{"id":135455,"date":"2008-03-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008"},"modified":"2014-04-25T11:16:57","modified_gmt":"2014-04-25T05:46:57","slug":"ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: R.B.Naik<\/div>\n
mm THE HIGH counw OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nHATED THIS THE 11TH DAY my MARCH Z\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02\nBEFDRE\n\nTHE HUN'EhE MR.JU8TICE R,B}\u00bbuE:xi\n\nl.Hf$.Pharma Centre,\n\nNm.B3f1A, 5\"'Crass,   ;\nRajenwranagar,VMy3ure}m'_\"\n2.Raja3hakhar, 54 y\u00e9ar\ufb01gi\n\ufb02Em=Malla:adhya{\",_'.'. , *. *;\nRfat Arakara, KhdihalliVEast;*y'\nKanakagar%}Tg,.3a\u00a7g%l\u00a2:e_313$:\n\n$.\ufb01h\u00e9;%;f:_:an\ufb01af$\ufb01\ufb01?a; 1\n\n3 ya, N, EJa,H\u00a7qarajaradhya\nCfa.U;T;3aaa\u00a7p3,r\ufb01hammanur\nEavamagerwf\ufb01w\ufb01t;,Dnvanagera--4.... PITITIOIIIB\n\n      \n    \n\n\" _\ufb02\ufb01y S\ufb01t}G\u00a7\u00e9:\ufb01$ nev:.n.p., A\ufb02v)\n\n4i\ufb01\ufb01D '\nT\ufb01\u00e9 Etat\ufb01 at harnataka\nR\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01. By DEHQ Inspectnr,\n\ufb01ysn:g+&?m 304. m aseeeausaw\n\nThia Crl.H.F. is filed under Section 39? and\n\n'j\u00e9cl \ufb02r\u00a2F.C. to aet aside the judgment dated\n\n31.1.139<\/pre>\n
T in c.c.mo.8\ufb015f96 on tha file of the III
\nP\ufb02\u00a2LEg!J# and C,J.M., Mysure, affirmed by the I
\nA\ufb02dl,E.J., Mysore, in crl.A.No.1?f97 dated
\nE?.1G.EQD4 and set aside tha \ufb02anfnnrn and<\/p>\n
—~–.- -u-o-1-…\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01Qm4uLu_<\/p>\n
cmnviatiaratn passed against the patitionar in
\n\u20ac.\ufb01.Nm.a\ufb025f8\ufb01 on the .file 6f’ the III .a\ufb01d1.C.J.
\nand C.J.M., Mysara and crl.A.Nc.1?f9? an the file
\n(‘if than I Addl.a3.J.. l~’1’5-‘mare.   <\/p>\n
This patiticzn -xmminrg an fax’-. . ‘haa.j\u00a7’iiigT\u00bb. ” th’i__<\/p>\n
ti-E33′, _1′:.h=xa t;’:=:tLJ:.’+; paaseri the i’f?l1.\u00a2Z’J”‘iiii*’\u00a7.\u00ab:._-f~..<\/p>\n
mditi.ana.1 i?i’r1:i. I’a’.1′: A
\n‘I’he\u00a7r ha???’ beefed’  an order ciateti
\n    puniehabla under
\n ~  with Section 27(6):\n<\/p>\n
 section 29: and section 18!!<\/p>\n
r-mad  Drugs and Cusmetics Act. and<\/p>\n
fchsay 4.\u00e9emAA’:%Ent.\u00a3enu:~ad to undergo 5.1. for Ia-ne year<\/p>\n
{‘;E\u00a3:1’:: the aff\u00e9fj\ufb01a uru::le.r- Saszticm 27[<:l) af the Drugs<\/p>\n
