{"id":13577,"date":"2010-07-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010"},"modified":"2014-07-07T16:46:24","modified_gmt":"2014-07-07T11:16:24","slug":"john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 229 of 2002()\n\n\n1. JOHN @ KOCHUNNY, S\/O. CHANDY,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. CHANDY @ ANIYAN, S\/O. JOHN,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :13\/07\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n          M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n\n           ---------------------------------------------\n             CRL.R.P.NO.299 OF 2003\n           ---------------------------------------------\n               Dated      14th      July 2010\n\n\n                          O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>            Second petitioner is the second<\/p>\n<p>accused  in    C.C.76\/1992                on       the   file of<\/p>\n<p>Judicial    First              Class              Magistrate-II,<\/p>\n<p>Kottayam. He was convicted and sentenced<\/p>\n<p>for  the  offence            under          Section       324 of<\/p>\n<p>Indian  Penal          Code          along            with  first<\/p>\n<p>petitioner\/first           accused.                Though    they<\/p>\n<p>challenged   the         conviction                and   sentence<\/p>\n<p>before   Sessions              Court,              Kottayam    in<\/p>\n<p>Crl.A.138\/1997, learned Additional Sessions<\/p>\n<p>Judge  on     re-appreciation                       of   evidence<\/p>\n<p>confirmed the conviction and sentence and<\/p>\n<p>dismissed the appeal. It is challenged in<\/p>\n<p>the  revision.          When          the         revision    was<\/p>\n<p>pending, first revision petitioner died on<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 229\/02               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>11\/1\/2005. Consequently charge as against the<\/p>\n<p>first     revision  petitioner  has   abated.  The<\/p>\n<p>question which      survives for consideration is<\/p>\n<p>only whether the conviction and sentence for<\/p>\n<p>the offence under Section 324 read with Section<\/p>\n<p>34 of      Indian Penal Code as against the second<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is legal and proper.\n<\/p>\n<pre>           2. Prosecution   case   is    that   on\n\n1\/10\/1988     at  about   8.45  p.m,  due  to  the\n\nprevious      enmity  of  the   accused  to   PW5,\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>petitioners poured acid on PW2, while he was<\/p>\n<p>standing near the gate of house of PW5 and<\/p>\n<p>thereby committed the offence under Sections<\/p>\n<p>308 and 326 read with Section 34 of         Indian<\/p>\n<p>Penal Code. Though learned Magistrate committed<\/p>\n<p>the case to Sessions court, Kottayam which was<\/p>\n<p>taken on file as S.C.29\/1989, learned     Sessions<\/p>\n<p>Judge finding that an offence under Section 308<\/p>\n<p>of Indian Penal Code exclusively triable by the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 229\/02            3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Sessions Court is not involved, sent back the<\/p>\n<p>records to Chief Judicial  Magistrate for trial<\/p>\n<p>after, framing the charge for the offence under<\/p>\n<p>Section 326 read with Section 34 of Indian<\/p>\n<p>Penal Code. Learned Chief Judicial   Magistrate<\/p>\n<p>made over the case to Judicial First Class<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate-II, Kottayam. Learned Magistrate on<\/p>\n<p>the evidence of Pws.1 to 11 and Exts.P1 to P6 ,<\/p>\n<p>called upon the petitioner to enter on his<\/p>\n<p>defence    and adduce evidence.   Accused  then<\/p>\n<p>examined    DW1 and   marked  Ext.D1.   Learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate   on the  evidence  found  that  the<\/p>\n<p>accused poured acid on PW2 in furtherance of<\/p>\n<p>their common intention and voluntarily caused<\/p>\n<p>hurt and thereby committed the offence under<\/p>\n<p>Section 324 read with Section 34 of      Indian<\/p>\n<p>Penal Code. Accused were sentenced to simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for one month. Learned    Sessions<\/p>\n<p>Judge re-appreciated the evidence and confirmed<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 229\/02               4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the     conviction.   