{"id":135838,"date":"2008-03-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008"},"modified":"2019-02-06T23:53:55","modified_gmt":"2019-02-06T18:23:55","slug":"sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
DATED nus THE 14'\"! DAY or   %\n\nnEronE-_\n\n1-an Hownm HR. Jusucm gm,  M\n\n1.<\/pre>\n
..}. naa.u.a….. 2.1.. :a,j;’~;.4\u00bb _.__.r <\/p>\n
\ufb01 <\/p>\n
SREEKANTA  ‘A  ‘
\ns,\/o LA’PE;JAVARAV_lAH-.,  .V
\nAGED ABOUfI’ 48’YEARS, _ <\/p>\n
Knlsui-JA   ~ ‘<\/p>\n
s,:’c:i- ;_.a.:;'”E,J’_’fvARA1;ue1″‘-,\u00bb_,   V
\n5gEn,qBa;jT 49 ‘(Em-es,__<\/p>\n
 sM15TSu’M11f1\u20acA. w.)’e mTE MUDDUMADUI<\/p>\n
.p.A;I_IGHTER;:u-Lm!__0F LATE JAVARAIAH
\nhc\u00a7E’D%ABQU’:j’4o’*:$AR~s,<\/p>\n
M _ sM’1″ ~r-.\u00bb1AHA,t:-EVMEJIA, D\/0 LATE JAVARAIAH<\/p>\n
w,Ir;: i_.A:z’E MAHJLDEVU<\/p>\n
 AGED ABC)U–‘–‘.’-‘——-1&4 YEARS,<\/p>\n
vi<\/p>\n
‘=._SMT=S\ufb01H!VAMMA D\/O {ATE JAVARAIAH<\/p>\n
‘   ‘Inn-mew<\/p>\n
I’ll II II<\/p>\n
AGEDABOUT 34 YEARS,<\/p>\n
‘*7S.M*1*’V’sHANTHAMMA. mo LATE JAVARAIAH<\/p>\n
;o sow.-.=n.A.:.Iua @ coxnunangzuga<\/p>\n
  “AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
\n” ‘ Li. ARE R\/AT HOUSE BEARING No.34.<\/p>\n
 OFF;  ‘:*Aru’rv:a ‘I”:.1}v\u20acPLE
\n; KYATHAMARANAHALLI, MYSORE.\n<\/p>\n
 PETITIONERS<\/p>\n
(BY M\/S. M S RAJENDRA PRASAD ASSOCIATES. ADVS.)<\/p>\n
\u00a35<\/p>\n
S-MT DEVAMMA. W\/O LATE SAKAIAH
\nAGED ABOUT C.-6 YEAR<\/p>\n
R\/AT KYATHAMARANAHALLI
\nPEAZ-‘%. BAD MOHALLA, 1
\nMYSORE.\n<\/p>\n
% _  iaE:;~:;=oNpE\u00a7N’1*%
\n(BY SRL MAHANTESH s HosMA;i’ia:, mqv.)   ” ‘<\/p>\n
OF’ THE c_:pNs’r1’1’u’rIoN OE-‘ IND1A.~”PRM_’IN(3 ‘P0 QUASH THE
\nUNDER l.JI’\\’l’I!JU ‘J-3. 1.’JU\u00a7JO !”‘I’9_S3’3!.’.i1)_|’-,1?! iVI.V_A.’VNU. H) U!” ZUUD UN THE
\nFILE or THE THIRD ADD1’If.If.’).NAL.DISTRlC’1f’ JUDGE. MYSORE, AND
\n      i.’A.ixiu.\n<\/p>\n
IN 0.S.N0-:.’ 671..,0′?I:3o04,;c)N~.THE”~:\u00a7*i1.b: OF’ THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL
\nJUDGE”: (SENi0.R ;~:;iv1s1<:m;._.}_ivivso\ufb01ig.<\/p>\n
 on for Prelilnilmly hearing
\nin B"GI'cj.u1p, ..a;1ay4,*t.l__1"c  made the following:<\/p>\n
l'|'l'lI'l'I'l'|'I:I
\n2 <\/span><\/p>\n
