{"id":133849,"date":"2009-02-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009"},"modified":"2018-09-15T19:07:16","modified_gmt":"2018-09-15T13:37:16","slug":"parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009<\/div>\n
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 230 OF 2002                             -1-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\nCHANDIGARH.\n\n\n\n\n            DATE OF DECISION:        February 16, 2009.\n\n\n                  Parties Name\nRamesh Kumar\n                                     ..PETITIONER\n            VERSUS\nState of Haryana\n\n                                     ...RESPONDENT\n\nCORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH\n\n\n\nPRESENT: Mr. Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate,\n         for Mr. Harkesh Manuja,\n         Advocate, for the petitioner.\n\n            Mr. S.S.Randhawa, Addl. A.G., Haryana\n\nJASBIR SINGH, J. (oral)\n\n\nJUDGMENT:\n<\/pre>\n
            It is allegation against the petitioner that on July 3, 1993, by<\/p>\n
driving a truck \/ Dumper No. DEG 1073 in a rash and negligent manner, he<\/p>\n
hit the car bearing No. DDD 9278. Five occupants of the car were injured.<\/p>\n
One of them Ajit Singh died in Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi,<\/p>\n
on July 15, 2003. Vide judgment and order dated February 8, 2000, and<\/p>\n
February 9, 2000, respectively passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class,<\/p>\n
Sonepat, petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous<\/p>\n
imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 200\/- for an<\/p>\n
offence under Section 304 -A IPC with a default clause. He was also<\/p>\n
awarded minor punishments for offences under Sections 279 and 337 IPC.
\n CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 230 OF 2002                              -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
He went in appeal, which was dismissed on December 3, 2001. Hence this<\/p>\n
revision petition.\n<\/p>\n
             The prosecution story, as noticed by the trial Judge, is that “on<\/p>\n
July 3, 1993, ASI Sube Singh was on patrolling duty along with Head<\/p>\n
Constable Ram Phal and Constable Pale Ram at G.T. Road, near Ganaur<\/p>\n
Chowk. He received an information that a car has met with an accident with<\/p>\n
a truck near village Ladsoli and the injured has been taken to the Civil<\/p>\n
Hospital, Sonepat. On reaching to the hospital, he made an application to<\/p>\n
the doctor for permission to record the statement but he was told that the<\/p>\n
injured has been referred to the hospital at Delhi. Thereafter on 4.7.1993, he<\/p>\n
went to the Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital at Delhi and the Doctor reported<\/p>\n
that the injured Lal Singh is in a position to make the statement. In his<\/p>\n
statement, Lal Singh son of Sardar Bhagat Singh disclosed that he is<\/p>\n
running a motor spare parts shop in Delhi. On 3.7.1993, he along with his<\/p>\n
wife Mahender Kaur, son Kuljit Singh, daughter-in-law Surinder Kaur and<\/p>\n
two grand children Naini @ Gangan Deep and Nancy along with his<\/p>\n
brother-in-law Ajit Singh started for Shahbad Markanda to attend a<\/p>\n
religious function of Baba Dalel Singh in his car No. DDD 9278. He was<\/p>\n
driving the vehicle and after attending the religious function at Shabad, they<\/p>\n
started for Delhi at about 5.00 p.m. When they reached near village Ladsoli<\/p>\n
in their car at about 8.15 p.m., a Dumper having registration No. DEG 1073<\/p>\n
suddenly stopped and the driver turned it reversed without any indication,<\/p>\n
signal or horn. The Dumper \/ truck struck with his car and the car got<\/p>\n
damaged. All the passengers sustained injuries. His wife sustained injuries<\/p>\n
on chest, Ajit Singh on both hands and legs as well as on the face, Surinder<\/p>\n
Kaur on the head and eyes, Kuljit Singh on the head and chest. He sustained
\n CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 230 OF 2002                                -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
injuries on his hands and chest. His grand children Nancy and Gagan Deep<\/p>\n
also sustained injuries. The driver disclosed his name as Ramesh son of Dei<\/p>\n
Ram, resident of Ladsoli.”\n<\/p>\n
             After the above said accident, injured were taken to Civil<\/p>\n
Hospital at Sonepat. Taking note of their serious condition, they were<\/p>\n
referred to a Hospital in New Delhi. On statement made by Lal Singh<\/p>\n
(PW1), formal FIR No. 246 was registered against the petitioner on July 4,<\/p>\n
1993. On completion of investigation, final report was put in Court for trial.<\/p>\n
Petitioner was charge-sheeted to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed<\/p>\n
trial. Prosecution produced eleven witnesses and also brought on record<\/p>\n
documentary evidence to prove its case. On conclusion of prosecution<\/p>\n