2:"-?m:r:i\u00a7;1:ic:a= Ac_: and ta gay fine af ns.5oo\/-<\/p>\n
VM  the offuanca under sactirm 23. Further,<\/p>\n
"':.'.Vh%3-' are santsancerzi ta gray fina __\u00a3 EIa,5|:_lD.\/'- each<\/p>\n
"~.i'-sir 'uzlhe '*-\ufb01fence under Sac*.:.'\u20ac.-.:an.23.l-. $2.' …1:ur,!a and<\/p>\n
C-*$.1E.%!Il'E'\u00a7'.$Ii -ca .-'mt. Ir: \ufb01efault sf ;_.'s'*3-'1-3:31: 9:.' fine,
\namusmi N535 . 2 tan 5- are ciireczted iio uran\u00e9rqa
\nimprimnmant for 3 further period of three<\/p>\n
(1 IN, , \\
\n7v.}LVA\/LC,L,LV—–\n<\/p>\n
mcsntlw. Thxa maid order caf ccmvictian and
\nsentence is confirmtcl by an <:rVc;\u00e9_|::V\ufb02_ dated
\nET.1D\u00bbEOU4 gaased by the 1 Audit1gna;;tS\u00e9\u00a7sions<\/p>\n
Mvgtgg in Eriminal hypeal_H\u00a7}1?f\u00a7?;_<\/p>\n
2. The brief f-aCtE3;”:.a\u00a3\ufb01! w\ufb01;S izncitjtz-‘5  <\/p>\n
3-. Ezntiirat\u00e9    t$t:> V.\u20aca’}g’ist\u00e9ra&
\nagainst tht E=Vt'”tj,tiot:2e’rtt_:’:hV\u00e9’:_g:i.n\u00e9ttam\u00e9wtthrte other
\na~:’.’=-:::.as~v.a-.r.i g:\u00bb.az’sc.1I:zzu=:’= tfj,?” Ltnape-star, Myaore
\nIziistri-:1_:.    . The laarnad
\n  ttat there is a
\npz;,*.:i.ttmva\u00abf\u00a5;;x\u00a7’._a’;’;*::}:.:’t.;;1;g;.a*.\u00bb$j\u00e9 caf the caffaancas
\n\u00e9lV1.:\u00a75l*’.%.*;;*.~’1!’\u00e93vV \u00a7..I;\u00a7=.{i:t.h.\ufb01”~b_’\u00a2t7mQl’5int and directed issue of<\/p>\n
prtItet:a\u00bb.V   the further case of the<\/p>\n
‘\u00a7L’tsecVwAtist\u00a7\ufb01” that A-1 is a. partnership firm and<\/p>\n
 M\u00bb:_rs!\ufb01f_’ ta 5 are its partners and accused<\/p>\n
” :’1..fa;:._.’.-.a .r:-‘.=,-t;’=.i.1. dealt: a:i_aa._l_ing in drugs under<\/p>\n
‘I}t;I__e%d,_ Ihiymnre. It i\ufb01 mitt i\ufb01 v\ufb01istuta that the<\/p>\n
“”A.’f:i.:::3’t =a\u00bb:tu;–ae::Id–partnershi5: firm is a ‘linen.-;set:i<\/p>\n
w1iu\u00a2::.’Las.aal:a dealer in drugs: and cosmetics and the<\/p>\n
a\u00ab;:n:1ui.ttaci aacuaad. No.6 is alga a licansad ratail<\/p>\n
\/al20\u00bbz,\\.ce,s’z U~–\n<\/p>\n
Accuaad Nm.6 an 7.5.1935 and during thg e\u00a7u;sa of<\/p>\n
N.F., Brtch Hc.22, alleged n3 have ween
\nmF”uf\ufb01f\ufb01uf%\ufb01 “y H#E.U11\ufb01ulaiE} Lt\ufb01., E\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01t wha<\/p>\n
stacka\ufb01 an\ufb01 axhihitad_for73\u00e9ia. Ha \u00e9\ufb01lia\u00e9f\u00e9u<\/p>\n
. \ufb01n.\n<\/p>\n
N<\/p>\n
1&9 tablats 5% sam@i\u00a7’ far t\ufb01\u00e93fF Q\ufb01\u00e9ifais V\ufb01n\ufb01
