{"id":136250,"date":"2008-11-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008"},"modified":"2019-02-09T18:25:00","modified_gmt":"2019-02-09T12:55:00","slug":"madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.Billappa<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\n\nDATED was THE 11*\" DAY or Novemaerg-2keL,\u00ab$%s %%kk\u00ab% % \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE Ho:~.pgLE Mmausrtc\u00e9 H%.B:LLA9P%A&amp;  T\n\nBETWE N:\n\nMADASAH   \n\nsxo LATE MANCHAIAH, _\n\nAGED45YRS,      \nRiAT BALAL{N\u20ac%EGO%\u00e9VDA 1A Do%:3an,%  %\nD0DDAGANC$AV3JAl3l.vF'0$T,     \nKOTAGAL:'HOE3LI\"\"        L   %\nRAMANAGA.R'\u00bb-TALUK   \u00ab \n\nBANC?\u00a2ALO*REL:?RU\"\u00a5*iA~!. :Di,$T..    PETSTIONER\n(By srifs  Aw.)\n\n A  WXRQANACAR---T'ALUK LAND TRSBUNAL\n\n _v?\u20acAMANVAGAR,\n T. BANGALORE RURAL D\u00a5ST,,\n\n% \u00ab  afetirs secv.\n\n2% STATE OF KARNATAKA\n* REP. av :73 SECY,\n5592'. oar REVENUE,\n\n% M s awe, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEBHL\n\nBANGALORE 560 001\n\nV4\n\nwart Permon t&amp;Q.:25345.\\ ?'\u00e9ao3  1    \n\n\n\n3 JGGlS\u00a7DDA\u00a7AH\nS\/0 LATE HUTCHAIAH,\nMAJOR,\n\nR\/AT BALALINGE GOWDANA :3ou3:,%[, ~Lj[      %\n\nDODDAGANG\/9sWADi F'O8T,_  \nKOGTAGAL HOBLI,  \nRAMANAGAR TQ.,   \nBANGALORE RURAL L:&gt;:sT., A\n\n4 Cl-i\u00a7KKA MUNIYAMMA i\nMAOR,  % :\u00bb-3.r_\nMAHADEVAPURA\"VlLLAG,E;\" %  \nSRIRANGAPATNA         \nMANDYA DIST,     A    %\n\n5 L:NGAs;4m%%k   \nWm  THE? U'W'.L5..G*QWDA\n\n6 SOD.1DVf\ufb01*.. H&amp;'5Px!NA'\u00a7\u00a2'4MQ\u00a7 &amp; \nW\/D RA5:1A%iA%H%  \n\n(R5 &amp; R3 ARE DE:-.?ETE'u'):':\\3':DE comm\nomen amigo zasazoes}  RESPONDENTS\n\n  (By\u00e9:r:.R;a\u00a7%sATH3:amARAYANA SINGH, HCGP, FOR R1 3.\n\n % Ei3%&amp; _R=4 ARE;SE.RVED, BUT UNREPRESENTEID)\n\nW.P, ss FILED UiA.226 &amp; 227 or\ncoNs7:%mT:oN or: IND\u00a5A, PRAYWG TO QUASH vane\n\n 25.4.2083 BY R'? GRANTING OCCUPANCY\n  RiSij5T IN FAVOUR OF TH\u00a7R{) RESPONQENT.\n\n  This Writ Petition ceming on for Hearing this day, the\n\nh K : _C\u00a7eurt made {he foilew\u00e9ng:\n\nL\/\/\/..\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Heard the learned counset for the petitienierv   <\/p>\n<p>the learned Gevernment Pleader. :;&#8217;\u00a5&#8221;heife&#8217;i\u00a7~.&#8221;nTo -1repj:&#8217;eee.nta&#8217;tjen<\/p>\n<p>on behalf of the respondents 3 and v.respant;te:nts   L\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>are deieted.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. in this writ peaatanttertttae, 226 and 227 of<br \/>\nthe Constitutien.\u00a7f..,I&#8217;ndi;\u00a7}utheihetiitienetVVhae:V&#8221;eaIIed in question,<br \/>\nthe order   the Land Tribunal,<br \/>\nRamaVnaga{atat; itt&#8217;   t30:?4-?5 vide Annexure-A.<\/p>\n<p> 1&#8242;   ardet at Annexure&#8211;A, the Land<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal, .R&#8217;azn&#8217;anag3arant&#8217;,*~*&#8221;has granted occupancy rights, in<\/p>\n<p>  tav\u00a3%e&#8217;ur:,._ef the thvitdteependent, in respect of sy,No.49\/18 of<\/p>\n<p>   measuring 1 acre and 20 guntas.\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;V  Aggrieved by that, the petitioner has filed this writ<\/p>\n<p>3   pasmt, u<\/p>\n<p>5. in brief, the facts are, the petitiener claims, his<\/p>\n<p>father iate Manchaiah had purchased 2 acres and 9 guntas of<\/p>\n<p>L\/\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>4*<\/p>\n<p>land in 8y.No.49\/1%\/of Talawadi viitage, V.<\/p>\n<p>Sy.No.49\/3B, from Smt. Chikkamuniyamma.V_and: <\/p>\n<p>cuttivating the land and the TribL;&#8217;naVI&#8221;was&#8221;&#8211;.t_not <\/p>\n<p>granting occupancy rightg in fa\u00a7&#8217;our14&#8217;of;&#8217;the thiT.r:d.g <\/p>\n<p>and therefore, this writ petition.  &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>6. the learned theietittoner contended<br \/>\nthat the impugnve\u00a7v.Qr\u00a7er:&#8217;.;anndt   law. He also<br \/>\nsubmitted   purchased by the<br \/>\nfather of.t.he&#8221;A&#8221;petitt&#8217;t3ner cultivating the land and<br \/>\nthereafter,  the land and therefore,<\/p>\n<p>the impugned ord&#8217;e.r14Vo&#8217;ann:ot&#8217;be sustained in few. He also<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;_  that the ilandvin question was not a tenanted land<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;and thTe&#8211;vt?athe.A.\u00a7:&#8217;o\u00a3_respondent No.3 has not produced any thing<\/p>\n<p>to aho\u00bbev.thatrjtheVEand in question was teased in his favour and<\/p>\n<p>therefor\u00e9ethve impugned order cannot be eostained in law. He<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;\u00a3_*\u00bba\u00a5Vs&#8217;o&#8221;tauoniitted that the impugned order is not a speaking<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  ofdet and therefore, it cannot be sustained in tow.<\/p>\n<p>1\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008 Author: H.Billappa IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED was THE 11*&#8221; DAY or Novemaerg-2keL,\u00ab$%s %%kk\u00ab% % BEFORE THE Ho:~.pgLE Mmausrtc\u00e9 H%.B:LLA9P%A&amp; T BETWE N: MADASAH sxo LATE MANCHAIAH, _ AGED45YRS, RiAT BALAL{N\u20ac%EGO%\u00e9VDA 1A Do%:3an,% % D0DDAGANC$AV3JAl3l.vF&#8217;0$T, KOTAGAL:&#8217;HOE3LI&#8221;&#8221; L % RAMANAGA.R&#8217;\u00bb-TALUK [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136250","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-09T12:55:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-09T12:55:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":302,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-09T12:55:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-09T12:55:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-09T12:55:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008"},"wordCount":302,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008","name":"Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-09T12:55:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madaiah-vs-ramanagar-taluk-land-tribunal-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madaiah vs Ramanagar Taluk Land Tribunal on 11 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136250","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136250"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136250\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}