/p>\n<p>2 hand&#8217; also not to change the nature or character of the<\/p>\n<p>said property in any manner.\n<\/p>\n<p>4} The Order Sheet of the Trial Court reveals<\/p>\n<p>that, on 17.07.1999, when the case was taken up for<\/p>\n<p>If<br \/>\nin<\/p>\n<p>consideration, the plaintiffs&#8217; advocate was not ready for<br \/>\nadducing evidence exparte and he was not interested in<\/p>\n<p>presenting the case finally. Even, neither the Vplraiiztiffs<\/p>\n<p>nor their counsel appeared before&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>23.06.1999, 13.97.1999 and _i7.07.,~1v999j.\u00ab1v.Hbw\u00a2v\u00a7;i,iVV,dl&#8221;r&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>they adduced their evidence  way,.:&#8217;of&#8217;.anf <\/p>\n<p>examination-in-chief. F&#8217;urthe;f, it is. manii&#8217;est..ifrqrnsorderf<\/p>\n<p>sheet of the Trial Court thy_&amp;1_t,;V:&#8217;eyeVn in hdspidte  the trial<br \/>\nCourt giving sufficiendt&#8211;.oppiotftuniity&#8221; to the plaintiff,<br \/>\nneither the pl_a\u00a7intiffs'&#8221;noz&#8217;:,thceir:&#8217;vscou,11s:el&#8217;itappeared before<br \/>\nthe  thatfground alone the Trial<br \/>\nJudged&#8217; -dismissed.&#8217;  V for non&#8211;prosecution.<\/p>\n<p>5]  .ag.ai:n_st&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;lVthe dismissal of the suit,<\/p>\n<p> Miscellaneous'&#8221;No;'&#8221;Vl5l47\/1999 was filed for setting<\/p>\n<p>    of dismissal of the suit. The only ground<\/p>\n<p>urged  the Miscellaneous Court was that, the<\/p>\n<p> Amattderfdiwas under negotiation for settlement, as such,<\/p>\n<p> -,,V&#8217;ei.th=er the plaintiffs or their counsel did not appear<\/p>\n<p>d  V. .. ..&#8217;t)efore the Court. The said fact is not proved even in the<\/p>\n<p>evidence led in the Miscellaneous case and the plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p>did not speak about the settiement, in turn, he alleged<\/p>\n<p>that there were some talks about the settlementtudfppthe<\/p>\n<p>dispute, as such, the plaintiffs did not <\/p>\n<p>Court to make submissions. This expla1;\u00bbatii0n&#8221;&#8216;wa.s<\/p>\n<p>accepted by the Misceilaneotis  <\/p>\n<p>I201: if   <\/p>\n<p>opinion, that the Court bellow has<\/p>\n<p>the said explanation of thellplairitiffs aiidhcontsequently<\/p>\n<p>rejected the Misce11ar1eiJus&#8217;&#8211;Case. if <\/p>\n<p>6) EVenp:y1the:=case&#8211;:bf &#8216;the&#8217;-iplaintiffs in the suit is,<\/p>\n<p>they were  defendants and they paid<\/p>\n<p>substantialxf;&#8221;&#8211;&#8216;am:6un&#8217;t..\ufb01&#8221;ti)&#8211; the defendants on the<br \/>\nunderstariding&#8221; that\u00bb  Jdefendants will execute an<\/p>\n<p>agreement (5f\u00ab.sa1e, and having failed to execute an<\/p>\n<p>.A :agreen1eii&#8211;i&#8217;::O~f sale, they filed the suit.<\/p>\n<p>7}  there is any document on record<\/p>\n<p> xevidencing any agreement of sale nor any material\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;,,fevid&#8217;encing the alleged oral agreement. The plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p> V. _..c1airn that they were tenants under the defendants and<\/p>\n<p>that they made some payment. Admittedly. there is no<\/p>\n<p>agreement nor this suit is for specific performance of<\/p>\n<p>Fa&#8217;)! ,<\/p>\n<p>,r I<\/p>\n<p>the alleged agreement. However, even to restore the suit,<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiffs have not made out any case.<\/p>\n<p>8) From the order sheet it is Clearthat.  <\/p>\n<p>Court granted sufficient oppojrtiinity -to ipwlaintiffs <\/p>\n<p>and despite giving several <\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs nor their counsel appeared befor:\u00e9i_:theV&#8221;Cou&#8217;rt.<br \/>\n9] Hence. there is&#8221;l&#8221;\ufb01o Vs.:;mg&#8217;Vpreciahle&#8221; ground for<br \/>\nsetting aside the  order 18.11.2004<\/p>\n<p>passed in  1999 passed by<\/p>\n<p>the    Mayo Hall Unit,<\/p>\n<p>Bangalore.\n<\/p>\n<p> 1110]  of the above, 1 \ufb01nd no good ground<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  .oir1t.erfe1\u00bb\u00a2f the impugned order. Accordingly, the<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-9<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n<p>KGR*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009 Author: Subhash B.Adi IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 20&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF NOVEMBER BEFORE THE I-ION&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE.,.$UBI:&#8217;iAS&#8217;Ii&#8217;E.*. _ O&#8217; &#8216;V M.F.A. No. 7223 of;&#8221;&#8217;30&#8217;?)5A~-\u00a7C&#8217;I3CV1&#8243;&#8216; A BETWEEN: 1 DEBASHISH SEAMAL\u00a7\u00ab&#8221; &#8216; I&#8217; A SON OF U B SYA1~A&#8217;A.L,&#8211;. A{3E{)N{AJQR [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-14T01:27:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-14T01:27:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":634,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-14T01:27:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-14T01:27:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-14T01:27:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009"},"wordCount":634,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009","name":"Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-14T01:27:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/debashish-syamal-vs-r-venkatesh-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Debashish Syamal vs R Venkatesh on 20 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13382"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13382\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}