{"id":136488,"date":"2008-08-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2"},"modified":"2014-01-17T20:31:13","modified_gmt":"2014-01-17T15:01:13","slug":"smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2","title":{"rendered":"Smt.Vatsala W\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\/O Bhujabal … on 21 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt.Vatsala W\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\/O Bhujabal … on 21 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE.\n\namen: THIS \"me 225'? DAY 0; AUGUST 2003.\n\n: BEFORE ;\n\n \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n$MT.VATSALA,\nw\/o KMAHAVEER,\n\nAGED 39 YEARS,\n\nR\/at No.499, 8\" MAIN ROAE),\n2\"\" PHASE, J.P.NAGAR., A *\n\nBANGALORE} \u00a7sown5%'ai;j-~.:%:\"  '\n\" V' \" ' '  I  \" _ um \n(By, :~4R.:{;:_HAas:i3a}ar4;i'r\u00a7~: ARIGA, ADVOCATE')\n\n\u00a5%AT'%+\u00a7.'N#\u00a7i\u00a7;A3 ::P:*$i3:iIA[L',,.%\ns\/0 aHu3.&.\u00abaA:\u00ab. 'rzeeps,\n\nL  j\"'%--kVi~1A3oa,% HQTEL. \u00a5v2';\u00a7f'\u00a7\"\u00a5-1 RUSAGAR,\n NEAR KSF\"<T"C"--\u00abBU":'3" STAMQ,\n% \u00ab .f\u00a7H\u00a7\\'Z.i<;ABALLA5PUR,\n\n.... RESPGFQDENTL.\n\n(83! MFLN ,9. KALLESHGQWDA, ADVOCATE')\n\n##3##\n\nThis Crimina\u00e9 Appeai is \ufb02ied under Secrtian 3'23 cf the\n\nCode of Criminaf Procedure, against the Judgment an\u00e9\n\ngj'\n\n \n\n\n\n(NE\n5..\n\nSentence dated 93.16.2603 passed in C.C. No.3S65?.'.2'\u20aci_O\u00a7.\n\npassed by the XVI Additional Chief Metropcxfitan M.ag4i;t\u00a7'a\u00a7\u00a7a,VV"\n\nBangaiore, etc.\n\nThis Criminai AppeaE, comirgg on fqr...%1e4arir:\u00a7'ih"i..\u00e9'.';Vd\u00e9'y,v'_the. V *\n\nCourt delivered the fo\ufb02cwing: _  _\n\nThis Es an appeal fiied under':-*;.\u00a7tti:3n "3'?.8_V_<:sf..'th\u00e91.%f\u00e9*V.'P'.C.,\nby the Ceunse! for the appe\ufb01lgnt  3u"d.\u00a7f31e'r}:t; dated\n03.19.2003 passed in c.<:. 1%.3S'G'S?.?\ufb01V0Q:'\u00a7f: \ufb01ig}5;$\u00a7d by the xv:\n\nAddition? Chief Mej\u00a3:*a!.%;9._'E-itar}__ M.a'\u00a7\u00e9'str\u00e9\u00ab\u00a3\u00e9'._'~.B\u00a7_;j'\u00a7;1\u00a7io:'e, acquitting\n\nthe " \u00e9ffence punishable under\nSection 138 of i'.'i:\u00bb.ex!\\fe\u00a2\u00a2t_i\u00e9'\u00a3.:f_Eee':i:_t2\u00a7.%uments Act.\n\n  f%\u00a2\u00a3s~.r_.:f..tvne case of the carnpiainaret ara as\nfaVi\u00a7e\u00a7$::\u00a7; "  ' V .\u00ab\n\nIt..i's"ai\u00a5\u00e9giu\u00e9g.V.':\u00a7iat the accused had issued a cheque far\n\n_ ~..$.$.'}.V.'40,.\ufb014bQf;xi.\u00e9\u00e9ted 15.19.2091 drawn an State Bank of\n\nChikl\u00e9abaiiapur. when the said cheque was presented\n\n 'Tj~.fQt"~.*an\u00e9;ashment. it was returned with an endorsement: "Funds\n\nA\u00a7\u00a5;I".~:.t,i'ff'\u00a7\u20aci&\u00a51t". Thereafter. the complainant issued 3 lega% notice\n\n fan 29.10.2031. Respondent rep\ufb01e\u00e9 to the legal notice an<\/pre>\n
