{"id":134477,"date":"2009-07-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009"},"modified":"2015-01-19T20:29:46","modified_gmt":"2015-01-19T14:59:46","slug":"ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers … vs M\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers … vs M\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar Kumar<\/div>\n
{N THE HEGH CQURT CF KARNATAKA, BANGALCERE}.-~.__\n\nDATES mzs mg 1013 my 0? JULY, 2009 2' f ~\n\nPRESENT 5\"\n\n'THE: HGWBLE MR. 4213395 av.sHYLENQ32;A_A'_:\u00a7ur\u00a7%(%\u00a7R_ 3\n\nAND   -\n\nTHE HON'BLE; MR. JUSTECE gz_RAVg_': N;3 :.;m;a;g%R%    _ \n\no.s.A no.13,T0'F 2o'<'2sg -\ncomma? APP:.IcA'r1oH..gg. 92651995\n Hi!  \nc:o.Ps'r1'1;1_-z_x1v m'0.2 3-3994.\n\nBETWEEN\n\nM\/5 Ravisha;r;;kaI?'  '\n\nFertilizers _I}_cai\u20ac:.r$,' V\n\nNo.47, 5133 Crdssgf.\n\nRavimi1'aQ_Nagar,V V \n\nShimoga }:}iSt;t:i.(:!;, --\n\n\u00a76pz"e$e:1ter.:i=.by~its  \n\nP:r0p1'iet_0:" RaViishan,k:g_r.A'--._ V '\n' "  V : Appe\ufb02ant\n\n  (Bf  , Acivocata}\n\nM\/3 Agra ,.\u00a7'nTpii:\u20ac$ Limited\n\n ' (En. Liquidatian)\n\n"  R'-zzgfzresentad by Of\ufb01cial Liqjuidater,\n\n ' \ufb01ttache\ufb01 to the Hozfble High Court\n" _C}E Kamaiaka, IV Floor,\n* \u00ab 'D' wing, iiexxdriya Saciana,\n\n  V ..Ba,\u00a7iga10rew34.\n\n: Resipozldent\n\n' (By Sr\u00a3V.Jayaram with \ufb01eeipak, Qi\ufb01cial Liquiziatm')\n\n\n\n\ufb01led a Company Application No.926}1996 for .,\n\nof Rs.1,23,955\/-- from the appeuant herein  '\n\nRavighankar Traders. 'Though appellguifwas   \n\nnotice sf said application; \u00e9iii not  (to ij \n\ncontest the matter. Hence, an  t '\u00a5)\u00a7 -p\u00e9i.';:{s\u00e9c\u00a7~ by\nthe leaxned Company Jugige o:;..Q'%}'\ufb01?_--20Q0  the\nsaid order. Questioning tki\u00e9  was \ufb01led in\n{i).S.A.No.22\/200--*=%_ '     appellant\nhexea\u00e9n. siw;;~.,V    gk\u00e9ferring the said,\n(}.S.A.Nof_22 {his Court dismisseci\n'Q16:  021* __ delay as per order dated\n\n83?\u00bb-2065,   by the same prefermd a\n\n S.L.P.'.3?{\u00e9.'VQ&4025\/QQQSV'bc\ufb01are Holfble: Suprems Court of India\n\n   numbered as Civil Appeal N0.5i2'I\"6f 200'?\n\n\"-t<':fC1;1  fI;;\u00a25:--:"0rcier passed in O.S.A.No.22\/2004 a\ufb01d\n\n _rem.ittad gh\u00e9,- i"nAatter back to the Division Bench of this\n\nif\u00a501:;'\u00a7:)\u00a3:: H Ca\ufb01urt for hearing the appeal 01:; merim by\n\n _:C (i}Zv1\u00a7('L{W?}n'1:Iig thti deizay as per the 0X'd\u20acI"S dated 16-1 I-\u00bb2{}G'?.\n\n this Court by order \ufb01ate\u00e9 7-34286.18 O.S.A.Ne; 2\/=\n\n4. 3:1 matter betrlg r\u00e9mitied to the Divis'<);:1 Bench cf\n\n   \n\n\n\nto be a\ufb02owed and the matter was remitted ":0 the Itamgd\n\nCompany Judge: for hearing the appwa\ufb02ant as also the \n\nLiquidater after a\ufb01brd:i.:1g opportiunity. Thus in--..':\u00e9ff\u00a2c-gf   "\n\nOrder dated 11\u00ab~6~2{){}4 passed in  \n\n"E9 1?] 2003 was sat aside by the: i)ivis:ion \u00a3\u00a7e;t1{:h'TTof :7 \n\nits GSA 22\/ 2094.\n\n5. On matter being 1"e:mittc:1"'t\u00a7{_: tti\u00e9-\u00bb _Lea1\u00b01:1\u20acti~AAC0\ufb011pamy\nJudge it was listsd for \ufb02ea:-31$  to hear the\n\nCompany Appligtaai\ufb01ioxx    under the\n\nresponde:viftM"}istdA.  