{"id":134908,"date":"1982-09-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1982-09-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982"},"modified":"2016-05-05T20:28:16","modified_gmt":"2016-05-05T14:58:16","slug":"dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982","title":{"rendered":"Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Bombay High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1983 Bom 114<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Masodkar<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p> 1. This is the landlords&#8217;  petitioner, whose  suit was  decree  by the Third  Additional Small Causes Court, holding  that defendants Nos. 1 and 2  were not in need of the suit premises and the landlord was entitled to possession because  the tenant, since the coming into operation of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, was  unlawfully sublet the tenanted.  premises, being House  No. 319, situated  in Kirkee, the Cantonment Area of Poona Town.  That decree  was, however, set aside in appeal by the District Court, Pune, holding that the sub-letting was in the year 1968 and the provisions of the Act were applied  to the area in year 1969.  Thus the sub-letting was not unlawful.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2.  That order   vacating the decree by the appeal Court is challenged in the present petition.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.  The fact  not in  dispute and as found are that  the suit premises were tenanted to defendants Nos. 1 and 2 as monthly tenants.  The plaintiff served the notice of termination of that tenancy on Dec. 20, 1971,  inter alia, on the ground that the learned premises were entirely   sub-let by  defendants Nos. 1 and 2 in favour of defendants No. 3.  In  the appeal Court a Purshis was filed that defendants No. 3  was put in the occupation of the suit premises as a subtenant in 1968.  The appeal  Court has found that the provisions of the Bombay  Rent Act were  made applicable by a Notification  to the Cantonment Area as from Dec. 1969.  Holding that as the sub-letting was in 1968,  the provisions of clause (e) of sub-section (1). of s. 13 of the Bombay Rent Act were not attracted, the appeal Court vacated the trial Court&#8217;s decree.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.  The  narrow question is whether that order is correct.\n<\/p>\n<p> 5.  It is well settled that the provisions of s. 13(1) and the  different clauses furnish the grounds on the basis of which the landlord, who is other-wise not entitled  to  recover possession is entitled to recover possession of the tenant premises.  As far as the sub-letting is concerned, cl.(e) enjoins that the landlord has to satisfy the Court that the tenant has, since the coming into operation of the Bombay Rent act, unlawfully sub-let the premises or any  part thereof. The words &#8220;has sub-let:&#8221; are  used in present prefect tense and contemplate a completed event connected in some way with the present time.  A similar phrase available in S. 13(1)(e) of the Rajashthan Premises (Control of Rent and  Eviction) Act has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in the case of Gappulal v. Shriji Dwarkadheeshji.  , to convey within its meaning any sub-letting  which was  made in the past was has continued up to the present time and it did not matter that the sub-letting  was either before or after the Act came into force.  The terms of cl.(e), therefore, have to be understood not only with reference to the time when the subletting began but also when the  subletting began but also when the action is brought and the landlord seeks to satisfy the conditions of that clause.  Upon this aspect, is   obvious  that when the subletting is with regard to the tenement taken on monthly basis, it is also assumed, as the  facts indicate in the present case, that the subletting is  on the same premises on monthly basis. In other  words, the sub-tenancy has a tenure of a month which   ends by the month and arises in his favour  every month.\n<\/p>\n<p> 6.  While considering the provisions of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, S  11(4)(i), which permitted the landlord to resume possession where subletting of the premises was without the consent of the landlord or  in absence of right to documents so under a lease deed in the case of <a href=\"\/doc\/969019\/\">K. K.  Krishna v. M. K. Vijaya  Raghavan,<\/a> , the Supreme Court ruled that right under  S. 108(j)  of the T.P.  Act  was no defence when the conditions of that provisions were fully satisfied. It was  there ruled that all the rights conferred don the landlord and tenant by S. 108 and other  provisions of the T. P. Act have not been left intact  and if a State Rent Act makes  provisions for eviction on certain specified grounds, eviction cannot be resisted on the basis of right conferred by the T. P. Act.  It  is, thus, obvious that what has to be satisfied by the landlord  is the requirement under a particular clause on the  basis of which a decree for possession is sought.\n<\/p>\n<p> 7.  Now,  to be the unlawful subletting; the provisions of S. 15(1) of the Bombay Rent Act prescribe  that after   the coming into force of the law, but subject to any contract to the contrary,. it would  not be lawful for the tenant  to sublet whole or  any portion of the premises.  Thus,  the subletting of the monthly tenancy and its continuance after the coming  into force of the Act would be within the mischief of S. 15.  There is no good reason to exclude the present subletting Court the monthly tenancy only  but  reason that it has initially began in 1968.  It was  not the case in defence in the present controversy that the sub-letting was continued either because of acquiescence or  consent in writing of the  landlord, or was permitted by any contract to the contrary.  The existing subletting  when the Act is applied, there being no agreement to save it, is well within the mischief of s. 15(1) and if made a ground satisfied  requirements  of clause (e) of sub-section (1) of S. 13 of the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p> 8.  This being the position of the sub-letting, which was continued even after the Act  applied and here being no contract pleaded permitting any such sub-letting, the landlord had satisfied  the provisions of S. 13(1)(e) of Bombay Rent Act.\n<\/p>\n<p> 9.  The appeal Court was, therefore, not right in vacating the decree of the trial Court.\n<\/p>\n<p> 10.  The impugned order  made by the appeal Court, that is, the Court of the 2nd Extra Joint Judge, Pune, in Civil Appeal No. 610 of 1976 is, therefore, set aside and the  decree made by the  Court of the 3rd Additional Small Causes Judge, Pune, is restored.  The Rule is made  absolute in these   terms,. The respondent to pay the costs of the petitioner throughout.\n<\/p>\n<p> 11. Order accordingly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982 Equivalent citations: AIR 1983 Bom 114 Bench: Masodkar JUDGMENT 1. This is the landlords&#8217; petitioner, whose suit was decree by the Third Additional Small Causes Court, holding that defendants Nos. 1 and 2 were not in need of the suit premises [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-134908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1982-09-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-05T14:58:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982\",\"datePublished\":\"1982-09-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-05T14:58:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982\"},\"wordCount\":1051,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982\",\"name\":\"Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1982-09-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-05T14:58:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1982-09-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-05T14:58:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982","datePublished":"1982-09-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-05T14:58:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982"},"wordCount":1051,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982","name":"Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1982-09-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-05T14:58:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dharamsas-mangilal-jain-vs-shrikumar-and-ors-on-18-september-1982#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dharamsas Mangilal Jain vs Shrikumar And Ors. on 18 September, 1982"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134908"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134908\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}