{"id":134585,"date":"2009-08-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009"},"modified":"2017-07-17T12:19:43","modified_gmt":"2017-07-17T06:49:43","slug":"bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Kumar And Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA cmcurr BENCH\nAT DI-IARWAD \n\nDated this the 1701 day of August 2009 \n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE 1VER.JUS_'_I'I.CE'N.     \n\nAND  _\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTI\u00a2E..\u00a73.SREERI'JASEV:RGQWDA \nWrit Aiaoeai \"8,RQ'8-Qf 20025 i R_  \nBetween: A R V R .\nBHIRA KUPPAIAN NA11o~1\\1.nE1~sf:'sl.\n\n(BY SR1 K.B.ADHYAPAK, ADDL. oovr. Amfoefareiiisok\n\nAND R2) \n\nThis Writ appeal is \ufb01led under  of _'l;.l'i.e._ \nHigh Court Act, praying to set_asidei'*the'--order~C|.t. V11.O3.2008g\nPassed in Writ Petition No. 2E5'5--r_2'3..F'f 2003 a\ufb02d  \" \n\nThis writ appeal _corning_on:A\"for\"prelirnir1a1jyhearing this\nday, N.Kurnar J., deliveired the folioWing:'\n\n  \n\n llpreferred  appellant challenging the\n\norder Iiassed Single Judge who has dismissed\n\nthe writ pet\u00abi.tion. TheA~-appellant claims that he is a tenant in\n\n  .__the a\"gri\u00a3.=...1lturai lands comprised in Sy.No. 254,\n\n  22\/2 and 198 situated at Bengaie village,\n\nSi.rsiliTali;i*l%.j.*:_ d\ufb01liccording to him he fiied Form No.7 seeking\n\n grant.' of occupancy rights under Section 48(A) of the\n\n Karn_atal&lt;:a Land Reforms Act on 27.12.1976. By an order\n\n  19.10.1981 the Land Reforms Tribunal granted\n\nL\/.\n\n\n\noccupancy rights in respect of Sy.Nos.254, 255 and 221 to an\nextent of 22 guntas, 24 guntas and 1 acre 37 guntas\nrespectiveiy. One Narasimha Annappa I-Eegde challengedpthe\nsame before this Court in writ petition No.334 of 19S&#039;2;--i\npetition was allowed and the matter was  .\nTribunal for reconsideration in accordance&#039;   iiS_:.pVo1&#039;1: \n\nreconsideration the Tribunal has&quot;. paissed  _ordier&quot;&#039;*---.onf\n\n12.03.1996 granting occupanicy&#039;--~._.right&#039;~ in  the \n\nappellant in Sy.Nos.221, 254, 255,i22;5,&#039;V.1_, :98 22\/2 to an\nextent of 1 acre and 37ig,&quot;..iir1tasi,,   .24 guntas and 1\nacre and 2 guntas, 36 guntas  respectively.\nRespondents~\u00bb(3V  \ufb01lled iWirit_:_iPetition&#039;&quot;&#039;No.27113 of 1996<\/pre>\n<p>cha1ienging~.theVgrant&#8217;of'&#8221;occ:.1pancy right only in so far as<\/p>\n<p>Sy.Nos. 225*,f 229\/i&#8221;2_   contending that no reasons are<\/p>\n<p> assigned for gra&#8217;nt_iol&#8217; occupancy right in respect of the said<\/p>\n<p>in   pwjrit-._petition was allowed quashing the order of the<\/p>\n<p> in respect of the aforesaid three lands<\/p>\n<p> _ against: which an appeal came to be \ufb01led in Writ Appeal<\/p>\n<p>it   &#8220;of&#8221; 1999. The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for<\/p>\n<p>9&#8242; _ fresh  consideration in respect of the claim<\/p>\n<p>regarding those three survey numbers. The Tribunal on<br \/>\nreconsideration rejected the claim in respect of  so<br \/>\nalso in respect of Sy.No..&#8217;225\/1 and 22\/2 the&#8217;<br \/>\nappellant has not produced any record to  riarrie <\/p>\n<p>Finds a place in the cultivator&#8217;s coivumniiin r&#8217;espect_.:ofut.hieii<\/p>\n<p>three survey numbers.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Aggrieved by the,Vsaid:oird&#8217;eri,; the\ufb01appellantiiipreferred a<br \/>\nWrit petition. The learned._iSiin&#8217;gle:iJLidge_&#8221;:Olijxzonsideration of<br \/>\nthe material &#8216;.011: 1*-ecoi\/id    as Sy.No.198 is<br \/>\nconcerned,    of some other person<br \/>\nby the orderifoiti.theif\ufb01andigTribunaldated 31.10.1981 and the<br \/>\nsame hays not  by the appellant and therefore,<br \/>\nthe said order in so   survey number, the appellant<\/p>\n<p>hasgli-ost this rightiiiin so far as Sy.Nos.225\/1 and 22\/2 is<\/p>\n<p>iconcerned, ithas recorded a categorical \ufb01nding that in Form<\/p>\n<p>ii\\To.