{"id":136369,"date":"2009-01-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009"},"modified":"2014-05-29T11:03:21","modified_gmt":"2014-05-29T05:33:21","slug":"a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport … on 22 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport … on 22 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n
Qsuri. \u00e9isssgss isi\ufb01stsisd as 8.12.2983 said on 2\u00a3!.3.2Q9\u00bb4. his ssnisiiiy\n rs?-ass\u00e9vsiss E\"'%ss{-Vrxsid. Yiisrssitsi\" sstiticzznsr msds s representation an\n\n 2-\ufb01zi\ufb02\ufb02\u00e9i'ss\u00e9iiiiiigfsrsmoiisn rsttsspsctivsiy item the year '$98. as his\n\n '~_ ii-.\u00bb\u00a5\u00a5!'}ed dsissii-by the respondent i\\isA3 by wrongiy irstsipresins the order 0:?<\/pre>\n
   sad sgsis he made sris more rspisssststisn ss 9.32.2036
\n …_”V”sss’; even said isprsssritstisn wss aiss nsgs\ufb01vsd sy sssthei<\/p>\n
V V V ‘ ‘  _ ‘4 ” Lrssssrssmsst iziatsd 38.23%.\n<\/p>\n
iiss set bssn csnsidersci and W.P.Ns.3284?20G8 is against the dsnisi sf
\nisczerssnis for s psrisd bstwssrs 14.4.1988 is 19.1 2.2983.<\/p>\n
3. Facss in both the visit petitions are idsntissi.  ti\u00e9sssi’ <\/p>\n
writ petiiisns sis dissssss sf by ‘ihis csmifssii ‘:”.3\u00a5’\u20ac39i”.’.. _.  ‘<\/p>\n
4. Pesziens jsirisd the  \u00a2\u00a7;*i\u00a7efra:ie5sii\u00a2ii;iss ‘air;
\nAssistsrs: Mscisssicsi Engineer   iii\u00a75 iissu\u00a2d wiiii
\nsziisiss is chaige sn 5.s.iss4_ iniersiisihsiisgisg inst,’ ‘cs 9.3.3994, hs
\nhas caused devistisn to intsisistsiirssiisi’iissiissssi purpose. in i:i:is
\nregard. an snquiiyfssis hsid    sursisviiimsnt sf rsmsssi was
\npassed agsinsfi,   in czusstisn the order
\noi rsmossi_   “\u00a5iei:ii??Vf_\u00a5$i:3’s.329e5i’i 998 and sssss can
\nseparate   issriiss. the said ssit sstitiss was<\/p>\n
disposed oiiss’ 19.! ‘i:2;Ci\u20aci3.,.4’:is.iV”;5sisasscs sf the side! passed by this<\/p>\n
bstsh=–:;i1atss~s;}s\u00a7;*si airsacisr promotes. Hosssvsr. ihe ssis request was<\/p>\n
‘  pa;sse\u00a7”\u00e9=.n er\u00e9ar cf remova! against the ;>e’\u00a3\u00a7t%ener can 13.4.1 9:98<\/p>\n
  had \ufb02ea ea agpeal against the said order and the appea\u00e9<\/p>\n
 ~-\u00ab’V\ufb01!$’e;\u00a7f;dA\u00a2a’se:\u00a71:\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9i%.%V ‘V<\/p>\n
it is stated as to why the case cf the ‘_;>e!i’%\u00a7?o=:\/3;\u00e9’:*- not c:3r\u00e95i\u00abd[e_?:e<\u00a7;:.\u00bb .?-\u00e9\u00e9nae.<\/p>\n
theta \u00e9a as fasrther requirement of \u00e9's:\u00a7;\u00e9d\u00e9*;"s\u00ab. ti%\u00a7g\u00e9s -'\u00e9?_:a }C';e.r\u00a79ratien.\n<\/p>\n
15. in the \ufb01ght :2? ‘FQVQ c<%\u00a5st\u00a5.\u00a7nti<:%{*'5\u00bb.'~:.i\u00a73e.._\u00a7=:$\u00a7nts that arise {<25
\ncsns\u00e9deratiss am: H   _ '
\nf.\u00a5;"\u00a3?\u00a5'\u00a7s=e$f%sr  :%g'\u00a7?e:\u00bbw"'a3f;'.?.f':e Vg\ufb01asaea by this Sew?
