{"id":136486,"date":"2008-06-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008"},"modified":"2018-04-18T20:52:32","modified_gmt":"2018-04-18T15:22:32","slug":"sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>In THE HIGH couwr OF KARNATAKA AT aAn\u00a7\u00a3.Ar;n DEST. \n\nP RU_D}\u00a7*A'SWA?.\u00a7'f = _  .. ' -\n\nS\/O LATE PEEKANA NAIKA \n\nAGED ABOUT 40 YE!'-aRS'= \n\nR\/O n0D:31c;ANA.L MEDEKEREPURA\n\nC-3HiTR.ADUR{_'1r_1\ufb02'l TALUK AND D18'?  APPELLANTS\n\n '(B:,essi~i: E Ivrs:1;~3)APPA;\"A't5v.}\n\n.. 1\n\nKL: am We LATE SAMYA NAIKA\nAGED' wow 57 yams\nR\/O=.\u00a5)O[)DIGAN.&amp;L MEDIKEREPURA\n\n\" 'C;HITRADURGA TALUK\n= .._A_2sZD Di\ufb01\ufb01'\n\n RAMASWAMY S\/O LATE SAMYA NAIKA\nAGED ABOUT 41 YEARS\n\nR\/O DODDIGANAL ME\ufb01IKE.REPURA\nCHITRAUURGA TALUK\nAND DIST\n\n,3?\n\n \n\n\n\n 9:\" \u00ab. \u00e9a.\u00abi\":;5s5:fi\u00a7.HARA NAIKA\n\n  AND DEGREE DTED 30.5.2002 PASSED {N\n\nV'  \"\u20acSR,'i.;3N.), CHITRADURGA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING\n\n_' AS\u00a5DE THE JUDGMENT AN}? DEGREE DATED 22.3.91 PASSED\n\n  O.S.NO.2}2\/85 ON THE FILE OF' THE PRL. MUNSIFF,\n  \u00abGHITRABURGA.\n\n3 ONKARA NAIKA S\/0 LATE SAMYA:i'\u20acAIK2=.. A \nAGED ABOUT 39 YEARS  7 A .1\nF:'\/() DQDDIGANAL MEEDIKEREPURA. \nCHETRADURGA TALUK V \nAND DIST\n\n4 vzsmw s\/0 LATE smm NAI_{~_:_A=,_ \nAGED mom 3': YEAz2sV_  'A  \nR\/O DODDIGANAL MED;:4Ea:EP:--.;gA~--.._'\u00bb\u00a5V%  _\nCHITRADURGATALUK   \nAND ms'? V   v\n\n5 KUMAR S\/-:2-' 1\u00a2':TE'SA3_dYA i'\u20ac'A\u00a7KAA '  'V \nAGED A3013'? 3?\u00a5,.Y'_EARB_  .   .\nR\/0 ii)OI;3DI{_3ANAL\"MEDifr':ER!\u00a7EfEIR.A \n&lt;:H1TRADug(3.r:&#039;.{;fALLI;(-  ~- \naNLs&#039;D&#039;is&#039;:1j:,  \n\n6 KAMALA NAIKJA .$&#039;\/&#039;O {.A?E SAMYA NAIKA\nAGEDAB\u20ac)U&#039;{&#039; 28&quot;&#039;.{EAFf&#039;$_  \nR10 D1D'\u00a3::f\u00a7ANAL 'MEDKKIEEEEPLIRA\nCHI_'}.\"RADURGA TALUK \nAND 1313;' \"\n\n'  $,!O\"!,ATE\u00ab.8AMYA NAJKA\n.;A.&lt;3E.I;&quot;z2..13oLm:_.23 YEARS\n--A we nazmsmuan ME{)IKEREPURA\n-(;&#039;.HITF3ADURGA TALUK\nA&#039;ND&quot;--\u00a7}ISE&#039;  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>TTHISNAPPEAL IS FILED U\/S109 CFC AGAINST THE<\/p>\n<p>:2.A_n'&lt;:\u00bb.22\/91 an THE FILE OF&#039; THE 1 mm&#8230; CIVIL JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>J:\n<\/p>\n<p>This Appeal on-mizig on f0rI1r,ari1_1g,.t,_}_1is   .( &#8216;\u00a3&#8221;m I&#8221;!: <\/p>\n<p>dcliveted the fuilowing :\n<\/p>\n<p>This appeal is filed by the  Lt\u00a7;.:~.\u00e9V\u00a71\u00a7\u00a7.-2&#8217;iJA2\/35.<br \/>\nThe tria} Court by its jud5g\u00a5:{{:*.1t&#8217; s.\u00ab~;1:1d;;_  1.991<br \/>\ndeemed the suit in \u00bbfavour .n.-f  V  defendants<br \/>\nClaiming to bc     the First<br \/>\nAppellate   Appcllat-1*, {&#8216;\u00a74:n.n&#8221;t<br \/>\nby its    the appeai and<br \/>\nset aside 1V!x;&#8221;{;.:\u00a2:j,-V&#8217;  damd 22.3.1993. The<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff V \ufb02_f3I&#8217;.