{"id":135138,"date":"1999-08-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-08-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999"},"modified":"2016-03-29T04:17:53","modified_gmt":"2016-03-28T22:47:53","slug":"bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999","title":{"rendered":"Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, &#8230; on 6 August, 1999"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Allahabad High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, &#8230; on 6 August, 1999<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 1999 (3) AWC 2636<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: B K Roy, L Bihari<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p> Binod Kumar Roy and Lakshmi Bihari, JJ. <\/p>\n<p> 1. Following two questions crop up for our consideration (i) whether the writ petitioner, who is party to a writ proceeding instituted by respondent No. 3 before the Lucknow Bench of the Court in which a stay order has been passed adverse to him, can claim any relief from the Principal Bench of the Court at Allahabad through this writ petition? and (ii) whether the stay order passed by the Lucknow Bench is without jurisdiction, null and void and nullity on the ground that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition of respondent No. 3.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. Firstly, very briefly the facts<br \/>\ngiving rise to this writ petition, filed<br \/>\non 16.4.1991. Vide the Resolution<br \/>\ndated 4.12.1985 of the Regional<br \/>\nTransport Authority, Jhansi, which<br \/>\nconsidered the applications filed for<br \/>\ngrant of 4 permanent stage carriage<br \/>\npermits for the route Lalitpur-Jhakora<br \/>\nvia Rajghat for which the petitioner as<br \/>\nwell as respondent No. 3 and others<br \/>\nwere applicants, one of the three<br \/>\npermits was granted to respondent<br \/>\nNo. 3 and one was reserved for<br \/>\nSchedule Caste and Schedule Tribe<br \/>\napplicant. Against the<br \/>\naforementioned Resolution, the<br \/>\npetitioner went up in Appeal No. 61 of<br \/>\n1986 before the State Transport<br \/>\nAppellate Tribunal. U. P. Lucknow,<br \/>\nwhich has not been impleaded as a<br \/>\nparty-respondent. By order dated<br \/>\n10.12.1990 (as contained In<br \/>\nAnnexure-2), the petitioner&#8217;s appeal<br \/>\nwas allowed by granting permit to<br \/>\nhim though subject to certain<br \/>\nconditions. Respondent No. 3 filed<br \/>\nWrit Petition No. 13149 of 1990 for<br \/>\nquashing the order dated 10.12.1990<br \/>\nof the State Transport Appellate<br \/>\nTribunal before the Lucknow Bench of<br \/>\nthis Court impleading the petitioner<br \/>\nherein as respondent No. 7. He also<br \/>\nfiled Civil Misc. Application No.<br \/>\n22880 (W) of 1990 for grant of interim<br \/>\nrelief. The matter came up for<br \/>\nconsideration before the Lucknow<br \/>\nBench of the Court on 20.12.1990. A<br \/>\nlearned single Judge of the Lucknow<br \/>\nBench issued notices to the<br \/>\nrespondents of the said writ petition<\/p>\n<p>and directed stay of the operation of the order dated 10.12.1990 passed by the   Tribunal   In    the   meanwhile. Pursuant to the aforementioned order, the    Secretary    of    the    Regional Transport      Authority.      Jhansl (respondent No. 2) sent letter R.T.A.\/ P.S.T.V. 900\/90 dated 26.12.1990 to the petitioner stating that since this Court had stayed the operation of the order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal,  hence you are directed to deposit   in   his   office   the   permit granted to you and stop the operation of   vehicle   No.  UTV-1469   on   the strength   of   the   said   permit.   The petitioner has come up with a prayer to quash the aforementioned letter appending its copy as Annexure-11 stating, inter alia that on the basis of the order  dated   10.12.1990 of the Tribunal, a permit was issued to him on 19.12.1990 and on 20.12.1990 he had commenced operating his vehicle on the strength of that permit and. accordingly, the order passed by the Lucknow Bench was not applicable, a certified copy of which was served on respondent No. 2 on 21.12.1990 ; and that the order of this Court was not an order of injunction but merely an order staying the operation  of  the order of the Appellate Tribunal which having been given effect to, nothing remained    to    be    stayed    by    the Transport Authority, who could only perform    a    ministerial    act.    The petitioner also filed an application for staying the operation of the direction contained in the impugned letter. The writ    petition    as    well    as    the application for grant of interim relief both were  placed  before  a Division Bench on 18.4.1991. The writ petition was admitted and notices were Issued in regard to the writ petition as well as miscellaneous application stating that &#8217;till further orders operation of the communication dated 26.12.1990 of the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority. Jhansi.  in   so   far  as   it pertains   to   the   petitioner,   shall remain  stayed&#8217;.   