{"id":134783,"date":"2011-01-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011"},"modified":"2016-12-21T18:12:47","modified_gmt":"2016-12-21T12:42:47","slug":"mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And … on 17 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And … on 17 January, 2011<\/div>\n
                         In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                          File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001792\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a017,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a017,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n\n\n           Appellant\n\n           Shri\u00a0P.\u00a0Rajamony,\n           26\u00a0Asarimar\u00a0South\u00a0Street,\n           Near\u00a0Arasamoodu\u00a0Junction,\n           Nagercoil\u00a0-\u00a0629\u00a0001\n\n           The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0absent.\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Field\u00a0Publicity,\n           East\u00a0Bock\u00adIV,\u00a0Level\u00adIII,\n           Ramakrishna\u00a0Puram,\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n\n           Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0\u00a0Smt.\u00a0Ranjana\u00a0Dev\u00a0Sarmah,\u00a0Director,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Shyam\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0Director\u00a0and\u00a0Dr.\u00a0Nadhli\u00a0\n           Dalela,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0Director.\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner                :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                 Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                           at\n                                                   New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001792\n                                                        ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
1.     The \u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a007.06.2010\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0retired\u00a0<\/p>\n
       from\u00a0service\u00a0in\u00a02003\u00a0and\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0regarding\u00a0his\u00a0transfer\u00a0application\u00a0made\u00a0on\u00a0medical\u00a0<\/p>\n
       grounds \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 year \u00a0 2001 \u00a0 and \u00a0 some \u00a0 other \u00a0 general \u00a0 information \u00a0 in \u00a0 this \u00a0 regard. \u00a0 This \u00a0 application\u00a0<\/p>\n
       comprised\u00a06\u00a0items\u00a0(a\u00a0to\u00a0f)\u00a0of\u00a0queries.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.     The\u00a0\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0through\u00a0his\u00a0communication\u00a0dated\u00a006.07.2010,\u00a0returned\u00a0the\u00a0application\u00adfee,\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0form\u00a0of\u00a0IPO,\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a06.7.10\u00a0asking\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0resubmit\u00a0it\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0proper\u00a0manner.\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Applicant,\u00a0accordingly,\u00a0remitted\u00a0the\u00a0application\u00adfee\u00a0on\u00a016.07.2010.\u00a0The\u00a0\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0<\/p>\n
       any\u00a0response\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0filed\u00a0 \u00a0his\u00a01st\u00adappeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0AA,\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Field\u00a0Publicity,\u00a0New\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Delhi \u00a0 on \u00a0 09.08.2010. \u00a0 CPIO, \u00a0 New \u00a0 Delhi \u00a0 transferred \u00a0 the \u00a0 Applicant’s \u00a0 application \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Director,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Field\u00a0Publicity,\u00a0Hyderabad\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0he\u00a0referred\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a01 st\u00ad<\/p>\n
       appeal\u00a0dated\u00a009.08.2010.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0Hyderabad\u00a0office\u00a0however,\u00a0through\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a009.09.2010,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       returned\u00a0the\u00a0application\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0papers\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0were\u00a0<\/p>\n
       sent\u00a0to\u00a0Delhi\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0and\u00a0hence\u00a0information\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Office.\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0thereafter,\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a02nd\u00adappeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n
       stating\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0receive\u00a0the\u00a0requested\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0his\u00a0\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0being\u00a0tossed\u00a0<\/p>\n
       from\u00a0one\u00a0office\u00a0to\u00a0another.\u00a0\u00a0He,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0requested\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0direction\u00a0be\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0<\/p>\n
       to\u00a0him\u00a0the\u00a0necessary\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0documents.\n<\/p>\n
\nDecision<\/p>\n
3.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0they\u00a0had\u00a0tried\u00a0to\u00a0search\u00a0the\u00a010\u00a0year\u00a0old\u00a0<\/p>\n
       records\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0both\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0HQ\u00a0in\u00a0Delhi\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Hyderabad\u00a0office\u00a0,\u00a0but\u00a0could\u00a0<\/p>\n
       not \u00a0 succeed. \u00a0 They \u00a0 added \u00a0 that \u00a0 a \u00a0 number \u00a0 of \u00a0 records \u00a0 besides \u00a0 those \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 had \u00a0 been\u00a0<\/p>\n
       misplaced\u00a0 \u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0state\u00a0of\u00a0affairs\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0efforts\u00a0are\u00a0being\u00a0made\u00a0to\u00a0locate\u00a0the\u00a0
\n              missing\u00a0files.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0therefore,\u00a0expressed\u00a0their\u00a0inability\u00a0to\u00a0furnish\u00a0the\u00a0required\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n
             to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0absence\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0records.\u00a0<\/p>\n
     4.      On\u00a0being\u00a0queried\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0transfer\u00a0of\u00a0application\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0Hyderabad\u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