evidence, statement of the petitioner was recorded under Section 313<\/p>\n
Cr.P.C., in which he refuted allegations levelled against him, pleaded<\/p>\n
innocence and false implication. However, despite availing             number of<\/p>\n
opportunities, he failed to lead any evidence in defence. The trial Court, on<\/p>\n
appraisal of evidence and hearing counsel for the parties, convicted and<\/p>\n
sentenced the petitioner as mentioned in earlier part of this order.<\/p>\n
             Shri Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner made an<\/p>\n
attempt to assail the impugned judgment on merits by making reference to<\/p>\n
minor discrepancies here and there in the statements made by the<\/p>\n
prosecution witnesses. This Court feels that discrepancies, indicated by him,<\/p>\n
were not material and fatal to the case of the prosecution. It is apparent from<\/p>\n
the record that a vivid account of the occurrence has been given by the eye<\/p>\n
witnesses. In the accident, which was result of rash and negligent driving by<\/p>\n
the petitioner, five occupants of the car were injured, one of whom, namely,<\/p>\n
Ajit Singh died thereafter. Lengthy cross-examination of the prosecution
\n CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 230 OF 2002                                -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
witnesses has failed to shatter their testimony. Recording of FIR was very<\/p>\n
prompt in this case.\n<\/p>\n
             Faced with the above situation, Shri Harish Bhardwaj,<\/p>\n
Advocate, stated that in view of lapse of time, lenient view be taken in the<\/p>\n
case of the petitioner. Accident had occurred in the year 1993. Petitioner has<\/p>\n
already undergone about three months of actual sentence. He further stated<\/p>\n
that the petitioner is a poor man, he was working as a Driver on the<\/p>\n
offending vehicle. He is the only bread winner of his family. If at this stage,<\/p>\n
he is sent behind the Bars, his entire family would suffer. He also brought to<\/p>\n
the notice of this Court that after the accident in question, the petitioner has<\/p>\n
not committed any such like other offence. He further assured this Court<\/p>\n
that as in the past, in future also the petitioner would drive the vehicle in a<\/p>\n
very careful and cautious manner. By stating as above, prayer has been<\/p>\n
made to grant benefit of probation to the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
             Prayer made by counsel for the petitioner has been vehemently<\/p>\n
opposed by the State counsel. He stated that the rash and negligent driving<\/p>\n
has virtually become a habit of the truck Drivers and if leniency is shown to<\/p>\n
the petitioner, it will encourage others to commit similar offences. He<\/p>\n
further stated that the punishment awarded to the petitioner is in proportion<\/p>\n
to the offence committed by him. He prayed that the revision petition be<\/p>\n
dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
      After hearing counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that<\/p>\n
the purpose of Criminal Law justice is not only to bring peace , discipline<\/p>\n
and harmony in the Society but is also to give an opportunity to an erring<\/p>\n
individual to reform himself. Keeping in view facts and circumstances of<\/p>\n
the case, especially a fact that the accident had taken place in the year 1993,
\n CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 230 OF 2002                                 -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
the petitioner has suffered agony of trial, appeal and this revision petition, is<\/p>\n
also pending since the year 2002, this Court is of the opinion that he<\/p>\n
deserves lenient treatment. He has grown up family members and if sent in<\/p>\n
jail at this stage, it is likely to prove counter productive. He is a first<\/p>\n
offender.\n<\/p>\n
             Their Lordships of the Supreme Court in Karamjit Singh v.<\/p>\n
State (Delhi Admn.)<\/a> , 2001(9) Supreme Court 161, in paragraph No. 7,<\/p>\n
observed as under:-\n<\/p>\n
             “Punishment in criminal cases is both punitive and reformative.<\/p>\n
             The purpose is that the person found guilty of committing the<\/p>\n
             offence is made to realise his fault and is deterred from<\/p>\n
             repeating such acts in future. The reformative aspect is meant to<\/p>\n
             enable the person concerned to relent and repeat for his action<\/p>\n
             and make himself acceptable to the society as a useful social<\/p>\n
             being. In determining the question of proper punishment in a<\/p>\n
             criminal case, the court has to weigh the degree of culpability<\/p>\n
             of the accused. Its effect on others and the desirability of<\/p>\n
             showing any leniency in the matter of punishment in the case.<\/p>\n
             An act of balancing is, what is needed in such case: a balance<\/p>\n
