{"id":134258,"date":"2011-07-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011"},"modified":"2018-07-05T06:41:17","modified_gmt":"2018-07-05T01:11:17","slug":"kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Patna High Court &#8211; Orders<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                                    Misc. Appeal No.434 of 2009\n            ======================================================\n<\/pre>\n<p>            Kamlesh Prasad, S\/o Laldhar Prasad of Village &#8211; Nigarha, P.O. and P.S. &#8211;<br \/>\n            Sigori, District &#8211; Patna.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                      &#8230;. &#8230;.Opposite Party   Appellant<br \/>\n                                                Versus\n<\/p>\n<p>               1. Pujan Rai , S\/o Sri Jamuna Rai, Resident of Village &#8211; Lekhan Tola,<br \/>\n                    P.O. &amp; P.S. &#8211; Bihta, District &#8211; Patna (Opposite Party).\n<\/p>\n<p>               2. Smita Devi, W\/o Late Rakesh Kumar\n<\/p>\n<p>               3. Roshan Kumar (Minor) Son of Late Rakesh Kumar\n<\/p>\n<p>               4. Munni Kumari (Minor) Daughter of Late Rakesh Kumar\n<\/p>\n<p>               5. Niketa Kumari (Minor) daughter of Late Rakesh Kumar, Minors are<br \/>\n                    under the guardianship of their mother Smita Devi, the natural<br \/>\n                    guardian who has no interest adverse to those of the minors.\n<\/p>\n<p>               6. Santi Devi, W\/o Late Nawal Kishore Yadav, All residents of<br \/>\n                    Mohalla Noor Pur, P.S. &#8211; Malsalami, District &#8211; Patna.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                     &#8230;. &#8230;. Claimants      Respondents<br \/>\n            ======================================================<br \/>\n            Appearance :\n<\/p>\n<p>            For the Appellant\/s          :       Mr. S.K.Bhartee<\/p>\n<p>            ======================================================<\/p>\n<p>6   11-07-2011                    Heard Sri S.K. Bhartee, learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>                   appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                  The present appeal has been preferred under<\/p>\n<p>                   Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against an order<\/p>\n<p>                   passed on remand by the Addl. District &amp; Sessions Judge IX,<\/p>\n<p>                   Patna, in Claim Case No. 58 of 2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                  The appellant who is owner of offending<\/p>\n<p>                   vehicle i.e. truck bearing registration no. HR-13-1696 has<\/p>\n<p>                   succeeded in defeating the right of the claimant for interim<\/p>\n<p>                   compensation for a long time.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                  From the order it appears that after filing of the<br \/>\n claim case by respondent no. 2, whose husband died in an<\/p>\n<p>accident in which the vehicle of the appellant was involved,<\/p>\n<p>in the said case a petition under Section 140 of the Motor<\/p>\n<p>Vehicle Act was filed for ad-interim compensation and same<\/p>\n<p>was allowed by the court below. Thereafter the appellant<\/p>\n<p>preferred an appeal before this court vide M.A. No. 75 of<\/p>\n<p>2006. By order dated 05.08.2008 a bench of this court set<\/p>\n<p>aside the impugned order and remitted back the matter to the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal for passing a fresh order after giving both sides an<\/p>\n<p>opportunity of hearing and considering the objections raised<\/p>\n<p>on behalf of the appellant. The order passed in M.A. No. 75<\/p>\n<p>of 2006 is on record as Annexure &#8211; 1 to the memo ofappeal.<\/p>\n<p>               After the matter was remitted back one another<\/p>\n<p>development took place in which the driver of the offending<\/p>\n<p>vehicle who was put on trial got an order of acquittal on<\/p>\n<p>03.09.2008 in Bihta P.S. Case No. 49 of 2005\/G.R. Case No.<\/p>\n<p>412 of 2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>               Emboldened with the order of acquittal the<\/p>\n<p>appellant who is the owner of the vehicle filed a petition on<\/p>\n<p>28.11.2008 before the court below praying therein to reject<\/p>\n<p>the claim petition dated 19.08.2005 and made a prayer for<br \/>\n refund of Rs. 25,000\/- which was paid as ad-interim<\/p>\n<p>compensation out of interim compensation amount of Rs.<\/p>\n<p>50,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The petition filed by the appellant was rejected<\/p>\n<p>by impugned order i.e. order dated 26.05.2009.