\nfmrwar\ufb01a\ufb01 a ,\u00a7agtighm”*@f’ <;ha t sampia t9 the
\nGavarnment Anaijntf \ufb01\ufb01ug% ?\u00a7s\u00a7ing Laboratory,
\nEangalm;a;;fTh\ufb02i\u00a5\u00e9m\ufb01i\ufb01@\ufb02\u00a7 \u00a7\ufb01a\ufb01%:faund in the ahop
\nax A\u00a2m\ufb01$g$ \u00a2g\u00a7;\u00e9 ,\u00a7a\u00a7* S\u00e9;ze&W and panchanama was
\ndgamwpT r~I;\u00a2hg. :\ufb01\u00a7i\u00a3\ufb01$gM} was reported tn the
\nj\ufb01riad\ufb01\ufb01\u00a3i@\ufb01\u00a7L C\u00a7Qrt.: Notice under section 18A<\/p>\n
and'1$\ufb01_wE:\u00e9 is\u00e9\ufb01ed tn accused No.6 an 8.5.1985,<\/p>\n
 :g;:.\u00bb;ier..:3. on 1'I_…!'.-..1.._9\ufb025. on a.a.19a5_.<\/p>\n
 A1'? '<\/p>\n
!"..r<\/p>\n
'z tha'\u00a7\u00a7ug \ufb02i\ufb01 nut want the stan\ufb01ar\ufb01 quali<\/p>\n
th% Qrug Insgectcr received test Eegurvs frem th\ufb01
\n'"\ufb02%\u00a3\ufb01E}\ufb02\ufb01 Analy\ufb01t, wherein it ""a c\ufb01rtifiad that<\/p>\n
&a\ufb01'a apuriaus drug. The copy of the report waa<\/p>\n
j?farwarded tn the aequitted Accuaed Nu.G. on<\/p>\n
3.6.1%B5, the cumglainant alang with the Drug
\nInspactar Sri.H.s.shyamamahan and witnesses
\naaarchad the gramisa\ufb01 cf accused Na.1-Firm and<\/p>\n
aaized cash will No.1 under Panchanama: recorded<\/p>\n
an<\/p>\n
tha statamenta at Accused Ne.2 and acg\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9q No.1<\/p>\n
was called anon tn \ufb02iscloae tug ~g\u00a2qf\ufb01e~.af<\/p>\n
give a detailed rap\ufb01y\u00a7 .Th\u00e9'3$m@is\u00a7 \u00a7\u00a7i$ sai\ufb01a
\nfraua the stack",;n t\ufb01\u00e9' \u00a7\u00a7\u00a7miaa3\ufb01 bf :#~1 and the
\naamplas on bei\ufb01\u00a7.$ubj%\u00a2t\u00a7\u00a7 \ufb01g ghemical analysis
\nware fguv\ufb01 tng\ufb01\u00e9 \u00e9\ufb01u\ufb01i\ufb01gs \ufb01n\ufb01 did not meet the
\npraS\u00a2\u00a31B\u00a7\ufb01i f\u00a7f\u00e9\ufb01d%:dVf'\u00e9\u00a2a}i\u00a3\u00a7. as such, a
\nc\u00a2mp1@i@ff%gama\ufb01;\u00a7\ufb01" $g,E\u00a3ilad a\ufb01 against tha
\n\ufb01atiti\ufb01\ufb02\u00e9:3{\u00e9c\u00a2m$\ufb01d h\u00e9rain slang with three athar<\/p>\n
accuag\ufb02,  IE i$ \ufb01@bmitted that accused No.5 has<\/p>\n
_\u00a7\u00a7aan a\ufb01ggitta\ufb01 of the charges levelled against<\/p>\n
tag: h9_wss mat raapansihle far the d;y ta<\/p>\n
"i$._\u00a7c:ua&d Mm.5 is aLaq acquitted an thg ground<\/p>\n
ID.\n<\/p>\n
V
\n4<\/span><\/p>\n
….. ..LI .1 _ ‘
\n‘uU\ufb01\ufb01u Ha.q–Samsshekar 1<\/p>\n
ti<\/p>\n
da\ufb01d. A5 auun, it is only Accused Nas.1 to 3 w’<\/p>\n
