{"id":136096,"date":"2011-08-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011"},"modified":"2018-09-02T15:56:29","modified_gmt":"2018-09-02T10:26:29","slug":"mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                    In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                  at\n                                            New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                      File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001056\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a04,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a04,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties: (heard\u00a0through\u00a0videoconference)\n\n\n\n        Appellant\n\n\n        Shri\u00a0Murlidhar\u00a0Mahadev\n        Dalavi,\u00a0Mahadev\u00a0Smruti,\n        Zenda\u00a0Naka\u00a0Murbad,\u00a0\n        AT\u00a0Post\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Taluka\u00a0Murbad\u00a0District,\n        Thane\u00a0421\u00a0401\n\n        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\u00a0\n\n        Respondents\n\n\n        Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0\n        Commercial\u00a0Branch,\u00a0CST,\n        Mumbai\n\n\n\n        Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0Atul\u00a0Rane,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0DCM\n\n                      Information\u00a0Commissioner         :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                         In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n                                                     at\n                                              New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                              File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001056\n\n\n                                                  ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0 his \u00a0 RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0 dated\u00a012.08.2010\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0 PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0<br \/>\n                                                                        st<br \/>\n       seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a06\u00a0points\u00a0[viz.,\u00a0local\u00a0train\u00a0fare\u00a0in\u00a01 \u00a0class\u00a0from\u00a0Shahad\u00a0to\u00a0Kalyan;\u00a0if\u00a0it\u00a0is \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       less\u00a0than\u00a0Rs.\u00a052\/\u00ad,\u00a0 \u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0rule\/circular\u00a0under\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0charged\u00a0Rs.52\/\u00ad;\u00a0name\u00a0\u00a0&amp; \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0employee\u00a0appointed\u00a0as\u00a0ticket\u00a0checker;\u00a0his\u00a0duties;\u00a0whether\u00a0police\u00a0personnel\u00a0are \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       permitted\u00a0to\u00a0travel\u00a0without\u00a0ticket\u00a0when\u00a0they\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0on\u00a0duty\u00a0and\u00a0if,\u00a0yes\u00a0then\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0rule\/circular\/order \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       in\u00a0this\u00a0regard\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0details\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0fine\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0imposed\u00a0on\u00a04\u00a0police\u00a0officials\u00a0who\u00a0deboarded \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0train\u00a0at\u00a0Kalyan\u00a0station\u00a0with\u00a0Railway\u00a0staff]\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0charging\u00a0him\u00a0both\u00a0fine\u00a0and\u00a0fare\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0TC\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       when\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0traveling,\u00a0as\u00a0admitted\u00a0by\u00a0him,\u00a0\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0local\u00a0train\u00a0TL\u00ad14\u00a0from\u00a0Shahad\u00a0to\u00a0Klayan\u00a0\u00a0&#8216;without\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       any\u00a0\u00a0ticket&#8217;.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.     The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0on\u00a014.09.2010,\u00a0gave\u00a0point\u00adwise\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0considered\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       to\u00a0be\u00a0inadequate\u00a0and\u00a0thus\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a01st\u00adappeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0on\u00a024.09.2010.\u00a0As\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellant\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0receive\u00a0any\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a01st\u00adappeal,\u00a0he\u00a0sent\u00a0a\u00a0reminder\u00adletter\u00a0dated\u00a025.11.2010\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0The\u00a0AA\u00a0then,\u00a0through\u00a0his\u00a0decision\u00a0dated\u00a008.12.2010,\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0i)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0IRA\u00a0137\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0ii)\u00a0\u00a0a\u00a0list\u00a0containing\u00a0the\u00a0name\u00a0&amp;\u00a0designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0TC\u00a0staff,\u00a0while\u00a0holding\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0information\u00a0regarding\u00a0duties\u00a0of\u00a0TC\u00a0staff\u00a0have\u00a0\u00a0been\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0duties\u00a0of\u00a0other\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       than\u00a0TC\u00a0staff\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0form\u00a0part\u00a0of\u00a0original\u00a0request.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0point\u00a0\u00a0(f\u00a0)\u00a0is\u00a0adequate.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0recorded\u00a0that\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0unsigned,\u00a0a\u00a0signed\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0to\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       thereafter,\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0AA&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0filed\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0petition\u00a0dated\u00a021.02.2011\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Commission\u00a0complaining\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0AA\u00a0has\u00a0refused\u00a0to\u00a0furnish\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0has\u00a0\u00a0not\u00a0provided\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0signed\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply\u00a0as\u00a0mentioned\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0order.