\nin %4\u00bb\u20acP. Ns.3f:\ufb02\u00a75}'f%\u00a7%9$" = 39"' raavemser 2993, she
\npetit\u00a3e;2er'5.:_\u00e9:2!:'t!%w'._ ?G \u00a72L*_ \u00e9\u00absg\u00a7s:2iered for promc\u00e9fon :0 2935
\n izigfzer c\u00e9L\u00a7\u00a3e'bef\u00a2:e A:7\u00a7sVje\u00a7;:iors v.-*a=,=.&=: pmmzazed?<\/p>\n
V A ?–.ir'5'\u00e92\u00e92:*.;er %:\u00e9}'\u00e9!  o3' backzaieges %'%:'{}~L\u00a7\u00a7{.? disen\ufb01z\ufb01e the
\nV"  L;o.e?f\u00a7\u00a7e:%:1:e2.’..\u00a7;e _’ ~   <\/p>\n
p\u00e9fffiazxm\ufb01e emw. Adaardingfy, ffza fora’!-::svv:’ng.z.<\/p>\n
ORGER<\/p>\n
I. W??? ,r,ve2i\u00e9:’o:’: is .a\u00a7!cwm\u20ac—- \u00a7\u00a7;:!e1″:zzacfe ‘=a}’3sa.!:.!is5<\/p>\n
\u00a33’. Ihe impszgnerzf ‘orders m\u00e9sa\u00e9’ L.b};s aha appeilate
\naufhoriiy daieci 9;9f.\ufb01;9.”\u00a7’998.–=in’ ctaqfismirrg the
\no:’darirr;ade \u00a31}? ‘ff:e\u00bb.’\u00a2.fis\u00a5si,;Sii;1e:}? eg\ufb01\ufb01e\ufb01gi datea
\n‘i3:,<'}a:'\u20ac:.,1;\u00a7\u00a73 are  $3569."  ..\n<\/p>\n
iii. =34 dire\u00e9\ufb01zan, ‘\u00a7’3’j’–.L\u00a7.’s’;=\u00ab:s.1\u00a7:?  $929 responaen\u00e9
\ncor;>:v*a_fion to “reef;-wiaie  peiifioner into
\n“”” ‘” –sg?2{!$e %1+’\u00a7’\u00a3?2i:\u00a7 –!?rE%:”: {*\u00a3’5′,h:fays’ fmm taday.
\n_ ‘ 4Pe\u00e9?z:’\u00a3:ic5:3er..\u00a7s\u00bb _e!’:2:’\u00a3f\u00e9;\u00a3 9222*}: far senxice bene\ufb01\u00e9s
\n  a’2arf\u00e9’\u00bb.__c:$f’ “cii.smi.saai iriii fhe dam of
\n‘;_fei:;.\u00a7!a!=eme\u00a72t :”.e2_!=;:; servisex<\/p>\n
it is made c!ear that #26 petf\ufb01oneyis :30? ezz\ufb01\u00e9iw
\n n  any bah)? wages w\ufb01afsoever from the dafe of
\n  girder of dismissal $51! the dam 4:3!
