{"id":136606,"date":"2010-11-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2"},"modified":"2018-11-09T15:46:57","modified_gmt":"2018-11-09T10:16:57","slug":"smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
 \" 'EEGU-R HC\u00a7B_LI,\u00bb_\n BANGALORE'?-O'U.TH TALUK.\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 11\" DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2O1G~T,'f\"--\u00ab.:,\"\".,_\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'8LE MR. IUSTICE A.N. IIENUGOIPA'L,A'=GOYvO_A. \n\nWRIT PETITION NO.315o9\/i\u00bb:<o1bf G(*GMi:CPC.)%,v   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSMT. AJAYAMARI\nAGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, ., :\nW\/O AROGYANATHAN @ ALTIN,__ I\nBEGUR VILLAGE & HOBL1,  \nBANGALORE SOUTH,TAL.UK,...--  .  '\n\n(BY SRI M.v.CHANDI;j::A' Sz+E:;--<AP,A"REDDY',' AIM)\n\nAND:\n\nPAPARAJU _     \n\nAGED ABOUT45 TYEARS, '  "\n\nS\/O LATE RAYAPPA,   "  \nRESIDENT OE ANANTHA f2JA"(3A_I'~1 LAYOUT,\nELECTRONIC CITY_ POST,  \n\nHUSKUR GATE '\n\n...PETITIONER\n\n...RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
 THIS ‘vII1R’IT’A1’PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 225 AND
\n227 O-T-.__ THE CONSTITUTION OE INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE<\/p>\n
 ‘ORDER DATED 31″ JULY 2009 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN
\nI’-\u00abi;f~.__O’;\u00bbS.NO,68.3;”2OO\u20ac) PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
\n ‘ ,;IR;’DCN.,_) AS PER ANNExURE–D AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE
\n ORDER “DATED 19*” AUGUST 2010 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL
\n DISTRICT JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE IN
\n‘”-._M.A.\u00e9NO.95\/2009 AS PER ANNEXURE-L AND CONSEQUENTLY
\nALLOW NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULES 1 AND 2<\/p>\n
G<\/p>\n
PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B GRANTENG INTERIM ENJUNCTION
\nAS PRAYED FOR,<\/p>\n
THIS PETETEON COMING ON FOR PRELIMENARY HEARENG
\nIN ‘8’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:<\/p>\n
QRDER<\/p>\n
Petitioner has filed O.S.No.683\/2009 in the Co,.uirl;i’o_f<\/p>\n
Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.,), Bangalore Rural District, <\/p>\n
against the respondent for the relief <\/p>\n
injunction in respect of property desc,ri.bevd’4′–,i,n”:\u00e9the\u00e9i’plaiiinvtaaat<\/p>\n
schedule. By filing written ,sta_l;emeht_”‘to  <\/p>\n
respondent has denied the claim of=,tVhe_Vpetit’i’oner’:tothe suit
\nproperty. LA No.1 was\u00bb   :.p_et’itio_ner vseevking an
\norder of temporaryAi_njuncti.0.n:T’_to defendant from
\ninterfering withj’: e-ni\u00e9oyment of suit
\nproperty by   filed statement
\nof objections 22,_–o*}T.V2oo9. The trial court
\nupon consviide\ufb01ratiion  made on behalf of the<\/p>\n
FeSDeCtl.\\;e _parties  their learned advocates and upon<\/p>\n
 consicferattcsn “ofA_the\u00e9re’cord of the suit, has held that, the<\/p>\n
p’e–titi.o.nei*i-..’has”no-tymade out a prima facie case for grant of<\/p>\n
  order t_empjorary injunction and as a result, LA No.1<\/p>\n
\\<\/p>\n
\/,1<\/p>\n
having found to be devoid of merit, was rejected by.___an<\/p>\n
order dated 31.07.2009. Feeling aggrieved, the <\/p>\n
filed Misc.Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r)  ”<\/p>\n
learned District Judge, Bangalore Rural \u00bbD.i\u00abstrict,_v,Balingaiore,7, it<\/p>\n
upon consideration of the rival conte”‘ntio.ns’an:d–the<\/p>\n
has concurred with the findingV’o_f,4″‘t.h%e learned.VVtriial”‘:;iii’dge: in
\nthe order passed on LA l\\\u00a3,.o.1 an;d—–ans”‘va result, has..d.is\u00a7missed
\nthe appeal. Challenging  judgment of<\/p>\n
the courts below, t_h”e.__plai.n’t’il”f ‘lfgs ‘:fi*le;d.V_tl”lis\u00ab~}.+l:V’r’it petition.<\/p>\n
2. L\u00e9.arne_’d:.w_  -the; petitioner contended
\nthat, the.V’hco’urtsrvliveloiri:halfe.:’_’not considered the case of the
\npetitionerthe correfctlllperspective and that the material<\/p>\n
placed on reco’rd.not”-been correctly appreciated and the<\/p>\n
._f’JVfi’n.riin\u00a7.s’C’recorded \u00e9th’e”impugned order and the judgment<\/p>\n
are  Iillegal.\n<\/p>\n
  have perused the writ petition record.\n<\/p>\n
 V.  The point for consideration is:\n<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
\u00abii<\/p>\n
Whether any interference with the impugned.
