{"id":1363,"date":"2010-11-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-10T18:45:45","modified_gmt":"2016-10-10T13:15:45","slug":"sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>ZEN THE HIGH courer OF KARNATAKA AT sANeg\\L\u00a7jaE\n\nDATED 11415 THE 157\" my OF NOVEMBE*\u00a7','   \n\nPRESENT... \n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE Moi-:J';1VN:;S H}\\NTsA.ANA6OU\u00a7\u00a7At\u00e9\" .\n\nTHE HON'!-ZZLE MR.JUS'\ufb01 EE S.A\u00bb.9\u00abV.B\u00a3)1_)_L\".!V\\}';=1i E?v!a\"Vu\u00a7VVV k\nTHE HQMBLE  NNA\n '  \n\n1\n\nP-\n\nwnttv  NOs.32574-32578\/2o1o(caM-RES)\nBETWEE'Ni.4' - M V   \n\n 1. Di'\u00ab:\u00a7\u00a71,di\u00a2akarAA\"\"'~-- ---------- \n _Aged 52 years\n\n2}' A\\.\/\u00e9nkaAta'fa:.\ufb01anappa\nAged,j'59. years\n\n  ss[s3;asG%u~;\u00ab:hatt: D.Shekar\n\n.  \"\u00a2.A'g'ed 44 years\n\n\n\n4. Shivaraj S.Thangadgi\nAged 52 years\n\n5. P.M.Narendra Swamy\nAged 57 years\n\nAll are Members of Legislative \n\nAssembly   _ A \nR\/at.Karnataka Legislativ\"'a__Home \n\nVidhana Soudha      \nBangalore. '    3. .  \"..y,_;._PETITIONERS\n\n(By Sri P.P.Rae;;   I\nSri He4rriant::lra'l'Raj\"&amp; A5P.l3a;3gan'a'th, Advs.,)\n\n1. D.N.JAee._yarvajV'u_  V'\nChief Whip' =  -\nF\ufb01ljarathiya J'ana_t_ha Party\n\n A \"Karr\u00a7\"ata'lka Legislative Assembly\n ' _\"'.(iclh.a'na'Sbudha\n . -.B_a\"r:gaVlQ'_r'e}'V-..~\"\n\n The Speaker\n= A. ,K__arn'atal&lt;a Vidhana Sabha\n .V_Vi&#039;t;ihana Soudha\n Bangalore.\n\n\n\n3. C.T.Ravi\nMember of Legislative Assembly\nKarnataka Legislative Assembly\nVidhana Soudha\n\nBangalore.     \n\n(By Sri Sathyapai Jain, SeniorV=CoLs-nsei for-.  &quot; j  \nSri M.B.Nargund &amp; Sri Vivevk__S;--Reddy,_--v_Advs.,3  &#039;\nFor R1, R3    1 g   \nSri S.Vijaya Shankar, Se-n&#039;~ior Cot:nsei.&#039;:--&#039;or&quot;,\n\nSri C.Shashikanth, Adv_,_,_&quot;fo_r R2)\n\nThis Mis_e&#039;.W. isfiiied  vseotion 151 of CPC\nr\/w. Articies.,,221:b: the &#039;Constitution of India,\npraying    to raise additional\ngrounds application as additional\ngroundsleaior1gV&quot;&quot;iMtLh--~.,;:t&#039;h&#039;e&#039; grounds raised in main\npetitionslvlto.sect1relt--he&#039;~~~ends of justice.\n\n  having been heard, reserved for\n 12.11.2010, this day MOHAN\n\nSH)L&#039;\\N&#039;i7_Ai\\i;4l&#039;X&#039;C&#039;3AOUEZ)AR, J., made the following:-\n\n\n\n-3-\n\nbecome necessary to bring on record all the facts and\ngrounds by raising additional grounds. It is\ncontended that no prejudice would be caused to&quot;&#039;--t,he\n\nrespondents.<\/pre>\n<p>3. The respondents have opposv:ed.Vvtl:ie    l <\/p>\n<p>application. According to the  &#8216;  <\/p>\n<p>explanation put forth cannot be&#8221;&#8216;avc&#8217;eepteV\u00a3&#8221;\u00ab\u00a7V&#8217;-<br \/>\ninstant application is belated.:._ifrom tl*1e&#8217;:date tiling<br \/>\nthe writ petitions;   izrere not<br \/>\nurged earlier  the same is<\/p>\n<p>only  &#8216;would amount to altering<br \/>\nthe entire  particularly, in the<\/p>\n<p>circurnstances&#8217;y;rhe&#8217;reA.&#8221;.the petitioners had already<\/p>\n<p>.  addressed ..their\u00abarguments before the earlier Bench<\/p>\n<p>  available pleading. It is further<\/p>\n<p>contendedithat the amendment and raising additional<\/p>\n<p> facts&#8221; and grounds cannot be made in a piecemeal<\/p>\n<p> fa.sh;*ion. The contents of the additional grounds<\/p>\n<p>WM<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-5-<\/span><br \/>\nsought to be urged were also referred before us to<\/p>\n<p>contend that the same cannot be permitted.<\/p>\n<p>4. Having heard the rival contentio2fist,.4 a<\/p>\n<p>perusal of the materials on record  tl.\ufb01Qat&#8217;~_ <\/p>\n<p>the sequence relating to the filing of  p:e&#8217;titio&#8217;ns 0<\/p>\n<p>in a hurried manner cannot&#8217;&#8211;be ignored.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>impugned order is  writ<\/p>\n<p>petitions have been \ufb01led&#8221;0001;}:l0.l&#8217;20&#8217;1A0*&#8217;Vand were<br \/>\nmoved for posting .e_&#8217;i1n1nVedia_tei\u00a7i;V.LIionsidering the<\/p>\n<p>nature of .d\ufb01spi1te iand&#8217;i&#8217;Vrnportant&#8217;qt1estions of law and<\/p>\n<p>fact&#8221;  of the petitioners that<br \/>\ndueto the \u00abrace against time, all the facts<\/p>\n<p>could not .n&#8217;arrate&#8217;d and the relevant grounds could<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;iriot:,,,&#8217;be &#8220;raised;&#8221;WiIl have to be accepted as a bona fide<\/p>\n<p> It is no doubt true that the instant<\/p>\n<p>A  is filed only on 29.10.2010. In our view,<\/p>\n<p>thavtwalone should not disentitle the petitioners in<\/p>\n<p>it %._seeking to raise the additional grounds since the<\/p>\n<p>prayer in the said application even if accepted by this<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Court at this stage would not prejudice\ufb01rrlp the<\/p>\n<p>respondents. The respondents in any ev.e~nt_&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>\ufb01led their objection statement to <\/p>\n<p>petitions which is the position eVc.