‘i\/’<\/p>\n
was examined. Accereing to the agreement betweerirthe<\/p>\n
games, profit and \u00a3055 of the business has te be <\/p>\n
ameng the eertners. Ex.?.;f.—Cheque bearing <\/p>\n
issued in favour ef husband of the co2j;z>ei;a::\u00a7’neVr\u00e9t_Tfore:<\/p>\n
Re.48,QG()!-. Accused had g\u00e9ven the sigv4ngdi”.b\u00e9ank ‘.:_heq:.\u00a7ee’;4 t’e ‘=,<\/p>\n
the husband of the cempiainant fo”\u00a5’=j;iE2.e pur;3eVse.”c*;f \u00e9V\u00a7:.;4J:us:EVVf1ess,
\nwh\u00e9ch was misused by the v<:;;:e::<rj:pEai:9i'e_:f;i:–:_';e 's-uA{n of 5!(e;\u00a73,?S9j~
\nwas given tea the husband at' the\u00a7;e'?r:\u00a7!ein.e.\ufb01tAA.';;\u00a7__may of cheque<\/p>\n
and the beiarzce areeee\u00a71'~\u00a7n e_es!3 Va:'hd*4.\u00a7fhL\u00a7's"\u00abfe.\u00a7t:f'has been proved<\/p>\n
by the evidence– preedv"\u00e9;:':;'ed{ 'teV4441tee"*\u00aba\u00a7:Cused, But? the Ccmme\u00e9neet
\nstates in her eii\u00a7:i4e;';.::eVV"'ihea$f_ E\u00e9ee\u00e9fhusbend has net received em?
\neV\u00a7:2e_ent,_~3g2tv$'%ze hes""ee\u00a7__e:xem\u00a7nee her heebend is {grave that<\/p>\n
heT~\u00a7j:es; r'-zet xeeeix\u00e9efziv__E1s.53,?5Q;"– frem the accused. Therefere,<\/p>\n
 the fr\u00e9aei '-f;'oau;:Vr"'E\u00ab '."_i\u00a7ei {\u00a7{fiat there is se\ufb01\u00e9cieet evieenee is shew<\/p>\n
 '7_thet the'.44\u00a32:.:zs'eee'e.V e? the ceree\u00e9e\u00e9naet @335 received the eeie<\/p>\n
.1 –.ee*:e'e,n\u00a7.*?:4em the eecusee. The 'ma: ileeri after cene\u00e9eer\u00e9ee the<\/p>\n
 ef bath sides, and eeeiysieg and epereciating the<\/p>\n
 e1;–\u00ab\u00a7.eie5:?\u00a7\u00a3.:e; has came te\u00a7 the cenciusicm that eccueed hes net<\/p>\n
 "ee_4"A"ce\u00e9;emittee the effeeee eiiegeci ageing: him end heme,<\/p>\n
acquitted him ef the ee\u00e9e e\ufb01eeee.\n<\/p>\n
if<\/p>\n
Fae\u00e9irsg aggrieved by the game, cemp\u00a7ainant.T”””‘\u00a7}Las<\/p>\n
pneferred this agpeai.\n<\/p>\n
4* I have heard the iearned Cogggagfai fcr”t’ir:\u00e9:’_a,;;\u00a5\u00a7\u00a7::\u00e9\u00a7E*::3z2′;:.V’4 ”<\/p>\n
and the Eaamed Counsei for the respdnci’ent;;”= ..:’ A<\/p>\n
5. Learned Counsei for”TV t\u00a7*zg a\u00a7\u00a7n\u00e9:l\u00a3\u00a2.n_tT’ $uw\u00a7;:n.it$~’3as <\/p>\n
foitosws:\n<\/p>\n
The beta! business \u00a7~:a;:’T.;::’a;ie;;:f: t’h’e[ -\ufb01aaftnership deed;<\/p>\n