for fV\u00e9\u00e9\u20acvuvery of Rs.1,28,Q543\/--.\nG11 the  'daft: ..(\u00a7a:111c to be adjourned by two\n\nW\u00e9\ufb01k\ufb01 at th\u20ac n=.q:1e.st'V-.of' i"espom:\u00a3ent's ceunsal i,\u20ac., the\n\n;b_h:e1'\u00a7~:i1:1. the matter came 1:0 be listed hefom\n\n  Judge on 3~?\u00bb2(}08 and fe\ufb01owing\n\ni'3r(.1e:f'\u00a3E:am\u00e9   passed:\nV. " ,."V\u00a7\\)2}:\u00a7-\u00e9\u00e9cztions am not \ufb01led by the appiicant in\n" :,$A. 9"25[96. However, as; 3 last chance, two\nV'  were waeks' time is granted. if tbs objections\nare not \ufb01led xvithixz two weeks, obj\u20acc:ti<:1:1s are\n\nW\n\nt:iee:med to haw been waived."\n\n\n\n6. The said order was pr\ufb01emptive in nature: i1'1Eif{\u00a71?. C'}f71 .A\n\nas an outer Emit of two Wseks had been grani\u00e9d   "\n\nrespondent in C.A.No,926\/96 for f1]j3:1g r3}:~,j<:;\u00a23:\u00a7.<:=\u00e9 1:\u00a7V." Ad.ii:i{\ufb01:ri_1j; <\/pre>\n
the statement of cbbjetctic,-1:13 tog) CA.No.\u00a726}_’_’19’\u00a76:w\ufb01s 3I <\/p>\n
by the: respondent therein i.e.,V\u00bb\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7pt;11a1it”
\nouter limit. \ufb01xed by  the: , Eilicigcj.\n<\/p>\n
Thereafterwards the ma1v;ft:;:7g:to:’:o;3. _’\u00a7’–8–2008, on
\nwhich date the apfgiaiigant }1\u20ac’1’iE:?if1′:  CA926\/96
\nmade an ati\u20ac:.1_11.;$%V    However, the
\nlearned   Ig\u00e9fzgsed to entertaixx the
\nsaid bjek%; 3’o1_1:\u00a7A51?;-“‘:h\u00a7F’grQ’u\u00a7\u00a7iti\ufb02zat the order dam axmoos<\/p>\n
was 3 prccmpfim: oi1:ierAan\u00e9f’–.siii<:e it was not \ufb01led withija the<\/p>\n
time stgytiiatedg '\u20ac;\u00a3'1\u00a2 rc5'qu\u00a7\u00a7stT<:)f the respondent thersin to \ufb01le<\/p>\n
 Qbje\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9ns was rajccted by holding that the<\/p>\n
 to have Waivsd his right.\n<\/p>\n
 T_h\u00e915\u00e9\ufb01er Wards the appellant harem \ufb01ied twezrr<\/p>\n
-A _. ., 4A4″—3i )*t\u00a7}\u00a5\u00bb\u00a5”;\u20acT\u00a7’iT;i0\u00a7;[\u00a7 iu\ufb01w’ C.A.N0.’7OOj G8 and 27631} 2008 with 3 piayer<\/p>\n
  the order date\ufb01 3~?’~;2{)O8 arzd 1:0 receive the<\/p>\n
 _’\u20ac:-bj-ziictzisns to the iiinmpany Agp\ufb01ca\ufb01on NQ926\/1996.<\/p>\n
  ‘Lcarne\u00e9. Company Judge by crxrdsr \u00e9atcd 5~2~2{)(}9 held that<\/p>\n
D ”\n<\/p>\n
the queation of nzcalling 1111!? older 3~’?~2{}()8 did _::_:_ot<\/p>\n
arise since the said. ox\ufb01er has mezrged with the easier-\u00ab<\/p>\n
7\u00bb-8-2(}(}8. Accozdingly both C.A.Nos.7′(}G an\u00e9 \ufb01fe: ~<\/p>\n
came to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
8. The: appellant beirzg aggrievedfay ‘:sai1;\u20ac_v i.’:\u00a7.’s 7}:<\/p>\n
up in pn\u00e9scnt appea} \u00a2or:tendin%g ._fha3t th\u00e9rzj was
\non the part cf the appe11a1__1t and.  hafi “batty piiaking
\neagmest e\ufb01’o1t$ t0 ciefemi ixi\ufb01hsaif  at all stagcs<\/p>\n
carried the 1natte3″Aa1:;.\u00a31 e\u00a7reIi*’tt\u00a7’   Cnurt to<\/p>\n
defend x;js’%”1ega.}\u00a2;ma\u00a3\u00e9*%;V %%ng;;;g%.  aiso contended that
\npreem;3ti\u00a7%;.\u00abc\u00a7i\ufb02er 3\u00a7Vas;.5e.c:i>T’o\u00a7i’T’–f\u00a7:\u00a7}?~2iOO8 was not netic\ufb01d and<\/p>\n
had 3.3.39 tenaer\u00e9d  csajeciiguzxs in com on 7–8~2008 i.::.,<\/p>\n