             records\u00a0were\u00a0expected\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0Delhi,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0explained\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0had\u00a0transferred\u00a0<\/p>\n
             the\u00a0application\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Regional\u00a0office,\u00a0Hyderabad\u00a0because\u00a0in\u00a0normal\u00a0course\u00a0of\u00a0business\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0<\/p>\n
             relating\u00a0to\u00a0inter\u00adRegional\u00a0transfer\u00a0cases–such\u00a0as\u00a0that\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0–are\u00a0kept\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0<\/p>\n
             Regional\u00a0office\u00a0where\u00a0the\u00a0official\u00a0is\u00a0posted.\u00a0\u00a0They\u00a0also\u00a0referred\u00a0to\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a01.8.01\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0OSD,\u00a0<\/p>\n
             GOI,\u00a0MoI&B,\u00a0IP\u00a0and\u00a0MC\u00a0Section\u00a0which\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0decided\u00a0with\u00a0IBM’s\u00a0approval\u00a0to\u00a0accede\u00a0<\/p>\n
             to\u00a0their\u00a0request\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0DFP\u00a0is\u00a0therefore\u00a0being\u00a0requested\u00a0to\u00a0transfer\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0to\u00a0Chennai\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
             earliest,\u00a0\u00a0as\u00a0one\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0transferring\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0back\u00a0to\u00a0Delhi\u00a0HQ\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0HQ\u00a0<\/p>\n
             which\u00a0takes\u00a0decisions\u00a0on\u00a0transfers.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     5.      Upon \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 the \u00a0 submissions \u00a0 and \u00a0 after \u00a0 perusing \u00a0 the \u00a0 records, \u00a0 the \u00a0 \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 directs \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
             Respondents\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0should\u00a0make\u00a0another\u00a0effort\u00a0to\u00a0trace\u00a0the\u00a010\u00a0year\u00a0old\u00a0records\u00a0corresponding\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
             the\u00a0Appellant’s\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication.\u00a0If\u00a0they\u00a0still\u00a0fail\u00a0to\u00a0locate\u00a0the\u00a0same,\u00a0\u00a0they\u00a0should\u00a0categorically\u00a0inform\u00a0<\/p>\n
             the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0the\u00a0places\u00a0they\u00a0had\u00a0searched\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0possible\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n
             loss\u00a0of\u00a0records.\u00a0\u00a0This\u00a0\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a025\u00a0\u00a0February,\u00a02011.\u00a0<\/p>\n
     6.      Appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                      (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                             Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n
     Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
     (G.Subramanian)
\n     Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
     Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.   Shri\u00a0P.\u00a0Rajamony,
\n              26\u00a0Asarimar\u00a0South\u00a0Street,
\n              Near\u00a0Arasamoodu\u00a0Junction,
\n              Nagercoil\u00a0–\u00a0629\u00a0001<\/p>\n
     2.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n      Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Field\u00a0Publicity,
\n     East\u00a0Bock\u00adIV,\u00a0Level\u00adIII,
\n     Ramakrishna\u00a0Puram,
\n     New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
3.   Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer,
\n     Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Field\u00a0Publicity,
\n     East\u00a0Bock\u00adIV,\u00a0Level\u00adIII,
\n     Ramakrishna\u00a0Puram,
\n     New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
4.   Officer\u00a0In\u00adcharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And … on 17 January, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001792 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a017,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a017,\u00a02011 Parties: Appellant Shri\u00a0P.\u00a0Rajamony, 26\u00a0Asarimar\u00a0South\u00a0Street, Near\u00a0Arasamoodu\u00a0Junction, Nagercoil\u00a0–\u00a0629\u00a0001 The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0absent. Respondents Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Field\u00a0Publicity, East\u00a0Bock\u00adIV,\u00a0Level\u00adIII, Ramakrishna\u00a0Puram, New\u00a0Delhi Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0\u00a0Smt.\u00a0Ranjana\u00a0Dev\u00a0Sarmah,\u00a0Director,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Shyam\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0Director\u00a0and\u00a0Dr.\u00a0Nadhli\u00a0 Dalela,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0Director. Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001792 ORDER Background 1. The \u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a007.06.2010\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0retired\u00a0 from\u00a0service\u00a0in\u00a02003\u00a0and\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0regarding\u00a0his\u00a0transfer\u00a0application\u00a0made\u00a0on\u00a0medical\u00a0 grounds \u00a0 in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-134783","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-21T12:42:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And … on 17 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-21T12:42:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":642,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-21T12:42:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And … on 17 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-21T12:42:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And … on 17 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-21T12:42:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011"},"wordCount":642,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011","name":"Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-21T12:42:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-rajamony-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-17-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.P Rajamony vs Ministry Of Information And … on 17 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134783","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134783"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134783\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}