{"id":13416,"date":"2008-06-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008"},"modified":"2015-12-17T10:39:41","modified_gmt":"2015-12-17T05:09:41","slug":"ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nOT.Appeal.No. 1 of 2006()\n\n\n1. M\/S.THOMSON PAPER PRODUCTS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN\n\n Dated :11\/06\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                                                                C.R.\n        C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &amp; V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.\n                       -------------------------\n                       O.T.A. No.1 of 2006,\n            WP(C) Nos.36213 of 2007 &amp; 415 of 2008\n                   ---------------------------------\n              Dated, this the 11th day of June, 2008\n\n                           J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>Ramachandran Nair, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The only issue arising in all the three cases filed by the same<\/p>\n<p>assessee pertains to the tax liability on assessee&#8217;s product, &#8216;white<\/p>\n<p>oats&#8217;, under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. On application<\/p>\n<p>filed under Section 94 of the Act, the Commissioner of Commercial<\/p>\n<p>Taxes, vide Annexure-A order produced in O.T.A.No.1\/2006,<\/p>\n<p>clarified that &#8216;white oats&#8217; falls under the residual entry taxable at<\/p>\n<p>12.5%. While petitioner is challenging the clarification in the O.T.A,<\/p>\n<p>in the connected two cases, challenge is against assessments at the<\/p>\n<p>higher rate of tax at 12.5%.\n<\/p>\n<p>       2.   We have heard learned counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>assessee and learned Government Pleader appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p>       3.   The first question to be considered is whether &#8216;white<\/p>\n<p>oats&#8217; sold by the assessee under the name &#8220;Shantis&#8221; is exempted<\/p>\n<p>from tax under Original Entry 9 renumbered as 12 of the 1st<\/p>\n<p>schedule to the Act and if not, the appropriate rate applicable to the<\/p>\n<p>O.T.A.No.1\/06, WP(C) Nos.36213\/07 &amp; 415\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>product under the other schedules to the Act.            Learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>appearing for the assesee has referred to the word used &#8216;Oats&#8217; in<\/p>\n<p>Entry 12(3) of the 1st schedule (previously item 9(3) of the same<\/p>\n<p>schedule) and contended that &#8216;Oats&#8217; in all forms are exempted from<\/p>\n<p>tax. In order to appreciate the contention, we have to refer to the<\/p>\n<p>relevant entry, which is extracted hereunder.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;12. Coarse grains other than rice and wheat<\/p>\n<p>            (1)   Rye<\/p>\n<p>            (2)   Barley<\/p>\n<p>            (3)   Oats<\/p>\n<p>            (4)   Maize (Corn)<\/p>\n<p>            (5)   Grain Sorghum<\/p>\n<p>            (6)   Buckwheat<\/p>\n<p>            (7)   Millet including Jawar, Bajra, Ragi.<\/p>\n<p>            (8)   Canary seed<\/p>\n<p>            (9)   Paddy and Paddy Chaff<\/p>\n<p>            (10) Other cereals&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The question to be considered is whether &#8216;white oats&#8217; marketed by<\/p>\n<p>the assessee under the name &#8220;Shantis&#8221; can be treated as &#8216;Oats&#8217; as<\/p>\n<p>referred in the above entry. We have seen the product produced in<\/p>\n<p>the Court, which is prepared oats flakes sold in a sealed container<\/p>\n<p>made of plastic or poly carbonate. It is noticed from the product<\/p>\n<p>description that no additives are used by the assessee in the<\/p>\n<p>preparation and the product is 100% oats.             It is stated in the<\/p>\n<p>O.T.A.No.1\/06, WP(C) Nos.36213\/07 &amp; 415\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>attached label that the item can be consumed after cooking in milk<\/p>\n<p>or water for 5 minutes. It is obvious from the nature of the product<\/p>\n<p>and the product description that it is not &#8216;Oats&#8217; grain pure and<\/p>\n<p>simple, but is a preparation made of it.        It may probably be<\/p>\n<p>comparable to rice flakes made from rice or corn flakes made from<\/p>\n<p>corn. Entry heading of Item 12 of 1st schedule makes it clear that<\/p>\n<p>the items intended to be covered under the group heading are<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;coarse grains&#8217;. The assessee&#8217;s product is not &#8216;coarse grain&#8217; but a<\/p>\n<p>refined product made out of coarse grain &#8216;oats&#8217;. Moreover, items 1<\/p>\n<p>to 9 arrayed under Entry 12 of 1st schedule are not any product of<\/p>\n<p>the grain named therein, but are grains of various types in the pure<\/p>\n<p>and simple form. We, therefore, reject assessee&#8217;s claim that the<\/p>\n<p>product is exempted from tax under item 12(3) of the 1st schedule<\/p>\n<p>to the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.    