&#8217;.&#8217;!&#8217;\u20ac&#8217;:i&#8221;{&#8217;51&#8243;1&#8242;,V.vC1aE?!j.&#8217;.lll&#8221;iL&#8217;!Aig  be aggrieved by the SHIBC is<\/p>\n<p>  bcfoIE&#8217;-&#8216;:f}&#8217;iis:_\u20ac:o1z.1jt in {}.ii\u00a7&#8221;af:pe,\u00a3%}.<\/p>\n<p> 2  are referred to in the: same rank as<\/p>\n<p>V zassigi\u00e9d   befbm the trial Court: far the putrpose of<\/p>\n<p>   &#8216;and clarity.\n<\/p>\n<p> T &#8221;   The brief facts irading to the case are that the<\/p>\n<p>  was hcfom the trial Court set\u00e9king for a judgment<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">15<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the: proptrriy bckmging tn the piainti\ufb01l The: ca.3g\u00e9&#8221;&#8221;\u00a7f A&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>defendants is that they have pInt*:hasar} the .Iv)(-;$\u00e9::::t&#8217;i1}g 3<\/p>\n<p>Sy.N&lt;1-.22\/3 nmasuring 4 891133 tmde1\ufb01s=: It;gi&#039;\ufb01~\u20ac\u00a33i&#039;tEt&#039;}&#039; SL63}1\u20ac\u00a7&quot;\u00a7i&#039;3;\u20ac:iV1&#039; V&#039;<\/p>\n<p>dated 8.3.1965 from mac Sri RTu_d_mp}pa.&quot;&#039;&#8211;..The _;i&#039;a:f\u00a7\u00a7uaan&#039;ts\u00a7&quot;&#039;- 1&#039;<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02)C&quot;l&#039;C\ufb01&#039;)I&#039;\u20ac: C\ufb02llt\ufb02lld that they are in &#039;vfm\ufb01mmqhii. .ai.1&#039;ir! .\u00a3tnjdy:nc11t<\/p>\n<p>of the land, which has   them and<br \/>\n\ufb02Zl6I&quot;Ef0&#039;I&#039;B the pIaif:1.fi&#039;-&#039;r3;.&#039;  fdrfgfzy against the<br \/>\ndeftmdants. T\ufb01c  &#039;\u00a730\ufb01ght for dismissal of<\/p>\n<p>the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.  &#8216;t:riavl v \ufb02flft rival eontgantions gmt<\/p>\n<p>forth before ithzaa \ufb01:s22I1i1\u00bb:%xi.=  many as mven iSSl.I\u00a3&#8217;:S\u00a7 for its<\/p>\n<p>_ VCOIlS&#8217;I1&#8217;E_&#8217;\u00a7\u00a5:.&#8221;a\ufb01(i13, wh&#8217;iar:hV read as izcztztinder:<\/p>\n<p> = &amp; V   the  pmve thai he is the<br \/>\n&#8216; V  \u00ab  and 20 guntas of land beatmg<br \/>\n   3 of Madakcrepuia?\n<\/p>\n<p> Vt\ufb01lm plaintiff pmw that he&#8217;; was cultivating thr:<\/p>\n<p>x &#8216;T  e\ufb02tiz\ufb01 auit land o1}:he.*: date. 0f the suit?<\/p>\n<p>:-\n<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;!<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216;~  &#8216;  T,ing&#8221;ti&#8217;1e sI_:itV&#8217;iK?ifAhout oonsiciering the admisaion<\/p>\n<p>d\u00a3:.fenda:nts being aggrieved by the same \ufb01led  ;__ A4<br \/>\nappeal in R.A.N::s.22\/91. The F&#8217;iT8t\u20ac;1fv::<br \/>\nrt:&#8211;app1*e(:iat:ing the evidence and   i  &#8216;.<br \/>\nsubmitted by the (.?\u00bbavn1misai9nc&#8217;r favas&amp;V&#8217;o_%<br \/>\nilamilar as 2314: Gaye put fart}; by&#8217;   sgach<br \/>\nreveraed the \ufb01llding of the: Jjjtff\u00e9ai &#8216;g)Iaint\ufb01vf%t}i;:Iz2f0re<\/p>\n<p>is h\ufb02fbl\ufb01 this\n<\/p>\n<p>6. This Cami&#8221;:  \ufb02if: aplmal on 2 1 $3.200?