  S. No. 671\/ 2004, pending on the \ufb01le<\/p>\n
 ‘ J31’ (Sr. Divn.), Mysore are the petitioners.<\/p>\n
.’T1i\u00e9y 1\u00e91.sai?.i'<_:V..T:qucsLiu11cd, in Lhis writ petition, the order<\/p>\n
MA. 10\/2905 by 1.111: I11<\/p>\n
%
\n073<\/span><\/p>\n
2. I have heard learned Counsel appearing an boll:
\nsides and perused the record of the writ petition.<\/p>\n
\\_,.\n<\/p>\n
\/,7<\/p>\n
3. Sri M.S. Rqicndra Prasad, learned e.=a%;i\u00a2%%::gu;1sc1<\/p>\n
for the pcl3’l.ioncrs conl.c::ude\u00bbd that \u00bbi;:*..__<\/p>\n
illegal, pelvenscg +_.n_I_.i capzie\ufb01uus.’    j<\/p>\n
c<m\u00a3.""d"d that ihe iower;\n<\/p>\n
iuipugucd order, wil.l1oul’.’V”L’L\u00bb$i_i*\u00a2\u00a2~;)_g:I’  of the
\nmaterial facts and  l1a\u00a7v;’AAc2VA:xt.’t:t:ded in its
\nju1’iadictJ’on i11valluwi;V;gv:'(_}A.;Vc  ” <\/p>\n
4. 1\u00b061:   S. Husumlh, learned
\n   1*\u00a2g$1Jm1de11t contended that the
\n  (3:\u00bb::_ij3:rA1; “‘\u00e9onsidcring the Inatxarial facls,<\/p>\n
ci1~;.:’mx;slai1cr._$ and itacurcl of the case as well I.-1… the natum<\/p>\n
 .oI””~*._li._’p’n_:-I_._’..”\u00ab.i__.r_.; r:.-..-poise-. 91′ me: ju:’iw’c””i:  in it, has<\/p>\n
 mic:-, lftmt too with conditions. Learned<\/p>\n
Cir-Lu1e$el -cblmtlndcd that theme is no exercise of excess<\/p>\n
A   AAjF.!1’iS(Iit::Li0l1 by the lower appellate Court and no case is<\/p>\n
\ufb02inade out for i11Lt:rfe1em:c in un: writ },_.I.;_ir.21- by llai.-5<\/p>\n
 ‘R ,,<\/p>\n
5. Considering the rival coutezntjons, and ”<\/p>\n
the point for consideration is:\n<\/p>\n
Whether the low;-I”A”  “has” 0
\ncommitted any illega1ity,=.__ per-are1’sityA.at1d’<\/p>\n
ca}.-129.19-.a.ss1y 11; }.nae_:s_=1;;g t.1;e’1;I.1LIp_1″1Icz,1;eti_-V_o:’\u00ab;t:::’?   ‘<\/p>\n
6. Considering the fact tltatvthe writ petition arises out
\nof an int.m’le-.:ut.o1’y  0′ it tanteuseem-3,: to
\nrefer to the faete oi’\ufb02’1e’caee’ Veinue the ilupugneci<\/p>\n
onler     <\/p>\n
 of a’*po__1_ftio11 allotted to de1’iendau%. 4 under a<\/p>\n
‘ .:.VLo1111o;.1ro11;1ie\u00e9: decree passed in O. S. No.2t’)41\/91 by the<\/p>\n
”  Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Myeole. The<\/p>\n
~ :.:.,:,.-‘I (‘1 …. -,a ..\ufb02…..
