{"id":134471,"date":"2008-10-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008"},"modified":"2016-02-26T12:22:34","modified_gmt":"2016-02-26T06:52:34","slug":"girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 2833 of 2008()\n\n\n1. GIRISH, SON OF CHEVI, POYILIL VEEDU,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :14\/10\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                     M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n                      ...........................................\n                     CRL.R.P.NO. 2833 OF 2008\n                      ............................................\n         DATED THIS THE           14th       DAY OF OCTOBER, 2008\n\n                                     ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Petitioner is the second accused in C.C.230 of 2005 on the file<\/p>\n<p>of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Thamarassery.                 He was tried<\/p>\n<p>along with first accused for the offences under Section 379 read with<\/p>\n<p>Section 34 IPC.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. Prosecution case was that motor cycle KL-11K 1969 was<\/p>\n<p>owned by PW1 and was being used by PW2, her husband and on the<\/p>\n<p>night of 3.3.2005, it was parked at the courtyard of their house and on<\/p>\n<p>the next day morning, it was found stolen and PW1 lodged Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>F.I.Statement based on which Ext.P7 F.I.R was registered. PW6<\/p>\n<p>investigated the case. On 5.4.2005, while PW6, A.S.I of Police was on<\/p>\n<p>patrol duty along with PW3, the police constable, they found the<\/p>\n<p>stolen motor bike proceeding through Muthalam-Mutheri road.<\/p>\n<p>Finding the police party, the rider and the pillion rider, after stopping<\/p>\n<p>the motor bike, tried to run away and was followed by the police<\/p>\n<p>party. PW6 arrested the accused and the motor vehicle was seized.<\/p>\n<p>After investigation, charge was laid for the offence under Section 379<\/p>\n<p>read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, which was taken<\/p>\n<p>cognizance by learned Magistrate. Both the accused pleaded not<\/p>\n<p>guilty. Prosecution examined six witnesses and marked twelve<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 2833\/2008                       2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>exhibits.   On the evidence, both the accused were convicted and<\/p>\n<p>sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.3000\/- and in default, simple imprisonment for three months.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner challenged the conviction before Sessions Court, Kozhikode<\/p>\n<p>in Crl.A.219 of 2008. Learned Sessions Judge, on reappreciation of<\/p>\n<p>evidence, confirmed the conviction and sentence and dismissed the<\/p>\n<p>appeal. It is challenged in this revision petition.<\/p>\n<p>      3. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner and learned Public<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutor were heard.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.   On hearing the learned counsel and going through the<\/p>\n<p>records of the trial court, it is seen that petitioner was not questioned<\/p>\n<p>under Section 313 of Code of Criminal Procedure. The proceeding<\/p>\n<p>paper shows that PW5 was examined on 22.11.2006 and case was<\/p>\n<p>posted for examination of CW12 by issuing summons to him to<\/p>\n<p>18.12.2006. As the Presiding Officer was on leave, the case was<\/p>\n<p>adjourned on 18.12.2006 to         20.1.2007 and then was posted to<\/p>\n<p>12.2.2007. On that day, summons on CW12 was not served. Case was<\/p>\n<p>therefore posted to 3.3.2007. On that day, as there was no sitting, it<\/p>\n<p>was adjourned to 26.3.2007. On that day also, it was adjourned to<\/p>\n<p>16.4.2007. Proceeding paper shows that on that day, only first<\/p>\n<p>accused was present and petitioner was absent and CW12, who was<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 2833\/2008                    3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>present, was examined as PW6 and non bailable warrant was issued<\/p>\n<p>as against the petitioner. Prosecution evidence was closed and case<\/p>\n<p>was posted for questioning the accused under Section 313 of Code of<\/p>\n<p>Criminal Procedure to 21.4.2007. Records show that first accused was<\/p>\n<p>questioned on that day. Proceeding paper shows that case was posted<\/p>\n<p>for defence evidence to 28.4.2007. On that day also petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>absconding. Proceeding paper shows that petitioner surrendered<\/p>\n<p>before the court only on 8.4.2007 and he was granted bail and was<\/p>\n<p>not questioned thereafter. On 28.11.2007, PW6 was examined denovo<\/p>\n<p>and the case was posted to 29.11.2007 on which day prosecution<\/p>\n<p>evidence was closed    and case was posted for questioning under<\/p>\n<p>Section 313 of Code of Criminal Procedure to 12.12.2007. On<\/p>\n<p>12.12.2007, both the accused were absent. Though case was posted<\/p>\n<p>for their appearance to 13.12.2007 and then to 18.12.2007. Both<\/p>\n<p>accused were absent and non bailable warrant was issued on<\/p>\n<p>18.12.2007. Proceeding paper shows that petitioner surrendered<\/p>\n<p>thereafter on 21.1.2008 and even thereafter he was not questioned<\/p>\n<p>under Section 313 of Code of Criminal Procedure and the case was<\/p>\n<p>posted for defence evidence and thereafter as no defence evidence<\/p>\n<p>was adduced, arguments were heard and both the accused were<\/p>\n<p>convicted.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 2833\/2008                     4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      5. Unfortunately, the omission to question petitioner under<\/p>\n<p>Section 313 of Code of Criminal Procedure was not taken note of,<\/p>\n<p>either by the learned Magistrate or learned Sessions Judge. In such<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, conviction of petitioner without questioning him under<\/p>\n<p>Section 313 of Code of Criminal Procedure is illegal and is to be set<\/p>\n<p>aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6. Though learned counsel appearing for petitioner argued that<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was only the pillion rider of the motor cycle as proved by<\/p>\n<p>the evidence of PW3 and the presumption provided under Section 114<\/p>\n<p>of Indian Evidence Act cannot be drawn against the petitioner, on the<\/p>\n<p>materials now available, it is not possible to acquit the petitioner on<\/p>\n<p>that ground. As learned Magistrate and learned Sessions Judge did<\/p>\n<p>not consider the failure to question petitioner under Section 313 of<\/p>\n<p>Code of Criminal Procedure, that question is left open to be decided<\/p>\n<p>by the learned Magistrate.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7. Revision petition is allowed. Conviction and sentence passed<\/p>\n<p>by learned Magistrate as confirmed by learned Sessions Judge as<\/p>\n<p>against the petitioner is set aside. Case is remanded to Judicial First<\/p>\n<p>Class Magistrate-II, Thamarassery for fresh disposal as against the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in accordance with law. Learned Magistrate shall question<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner as provided under     Section 313 of Code of Criminal<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 2833\/2008                   5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Procedure and thereafter post the case for defence evidence and then<\/p>\n<p>consider whether there is any evidence as against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner is directed to appear before learned Magistrate on<\/p>\n<p>19.11.2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Send back the records immediately.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                           M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>lgk\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2833 of 2008() 1. GIRISH, SON OF CHEVI, POYILIL VEEDU, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-134471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-26T06:52:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-26T06:52:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":854,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-26T06:52:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-26T06:52:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-26T06:52:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008"},"wordCount":854,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008","name":"Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-26T06:52:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girish-vs-state-of-kerala-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Girish vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134471"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134471\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}