{"id":13583,"date":"2009-09-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009"},"modified":"2015-12-25T08:16:58","modified_gmt":"2015-12-25T02:46:58","slug":"karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009<\/div>\n<pre> CRM No.212-MA of 2009                                  1\n\n\n\n\n    IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB &amp;\n              HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.\n\n\n                               CRM No. 212-MA of 2009 (O&amp;M)\n                               Date of decision: 05.08.2009\n\nKaramvir                                            ...Petitioner\n\n                            Versus\n\nMs. Anita Sharma                                    ...Respondent\n\n\nCORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA\n\nPresent:    Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.\n\n\nRajan Gupta, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>            The petitioner through the instant appeal has impugned the<\/p>\n<p>judgment dated 16th January, 2009, passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist<\/p>\n<p>Class, Gurgaon, whereby the complaint under Section 138 of the<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The complaint was registered on the allegation that<\/p>\n<p>respondent is a clerk in Punjab National Bank, Gurgaon. Her husband,<\/p>\n<p>namely, Pardeep Sharma was a clerk with the petitioner in Central Bank<\/p>\n<p>of India, Gurgaon. In November, 1998, respondent and her husband<\/p>\n<p>requested the petitioner to advance loan of Rs.1.00 lac to purchase a car.<\/p>\n<p>The respondent assured to return the loan within three months. Car<\/p>\n<p>bearing No. HR-26H-0358 Maruti Zen was purchased by the respondent<\/p>\n<p>in the name of her husband. A sum of Rs.42,000\/- was returned by the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">  CRM No.212-MA of 2009                                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>respondent on 13.1.1999 through cheque no.442381 of Punjab National<\/p>\n<p>Bank and the same was encashed. Respondent further issued a cheque<\/p>\n<p>bearing No.422384 dated 7th March, 1999 for Rs.30,000\/- and cheque<\/p>\n<p>No.442385 dated 10th April, 1999 for Rs.20,000\/- of Punjab National<\/p>\n<p>Bank, Gurgaon towards repayment of the balance amount of loan. The<\/p>\n<p>said cheques when presented in bank, were dishonoured on account of<\/p>\n<p>stop payment as the payment was stopped by the drawer\/respondent.<\/p>\n<p>            In the preliminary evidence, the complainant was examined<\/p>\n<p>as PW1 and the documents Ex.P1 to P8 were placed on record.<\/p>\n<p>            After preliminary evidence, the respondent was ordered to<\/p>\n<p>be summoned vide order dated 17th May, 1999.\n<\/p>\n<p>            After appearance of respondent, notice of accusation for the<\/p>\n<p>commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments<\/p>\n<p>Act, was issued.   Respondent did not plead guilty and claimed trial.<\/p>\n<p>Evidence was led by the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>            In after charge evidence, the complainant examined himself<\/p>\n<p>as PW1 and Ashok Sharma as PW2.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Statement of the respondent was recorded under Section<\/p>\n<p>313 Cr.P.C. Respondent denied the allegations levelled against him. In<\/p>\n<p>defence four witnesses were examined.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The accused examined Mehar Singh Gandhi, Registration<\/p>\n<p>Clerk as DW1, I.M. Utreja as DW2, Jitender Kumar as DW3 and A.K.<\/p>\n<p>Pahwa as DW4.\n<\/p>\n<p>            After hearing learned counsel for the parties, trial Court<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">  CRM No.212-MA of 2009                                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>dismissed the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable<\/p>\n<p>Instruments Act vide order dated 16th January, 2009.<\/p>\n<p>             Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that a loan of Rs.1<\/p>\n<p>lac was advanced to the respondent to purchase a Car. Three different<\/p>\n<p>cheques were issued to return payment. One cheque No.442381 dated<\/p>\n<p>13.1.1999 for Rs.42,000\/- was encashed.           Two cheques bearing<\/p>\n<p>Nos.422384 dated 7.3.1999 for Rs.30,000\/- and No.422385 dated<\/p>\n<p>10.4.1999 for Rs.20,000\/- of Punjab National Bank, Gurgaon were<\/p>\n<p>dishonoured.    