Argument  of  the   learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel     appearing  for  the  second  revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is that evidence was not properly<\/p>\n<p>appreciated by the courts below and evidence of<\/p>\n<p>DW1 with     Ext.D1 should have been accepted by<\/p>\n<p>the courts below and it should have been   found<\/p>\n<p>that PW2 sustained injuries not from the hands<\/p>\n<p>of the accused but when PW2 and others poured<\/p>\n<p>acid on the house of the accused while causing<\/p>\n<p>damage to the house and in such circumstances,<\/p>\n<p>conviction is not sustainable.\n<\/p>\n<p>           3. Evidence of PW7, the doctor with<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P3 wound certificate establish that at 9<\/p>\n<p>p.m     on   1\/10\/1988,  immediately  after  the<\/p>\n<p>incident, PW2 was examined by the doctor from<\/p>\n<p>District     Hospital, Kottayam  and  the doctor<\/p>\n<p>noted burns on his face, left shoulder, left<\/p>\n<p>arm, left ear, neck and left eye. Left cornea<\/p>\n<p>was found hazy. Considering the condition of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 229\/02              5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the    patient,   he  was  referred  to   Medical<\/p>\n<p>College,    Hospital. Alleged   cause  of  injury<\/p>\n<p>disclosed to the doctor was sustained when acid<\/p>\n<p>was poured        at about 8.55 p.m at Erettu<\/p>\n<p>Kadavu.    Ext.P6  discharge  certificate  issued<\/p>\n<p>from the      Medical College Hospital, Kottayam<\/p>\n<p>proved by the evidence of PW11, who identified<\/p>\n<p>the      signature of Professor of Ophthalmology<\/p>\n<p>who was not then in a service, establish that<\/p>\n<p>PW2 was treated in the hospital as an inpatient<\/p>\n<p>from 1\/10\/1988 to 24\/10\/1988. Evidence of PW7<\/p>\n<p>with Ext.P3      wound certificate establish that<\/p>\n<p>PW2 sustained hurt and the hurt was caused when<\/p>\n<p>acid was poured on PW2. Even suggestion given<\/p>\n<p>to PW7 the doctor was that those injuries were<\/p>\n<p>caused, when acid fell on PW2, evidently in<\/p>\n<p>tune with the defence case that PW2 and others<\/p>\n<p>attempted    to  cause damage  to  the  house  of<\/p>\n<p>accused and during that acts, acid was poured<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 229\/02              6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>which accidentally fell on PW2. Therefore, it<\/p>\n<p>is conclusively proved that PW2 sustained hurt<\/p>\n<p>when acid fell on PW2. The only question is,<\/p>\n<p>whether it was poured by the accused or it had<\/p>\n<p>accidentally fallen on PW2 when PW2 and others,<\/p>\n<p>were committing damages to the house of the<\/p>\n<p>accused as canvassed by the defence.<\/p>\n<p>           4. I have  gone  through  the   entire<\/p>\n<p>evidence in the    light of the defence raised by<\/p>\n<p>the    petitioners.  As  rightly  found  by   the<\/p>\n<p>learned Magistrate and learned    Sessions Judge,<\/p>\n<p>it is absolutely clear from the evidence that<\/p>\n<p>PW2 did not     sustain injuries as canvassed by<\/p>\n<p>the    accused.  Though  crime  No.396\/1988   was<\/p>\n<p>registered in respect of the incident in which<\/p>\n<p>damages     were caused  to  the  house  of   the<\/p>\n<p>accused, there is no evidence to establish that<\/p>\n<p>it was in that incident PW2 sustained injury.<\/p>\n<p>Evidence of injured and Pws.3 and 4 the eye<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 229\/02               7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>witnesses     were  properly appreciated  by  the<\/p>\n<p>courts below and I find no reason to differ<\/p>\n<p>with    the  findings  based on  appreciation  of<\/p>\n<p>evidence. Evidence conclusively establish that<\/p>\n<p>accused     voluntarily caused  hurt  to  PW2  by<\/p>\n<p>pouring acid which is corrosive substance on<\/p>\n<p>him in furtherance of their common intention.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, conviction of the accused for the<\/p>\n<p>offence under Section 324 read with Section 34<\/p>\n<p>of   Indian Penal Code     is perfectly legal and<\/p>\n<p>warrants no interference.\n<\/p>\n<p>           5. Then the only question is regarding<\/p>\n<p>the sentence. Argument of the learned     counsel<\/p>\n<p>appearing for the second revision petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>that incident was in 1988 and at this distant<\/p>\n<p>point of time, second revision petitioner may<\/p>\n<p>not be sent to prison and PW2 is now no more<\/p>\n<p>and therefore, he is disabled from compounding<\/p>\n<p>the offence and as evidence establish that PW2<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 229\/02              8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>sustained only simple burns     with no deformity<\/p>\n<p>in the interest of justice sentence may be<\/p>\n<p>modified to    fine.