\\nx_as&#8221; on&#8221;tl1.i__s'&#8221;(_1_ay<\/p>\n<p>and as such, it is not a_ case  &#8216;i:nprogving:&#8217;upo&#8217;i;1 itheiv,<\/p>\n<p>pleading after knowing the:defence.~.i_ it is contended<\/p>\n<p>on behalf of the  jithat  additional<\/p>\n<p>grounds are raised  fill upi&#8217;i&#8217;the_.t:1_act;n_a&#8217;_.pointed out in<\/p>\n<p>the order of whileidisposing of the<\/p>\n<p>WP.Nos.;3&#8217;2h&#8217;6(j:;33i;.T6&#8217;fQ}! But, the fact is that the<br \/>\nsaid&#8217;l'&#8221;W&#8217;r\u00a3ts. uiag\ufb02ainst a different order<br \/>\npassed &#8216;by the  the parties involved were<\/p>\n<p>differenti.&#8221;&#8221;-Hence, tivzeiiadditional grounds sought to be<\/p>\n<p>  _in\u00bb.the instant case, in any event would have to<\/p>\n<p> order impugned herein and the<\/p>\n<p> in those writ petitions will not aid the<\/p>\n<p> petitioners nor will they prejudice the respondents.<\/p>\n<p>A   if the additional grounds are permitted to be<\/p>\n<p>raised at this stage, the respondents would have the<\/p>\n<p>opportunity of adverting to the same in their objection<\/p>\n<p>\\~&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>statement. On the other hand, all the parties&#8217;-would<\/p>\n<p>have the opportunity to put forth all their.pconVte4r1Vtio.ns<\/p>\n<p>by way of pleadings and merely  <\/p>\n<p>petitioners would raise certain&#8217; &#8216;ad.dit.iona.llVgrounds to 7<\/p>\n<p>assail the impugned order,K__th_e sanse &#8220;ca&#8217;~nn=ot-~_beV<\/p>\n<p>objected to at this stage=.a:s&#8211;,evehn  .llV&#8217;Ol..1l(..&#8217;l<br \/>\nbe incumbent or1.__the  respondents to<br \/>\njustify their action:  which are<br \/>\nsought to  the grounds<br \/>\nwhich    writ petitions.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8216;\u00a5.Th.eret&#8217;_or_e,_&#8217; we are of the considered<\/p>\n<p>opinion&#8221; npthatl  made in the instant<\/p>\n<p>application is&#8217; &#8216;liable to be allowed and the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>.  _ l&#8221;slhoi&#8217;l1:ldV&#8217;l&#8217;be perniitted to raise the additional grounds<\/p>\n<p>  the application. While coming to the<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217;afo1je&#8217;saidl conclusion, the position of law and the<\/p>\n<p> pp p reasons assigned while disposing of<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; &#8216;\u00bb&#8211;M&#8217;isc.W.9995 \/ 2010 are also taken into consideration.<\/p>\n<p>\\j\\<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, Misc.W.No. 1 0529\/2010 is<\/p>\n<p>allowed. The additional grounds I to XXXI&#8217;I in<\/p>\n<p>the application shall be incorporated.; .\u00e9{fte2; <\/p>\n<p>NofL&#8217;c\ufb01&#8217;the grounds in VV\ufb01i~Petkk\ufb01ifEQ$\u00a732674&#8211;&#8216;fl<\/p>\n<p>32678\/2010.\n<\/p>\n<pre>5d,S    %  \\;\n\n  \n\n    \n  \n\n   \n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar A.S.Bopanna ZEN THE HIGH courer OF KARNATAKA AT sANeg\\L\u00a7jaE DATED 11415 THE 157&#8243; my OF NOVEMBE*\u00a7&#8217;,&#8217; PRESENT&#8230; THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE Moi-:J&#8217;;1VN:;S H}\\NTsA.ANA6OU\u00a7\u00a7At\u00e9&#8221; . THE HON&#8217;!-ZZLE MR.JUS&#8217;\ufb01 EE S.A\u00bb.9\u00abV.B\u00a3)1_)_L&#8221;.!V\\}&#8217;;=1i E?v!a&#8221;Vu\u00a7VVV k THE HQMBLE NNA &#8216; 1 P- wnttv [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-10T13:15:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-10T13:15:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":648,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-10T13:15:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-10T13:15:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-10T13:15:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010"},"wordCount":648,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010","name":"Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-10T13:15:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-sudhakar-vs-sri-d-n-jeevaraju-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 15 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1363"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1363\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}