<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02amed thti ::fi.;g-}3i.Ib.&#8217;$\u00e9i,f:i&#8217;j?Vt&#8221;!&#8217;*.i&#8217;_ie&#8217;13&#8242;&#8221;&#8216;i&#8217;1ijiEV5\ufb01\ufb01133 of law, which<br \/>\nread as heir:-f:::;de;:_ VV   % H<br \/>\n&#8220;L Wh;\u00a7i&#8217;h;\u00e9rvvtt;\u00e9 mart&#8217; b\ufb01bw is juati\ufb01ed in reversing<br \/>\n judgrnrnit  de\u00e9ree passed by the trial court<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  &#8216;1;2a;d3_i\u00a7\u00a7r defendant in his evidence as DW. 1?<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216;  Whaf\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01izhe lower appeilate cuurt is wrong in not<\/p>\n<p>c\u00e9nsidgri\ufb02g the evidence: of the court commissioner<br \/>\n AA and i316 report giv\ufb01r: by the court commissioner and<\/p>\n<p> , p\ufb01igitting to consider ihe same aiong with other<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p> etfidenca on record?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>the mattsr is mu al-(mg with the document at   &#8216; *<\/p>\n<p>extant mentioned in the body wnuld  \u00bbt!1e_   <\/p>\n<p>cf 7 acre-.. 3 27 guntzas of the V\ufb01fldf\ufb01&#8217; of tie: ag\u00a7p&#8217;.ii&#8217;~a\ufb01t, :ia;.n 1j_&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>area of 1 acre 5 gunfas of land&#8221; is mtiie<\/p>\n<p>said smvey number, the   el\ufb01\ufb01iy\ufb01icilt of<br \/>\nthe actual cxtent af the ownVgf:;&#8217;V  extent of<br \/>\n3 aczims 32 guntays    said basis, the<br \/>\nboundaries  whereby rim<br \/>\n\u20ac&#8217;.I}tiI&#8217;c cxt\u00a2iif.&#8221;i3    This aspect<br \/>\nof the naaiiimrl   _w#u.1dcrstx)od also by noticing<\/p>\n<p>the onnizentio\ufb01\ufb02f \ufb01lm d__ef\u00e9,~nsti:aii.ts.<br \/>\n&#8221; Even a&#8221;a.3_1iii1ing for as mument that under the sale<\/p>\n<p> t&#8217;x}j4e:.\u00ab_.&#8217;\u00a2:3&lt;&#039;tt3I1t&#039;&quot; &#039;\u00e9:s:&lt;3111(i&#039;n1g kharab land, 7 acres 27<\/p>\n<p>  and $iI\ufb02C.13 hallnriaries iilclmirz icharab<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  in  defendants cannot lay claim to the mid<\/p>\n<p>  in the said stnvey number as admitftadly the _<\/p>\n<p>V&#039;   under Ex.DI have purchased 4 aux&#039;:-,3 in<\/p>\n<p>  22\/ 3 to which boundary is also indicated 3\u00a2::cx)\ufb02ii11g}y.<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sy&#8217;.N{&gt;.22f3 Whirih belong to them, the cam put   <\/p>\n<p>plaintiff that he is culiivatittg the extent of 8  Vvgiiiftns<\/p>\n<p>as indicated in the schedule to the ;;1aint..3n;as* 1&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>\ufb021ct3&#8217;ialC&#8217;.ourt.\n<\/p>\n<p>1 1. In additinn in the eVi(iPJ_]R(x&#8221;:V_iiVi}i(fi},_I&#8221;15i\u00a7&#8221;IVV<\/p>\n<p>by the plaintiff bcfnrrc the; trial  {:&#8217;~:)_3L1si(i.