<\/p>\n<p>                   Sri Bhartee, learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>appellant has argued that truck in question was standing by<\/p>\n<p>the side of the road and husband of the claimant died in an<\/p>\n<p>accident in which another vehicle was involved and due to<\/p>\n<p>that reason the driver of the appellant, who was<\/p>\n<p>charge-sheeted by the Police, was acquitted by the court of<\/p>\n<p>Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Danapur. Learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>the appellant has referred to Annexure &#8211; 2 to the petition<\/p>\n<p>which is photo-copy of order dated 3rd September, 2008<\/p>\n<p>passed in Bihta P.S. Case No. 49 of 2005\/G.R. Case No. 412<\/p>\n<p>of 2005. On this ground alone it has been prayed to set aside<\/p>\n<p>the order.\n<\/p>\n<p>             In the present case it is not in dispute that<\/p>\n<p>driver of the appellant was charge-sheeted by the Police for<\/p>\n<p>an accident in which husband of the claimant died.<\/p>\n<p>               On perusal of the impugned order it is further<br \/>\n evident that prima facie there were materials on record to<\/p>\n<p>suggest that due to rash and negligent act of the driver of the<\/p>\n<p>offending vehicle accident had taken place. It is also clear<\/p>\n<p>that the truck after seizure was released in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner being owner of the vehicle.\n<\/p>\n<p>             After going through the impugned order this<\/p>\n<p>court is also prima facie satisfied that there were materials<\/p>\n<p>on record to draw at least an inference that in the accident<\/p>\n<p>the vehicle of the appellant was involved.<\/p>\n<p>            In a case for interim compensation filed under<\/p>\n<p>Section 140 of the Motor Vehicle Act it is not necessary to<\/p>\n<p>lead evidence for coming to the conclusion as to who was<\/p>\n<p>responsible for the accident. Section 140 (3) makes it clear<\/p>\n<p>that in such claim claimant shall not be required to plead and<\/p>\n<p>establish the case. For better appreciation it is apt to quote<\/p>\n<p>Section 140(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act which is as follows:<\/p>\n<p>              &#8220;In any claim for compensation under<br \/>\nsub-section (1), the claimant shall not be required to plead<br \/>\nand establish that the death or permanent disablement in<br \/>\nrespect of which the claim has been made was due to any<br \/>\nwrongful act, neglect or default of the owner or owners of<br \/>\nthe vehicle or vehicles concerned or of any other person.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             The court is of the opinion that if Tribunal is<br \/>\n                  prima facie satisfied with the materials on record the<\/p>\n<p>                 Tribunal is competent to pass an order for compensation<\/p>\n<p>                 under Section 140 of the Act. The impugned order makes it<\/p>\n<p>                 clear that the court below had examined the materials on<\/p>\n<p>                 record and thereafter the petition filed by the appellant for<\/p>\n<p>                 rejecting the claim petition was rejected. The order<\/p>\n<p>                 impugned assigned a detailed reason which requires no<\/p>\n<p>                 interference. Accordingly, the appeal stands rejected.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>                                  (Rakesh Kumar, J)<\/p>\n<p>PRAFUL KUMAR\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court &#8211; Orders Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Misc. Appeal No.434 of 2009 ====================================================== Kamlesh Prasad, S\/o Laldhar Prasad of Village &#8211; Nigarha, P.O. and P.S. &#8211; Sigori, District &#8211; Patna. &#8230;. &#8230;.Opposite Party Appellant Versus 1. Pujan Rai [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-134258","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-05T01:11:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-05T01:11:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":925,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-05T01:11:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-05T01:11:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-05T01:11:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011"},"wordCount":925,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011","name":"Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-05T01:11:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamlesh-prasad-vs-pujan-rai-ors-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kamlesh Prasad vs Pujan Rai &amp; Ors on 11 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134258","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134258"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134258\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134258"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}