             between the interest of the individual and the concern of the<\/p>\n
             society: weighing the one against the other. Imposing a hard<\/p>\n
             punishment on the accused serves a limited purpose but at the<\/p>\n
             same time, it is to be kept in mind that relevance of deterrent<\/p>\n
             punishment in matters of serious crimes affecting society<\/p>\n
             should not be undermined. Within the parameters of the law, an<\/p>\n
             attempt has to be made to afford an opportunity to the
\n CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 230 OF 2002                              -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
            individual to reform himself and lead the life of a normal,<\/p>\n
            useful member of society and make his contribution in that<\/p>\n
            regard. Denying such opportunity to a person who has been<\/p>\n
            found to have committed offence in the facts and circumstances<\/p>\n
            placed on record would only have a hardening attitude towards<\/p>\n
            his fellow beings and towards society at large. Such a situation<\/p>\n
            has to be avoided, again within the permissible limits of law.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon two judgments of the<\/p>\n
Supreme Court in Sukhdev Singh v. State of Punjab,<\/a> 1982 CAR 280(SC)<\/p>\n
and Aitha Chander Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1982 C.A.R. 5 (SC),<\/p>\n
and also upon a Single Bench judgment of this Court in Criminal Revision<\/p>\n
No. 21 of 2002 ( Gurdial Singh v. State of Punjab), rendered on February<\/p>\n
10, 2009, to contend that petitioner be given a chance to reform by releasing<\/p>\n
him on probation.\n<\/p>\n
            Keeping in view facts and circumstances of this case and ratio<\/p>\n
of the aforesaid judgments, conviction is upheld. However, sentence of<\/p>\n
imprisonment of the petitioner is set aside and he is ordered to be released<\/p>\n
on probation under Section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958,<\/p>\n
for a period of six months. Keeping in view ratio of the judgment in Gurdial<\/p>\n
Singh’s case (supra) and to settle equity between the parties, fine imposed is<\/p>\n
enhanced to Rs. 50,000\/-. The petitioner is directed to deposit the amount of<\/p>\n
fine with the trial Court within three months from today and on deposit so<\/p>\n
being made, trial Court will issue notice to the legal heirs of deceased Ajit<\/p>\n
Singh and disburse that amount to them forthwith. In case amount is not<\/p>\n
deposited, this revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed.
\n CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 230 OF 2002                               -7-<\/span><\/p>\n
The petitioner shall execute bail bond and undertaking before the trial Court<\/p>\n
that he would act like a disciplined citizen and will not indulge in any crime<\/p>\n
of the like nature during the period of six months. Requisite bail bonds and<\/p>\n
undertaking be furnished within three months. With above said<\/p>\n
modification, this revision petition stands disposed of.<\/p>\n
February 16, 2009                                          ( Jasbir Singh )\nDKC                                                             Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009 CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 230 OF 2002 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: February 16, 2009. Parties Name Ramesh Kumar ..PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana …RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Harish […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-133849","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nParties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-15T13:37:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-15T13:37:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1701,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-15T13:37:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-15T13:37:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-15T13:37:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009"},"wordCount":1701,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009","name":"Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-15T13:37:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parties-name-vs-state-of-haryana-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parties Name vs State Of Haryana on 16 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133849","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=133849"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133849\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=133849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=133849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=133849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}