appeiiant Ems!’  to the ewner 9? ‘me
\nbu\ufb02d\u00e9ng; as’:\u00a5!”–P.V_;.-:.;’.8Q,a’;”?:i;V\u20ac}\u00e9\u00bbx’jfLfV~.\u20aco ..V\u00a7h%:’zgc\ufb01assed towards his share in
\nthe bus\u00e9negs; tEV’i\u00ab.’=’.~”~vT{‘\u00e9a.i:V\u20acoA\u00a3\u00a7:f ?\u00a7s believed the issuance of the
\ncg\ufb01\u00e9qua  az:\u00a7us\u00a7i”f:32″‘Ia sum of Rs.:1.,4Q,,GOQ\/- payable ts<\/p>\n
th\u00e9'”A3’_p\u00a3:f\u00e9_E\u00a5an\u00a7\u00a7s:.’a’\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7&;;ted \u00a7n front ef the eiders at the time of<\/p>\n
‘  ‘*A…..s;ettEerfie;\u00a7t ; a\u00a7;c.i.\u20ac\u00a7g*:i:: has issased a cheque was far Rs.3.,,4Q,\u00a7\u00a7G,+’\u00ab-<\/p>\n
. f1;g33;\u00a7\u00e9:a\u00bb_;”ds tha f\u00a7na\u00a5 settiement as he was net; Entendmsg to”<\/p>\n
‘:._’_’V\u00a5<;:.A\\;_nt:\u00a7f\u00a7\u00a7::,;,e 'it:_. the beta business. The tr\u00e9ai Eu\u00e9ge has erreneousiy<\/p>\n
"  –ViT";:: ej\u00e9ee:\u00a7:!ed to give a \ufb01n\u00e9ing that the said cheque was not Essued<\/p>\n
.::;=_',:; ;$:i*1e accused in favour cf the cempiainant, The Trier: Caurt<\/p>\n
 .. E*sas arrrmeausly came tattle cerzcms\u00e9on that there has \ufb01een<\/p>\n
g\/.\n<\/p>\n
gayment of Rs.S3,?59!~ to tiie gw\u00e9band of the appeitant by?’–the<\/p>\n
accused. Even if it Es agaaumed that there was  V.<\/p>\n
the compiainarzfs husband it is net towards the <\/p>\n
the debt and snare so discharge af the”\u00e9\u00e9\u00e95%:%t’y”-.Ategt:\u00e9AT\u00a7t\u00a7’5_ \u00a7~g’?{iz:h “.<\/p>\n
the cheque was issued. The f\u00e9nci\u00e9ng rece \u00e9*’c1a\u00bb::;\u20ac_ b3z t?\u00bb:fg–v_%A;\u00a7”r\u00a7.aE’~ <\/p>\n
is erroneous and hence, be saugbt te,\u00e9ies;t aside ;th’e$ar?ia;” ‘<\/p>\n
6. Learned Ceuns\u00e9i~…_..%%;:e; *\ufb01he;_V.\u00a7;\u00e9;*3;3s\u00a7’\u00a7:’dgnt mbm\u00e9tg as<\/p>\n
under:    ‘<\/p>\n
The a;f\u00a7a!%a’\u00a3i?.\u00a3t;#\u00a7;fg3V\u00a72\u00a5ain\u00e9\u00e9tztf r;espondar\u00a7t\/ accased and cane<\/p>\n
Narayana$wa%r:3{–‘?,W’.2_. \u00e9::’;’t\u00e9={_fes\u00a7”ii\u00e9te sartnersh\u00e9p ta start the<\/p>\n
hete\u00e9 bus\u00e9rga-55;,  ‘\ufb01n far gniy s\u00e9x marnths. Then that ‘mere<\/p>\n
s}~;? a.\u00e9”*s;e;tf\u00a3%9s’;’a\u00e9*:*\u00a7’c bvetwee\ufb01yvih\u00e9 parties and a settiement deed was<\/p>\n
eff\u00e9\u00a7tt.e \u00a7\u00a3.._Tbfiz\u20acc4V\u00e93V’e.<;\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7ment has not been groduced befare the<\/p>\n
 C\ufb01uft v;\u20aca:2~ '$3-w\u00e9w that mggas\u00e9dezziz \ufb02ed agraad to gay<\/p>\n