__:.;x1c:_-:1; <:{\u00e9i1ic:vv–.e,f:\u00bb.f\u00abhea.1'\u00a7.3z:1.g after 3~'2*–200s and thus<\/p>\n
 t1:;;6:\u00a7".\u00e9"w2;sv..:1u\u00a7'vziiiigence. The appellant also submits that if<\/p>\n
  th\u00e9s case is affor\u00e9ed, agapellant Wouid<\/p>\n
 ' 'ha abl\u00e9 tc;:"dc.\ufb01'onstrate the falsity of the claim made by {he<\/p>\n
  \u00e9p\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9agt 1%; (3.5. No.926,' zgga.\n<\/p>\n
9.P\u00a2r ao\ufb02tra the leamed counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n
   ‘ ;:\u20acspand\u20ac:n1: Wank} C(}I}.I:’321d that admitted}? the applica\ufb01on<\/p>\n
my<\/p>\n
CA 926\/1996 Wa$ filed an the basis 0f the statement\ufb01f<\/p>\n
a\ufb01airs \ufb01led by the Ex–Diz’ector of the Company <\/p>\n
since been wound up and claims that <:omp'e:zny* \u00abj  \u00ab *<\/p>\n
Ravisharzkar Traders Gwesti 3 sum of, R.S.__1,28_','\u00a7.S6';:\u00a7_'  <\/p>\n
Company which has been wound\u00bbu1i:.  3f <\/p>\n
mquimd 1:0 he \ufb01istxibut\ufb01d ts t11\u00e9 _{"Er.\u00a7:dit–{51fs-3eL'1(_i *g\u00a7\u00a2:;:~a..ig.g:y
\nprayad for \u00e9ismissal of the _appeal.__ : – T I V<\/p>\n
10. We have givrsm   \u00e9zgizsideratian to the<\/p>\n
argumems advanced by the”is::3\u00a7}:’:1E5d_.V”C;3ui:sxf:1S” and we have<\/p>\n
gaeruscd   wt: that this appeal has
\nchequ\u00a3:red””+i:\u00e9i%:ef jf:<3n1 the year 1\u00a796 and has<\/p>\n
3130 k1::Q\u00a21<6:d t13.t: "do{)i–fs. cr._1;  Hon'b1e Supreme Court. By<\/p>\n
' i'\u00a31_I'I3.  \u00e9vcnts aS"':19.–.1'rated herein above, {he C.A.N<::.<\/p>\n
  been taken up for considemtian on marits<\/p>\n
   and't1i\u20acV\u00abpr0\u00a2\u00a3,\u00a7L_}i;iisg}$ art": stallecl duct 31:3 hiccups. After having<\/p>\n
 ' 3563:":  :'\u20ac3bsj.\u00e9s'::tio11s which was sought to be \ufb01led by<\/p>\n
    hersin bafcem the leatrzed Comgany Judge on<\/p>\n
 _  We are of the <);:2inia:m that in 13:16 intsmst af daing<\/p>\n
*.;V\u00e9V.231V7i::'s'si;a_:1{ia1 and cam\ufb01lete jzisticfr hmtwean the pax\ufb01ss, to<\/p>\n
a \u00abpermit the appeiiant hsrein. to\u00bb \ufb01i\ufb01 objectians '(,9 Company<\/p>\n
1"'?\n<\/p>\n
Application No.926\/1996. Hcrwever, this should
\nstrict fctters as Gthersvisc on tcc}.:13:1icalitie$ the  A’ <\/p>\n
should not be stailed thereby contributing to d;:}9.y;_: K V” ”  9 <\/p>\n
we pass the following:\n<\/p>\n
(i)<\/p>\n
 V.J* <\/p>\n
GSA 13\/2009 is a11o”s\u00a7x$?\u00a3*:\u00e9: c;:r1 pay’:-mgit  .%;\u00bb\u00a3 \u00e9qsi\u00e9, cf
\nRs.5,D\u20ac)G\/\u00ab~ payable 1;:g”a\u00a7\u00a7pg\ufb01a;;t Wi’iic’11  to be
\ndeposited befefe : t;j1′;.:=:”\u00a5)fiiit::i\u00e9\u00a7”Z;iqf\u00a3idator for being
\n<:mdited__t-:3 the_a;c\u00a7ioa1n'\u20ac_V of t}'):\u20ac:'V#;4\u20ac;'2.\u00a7:0:i1d\u20ac\ufb02{ herein
\nazid ib.:f:VL:V1"er\u20acitf:r g  passed in
\ncqm;s._m3;<..-;a;–;\u00a7;\u00a7;i\u00a2a\ufb01ag 1$;o;g;7Q0 and 701\/2008 in<\/p>\n
 " piiC\u00a7\ufb01on ..\u00a5:\u00a7V\u20acV{iV\u00a7'\u00a72\u00a52Ei\/ 1996 in Company
\n[is set aside. Consequently,<\/p>\n
thg; ord\u00e9-m"da1edT"–_(3\u00e9?\u00bb20o3 as also 7-8-'ZOO8 are<\/p>\n
' ~ _ set a-&;.i{ie; "\n<\/p>\n
~%.%<:i;\n<\/p>\n