\u00abDI<\/p>\n
TIa:a in this revision getitiun challenging the<\/p>\n
mr\ufb01ar u\ufb01 cmnvictiun and sentence.<\/p>\n
}_DJ.xA.C|’–\u00a2\\–L\/(—-\n<\/p>\n
\u00bb_far~\ufb01ha husinass af \ufb01ha compamy alana wou\u00a2a<\/p>\n
\u00abm<\/p>\n
3. I havu heard the learned cgu\ufb01sal for<\/p>\n
tha gatitimnaza a5 wail as tha_fStata::Eubl;g<\/p>\n
“Glut-I.-1|:-.Ia,._–ILH-*\u00bb-‘A l”‘
\nE & ‘IC’hF\\l”Iu”od $”H’&u I<\/p>\n
4. I have been t\u00e9ken\ufb01t\ufb01rdugh th\u00e9$a\ufb01i\ufb02anc$””<\/p>\n
am wall an tha orqah\ufb01*\u00a7aas\u00e9dVby_th\u00e9f\ufb02eurta beldw
\nand the dmcumenta rel\u00a7\u00e9d_uQun by_\ufb01h\u00a2fprosecution<\/p>\n
in the caaa.\n<\/p>\n
\ufb02. .li$ i\ufb01\ufb02%\u00a2\ufb01\u00a7w\ufb01dQ\ufb01,\ufb01\u00a71%$e learne\ufb01 counael
\nfar \u20acth\u00a7 _\u00a7%t\u00a7\ufb01igQ\u00a7r_’th\u00a7tV_t\u00a3\u00a7 avarments in the
\nc\u00a2mpl\u00a7i\ufb01\u00a3if;ladt\ufb01\ufb01da$ 5aEtion 2&0 do net reveal
\n$3 :tm w\ufb01i\ufb01h %\u00a7f.’iha accused parsons were
\n clay to day lausinesa of the<\/p>\n
i an<\/p>\n
(_1’F”F’nwri’.ng -ma 3–mr n I””nrnn:n~.tr {“11” an ‘I’-“-i rm ‘Phi: naawuznn-I:
\nJ-nil’ .i’fJ’in”1-0… win”, Bf.” ‘# “\ufb02”‘III-nf\ufb01lllll Jfdn. 1 L in\ufb01ll” Hid? n7H’&Z”U’IIZ<\/p>\n
\ufb01a\ufb01bwnaihie fur any offences cammitted.<\/p>\n
6. I have haan taken through the averments<\/p>\n
warm ht is ma\ufb01a in tha<\/p>\n
–1<\/p>\n
day’ tam: day business 0f the Patitzianar…h’c;_P1+firm.<\/p>\n
It 1 -32- Ten .:ar*’|m~i +’+-nril Hr lb H? 1′ gm *-ha ‘ fr.-rcmuu
\nNUDE-l -PI-\u00a7hI”\\l” |\u00a3’\ufb02\u00a7I|IO\u00e9l\\”I’-I”UI DJ’: In I ‘V I In I!’ II V 1′!
\n..;……….. … .. .5. ‘ Jill’; ..\\..’|…..a.. L… ..n..’ –I …..J.. …………..A…a..i .. …….. 4,-Q .-1. u
\nE7 ‘3 L.L11|$i ‘wJ ‘ J K.-JJVHB J15 HHLKJ J] Lu \ufb02\ufb02[~.i’v-d– band; I \u20ac151!” 2′? II<\/p>\n
.. .._. *3 450 _,n-19 AJV’<\/p>\n
pati’!:i\u00ab:1hm;~ M-.:n.i—firm,’   v\u00e9’hht\u00e9hdVed
\nthat L;chd\u00abar.” Rule 55A”V”rrrf’r\u00bbtha  \u00abhh:riVVVvI.”rosma’cVri.cs
\nRules, was {\u00a3_arHIrJ.as”). the
\nc\ufb02rzmum.-anrtsa, whi’\u00a2h~.”V  marked DY the
\n VVJPE are not proved
\nand 9;r;’\u00a3’\u00e9;_};-Virhvss’E:g_ra.\u00a7:1′.:_V:-A.__jT~~hg4.rV_a::”1&’a,s’ za pratest f car marking
\nat —-   3~Lh1’l”J\u00a7v pretest has been heated<\/p>\n
 ‘atv rewarding the; evidence and<\/p>\n