-&#8216;..7_ iiled.:&#8221;&#8216;there&#8217;-is no mention of these survey numbers and<\/p>\n<p>theirefore___vheld*&#8221; that the Tribunal was justified in giving the said<\/p>\n<p> ziiggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge<\/p>\n<p>ii  i&#8221;tih&#8217;e,ap.pellant is in appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n<p>assailing the impugned order of the learned Single Judge<br \/>\ncontends that the appellant was an illiterate person ajndy he<\/p>\n<p>had to depend upon others even to \ufb01ll up Form <\/p>\n<p>have not included the said survey numbers in'&lt;.__i*&#039;orin. <\/p>\n<p>Under these circumstances a too technical y_view.;of:Vthe mattenr&#039;;<br \/>\nis taken by the learned Single Judge :and&#039;&#8211;therefo;fC,&quot;it rec1ui~rels&#039; ._<\/p>\n<p>interference.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. We do not find  said contention.\n<\/p>\n<p>Unless at c1aim.vi.SlI&#8221;11.ade   &#8216;Section 4l~8{A) of<br \/>\nthe Karnatak&#8217;a&#8221;&#8221;_.._Land_V.    Tribunal has no<br \/>\njurisdicticn..to&#8221;enteiEtaini&#8211;.a  the same and pass<br \/>\nan order  Taking note of such<\/p>\n<p>helplessness on  many of these tenants, the<\/p>\n<p> legis,l.a;ture arnended the law and extended the time for filing<\/p>\n<p> the. _,applicatio1i._Vand prescribed a separate procedure. When<\/p>\n<p>ithe&#8221;p_etition~e_r  omitted to mention these survey numbers<\/p>\n<p>in F&#8221;orm,_&#8221; &#8216;Nod&#8217;? filed, law provided him to file one more<\/p>\n<p> yjapplication Form No.&#8217;7A within time prescribed under Section<\/p>\n<p>   the Act which admittedly the petitioner has not done.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009 Author: N.Kumar And Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF&#8217; KARNATAKA cmcurr BENCH AT DI-IARWAD Dated this the 1701 day of August 2009 PRESENT THE I-ION&#8217;BLE 1VER.JUS_&#8217;_I&#8217;I.CE&#8217;N. AND _ THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTI\u00a2E..\u00a73.SREERI&#8217;JASEV:RGQWDA Writ Aiaoeai &#8220;8,RQ&#8217;8-Qf 20025 i R_ Between: A R [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-134585","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-17T06:49:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-17T06:49:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":450,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-17T06:49:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-17T06:49:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-17T06:49:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009"},"wordCount":450,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009","name":"Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-17T06:49:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhira-kuppaian-naik-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bhira Kuppaian Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134585","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134585"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134585\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134585"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134585"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134585"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}