\n0 R11 uuuu. mus:\n<\/p>\n
 \ufb01ajgrpvlicatioli was contested by the 4″‘ del’endanl.. The<\/p>\n
}……..’….. II<\/p>\n
 parties, by its order dated 25.02.2005 has allowed the<\/p>\n
application and the defendant no.4 was appoiutsed as
\nReceiver to properly account the income derived from the
\n‘m .1′ v al,1ot.ted to her, in the compromise decree passed<\/p>\n
I’<\/p>\n
LII<\/p>\n
in as. No.214\/1991. Condition was also i1:11._”‘3″‘- <\/p>\n
eII’ect that, he should furnish accounts Ollciifiillv$lX:lil1ll1’1.liei’<\/p>\n
till the dispusal cf the suit. It was also  <\/p>\n
90% :11′ the earning \ufb01uul the  te  l<\/p>\n
Vie ..f’
\n‘E: 1<\/p>\n
 ‘ii-g   ftviv {gig-.’Vk;i:iIl>:I’I’.lJIlt\ufb01lli-‘\ufb01e  5 vi’-VIl'”‘l”l”Vl’l”|’lH-i’l’ <\/p>\n
subject to pmper   and also
\ndirected for ftuilislzillgl  fol. pcI.[o1mi11g the
\nactol’1’ecx:i\u00a7s~ei-iljlz   party to the suit.
\nPetitiezleii-e    said order. it was<\/p>\n
defetlidaut’    tl’e “-“n””‘<me impeeezl in<\/p>\n
the \u00a71u\u00a2;.,'1'i1gd 10\/ 2005 in the lower Appellate<\/p>\n
 causiaelixjg die fact that defendant 4 in the suit is<\/p>\n
 " _edl11i5t"t.edl3'lA_  ' Hjieesessiozl of the property and the<\/p>\n
 V =g:'\u00ab..-}.2e'."Q.;-..'V ji.l~x.+….~1;g ell V LI. a_=1:;_ll ezgtent, eumpaled to the suit<\/p>\n
1 1:11'<\/p>\n
et:l1e(_luEe4i'.V'p1'ope1'ty, in which "1iiIiil.I.I1i:i   lmu**="'<\/p>\n
 .. el1azve–~lla1;d as the plaintilI's am entitled to mesne Inufil, <\/p>\n
l  they succeeded in the suit, wherein an enquiry can also be<\/p>\n
F held to ascertain the vent collected by defendant 4 from<\/p>\n
lam – all in view of the<\/p>\n
— —–r.r –\n<\/p>\n
decision of the Apex Court in me  vi’ 1’|.”””‘i.ir”‘i Baa’ eu-<\/p>\n
\\.\\
\nA’<\/p>\n
an<\/p>\n
— ..q.\n<\/p>\n
the 1:-ondil;ione imposed against defelldetit out<\/p>\n
justi\ufb01ed and hence was set aside—- and d_efeiIsde11|\u00a7]4w\u00a3te. <\/p>\n
t._.re\u00a2_:Led ,o furnish details of    J<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
H<\/p>\n
1e rope -igy’ an} the 1iaee:se\u00bb..o’*mlit. da_’i-.r’~;:a1 E.’_.!.i:–.: \u00ab.e;;-e.\u00ab.,..; 1.!’ t.;_e<\/p>\n
\u00a31<\/p>\n
shop premises. PLr1*:s.L_1e11t;’I1>*At,_heVV dei’e11<iai1i. 4
\nhas also \ufb01led memo of  '1__l1l:3 trial Court on
\n3O.03.200'Z~vfi2;j)iel1i11g\u00a7the new um tenants and the
\nmozztlaly    '<\/p>\n
8. ‘ANoticingtlie.t’at:t”‘tluat the plaint.i1Te in the suit. did not<\/p>\n
sL1;3\u00a2,’eed  the \ufb01ndings in the order dated<\/p>\n
V.  ” ‘  voii1e:’s on IA No.3 is also against them and<\/p>\n
V’ -\ufb02ae  hi .11a_.e (“tom-1. has only deleted the conditiolns,<\/p>\n
w.i1io,’s1’i:o?ti1e facts ai<\/p>\n
ii ‘*f’i”cijiii:-eta:-we of um :.:e.ee, in 1:33.!<\/p>\n
 .t ;viev.s.v=.- is jueti\ufb01ed, the lower Appellate Court. has<\/p>\n
V’ ‘ediowed the appeal. Since the petitjozxem did not. question<\/p>\n
1 the order passed on IA No.3 by the trial Court and as the<\/p>\n
cenditione ..npr..n:~:e-d  _om;,, to be unacceptable, the<\/p>\n
vested in it, has passed the impugned order, <\/p>\n
appeal in part, i.e, only setting aside   <\/p>\n
\ufb01t<\/p>\n
fuiiiisii details, which   .1.”a.a1’1iir.sli;:_s,1. ‘*.a;\u00a7.  the<\/p>\n
memo of calculation dated   d”‘um”<\/p>\n