t:he”>2_:_a}id “ti-_::i:ume.h'”{:s are marked auhjact ta proof.<\/p>\n
The aa3′.”r’.:~;~..::=’.=~’1cH:.w::e:-+.’-3 have mat been ant”!-!’rr’-mr\u00e9 1.2:: be<\/p>\n
  pi-Laci’uEtic\u00abrL m; t<\/p>\n
 hm u-‘3w-u-up’: mun In-1-r and; man nu? 4-‘h.u.|5n. -an-u-Minn:-I Irma!-lana-II-Lu
\n‘0]. ‘u”’; . ‘..:’h\u00abf\ufb01.’..LWK’ II-4′)’ EU-I-J’ VJJW ‘Ia’:-L DJJWQU \ufb01.’..r\\-rld-i3W’u|. b|’VJ-9′-\\-IJIDI<\/p>\n
 the’ .\u00ab:.}?:.n1at::am::=3 -:3f the sri-hcuttt-ants in quaation. Than<\/p>\n
hrhductimh mf the partnership deed by itself<\/p>\n
E-‘wmsrln\ufb01 L’1|:”‘iL eatzatztlish that any cane nssf these accused<\/p>\n
ia guilty hf the affenc.-as for which they are
\ncharghd. It is furth-ar smhmittad that in another
\ncar:-9 fil-Eatt\ufb01 againht the. patitianar–ac:c:u5ad, along<\/p>\n
with E1ar:.313 sstatamant, the accused parscms<\/p>\n
grmduaad three invaicas. These dacum\u00e9\ufb01tg havn<\/p>\n
\ufb01acumanta pra\ufb01uca\ufb02  i\ufb01 a\ufb01e\ufb01\ufb01ar c#$a;  H\ufb01i\ufb01hV hava
\nhaan taken inta acaa\ufb01n\u00a3’in \u00a3ha p\u00a2\u00a7s$\ufb01\u00a3 \u00a2\u00e9sa.VVAs
\nauch, placing :e;;an\u00a2\u00e9 \ufb01\u00e9a hat p\ufb01hmia\u00e9ibla in law
\nand the aame Haa  \u00e9ffe\u00a7t\ufb01\u00a7 f;\ufb01&; finding uf the<\/p>\n
trial \ufb02mu\ufb01\ufb01g<\/p>\n
:?,i f?ef”‘:\u00a7\ufb01i:a;* t\ufb01\u00e9  learned \ufb01tate Puhlic
\nEhaae\ufb01u\ufb01nr \u00e9ummitted that under Section Ed, each<\/p>\n
mne mf thg*\u00a7c\ufb01u3&d is responsibla far the day to<\/p>\n
_\u00a7ay L\ufb01f\ufb01air\u00e9 Ac: “\ufb01ha firm. or campany’ and every<\/p>\n
 9pg\u00a7san i\ufb01+eharga af the cumgany’ wauld be<\/p>\n
‘ -rea\ufb01\ufb01ngihle and the burden is on the accused to<\/p>\n
. e\ufb01taE;i\u00a7\ufb01 that the offense was n\u00a2t within his<\/p>\n
‘k\ufb01awihmge at that he exercised due diligence to<\/p>\n
x *gugb\u00e9vant cammissian at suah affanca. He also<\/p>\n
 suhmittad that tha gartnarship dead produced in<\/p>\n
Vha caka wnuld alga: U eatab;i\u00a7h that each an;<\/p>\n
such nothing mnra was sugpasad to ha prn\u00a7e\u00a7 when<\/p>\n
the deed speak: fur itself making aa\ufb01n gn\ufb01 gt the<\/p>\n
0 <\/span>
\n‘_!-II’<\/p>\n
gartnnr in the firm re3ggnsible~ann.lia\u00a7le;”<\/p>\n
‘FI’iI’|+’1″u|l,nl|”‘ -gunk-am-‘u -l–\u00a7’-at-41 +1-\\.:u+- I-D-‘hm: -i’.1_.1I-‘.’a!-14  ‘run-.4-9rI’lV:’1u-u.anr-7′!