The next question to be considered is whether the item<\/p>\n<p>falls under any entry of any of the other schedules to the Act to<\/p>\n<p>justify the clarification and assessment under the residual entry at<\/p>\n<p>12.5%.     Learned counsel for the assessee has referred to items<\/p>\n<p>contained in Entries 48 &amp; 49 of the 3rd schedule to the Act, which<\/p>\n<p>provide for levy of tax on various forms of grains and food products.<\/p>\n<p>For easy reference, we extract hereunder Entries 48 &amp; 49 of the 3rd<\/p>\n<p>O.T.A.No.1\/06, WP(C) Nos.36213\/07 &amp; 415\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>schedule to the Act.\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;48. Flour, Atta, Maida, Suji, Besan and dough<\/p>\n<p>             (1)  Wheat or meslin flour<\/p>\n<p>             (2)  Rye flour<\/p>\n<p>             (3)  Maize (corn) flour<\/p>\n<p>             (4)  Rice flour (puttu podi and the like)<\/p>\n<p>             (5)  Other cereal flour<\/p>\n<p>             (6)  Flour, meal and powder of the dried leguminous<\/p>\n<p>                  vegetables<\/p>\n<p>             (7)  Wet mix.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      49.   Food products like pickles, corn flakes, savouries, sweets<\/p>\n<p>      made of groundnuts, gingelly, other than those sold under brand<\/p>\n<p>      name registered under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (1)   Pickles<\/p>\n<p>            (2)   Savories like chips, popcorn, murukku, achappam,<\/p>\n<p>                  pakoda, mixture, chikky items, kuzhalappam and<\/p>\n<p>                  similar preparations.<\/p>\n<p>            (3)   Corn flakes<\/p>\n<p>            (4)   Sweets made of groundnuts or gingily.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Obviously &#8216;oats&#8217; is not an item covered by Entry 48. However, it is<\/p>\n<p>a food product like corn flakes, which is covered by Entry 49. Even<\/p>\n<p>though learned Government Pleader pointed out that only four<\/p>\n<p>items are covered by Entry 49, which does not prescribe &#8216;oats&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>specifically, we find item (2) of Entry 49 refers to similar<\/p>\n<p>preparations. Since Entry 49 provides for food products, we are of<\/p>\n<p>the view that food products other than those mentioned elsewhere<\/p>\n<p>O.T.A.No.1\/06, WP(C) Nos.36213\/07 &amp; 415\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>will come under &#8216;similar preparations&#8217; referred to in Entry 49(2) of<\/p>\n<p>the 3rd schedule. We, therefore, hold that &#8216;white oats&#8217; other than<\/p>\n<p>those sold under brand name registered under the Trade Marks Act<\/p>\n<p>1999, will be taxable at 4% under Entry 49(2) of the 3rd schedule to<\/p>\n<p>the KVAT Act. It is for the Assessing Officer to examine whether<\/p>\n<p>the appellant has obtained a trade mark registration for the product<\/p>\n<p>and if not to assess the product at 4%.           In view of the above<\/p>\n<p>findings, we allow O.T.A.No.1\/2006 in part by holding that &#8216;white<\/p>\n<p>oats&#8217; is taxable under Entry 49(2) of the 3rd schedule @ 4%, if the<\/p>\n<p>assessee does not have a registered brand name under the Trade<\/p>\n<p>Marks Act, 1999. In view of the above, we direct the Assessing<\/p>\n<p>Officer to revise the assessments made up to date at 4% but forfeit<\/p>\n<p>excess collection of tax after date of clarification.<\/p>\n<p>      The O.T.A and the writ petitions are allowed to the extent<\/p>\n<p>indicated above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                         (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)<\/p>\n<p>                               (V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE)<br \/>\njg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM OT.Appeal.No. 1 of 2006() 1. M\/S.THOMSON PAPER PRODUCTS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, &#8230; Respondent 2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, For Petitioner :SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-17T05:09:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-17T05:09:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":955,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-17T05:09:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-17T05:09:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-17T05:09:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008"},"wordCount":955,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008","name":"M\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-17T05:09:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-thomson-paper-products-vs-the-commissioner-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S.Thomson Paper Products vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13416\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}