\nAV \u00bbvr\u00e9\u00a73s’\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3e:r:9nf info service am far\u00e9fzer he is
\n‘ \u00ab w a__\u00a3;~;g’ ms enfit\ufb01ed to any annuaf increzzzen\u00e9s from
\n. aforesaid dates.”\n<\/p>\n
V, ;,}’\u00bb <\/p>\n
~   ‘ J58. The;-e_Ai\u00e9; ne daubt that this Cam: has net gene into the mer\u00e9ts<\/p>\n
 t%1\u00a7L\u00a7;as:e ‘\u00e9’A?:d it has \u00e9ispesead of the writ pet\u00e9tian base\u00e9 on the memes<\/p>\n
” V–?EL_{\u00a7i””by T:t?:e resg\ufb01ective part\u00e9es. if the memos are acceaeted. even
\n VTfL”~va;$\u00a5\u00e9\u00a3:~m\u00e9%2g that the petitioner di\u00e9 merzt\u00e9an an \u00e9he cenaeqzzeni\u00e9a bene\ufb01ts.<\/p>\n
  sear: baa :29! rgiected the memes. reading 9? bath Ewe memos. $2 is<\/p>\n
D(1S\ufb02:\n<\/p>\n
Co:’pc$a:\u00a7=3n, C\ufb01ause-V sf the crazier has been paaa\u00e9ed and it has to be
\ni\u20ac!3{Z\u00a76$’$’1.2\u00aed in {$19 caatex\u00e9 of bath the memes and net in \u00a7sa\u00a7ation and it is
\nakse c\u00e9ear at saram\u00e9 Ewe?! \u00e9nteraiia stating that the wr\u00e9t petit\u00e9on is d\u00e9epesed<\/p>\n
at in wsiaw of the mamas \ufb02ied by the part\u00e9es.\n<\/p>\n
20, it is c%ea.r farm the cx\u00e9er a? mis Csurt. that me \u00a7ai\u00a7%i%\u00e9\u00a7%\u00e9\u00e9?”2\u00a5%:a–az\u00a7fe2’i–. .<\/p>\n
:29: be entit\u00e9ed for the backwages er any egfser ma–rae:a\u00a7\u00a7~..  b’\u00e9s\u00e9af%t3 u  <\/p>\n
be\u00e9ween 398819 EGGS. Except t\u00a7:%a..x no o;*:%1’\u00e9r:{~;:*ef!$.5i::L\u00bb.3.’ben\u00e9\ufb01fir\u00bb sfgrs\u00e9ed to
\n$929 getit\u00e9oner. 9!: my c:3\u00a7r=.\u00a7on,  Carpora\u00e9\u00e9an
\nmating the er\u00e9e: pass\u00a7d \u00a7:s’;.!.. \ufb01nial’\u00e95\u00a7:r\u00a7:V:\u00a7ez.\u00a7.::\u00a7r\u00a7\u00e9:\u00a7s%:$\u00e9:\u00a7\u00a7 ‘v\u00a7’;\u00a7:\u00a7;z’\u00e9*.~3\u00a72r:-gerst an *-the
\npetitianer and the{.e*%3;\u00a7v  a? ma case is:\n<\/p>\n
nremsticn is r:%\u00a7$fc;eH:%*;\u00e9\u00a7is?_%”\u00a3;:’1.:;;::’_      \u00bb<\/p>\n
22. As \u00a7g,ga:’\u00a7V cave: \u00a7.te?;A.\u00bb.V_?\u00a7\u00a7:v?%\u00a7e::A:a domestic enquiry Es init\u00e9ated aga\u00e9nsi<\/p>\n
d:e%’\u00a7\ufb01q\u00a7\u00a7e:\u00a2.i_,vL’fean\u00a7Ea\u00a7%ge\u00a7’\u00ab-grad during which ge\ufb01ad the 9536 %s me: ‘far<\/p>\n
 cans%:dL\u00a3\u00a7i_ri\u00a7\u00a7_\u00a7?.:Te”\ufb01emc\ufb01on. non-cons\u00e9\u00e9eratiesz 9? the case at? the
\nT’ ‘v \u00e9\u00e9%’\u00e9\u00e9:}nue::i’em\u00a7!;\u00e9?ea%\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7r\u00a7n\u00a7 the said peried is \u00a7usti\u00a5\u00a7ed as $919 ems\u00e9oyse
\n eLn:.z:\u00a7!z3z ‘ aga\u00e9gzssi: him is net entit\u00e9e\u00e9 fer consi\u00e9eratian far
\n his case w%%\u00a7 be keg? in sea\u00e9ed saver. \u00a35′: case the
\n. \u00a7!e\u00a7 is punished fez’ m\u00e9scsndasct. he %3 not enti\ufb01ed fez cenei\u00e9arai\u00e9c-:2<\/p>\n