5’.\n<\/p>\n
fumiehed in the  ‘iet_a;ti1*1.’e1:t ei'”’11’et. and the
\nincome derived [ruin the  inquiied into
\nee}.-e1’e.t.ely   :wiiy”ei:’d1iiesI_1..\u00e9 pm\ufb01te, in my view,<\/p>\n
the iuwer  l:ia:sl’:’-“\ufb01t. {:e::m:…ted .r-my ..1_.geliLy,
\npe1’ve’.rsity_ x0i’._-vVe;;11;:1ie*ieu_ts act in passing the iinpugned
\norder. “T_lie1re’ie_ 11-45′ -ei-i~:,;i”\u00ab:ii’ illegality apparent. on the face<\/p>\n
of  ifeeerd\u00bb 9’l””iin1iug;l1etl order, to set aside the same in<\/p>\n
A the -.I.’:\u00b0’i.t jt\ufb01iylicli\ufb02ll<\/p>\n
 iii view of the petitioners not ehuileligilig the ouier<\/p>\n
 it  IA NO.3 by the trial Court dated 25.20.2005, nu-<\/p>\n
 as such is caused by the impugned older passed<\/p>\n
” ‘W the  ..p1.re…r-.a.i._. C_Ll1’L. No gmuiid is made out In<\/p>\n
interfere with the older impugned i*ei”e”i, ‘-‘l:ieli in my<\/p>\n
.11;p:_,s_:-:11 t__l defendant 4 wiu1;’J:i”i*ide1*’..’tl;s:LtLV’:v!;eV:elnoi.:ldf<\/p>\n
957<\/span><\/p>\n
View is just, couzsidering the uuncurrcni. i’u1\u00a2.iji:n’e\u00a7,f”–\u00ab \ufb01le
\ntrial Court as well the lower Appellate  V <\/p>\n
In the result, writ pclitiui; i:e d’cv0id.,%”0IV <\/p>\n
I-.ur <\/p>\n
‘u
\nJ”IJI&I Cl<\/p>\n
~.._, \\.uau.| mu… -..\u00abm-:.:.-.-: !.h.*:V..~:-.:1=.–!. 9.! LL:<\/p>\n
and is one for pa1’ljt:i9_1:,  \u00a3115 ‘1mw’i sio11s made
\nunder the   Rules, 200.5,
\nthe trial is  Ithe disposal of me<\/p>\n
:;n_1iL .t}1;-‘.5 one year from mu dale<\/p>\n
‘ Sd\/-Q<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda DATED nus THE 14′”! DAY or % nEronE-_ 1-an Hownm HR. Jusucm gm, M 1. ..}. naa.u.a….. 2.1.. :a,j;’~;.4\u00bb _.__.r \ufb01 SREEKANTA ‘A ‘ s,\/o LA’PE;JAVARAV_lAH-., .V AGED ABOUfI’ 48’YEARS, _ Knlsui-JA ~ ‘ s,:’c:i- ;_.a.:;’”E,J’_’fvARA1;ue1″‘-,\u00bb_, V 5gEn,qBa;jT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-135838","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-06T18:23:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\\\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-06T18:23:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1405,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\\\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-06T18:23:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\\\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-06T18:23:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-06T18:23:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008"},"wordCount":1405,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008","name":"Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-06T18:23:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sreekanta-vs-smt-devamma-wo-late-sakaiah-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sreekanta vs Smt Devamma W\/O Late Sakaiah on 14 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135838","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=135838"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135838\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=135838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=135838"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=135838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}