\njudgment and order, is called for? ” T<\/p>\n
5. The grant of interlocutory injunctions~:fi’s7″sniff’? M<\/p>\n
exercise of discretionary power of the Court. :t.r.i’-a_lxCo’_u,rt’V..<\/p>\n
upon consideration of the case of the.Vpa.r’ti’es,<\/p>\n
the finding that, the plaintiff haVs–.n:ot_rnade.outVyyahv-.pripfia’~’fa:cie
\ncase for grant of temporary injun–et”i’o–n}”-Tfhe.appellate court
\nshould not interfere with put under
\nchallenge by sub.st_i:t’u.ttng   the appellate
\ncou rt finds \u20ac.t’l’:et!V    been exercised
\narbitrarily,cap’ric:i’ou’E:!;y.,_  where the trial court
\nhas ignored the “of law regulating the grant<\/p>\n
or refusal of*~ti._nte.r|ocutoryorrder. The appellate court may<\/p>\n
_._not re.–\u00ab\u00a7asse:;s the ‘material and seek to reach a conclusion<\/p>\n
A*o_iffer~ent  one reached by the court below, if the<\/p>\n
 trial court was reasonably possible on<\/p>\n
the ma’te.ri’a:lVs’p’iVaced on record by the parties.<\/p>\n
  A perusal of the record would show that, the<\/p>\n
. court by taking into consideration the case of the<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
petitioner, has considered the record placed by her v_i.s___–a–<\/p>\n
vis, the record placed by the respondent and has heifcl’<\/p>\n
the plaintiff has not made out a prima facie case-to  ”<\/p>\n
order of temporary injunction in ..res\u00bbpe,ct .Vpla_i’nt”.., if<\/p>\n
schedule property in her favour.\n<\/p>\n
consideration of the record, has–..::ii\u20ac2l.d th.at.,__  has
\nnot made out a prima facie case,.a-nVcl”,’vthat,’the fi’r1vdi.ngs of the
\ntrial court are justified.  findings by the
\ncourts beiow wi.vtif,_::–r;ggar\u00a7;f”‘t:Q~not having a
\nprima facie case}  facie case, there
\ncannot be..any’V”baiaV’i*1:;:;e_  nor irreparable loss
\nand injury to the courts below have<\/p>\n
noticed the”‘c_ahse Vof.’4’the.:’::;i2’iaintiff and have prima facie<\/p>\n
4,..,appreci.ated~ the V’recor_d_s_:produced by her, I am unable to<\/p>\n
“=find:V’merit,:in  submission that the impugned order and<\/p>\n
the~.judgm’en’t-._are”fperverse and illegal. It is not a case<\/p>\n
wherein the “courts have omitted from consideration any<\/p>\n
 rn.ateriai document placed on record. The courts beiow in<\/p>\n
..,e_.x\u00e9rcise: of their discretionary jurisdiction, upon adverting to<\/p>\n
*4′..t’he”record, have held that, the plaintiff has failed to make<\/p>\n
\/77′<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda ” ‘EEGU-R HC\u00a7B_LI,\u00bb_ BANGALORE’?-O’U.TH TALUK. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 11″ DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2O1G~T,’f”–\u00ab.:,””.,_ BEFORE THE HON’8LE MR. IUSTICE A.N. IIENUGOIPA’L,A’=GOYvO_A. WRIT PETITION NO.315o9\/i\u00bb:<o1bf G(*GMi:CPC.)%,v BETWEEN: SMT. AJAYAMARI AGED ABOUT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-09T10:16:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-09T10:16:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":854,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2\",\"name\":\"Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-09T10:16:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-09T10:16:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-09T10:16:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2"},"wordCount":854,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2","name":"Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-09T10:16:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-a-jayamari-vs-paparaju-so-late-rayappa-on-11-november-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt A Jayamari vs Paparaju S\/O Late Rayappa on 11 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136606"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136606\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}