‘   “a\u20ac,  case fer azemat\u00e9aa \u00e9uz\u00e9ng the said aer\u00e9ec\u00e9 cr ieirass\u00e9estiveiy’.<\/p>\n
\u00ab<\/p>\n
I
\n 33911
\nJ<\/p>\n
LL  .;e?:%%i%\u00e9\u00a7 \u00a7$%’ ::a\u20ac\u00a7or:a\u00a7 incsament,<\/p>\n
-35.-\n<\/p>\n
22. 3:”; th\u00e9s case such a s\u00e9tuatisn {ices net arise. as there was ne
\nmeeting 9? SP3 \u00a39: considering we premmians during the aendency 9?<\/p>\n
the deparimenal enquiry or during the pendeacy cf the writ $$.’3?\u00a7.’\u00a7__\u00a7_$3′:<\/p>\n
izzefsre tfa\u00e9s Saar: Adm\u00e9tiediy, w%2a% Es denied is backwages <\/p>\n
was and 2093 and admsttedsy. bath the parties hsac\u00e9 agmed  c:\u00e9A:\u00a72sAa\u00e9%;:::%gf’% ~<\/p>\n
cf service and re\u00e9aied t\u00e9ene\ufb01ts. Crpcs’a\u20ac\u00a7:3_.r_3W%:\u00bb5a2;3 a\u00a7s\u00e9”*re:-\u00e9tgar\u00e9d 33:39 <\/p>\n
sen\u00e9crity ef the pet\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9aneg. !n the Sight ofv’-.%:he;”*:sa\u00a7*n\u00e9’;\u00bb_\u00a7  ‘\u00e95f:”‘i\u00a3r:\u00e9i1.T_’<\/p>\n
cens\u00e9demd \u00a7$}\u00a7%’\u00a7\u00a7$$”% the: the endaffgemeni \u00a7_.”%;r\u00a2;=\u00bb;’ati’;’2vv’\u00e9e’?\u00a7:’aeca.s3\u00a7’y
\n\u00e9ratemset\u00e9rzg the erdeg sf thia Csurt  \u00e9e\ufb01y\u00e9\ufb01g  consideratien
\ncf the case at’ the is :z?z’__\u00a7s\u00a3s_.’\u00bb,~\u00a7r::\u00a75;\u00e9\u00e9\\.\u00bb*ei\u00bb\u00e9::i’.\u00bb’L’ Cespcrat\u00e9cn \u00e9\u20acse%f
\nhas accap-$95 that \u00a7t::f2\u00e9V   pet\u00e9\u00e9iener with centinaziiy
\n<2'? serv\u00e9ce and ibeae\ufb01fg;-.\u00a7\u00a3 \u00a7\u00e9a1*.;"te- V3239 zzndersicsscf that except
\nthe backwage\u00e9g-'fer aii  net\ufb01ieaey became ent\u00e9\ufb02ed and
\nhe cannet be deniied\u00e9j\u00e9f ,$:.V:V\u00a2!'_z' \u00a7v!'s\u00a7c.%'e is athezw\u00e9se ms? denied by
\nth\u00e9\u00e9gv\ufb01ou\ufb01. ,.E?jg5\u00a7%\u00a7?:*er. \u00a2e%:p%\u20ac a\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:A 'having reamed yanking 9? the petiiisrser<\/p>\n
%n\u00e9\u00a5:z_e ,se:2\u00a7<.::\u00e9ty_A\u00e9\u00a7s\u20ac.,\u00a7%'~?:as net jus\ufb01\ufb01ed \ufb01n mi considering the cage sf<\/p>\n
 , V ;:=e2\u00a7<:%\u00a7\u00e9’e:=.; ifi\u00e9sk %\u00a7f\u00a2ni’\u00a3;%\u00a7_Q\u00a72.;’ V V <\/p>\n
V –V 23. ‘E=,sen~ \u00a7sT'”a;ega\u00a7d ’29 the mnsi\u00e9erat\u00e9en a? gen: 9? nc\u00e9\u00e9csm\u00e9<\/p>\n
_ _\u00a7}\u00a7a::5:e’a’:\u00e92;e:*:%..T\u00a7$ cer\u00e9\u00e9erned. Ccrperat\u00e9en was rm: fazsti\ufb01ed \u00e9n denying gram’:-g
\n *. \u00e9>\u00a7 %_\u00e9et_\u00a7<:r3a\u00a3"ir:'cre:':~\u00a7eni:s. This Cans! has net denied the \u00e9ncremeats. but<\/p>\n
\u00a7e\u00a7\u00a7z\u00a7ed..:!\u00e9e gayment $3' increment dus\u00e9ag the sa\u00e9d per\u00e9ad. Petit\u00e9szzef is<\/p>\n
24. in me Eight 9%’ the amaze <%\u00a7s<:e:3s\u00a7o:':. ! find that 239%: $29 \u00a5.4%':\u00e9t<\/p>\n