\u00a7\u00b0.i&#8221;i:1gA  the<\/p>\n<p>parties&#8217; , had    iiofation of the land,<\/p>\n<p>mam  ware oontgntiing that<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;the e.asmi5L:.\u00ab &#8216;bo11i1d:\u00a7zi*\u00a7 and \ufb02mwbm the said<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Kaila&#8217; amags.  _1Va\ufb01:3_\u00bb&#8217; h\u00e9meen the p}ai:.1ti\ufb01&#8217; and the<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8216;d;2&#8217;&amp;Ilfi\u00a7;3lLS,L. the B1izii&#8217;\u00a3&#8217;431:rt had appointed Stxlveyor as the<\/p>\n<p> -V Cuxgimiatsi\u00e9zner. The Clmrrt. Colnmissioncr has<\/p>\n<p>   suhmittbd  and the report as per Exila\ufb01? and (T8.<\/p>\n<p> By t11c &#8216;szaii\u00a7\u00a2Vs.&#8217;l\u00a7\u00e9tch, the Court Fazrmmissioner has indficatmi<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;ffgaf \ufb021\u00a7 d\u00e9fcndmats have enclnaczhcd 8 jpartion of the land<\/p>\n<p> ..}jj.e1&#8217;5\u00a2;-&#8216;\u00a7g&#8217;;:&#8217;1Ag tn the plainufr. It is a\ufb01m&#8217; mtacing this asgmet of<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;-.:\ufb01i\u00e9&#8221;Tmattcr and ctwnsidering the report submittcd by the<\/p>\n<p> C\ufb01\ufb02lt Commissioncr along with other evi\ufb01enae which was<\/p>\n<p>J,<\/p>\n<p>-&#8216;3<\/p>\n<p>1?\n<\/p>\n<p>judgment dated 22.3.1991 in O.S.No.212\/85 gmsff\u00e9\ufb01i   &#8216; ~<\/p>\n<p>Prl. Munsiff, (&#8216;.5hit;rau:i1.mga is \ufb02&#8217;3Sf1&#8242;.7&#8242;:i&#8221;t&#8217;td\u00bb._ &amp;T1&#8217;_\u00a7\u00a7  :31 ._i_.:; <\/p>\n<p>acreui\ufb01tingly allowed. New 01:33:&#8217; as ten T * <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna In THE HIGH couwr OF KARNATAKA AT aAn\u00a7\u00a3.Ar;n DEST. P RU_D}\u00a7*A&#8217;SWA?.\u00a7&#8217;f = _ .. &#8216; &#8211; S\/O LATE PEEKANA NAIKA AGED ABOUT 40 YE!&#8217;-aRS&#8217;= R\/O n0D:31c;ANA.L MEDEKEREPURA C-3HiTR.ADUR{_&#8217;1r_1\ufb02&#8217;l TALUK AND D18&#8242;? APPELLANTS &#8216;(B:,essi~i: E Ivrs:1;~3)APPA;&#8221;A&#8217;t5v.} .. 1 KL: am We LATE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-18T15:22:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-18T15:22:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":918,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-18T15:22:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-18T15:22:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-18T15:22:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008"},"wordCount":918,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008","name":"Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-18T15:22:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sonali-bai-vs-ali-bai-on-25-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sonali Bai vs Ali Bai on 25 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136486"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136486\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}