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0referring\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0background\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0argued\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       that\u00a0while\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply\u00a0the\u00a0minimum\u00a0fare\u00a0from\u00a0Sahad\u00a0station\u00a0to\u00a0Kalyan\u00a0station\u00a0is\u00a0Rs.\u00a0<br \/>\n          41\/\u00ad\u00a0only,\u00a0the\u00a0Ticket\u00a0Checker\u00a0had\u00a0levied\u00a0on\u00a0him\u00a0excess\u00a0charges\u00a0(the\u00a0fare\u00a0was\u00a0\u00a0Rs.\u00a052\/\u00ad)\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         journey\u00a0from\u00a0station\u00a0Titwalla\u00a0to\u00a0Kalyan\u00a0instead\u00a0of\u00a0from\u00a0\u00a0Shahad\u00a0(where\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0actually\u00a0boarded\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         train)\u00a0to\u00a0Kalyan\u00a0.\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0have\u00a0 \u00a0failed\u00a0to\u00a0give\u00a0him\u00a0any\u00a0information\u00a0which\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         would\u00a0justify\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0difference.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0clarified\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0TC\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0charged\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0any\u00a0excess\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         fare\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0train\u00a0fare\u00a0in\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0cases\u00a0(either\u00a0Titwalla\u00a0to\u00a0Kalyan\u00a0or\u00a0Sahad\u00a0to\u00a0Kalyan)\u00a0is\u00a0same\u00a0i.e\u00a0Rs.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         52\/\u00ad\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0what\u00a0they\u00a0have\u00a0told\u00a0him\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adquery\u00a0was\u00a0the\u00a0&#8216;base\u00a0fare&#8217;\u00a0(i.e.\u00a0Rs.41\/\u00ad)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         which\u00a0adds\u00a0up\u00a0to\u00a0Rs.52\/\u00ad\u00a0after\u00a0including\u00a0certain\u00a0surcharges.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>4.       In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0clarification\u00a0above,\u00a0no\u00a0further\u00a0disclosure\u00a0need\u00a0be\u00a0made\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         petition.\u00a0It\u00a0is,\u00a0however,\u00a0directed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0shall\u00a0formally\u00a0communicate\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0clarification\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Appellant\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0break\u00adup\u00a0of\u00a0total\u00a0fare\u00a0 \u00a0from\u00a0both\u00a0stations\u00a0to\u00a0Kalyan.\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Time\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0 \u00a0by\u00a05th\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         September,\u00a02011.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.       Appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                              \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                      Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar\u00a0<br \/>\nCc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Murlidhar\u00a0Mahadev<br \/>\n         Dalavi,\u00a0Mahadev\u00a0Smruti,<br \/>\n         Zenda\u00a0Naka\u00a0Murbad,\u00a0<br \/>\n         AT\u00a0Post\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Taluka\u00a0Murbad\u00a0District,<br \/>\n         Thane\u00a0421\u00a0401<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<br \/>\n         Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0<br \/>\n         OSD,\u00a0DRM\u00a0office\u00a0\u00a0<br \/>\n         Commercial\u00a0Branch,\u00a0CST,<br \/>\n         Mumbai<\/p>\n<p>3.       Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0<br \/>\n         O\/o\u00a0SR.\u00a0DCM,\u00a0DRM\u00a0office<br \/>\n           Commercial\u00a0Branch,\u00a0CST,<br \/>\n          Mumbai<\/p>\n<p>4.        Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n<p>Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0<br \/>\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/\u00a0Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001056 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a04,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a04,\u00a02011 Parties: (heard\u00a0through\u00a0videoconference) Appellant Shri\u00a0Murlidhar\u00a0Mahadev Dalavi,\u00a0Mahadev\u00a0Smruti, Zenda\u00a0Naka\u00a0Murbad,\u00a0 AT\u00a0Post\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Taluka\u00a0Murbad\u00a0District, Thane\u00a0421\u00a0401 The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\u00a0 Respondents Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0 Commercial\u00a0Branch,\u00a0CST, Mumbai Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0Atul\u00a0Rane,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0DCM Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001056 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0 his \u00a0 RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0 dated\u00a012.08.2010\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0 PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0 st [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136096","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-02T10:26:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-02T10:26:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":720,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-02T10:26:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-02T10:26:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-02T10:26:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011"},"wordCount":720,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","name":"Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-02T10:26:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-murlidhar-mahadev-dalavi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Murlidhar Mahadev Dalavi vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136096","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136096"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136096\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136096"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136096"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136096"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}