 lif\u00e9appe\ufb01ant is permitted to \ufb01le statement of<\/p>\n
 jj”\u00bb1c;fn’\u00a7\u00e9:;~r:;ju1s to Application 310.926\/I996 within<\/p>\n
_\u00ab\u00a3\u00a5i’\u20ac%_$$’e<2ks fmm today, subject to deposit of \u00a31161
\n A\u00e9ab\u00e9ve said aamunt of Rs.5000\/ ~ as Costs.<\/p>\n
H The mspondem: is pexmitte\u00e9 to \ufb01ie rejoindar if<\/p>\n
any wiizhin (Elf: W\ufb01\ufb01k {ram the \ufb01ats of mcaipt of<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
the statement of objec\ufb01cns.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
(iv) The said statemant of abjections taken <\/p>\n
-.’ 5}\u00bb-‘<\/p>\n
will be considered on merits axid   ~<\/p>\n
C.A.No.926\/ 1996 in accordance: wi:.h..a,a_\u00a7z, V  ”<\/p>\n
11. in View of the order    <\/p>\n
O.S.A.No.13\/2009, the   ‘o\u00a3_ <\/p>\n
Misc.Cv1.8672\/2009 does not  iris h\u20ac%’\u00e9\u00a7’.)}T._I’\ufb02]l.Fg:\u00a7C{\u20ac(i.<\/p>\n
A .\n<\/p>\n
Parties art: directed tQ.w’se:ajr co\u00a7x\u00a7:'<::L\u00bbo;fx<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers … vs M\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar Kumar {N THE HEGH CQURT CF KARNATAKA, BANGALCERE}.-~.__ DATES mzs mg 1013 my 0? JULY, 2009 2′ f ~ PRESENT 5″ ‘THE: HGWBLE MR. 4213395 av.sHYLENQ32;A_A’_:\u00a7ur\u00a7%(%\u00a7R_ 3 AND – THE HON’BLE; MR. JUSTECE gz_RAVg_’: N;3 :.;m;a;g%R% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-134477","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers ... vs M\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers ... vs M\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-19T14:59:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers … vs M\\\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-19T14:59:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":900,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers ... vs M\\\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-19T14:59:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers … vs M\\\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers ... vs M\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers ... vs M\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-19T14:59:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers … vs M\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-19T14:59:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009"},"wordCount":900,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009","name":"M\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers ... vs M\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-19T14:59:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ravishankar-fertilizers-vs-ms-agro-inputs-limited-on-10-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Ravishankar Fertilizers … vs M\/S Agro Inputs Limited on 10 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134477","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134477"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134477\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134477"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134477"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}