"\u00ab\ufb01gs,1',-\u00bb4Q,Q@G};'r \u00e9rz\ufb01 $2 th\u00e9g cermactien he issued a chasm, Ever:<\/p>\n
 ., " .\u00a7%2<z@_\u00a7:=a\u00a7s;aunt ef Rs.S3,75\u00a7,\/- was receive\ufb01 by the husband sf<\/p>\n
V\u00a7:?ze a:Q_n?:pEa%nant; he has not man examined :9 show that the<\/p>\n
$a.\u00a3c\u00a7' ammmt was mreived by him in connectisn w\u00e9th share<\/p>\n
S "arr%;o2..mt cf' the campiainant in the partnership firm. There is a<\/p>\n
ix<\/p>\n
r=<\/p>\n
. -:5 .\n<\/p>\n
differemtra in the \ufb01nk with regard to the figures and wcrds..__and<\/p>\n
signature of the accused in the cheque. He further subm:’t$:’ftI*j7z’s-t_’<\/p>\n
he supparts the impugned Judgement,<\/p>\n
“I. The contention cf the !eva–m’ed,  V’<\/p>\n
appeiiant is that perusai of the impugne{i’.3u7\u00e9.TgAr}2af2’t* <\/p>\n
the Order of acquittai and the view}  :h_a”\u00a5’fia%  \u00a33335 ” ‘<\/p>\n
manifestiy unreasenable anc\ufb01was ;n–sf:..’\u00a7_vegf’a!L_._ If’t’he\u00bb..Tr\u00a7vv;$\u00a3 Court<\/p>\n
Budgement found to be bas ed’_T’o:\u00a7’  reasoning or<\/p>\n
there is mEs;\u00a7ppr\u00e9\u00e9i'”e;.%;;_oz3  !:h;\u00e9’\u00e9 \\:\u00a7::%e:1<V:V\u00e9 resu\u00e9ting in manifesting
\nE\ufb01ega\ufb01tv ther\u00e9ih\u00e9s Ce;\u00a7.ir'.{fvc\u00e9'n-.._:\u00e9:<3mine the evidence and set<\/p>\n
asicie the Q–r::\u00a3er caf"a\u00a2quVif%:aiAf-\n<\/p>\n
 _VVT\u00a7:\u00e9.*\u00ab\u00a5.\u00a7%\u00a7a.r;:ed Counset for the appe\u00e9lant further<\/p>\n
 subm itsAV”.th’a\u00a3’V f\u00e9s\ufb01endent agree\u00e9 to make payment and<\/p>\n
“v: _EsVsuVec\u00a3 a’.4″‘:;h\u00e9:qJu\u00e9”‘Vfcr a sum 9? Rs.1,4\ufb02,G9G\/’- towards the<\/p>\n
4:  A$ef\u20acV\u00a7e:me:z.t_ pf\u00e9posai at the interv&ntisr’: of the we?!-w\u00e95hers, and<\/p>\n
 the centention cf the respondent that a sum of<\/p>\n
  TR\u00e9–..:S3;?5G;’- was received by the husband of the zemnia\u00e9nant is<\/p>\n
 “<,.4'u'v%.:';z.t;:\u20ac:;'re<::t, It has been further ccnten\u00e9ed that ever; assuming<\/p>\n
that there was a payment made to the hus\ufb01and ef the<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
C:\n<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
cempieinerzt, this was met towards discharge ef a E\u00e9eb\u00e9iity mere<\/p>\n
so rewards discharge of the \u00e9ieh\u00e9i\u00e9ty by way of the eheqT1.EeEe<\/p>\n
quesizien. Though it is centerz\u00e9ed by the \u00e9eereed Ceuneeei\u00e9’ <\/p>\n
eppeiiarzt that an the aver!-wishers’ interventien, the ef_<;ctL:sefc\u00a3–_ V'<\/p>\n
