{"id":134165,"date":"2009-03-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-04T06:30:57","modified_gmt":"2017-03-04T01:00:57","slug":"sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 350 of 2006()\n\n\n1. SREEKALA, W\/O.LATE P.R.PRADEEP RAJ\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. JEEVAN RAJ, MINOR, S\/O.LATE\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE SECRETARY,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. JAYACHANDRAN, S\/O.KARUNAKARAN NAIR,\n\n3. RAJARATNAM, PANDARIKKAL HOUSE,\n\n4. RADHA, W\/O.RAJARATNAM, PANDARIKKAL\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR\n\n Dated :05\/03\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                 R. BASANT &amp; C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n              ---------------------------------------------------------\n                         M.A.C.A. NO.350 OF 2006\n              ---------------------------------------------------------\n                   Dated this the 5th day of March, 2009\n\n                                  JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Basant, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The claimants before the Tribunal are the appellants before us. They<\/p>\n<p>claimed compensation for the loss suffered by them consequent to the<\/p>\n<p>death of the deceased who was the husband of the first appellant and father<\/p>\n<p>of the second appellant. The parents of the deceased filed a separate claim<\/p>\n<p>petition. Both the petitions were disposed of earlier by the Tribunal and<\/p>\n<p>the   respondents filed two appeals against the common award.              The<\/p>\n<p>appellants herein also filed an appeal challenging the quantum of<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. Another Division Bench of this Court, as per judgment dated<\/p>\n<p>6.1.2003 in M.F.A. Nos. 500 of 1994, 501 of 1994 and 1081 of 1999,<\/p>\n<p>considered the question in detail and dismissed the appeal filed by the<\/p>\n<p>appellants herein, but allowed the appeals filed by the respondents. We<\/p>\n<p>extract the operative portion of the said common judgment below:<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.A.C.A. NO.350\/2006                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                    &#8220;8. As already mentioned above, the<br \/>\n             appropriate multiplier shall be 20. Accordingly,<br \/>\n             the compensation payable to the claimants has to<br \/>\n             be recalculated applying the multiplier of 20<br \/>\n             instead of 26 adopted by the Tribunal.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                    9. Therefore, M.F.A.Nos.500 and 501 of<br \/>\n             1994 are allowed in part and M.F.A. No.1081 of<br \/>\n             1999 is dismissed. In all other respects        the<br \/>\n             award is confirmed.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      3. The matter went back to the Tribunal. The Tribunal followed the<\/p>\n<p>directions of the Division Bench and recalculated the compensation<\/p>\n<p>payable, accepting all the other details which were accepted in the earlier<\/p>\n<p>judgment, but reckoning the multiplier as 20 instead of 26. Accordingly,<\/p>\n<p>the impugned order was passed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. The appellants claim to be aggrieved by the impugned award.<\/p>\n<p>What is their grievance? The short contention raised by the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the appellants is that the multiplicand reckoned by the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>is totally incorrect. The Tribunal had not taken into account the future<\/p>\n<p>prospects of the deceased, contends counsel.<\/p>\n<p>      5. We are afraid, it is too late in the day for the appellants to<\/p>\n<p>advance such a contention. In the light of the earlier judgment of the<\/p>\n<p>Division Bench in M.F.A. No.500 of 1994 and connected matters, it<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.A.C.A. NO.350\/2006                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>cannot be disputed that it was not an open remand, but a closed remand<\/p>\n<p>and the only direction to the Tribunal after such remand was to rework the<\/p>\n<p>compensation adopting 20 instead of 26 as the multiplier. The appeal<\/p>\n<p>preferred by the appellants was specifically dismissed and the award<\/p>\n<p>impugned in those appeals was upheld &#8220;in all other respects&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>      6. In the light of the very clear finding\/direction in the earlier order<\/p>\n<p>of remand, the appellants cannot be heard to advance any grievance<\/p>\n<p>against findings\/conclusions confirmed by the earlier judgment of the<\/p>\n<p>Division Bench. It follows that the appeal deserves and can only be<\/p>\n<p>dismissed . We do so. No costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         (R. BASANT)<br \/>\n                                              JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                     (C.T. RAVIKUMAR)<br \/>\n                                             JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sp\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.A.C.A. NO.350\/2006    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                           R. BASANT &amp;<br \/>\n                           C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n<\/p>\n<p>                           M.A.C.A. NO.350\/2006<\/p>\n<p>                           JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>                           5th March, 2009<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 350 of 2006() 1. SREEKALA, W\/O.LATE P.R.PRADEEP RAJ &#8230; Petitioner 2. JEEVAN RAJ, MINOR, S\/O.LATE Vs 1. THE SECRETARY, &#8230; Respondent 2. JAYACHANDRAN, S\/O.KARUNAKARAN NAIR, 3. RAJARATNAM, PANDARIKKAL HOUSE, 4. RADHA, W\/O.RAJARATNAM, PANDARIKKAL For Petitioner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-134165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-04T01:00:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-04T01:00:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":492,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-04T01:00:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-04T01:00:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-04T01:00:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009"},"wordCount":492,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009","name":"Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-04T01:00:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekala-vs-the-secretary-on-5-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sreekala vs The Secretary on 5 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134165\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}