Pet\u00e9t\u00e9ena are reau\u00e9re\u00e9 1:9 be a\u00a3\u00a5ewe\u00a7.\n<\/p>\n
Aacor\u00e9\u00e9rzg\u00e9y, $!’\u00a7.P.\u00a5’-\u00a3c.3284!2GG8 ans! w.P.5;e.4e,!2s:;\u00a7%
\na\u00a7%e%a:*e=:3. The enasrsemerzm \u00e9ssaed by :’espora\u00a7ent \u00a5”\u00bb\u00a7:::res–\u00bb.\u00a7  a:’2a’-.!}\u00a7 2%,’?
\n\\!%?.?\u00b0.!\\\u00e9s3.4\u00a3!!209? and en\u00e9ozsements $352-ze\u00e9  <\/p>\n
2′?.2.2{}% an\ufb01 22.1.2898 ;>:<:\u00a7e.:cad at .'\u00bb"\u00a7 :fe :"se: xzsze\u00e94HV:a:3dj 7L :v'\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9\u00bbpeai%wf\u00e9\u00a7y %<\/p>\n
in m=.:xso.e2s422ms are q:.:a3!1e 7r*::’::s:1V\u00a3’:%G%’s’;\u00a7:\u00ab%_V”;’vi.\u20ac\u00a7.z%’:d e\u00e9\u00e9g\u00e9ms in<\/p>\n
acsw\u00e9arzae as.-r\u00a7th %a%.-%;….\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-‘3
\nJudy?\n<\/p>\n
s<:'2&sa.:_-+  ~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport … on 22 January, 2009 Author: Subhash B.Adi Qsuri. \u00e9isssgss isi\ufb01stsisd as 8.12.2983 said on 2\u00a3!.3.2Q9\u00bb4. his ssnisiiiy rs?-ass\u00e9vsiss E”‘%ss{-Vrxsid. Yiisrssitsi” sstiticzznsr msds s representation an 2-\ufb01zi\ufb02\ufb02\u00e9i’ss\u00e9iiiiiigfsrsmoiisn rsttsspsctivsiy item the year ‘$98. as his ‘~_ ii-.\u00bb\u00a5\u00a5!’}ed dsissii-by the respondent i\\isA3 by wrongiy irstsipresins the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136369","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nA Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-29T05:33:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport … on 22 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-29T05:33:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1317,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009\",\"name\":\"A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-29T05:33:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport … on 22 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-29T05:33:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport … on 22 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-29T05:33:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009"},"wordCount":1317,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009","name":"A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-29T05:33:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-himavardhana-naidu-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-22-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A Himavardhana Naidu vs Karnataka State Road Transport … on 22 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136369","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136369"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136369\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136369"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136369"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}