agreed te pay Rs.1,40,GOG\/- anti in th\u00a7s;v'7cee"ne<:_t?ee <\/p>\n
issued the cheque Er: question, the persee_s\u00bb:'-wrze p.a}z*f;i:;\u00e9'ea:te::\u00a7.";'*r'\u00a7V"<\/p>\n
the settiernent have not: been exe're:E'r2ed  sthe
\ncemmainarrt \ufb01e eeteb\u00e9\u00e9sh that .;.here=eiee.Z'e eettiemeet'. 'Eeen the<\/p>\n
meteria! document viz" the se{t.?emee~V\u00a7t:'VdeeLe~};ee'_~_a!se net been<\/p>\n
produced  tee. eeEr2\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7er\u00a7'r\u00a7'er\u00a7t"— id prove that there was<\/p>\n
settlement betere_er: _tiie_eer_np\u00e9:_a1.'\u00a7eant and the accused, It is en
\nueeiseeted\u00e9' ufect t\u00a71?ai:,.V _ac:f:'<3\u00a7'b\u00a7\u00a7-\u00e9iigf; "~:!egai_ 4<\/p>\n
responsibiiity. In other words, tha c<L$7\u00bb;}dit_\u00a7<\u00b0::2:'  <\/p>\n
subject ta a charge er duty wh\u00a7c%'\u00e9TV_rVn\u00a7y b'e..j'isd%c\u00a7aE}3?AV.\u00a7:zf9V;c'Ledv.%
\nBut, in the instant case, eyen t%:__<\/p>\n
fir-m,_,V t?’:e_:;7%:;ajxa_:e1t9 a\u00a7p \u00a7;:’:**aa_\u00a7\u00a73.the CM! Ceurt.<\/p>\n
 of the Partnership Act; prev\u00e9des f\u00a7r<\/p>\n
:’v.:’AA”Ts\u20ac.’\u20ac:tE&m\u00a7eg: cf.-at’:_\u00a2%*.r:e;sTr:t an disso\u00e9ut\u00e9on’ The Eeamed Caunsei far<\/p>\n
“* -71i\u00e9j2e__ “\u00bb:je$ps\u00e9\u00e9{\u00a7\u00e9’nt aise submits that as Gr\u00e9gina\u00e9 Emit<\/p>\n
  ‘–V.\u00a7\u00ab:ce,TSa’\u00a7g:.’;*\u00a3j2:%f\u00a7Q3 was \ufb02ied by the cempiainant: against: the accused<\/p>\n
“T.\u00a7Fa’r.:;s_a_tf;\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7ng Em accsunts and a\u00e9se ta recever the amc\u00e9mt. if; is<\/p>\n
 net ciear as :3 have they arrived at the amczmt sf<\/p>\n
  R$,1;4G,QOQf\u00ab as a iiabitity gart\u00e9cufariy when they fa\u00e9ied to<\/p>\n
\ufb01g’<\/p>\n
examirza the persans whee were present when the sett\u00e9e\ufb01\u00e9ent<\/p>\n
tack piazza and aim faii\u00e9na is grcduce the settienjen’tVV~::d\u00a7’\u00e9a;:\u00a7”<\/p>\n
befcre the ‘ma: Coart, The Triai Caurt has  t\u00a7*e7e’<\/p>\n
evidence cf P.W.1 and a\u00e9se B.ws.1 andggz   <\/p>\n
evidence am? has came to a cz3nVc\u00a7;s4s!on\u00e9’t\u00a7_1 at theJ,r:.;r;:rir\u00e9’;:\u00a5’a-iz*\u00a3’;aEit <\/p>\n
has fa\u00e9\u00e9ed to estabiish his <:a!2 th’\u00e9”Hs:;:{u:\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7.\\\u00a7r%;}c%p\u00a3\u00e9\u00a7e?VEaw.<\/p>\n
11. The learned C9u:3;s,_;e \u00a3_.\u00a7or ti}:e*”re\u00e9;i\u00a7;1\u20acEant relies; on<\/p>\n
the ciecssm r\u00e9;;:\u00a2;:;~:eaw .\u00a7{ F{\u00a7”._’$H_NAVEANAREHAN BHAT vs.