\n.l.’.aIJ- ‘co-JJ’ir.|\u00ab u.n”JIM’l.LI-.I-‘h”0.’V’I.-I t.-uvt-\u00bb VUJJTJ .1-JaVV’U’_.I-‘I-“$9–_ taraq. wafuuyg\ufb01lui<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
thn ac\u00a3u5.r
\ngruducad along with 3n\u00a7tian.Eii4Statnn\u00e9nt, tn\u00e9ra
\nwas nnthing wmnnq ‘in n@;nting \ufb02tg\ufb01ignca on the
\ninvoicns yrodunn\ufb01t \u00e9nin\ufb02tgbnta nth: accused who
\nyrmdumgg it on tnntt nwntnndznnt at the instance
\nGf :\ufb01h\u00a7n_i#3?3\u20ac\u00a7H\u00a7i\ufb02D7_i$n\u00a7\u00bbwmcantand$ that the
\ncnmvi\ufb01tinng and ;aan:an\u00a2a dues net call far<\/p>\n
i\ufb02tarfnr\u00e9nc\u00e9 in tna grasant revisian patitian.<\/p>\n
LE” v.93 mntitulnus analysis nf the evidence<\/p>\n
“inn rncnrn} mare garticulaxly, the statement given<\/p>\n
V ~.hytP{w;1 that he did nnt ascertain as to whu wan<\/p>\n
.Vt:\ufb01s\ufb01\ufb01n\ufb01inle far the day to may affairs qf the<\/p>\n
‘g\u00e9titimner Nn.1–Firm and as thara is no averment<\/p>\n
V’=,_insthn cnmplaint in the said regard, in viaw of<\/p>\n
‘jsactiun 34 nf the nruga and Cnsmatics Act and<\/p>\n
alsn in viaw cf the law lai\ufb01 down by the Han’hla<\/p>\n
I
\n.54’<\/p>\n
10 ‘<\/p>\n
swnma aw mmnvnmn .vs. ERJJ LAL MITTALWA\ufb02\ufb01 QTHERS<\/p>\n
regertad in AIR 1968 ac 232? and :55-d\u00a7\u00a7i\u00e9\u00a7\u00e9n uf<\/p>\n
na allegation to i\ufb01\u00a7icata~=\ufb01haf: \u00e9 \u00a7\u00e9r\ufb01ic\ufb01lar
\nparsmn was inecharge bf \u00a7\ufb01\ufb01_ra5\ufb01bnai$1a for the
\n\ufb02ay tn day a\u00a3f$ir\u00a7’dfj\ufb01he:\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01paqy er the conduct
\nuf th\ufb01.hu$ina3\u00a7w\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7t\ufb01\u00a7E\ufb01;\u00a7m:\ufb01E the company, the
\nprnsga\ufb01ti\ufb01\ufb01 $5 \u00a7g\u00a7i\u00a7st him \u00a7$uld be liabla ta he
\nquash\u00e9d;’3; n\u00a71d\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9\u00a7 g\ufb01an in this case, on the
\n\u00e9sid- \ufb01E\u00e9un\u00a7;9 \ufb01\ufb01%,’prasagution as against the<\/p>\n
patitiwnef5’i\u00e9.ii\u00a7\ufb02ie to he quashed.<\/p>\n
x9. h*Rg regards the marking uf the dacumant,<\/p>\n
“w.Ex;P1 \ufb01n 96, I hold that meta marking at the said<\/p>\n
“ajd\ufb01c\ufb01\ufb01a\ufb01t% would not prove all tha contents cf the<\/p>\n
n<\/p>\n
1\/”\n<\/p>\n
 ‘$$@d \ufb01acument$: They shnuld have been pmuved as<\/p>\n
‘”=,_pEhvidad under Rule 55A mf tha Hulas and as such<\/p>\n
‘ 1 held that tha aaid dacumants are not proved in<\/p>\n
tha instant casa. Furthar more, the trial Judge<\/p>\n
P I I I
\ne.1t1ane:3–accu3ed in another<\/p>\n
gL\u00bb\u20acJ~–‘L\/L g<\/p>\n
‘E!
\n3’!