Trial Court while appreciating evidence from the file<\/p>\n<p>observed that loan was taken for purchasing a car whereas the allegation<\/p>\n<p>of the respondent is that cheque was not for discharge of a debt or<\/p>\n<p>liability. Mehar Singh Gandhi (DW1) appeared and stated that car was<\/p>\n<p>purchased on 28th October, 1998 and the same was financed by a<\/p>\n<p>Finance Company. He had proved the documents DW-1\/A to DW-1\/H.<\/p>\n<p>Allegation of the petitioner was that loan was advanced in the month of<\/p>\n<p>November, 1998 whereas the car was purchased on 18th October, 1998<\/p>\n<p>i.e. before November, 1998, meaning thereby that the allegation of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was not true.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The trial court dismissed the complaint by coming to the<\/p>\n<p>conclusion that the date of advancing loan had not been mentioned in<\/p>\n<p>the complaint and in whose presence the loan was advanced. The court<\/p>\n<p>also observed that no document was executed and no interest was<\/p>\n<p>charged. It has also come into evidence that husband of accused had<\/p>\n<p>taken loan from lot of people and was involved in a case of cheating.<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">  CRM No.212-MA of 2009                                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>There was no business transaction between the parties. There is no<\/p>\n<p>documentary evidence on record to show how he got that much money.<\/p>\n<p>Regarding the money, the complainant could not give a satisfactory<\/p>\n<p>reply in the cross-examination. He also could not tell when he got the<\/p>\n<p>loan from the society. He also could not tell the date when he made the<\/p>\n<p>payment to the accused. According to the accused, her husband was<\/p>\n<p>involved in a case of cheating. The complainant promised to help him.<\/p>\n<p>The cheque was issued in order to pay money to the complainant for that<\/p>\n<p>purpose. When case was registered against the husband of the accused,<\/p>\n<p>the accused directed the bank to stop payment of the cheque.<\/p>\n<p>            Learned counsel has not been able to point out any infirmity<\/p>\n<p>in the impugned order nor has he been able to point out any glaring<\/p>\n<p>misappreciation of evidence. Moreover, learned counsel has failed to<\/p>\n<p>convince how the loan was advanced in the month of November to<\/p>\n<p>purchase the car when the car was purchased on 28th October, 1998.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, the car was purchased from PASCO Auto Mobiles, financed<\/p>\n<p>by Finance Company that means the cheque was not to discharge legal<\/p>\n<p>debt or liability. Regarding payment of Rs.1 lac, no receipt is on the<\/p>\n<p>file. No date and time is mentioned when the loan was advanced and in<\/p>\n<p>whose presence.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>            When two versions are there, version in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>accused is to be accepted. Trial Court rightly held that no offence under<\/p>\n<p>Section 138 of the Negotiable and Instruments Act was committed.<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">   CRM No.212-MA of 2009                                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Respondent was rightly acquitted. No ground for interference is made<\/p>\n<p>out.\n<\/p>\n<p>            This petition is, accordingly, dismissed.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\n                                               (RAJAN GUPTA)\nAugust 05, 2009                                     JUDGE\n'rajpal'\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009 CRM No.212-MA of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. 212-MA of 2009 (O&amp;M) Date of decision: 05.08.2009 Karamvir &#8230;Petitioner Versus Ms. Anita Sharma &#8230;Respondent CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-25T02:46:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-25T02:46:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":897,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-25T02:46:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-25T02:46:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-25T02:46:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009"},"wordCount":897,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009","name":"Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-25T02:46:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karamvir-vs-ms-anita-sharma-on-5-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karamvir vs Ms. Anita Sharma on 5 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13583"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13583\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}