\nDATTA”fPAYA””F\u00a7.”1:fiEi’3\u00a3\u00a7EA:,%jV'{.\u00e9\u20acJ’\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7*KER saw 738), wherein the<\/p>\n
Apex Court has ha.\u00e9’id.: asVf\u00a3\u00a3\u00a7i’w\u00e9fi..\n<\/p>\n
\u00e9  5.-“(A3 .rsiea\u00a3i\u00e9’\u20ac)”\u00a5\u00e9V Instruments Act (25 af 1881),
\n : ‘3T.1w3\u00a7va4:”‘Pt’e\u00a7arg1ation under msactien 139 mere\u00e9y
\nH  “r\u00a7f\u00a7\u00a7.sg;%?iv.;3tien in favour of insider sf cheasga<\/p>\n
_ that s;”ar:m:” has been Qsszied fer d\u00a7s:’:\u00a3*2arge of any<\/p>\n
 debt’  oihar iiab\u00e9iizy –~ Ex\u00e9aence of Eegaihg<\/p>\n
  a’ e ‘c:ishomur cf ch&qu9.~Beferzca-Proaf-
\nAccused Ti\ufb02t require\u00e9 :9 step mic w%tness\u00abbox~ He<\/p>\n
\u00a39,<\/p>\n
‘2 ‘”><\/p>\n
may discharge h\u00e9s burden an basis of materEa!s””*–.T<\/p>\n
a\u00e9ready brcezaht en record –Question w%:et’k\u00a7’;erf”L:’\u00ab.[:”‘~_<\/p>\n
statuterv \ufb01resumpt\u00e9cn rebuttec! Q?” net ~– P\u00e9\u00e9-aigt’ <\/p>\n
determ\u00e9ned in View sf other evidences en_..rre{:<\u00a7';*Q\u00a7  .<\/p>\n
(C) Negetiabie Instruments' Act'  <\/p>\n
5.3.39-Presumptian :.:nder,r—___ ::z.ebu:;1ia: — ,a\u00a3g.:Ay _V cf :1 %
\nCam'? -~ Presumpt\u00e9on of \u00e9nn\u00e9sghce as '%'..\u00a3,i_r1":=E!:%.':
\nand dectrina ef raygrse 313::E\ufb01eh"~.._i_ntreduv::e:\u00bbd.'iby
\n5.139-Should be \u00a2ieaf":%a_\u00a7;'~;;tees,':_% t+ja:5an<V.9f.v'\u00e9\u00e9\u00a7h -'Cav\u00e9.\u00e9~;_'fV..'–'*'<\/p>\n
12$ Laar\u00e9edv\u20acic{\u00a7r\u00a7$ai:'4Vf\u00e9_f"tbe respondent also re\ufb01es on
\nthe 3udgmen:'%'%\u00ab.:gs .tsie_ of MfS.Q-SOFT SYSTEM &
\ns.c2LAuT1Q :\u00e9s%V%%L"(9)  L"m%., %%%% ms. H.N.GIR.\u00a3DHAR (ILR 2903<\/p>\n
KA1R,&'ATi\u00abEKA..\u00a74~3};:i\u00e9v?3_ere\u00a7n th\u00e9s Court has hem as uader:<\/p>\n
'**:-5%.); :$\u00a2EG5TzAaLE :N$'m:m5NTs AC3: 1331\u00bb-
\n\u00a7':':*:c":?1]m;%""3.3s\u00ab Object and scape ef – 245m, The<\/p>\n
 AA Qbj\u00e9zztlof Sect\u00e9an 138 of tha Act \ufb01g ts Erzcuicate faith
\n , iiizftrhe ef\ufb01cacy cf Banking operat\u00e9oas and cred\u00e9bil\u00e9ty
\n transaczt\u00e9ng business on szegotiawe instruments\n<\/p>\n
 -~ The Act makeg it c\u00e9ear that the intent of
\nPari\u00e9amarzt is that honest drawer sheuid not suffer<\/p>\n
fx<\/p>\n
6%<\/p>\n
\\.#<.j<\/p>\n
at the mechan\u00e9satien of dishenest of drawe;25:a~~–a}.g1;:\u00a7\u00a7_'__j' ?
\nthe \u00e9ntent\u00e9ars of drawee bacames Emp6rtant;?._   '%<\/p>\n
(B) NEGGTIABLE ZE\\\u00a3STRU;;*?!E!\u00a7}fSjj, #\u00ab;'F,.   'V,
\nSECTIGN 138- Offence under -=A:"C\u00e9n\u00a7_".zr'actp'E;_\u00a79;tv\u00a2.eiar%
\nthe parties – Breach 'ef":\u00a7'n3:g'actA"'—V__Ch5\u00e9\u00a72.;gAe*:..\u00a7v*aVs
\nissued for 9.3.2 Lakhs byL4L"'w\u00a3ay.u_Vof 'tr5ai':\u00a7a5:ges; ~ .