\n{J
\n\u00a33.\n<\/p>\n
‘.2:\n<\/p>\n
fl
\n\ufb01ll
\n\u00a32.\n<\/p>\n
5?\n<\/p>\n
\u00a31′
\n:3′
\n{B
\n‘3<\/p>\n
: $1L3DHART\u00a7i’-..1E’E\u00a7i\u00a7il!..h*?;im4′ <\/p>\n
cnsn ‘withnut giving a fair oppartunitjg tn .tha<\/p>\n
gntitimnens–accuaed and withqut ascqftainin\u00a7.from<\/p>\n
them an tn whather they Lw\ufb01ld :$l,nug@n’\u20ache’3;i\u00a2.<\/p>\n
.. …… .. 4-1-u ‘
\n\u00a2Jf\ufb01\u00a2\ufb02%3 nr nun grasant cane alga. Planing
\n…. -11 . ‘_’|.\n<\/p>\n
‘and without nvan bringing it tn \ufb01h\u00e9 natiha af Eha<\/p>\n
accused and taking tn: n\ufb01n\ufb01agd n\ufb01”surnrise wuuld
\ndefaat the rignn yeape\ufb01fi\ufb01ltng accused to defend
\nhis r:aag,j;:Vn:na  :n%n:+.\u00bb:.~;.;;n the trial cum:
\nshnunn nay nnna gniind nnnn nna invaicas pruducad
\nby thnVn\u00e9ni;inn\u00a7rn?\u00e9\ufb02nQ3nH in anather case, which
\nhas manning tn \ufb01n in-the present caaa. on these<\/p>\n
gruunnnvrnf\u00e9bbedftn above, the revision petition<\/p>\n
_\u00a7:i;gd by.nn\u00e9 pntitionera herein has to be allowed<\/p>\n
 i; ._ ‘V..t.'{ ..   4-\u00bb 1a. . ‘ ._
\n. ~w1nnn.unurna uelnu’nra llahla<\/p>\n
.;3 ands: -f cnnv\ufb01ctign and santencg gagged
\ni’-A
\ntn!-I<\/p>\n
 i\ufb02. Henna, I pass the fallowing:–
\nGRDIR<\/p>\n
The reviaiun getitian is
\nallowed. The arder nf conviction
\nand santanca panned my the courts<\/p>\n
halow are set aside. i\ufb02a \\<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
The patitianarswaccuaad ‘ \u00e9r&-\n<\/p>\n
aaryuitted am’? the charges 1.~:~’va’1’1′-an’:<\/p>\n
against tham.\n<\/p>\n
The mail hands eza\ufb01m\ufb01eg by th\u00a3 a\u00bb <\/p>\n
-nu.-1.4–: ‘”1′ n,nnw.m a’n.’-I1 1  Jul 1111′ l’.!l3″.)’\\,1′.!’\u00a3n’I:A”Il ‘; .
\nL-WW3 L-L L:-J: |–.dll.u.l. WI i3|-.5-\ufb01nal-J-. W   E’–‘pl ‘<\/p>\n
The fine am\ufb01upt, if an\u00a7”pai@ by
\nthe petiti@na:5_EhEll. be*-g Lrqeq
\ntn them, =a V ‘ 2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008 Author: R.B.Naik mm THE HIGH counw OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE HATED THIS THE 11TH DAY my MARCH Z\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 BEFDRE THE HUN’EhE MR.JU8TICE R,B}\u00bbuE:xi l.Hf$.Pharma Centre, Nm.B3f1A, 5″‘Crass, ; Rajenwranagar,VMy3ure}m’_” 2.Raja3hakhar, 54 y\u00e9ar\ufb01gi \ufb02Em=Malla:adhya{“,_’.’. , *. *; Rfat Arakara, KhdihalliVEast;*y’ Kanakagar%}Tg,.3a\u00a7g%l\u00a2:e_313$: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-135455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-25T05:46:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-25T05:46:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2193,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-25T05:46:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-25T05:46:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-25T05:46:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008"},"wordCount":2193,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008","name":"M\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-25T05:46:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-pharma-centre-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Pharma Centre vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=135455"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135455\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=135455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=135455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=135455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}