Respondent   No.   3 filed   a   petitioner  for  vacating  the interim order dated   18.4.1991  along with a counter-affidavit stating, inter alia, that the petitioner had already filed his counter-affidavit in his Writ Petition No.   13149 of 1990 but the<\/p>\n<p>stay order passed therein has not been vacated till date and the Instant writ petition has been filed. In effect, to get the order dated 20.12.1990 passed therein to be set aside\/ vacated making Identical allegations already made by him in Writ Petition No. 13149 of 1990 and thus the instant writ petition is neither entertainable nor can any order passed in it ; and that the interim order dated 18.4.1991 passed in the Instant writ petition be vacated.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. Having heard Sri A. D. Saunders. learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Devendra Pratap. learned counsel for respondent No. 3 and Sri P. K. Bisaria. learned standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, we have no hesitation in answering both questions in negative. The Lucknow Bench as well as the Principal Bench both exercise one and the same constitutional jurisdiction under Article 226 and thus the Principal Bench of this Court cannot issue a direction contrary to what has already been issued earlier through Us Lucknow Bench to which the petitioner is a party and is thus binding on him unless it is set aside and\/or rescinded and he cannot challenge it collaterally through this writ petition as what cannot be done directly, cannot be done even indirectly.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. We also do not find any substance in the argument of Sri Saunders that the order of stay passed by the Lucknow Bench is nullity\/void ab initio in view of the fact that it did not lack territorial jurisdiction to pass order in relation to orders passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow, which is under challenge by respondent No. 3 before the Lucknow Bench of the Court. The law declared by the Supreme Court in <a href=\"\/doc\/458532\/\">Nasiruddin v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, AIR<\/a> 1976 SC 311, is crystal clear in this regard which was reiterated in <a href=\"\/doc\/173865\/\">V. P. Rashtriya Chini Mill Adhikari Parishad v. State of U. P.. AIR<\/a> 1995 SC 2148. From the ratio laid down therein, there is no doubt that the Lucknow Bench of the Court has territorial jurisdiction.\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. For the reasons<br \/>\naforementioned, this writ petition is<br \/>\ndismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. Before parting, it is clarified that this judgment and order shall not stand in the way of the petitioner in contesting on merits the Writ Petition filed by respondent No. 3 before the Lucknow Bench in which interim orders was passed.\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. Let the office serve a copy of this order within one week on Sri Bisaria. learned standing counsel, for its intimation to the authority concerned.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, &#8230; on 6 August, 1999 Equivalent citations: 1999 (3) AWC 2636 Bench: B K Roy, L Bihari JUDGMENT Binod Kumar Roy and Lakshmi Bihari, JJ. 1. Following two questions crop up for our consideration (i) whether the writ petitioner, who is party to a writ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-135138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allahabad-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, ... on 6 August, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, ... on 6 August, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1999-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-28T22:47:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, &#8230; on 6 August, 1999\",\"datePublished\":\"1999-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-28T22:47:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999\"},\"wordCount\":1079,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999\",\"name\":\"Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, ... on 6 August, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1999-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-28T22:47:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, &#8230; on 6 August, 1999\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, ... on 6 August, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, ... on 6 August, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1999-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-28T22:47:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, &#8230; on 6 August, 1999","datePublished":"1999-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-28T22:47:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999"},"wordCount":1079,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Allahabad High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999","name":"Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, ... on 6 August, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1999-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-28T22:47:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bal-krishna-sahu-vs-regional-transport-authority-on-6-august-1999#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bal Krishna Sahu vs Regional Transport Authority, &#8230; on 6 August, 1999"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=135138"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135138\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=135138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=135138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=135138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}