\nWhether attracts t\u00e9z\u00e9"prev'\u00a7A\u00a7E\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7s':.;ef:S.gct&e:2"A133 :3?
\nthe Act ~ on FACTS, '\u00a7H$E_LB . is ;;';uiE9;%;\u20acv"a.__matter af
\nciv\ufb01 transact_%{:n__ wh%'t'h'~::\u00a7%\u00e9\u00a7e '-.\u00a7':!y\u00a7\u00a3 lC\u00a7:e\u00a7e\u00a5;2'E\u00a3 has ta
\na\ufb01judicatg %\u00a7fn\u00a7:\u00a7;1i['La\u00a7~$,a:e:\u00e9'ta\u00e9{::"\u00e9s _iEc; Q!ie\u20ac\u00e9~iar there is a<\/p>\n
brea::ag\u00a7*e\u00a7;*?*;er:t’ and whether tha very
\naondu\ufb01L\u00e9f%t?;’e’\u00bb.ci:\u00a7e’%f3′;2\u00a7\u00e9’\u00a7\u00ab:2L\u00e9r\u00e9\u00e9 is without any biam\u00e9sh,
\nEa _a_sepa\ufb02:’a.tV\u00e9 en’qu\u00e9}*yVE?Qf be heici if nee\u00e9 be — Omar
\ntgf cEqjA:V’2E!?t_a\u00a3 \u00a5s” ju s~t.i.\u20acs ad .”\n<\/p>\n
 13;\u00bb  “ET,a;\u00a3<:En'g \u00a7:':t_;fo account a\u00e9\u00e9 asgects ef the case and 3:53<\/p>\n
 the r*\u00a7\u00a7a\u00a7;\u00e9.r\u00a7.a\u00a7 '5px;\u00e9l:ea'%*TL5k:\u00e9 record and after carefu\u00e9ixg anaiysing am<\/p>\n
vV'7'TT._ap9raE$\u00a72\u00a7\u00a7 ?\u00a7j*:\u00e9.g#'%$ence dated an vecer\u00e9, I find that the \ufb01rming<\/p>\n
.1  Sig Triai Cezgrt Es yeasenab\u00e9e an\u00e9 (mes net ::a%\u00a7 far<\/p>\n
V  *_v.\u00a7%n1:e'2f\u00e9rgir\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9 and th\u00e9s apgea\u00e9 is davci\u00e9 of merits.<\/p>\n
2'<\/p>\n
6\/<\/p>\n
iii<\/p>\n
3.4. in View cf the above, \u00e9iscussion, E 933$"-. f!':-.;e<\/p>\n
foiiew\u00e9rzg:\n<\/p>\n
kg<\/p>\n
This Crimina! Apnea? is dismissedg<\/p>\n
*KSM<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt.Vatsala W\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\/O Bhujabal … on 21 August, 2008 Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. amen: THIS “me 225′? DAY 0; AUGUST 2003. : BEFORE ; BETWEEN: $MT.VATSALA, w\/o KMAHAVEER, AGED 39 YEARS, R\/at No.499, 8″ MAIN ROAE), 2″” PHASE, J.P.NAGAR., A * […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt.Vatsala W\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\/O Bhujabal ... on 21 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt.Vatsala W\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\/O Bhujabal ... on 21 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-01-17T15:01:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt.Vatsala W\\\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\\\/O Bhujabal … on 21 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-17T15:01:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2\"},\"wordCount\":2084,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2\",\"name\":\"Smt.Vatsala W\\\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\\\/O Bhujabal ... on 21 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-17T15:01:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt.Vatsala W\\\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\\\/O Bhujabal … on 21 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt.Vatsala W\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\/O Bhujabal ... on 21 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt.Vatsala W\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\/O Bhujabal ... on 21 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-01-17T15:01:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt.Vatsala W\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\/O Bhujabal … on 21 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-17T15:01:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2"},"wordCount":2084,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2","name":"Smt.Vatsala W\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\/O Bhujabal ... on 21 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-17T15:01:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vatsala-wo-k-mahaveer-vs-rathnaraj-padival-so-bhujabal-on-21-august-2008-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt.Vatsala W\/O K Mahaveer vs Rathnaraj Padival S\/O Bhujabal … on 21 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136488"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136488\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}