\n<\/p>\n<p>           6. Unfortunately prosecution  did  not<\/p>\n<p>adduce the evidence, which should have been<\/p>\n<p>adduced.      PW2   the  injured  has  not  given<\/p>\n<p>evidence     that  he  sustained  any   deformity<\/p>\n<p>consequent    to  the  burn  sustained.  PW7  the<\/p>\n<p>doctor had only seen PW2 on the date of the<\/p>\n<p>incident and referred him to Medical College.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, PW7 is not in a position to give the<\/p>\n<p>details of the treatment or the consequence of<\/p>\n<p>the injuries. Though PW11 was examined, he did<\/p>\n<p>not treat PW2 and only identified the signature<\/p>\n<p>to formally prove Ext.P6 discharge certificate.<\/p>\n<p>Learned Magistrate has also not recorded that<\/p>\n<p>when     PW2 was   examined  he  could  find  any<\/p>\n<p>deformity on PW2. Ordinarily, it would not have<\/p>\n<p>been omitted to be taken note of by the learned<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 229\/02               9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Magistrate      if   there   was   any   deformity.<\/p>\n<p>Considering the fact that the incident was in<\/p>\n<p>1988 and there is no evidence to prove that PW2<\/p>\n<p>suffered     any  deformity   and  the  threat   of<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment was hanging over the head of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner for the last more than two decades,<\/p>\n<p>interest     of  justice  will   be  met,  if  the<\/p>\n<p>sentence     is  modified   to  imprisonment   till<\/p>\n<p>rising of court and compensation of Rs.15,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>to be paid to PW2 or is legal heirs. Sentence<\/p>\n<p>is accordingly modified.\n<\/p>\n<p>           Revision petition is allowed in part.<\/p>\n<p>Conviction     of  the   second  petitioner\/second<\/p>\n<p>accused in C.C.76\/92 on the file of Judicial<\/p>\n<p>First     Class  Magistrate-II,  Koyyayam  for  the<\/p>\n<p>offence under Section 324 read with Section 34<\/p>\n<p>of    Indian Penal Code     is confirmed. Sentence<\/p>\n<p>is modified. In supersession of the sentence<\/p>\n<p>awarded by the learned Magistrate and confirmed<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 229\/02              10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>by learned      Sessions Judge, second petitioner<\/p>\n<p>is sentenced to imprisonment till rising of<\/p>\n<p>court and compensation of Rs,15,000\/- (Rupees<\/p>\n<p>Fifteen thousand only) and in default simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for one month. Second petitioner<\/p>\n<p>is directed to appear before the Judicial First<\/p>\n<p>Class     Magistrate-II, Kottayam  on  30\/8\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>Learned Magistrate     is directed to execute the<\/p>\n<p>sentence.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                             M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,<br \/>\n                                        JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>uj.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 229 of 2002() 1. JOHN @ KOCHUNNY, S\/O. CHANDY, &#8230; Petitioner 2. CHANDY @ ANIYAN, S\/O. JOHN, Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-07T11:16:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-07T11:16:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1250,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010\",\"name\":\"John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-07T11:16:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-07T11:16:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-07T11:16:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010"},"wordCount":1250,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010","name":"John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-07T11:16:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/john-kochunny-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"John @ Kochunny vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13577"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13577\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}