{"id":13675,"date":"2010-06-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010"},"modified":"2017-10-03T18:05:14","modified_gmt":"2017-10-03T12:35:14","slug":"p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 1478 of 2005()\n\n\n1. P.GIRIJA, AGED 47 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. R.RAMANI, AGED 42 YEARS,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. S.BUVANENDRAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :10\/06\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n          M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n\n           ---------------------------------------------\n            CRL.R.P.NO.1478 OF 2005\n           ---------------------------------------------\n              Dated 10th            June, 2010\n\n\n                          O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
              Petitioners,                  the        accused in<\/p>\n
C.C.643\/1997 on the file of Judicial First<\/p>\n
Class   Magistrate-I,                   Nedumangad           taken<\/p>\n
cognizance for the offence under Section<\/p>\n
138 of Negotiable Instruments Act on a<\/p>\n
complaint      filed              by            Mithranikethan,<\/p>\n
Thiruvananthapuram           through             the     power  of<\/p>\n
attorney, was convicted and sentenced for<\/p>\n
the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable<\/p>\n
Instruments Act. Petitioners challenged the<\/p>\n
conviction   and        sentence             before       Sessions<\/p>\n
court,            Thiruvananthapuram                            in<\/p>\n
Crl.A.141\/2001.                Learned                  Additional<\/p>\n
Sessions Judge on re-appreciation of the<\/p>\n
evidence  confirmed               the         conviction       but<\/p>\n
Crrp 1478\/05
\n                           2<\/span><\/p>\n
modified sentence to imprisonment till rising<\/p>\n
of     court   and   compensation  of  Rs.75,788\/-.<\/p>\n
Revision is filed challenging the conviction<\/p>\n
and sentence.\n<\/p>\n
            2.   Learned  counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n
petitioners and first respondent were heard.<\/p>\n
            3. Argument of the    Learned   counsel<\/p>\n
appearing for the       petitioners is that as is<\/p>\n
clear from Ext.P10 ledger extract and Ext.P11<\/p>\n
specimen signature furnished by the petitioners<\/p>\n
for the purpose of opening the      account, Ext.P2<\/p>\n
cheque was issued in that account opened by<\/p>\n
Mahila Samajam with first petitioner as the<\/p>\n
President and second petitioner as Secretary of<\/p>\n
the Association and Mahila Samajam is not made<\/p>\n
an accused and the proceedings was        initiated<\/p>\n
only      against  petitioners and  therefore,  the<\/p>\n
conviction is not sustainable. It is argued<\/p>\n
Crrp 1478\/05
\n                            3<\/span><\/p>\n
that       petitioners   have no personal liability<\/p>\n
and the loan was granted to more than             40<\/span><\/p>\n
members        of the association and      they are<\/p>\n
liable to re-pay the same and when        there was<\/p>\n
default      at  the  instance   of  Mithranikethan,<\/p>\n
petitioners       entrusted  signed   blank   cheque<\/p>\n
which was utilised for creating Ext.P2 cheque<\/p>\n
and as the cheque was not issued             by the<\/p>\n
petitioners to discharge any of their debt or<\/p>\n
liability, they cannot be convicted for the<\/p>\n
offence      under   Section  138  of     Negotiable<\/p>\n
Instruments Act. It is therefore, argued that<\/p>\n
conviction is not sustainable.<\/p>\n
            4.     Learned   counsel appearing for<\/p>\n
first       respondent  would   argue  that   Mahila<\/p>\n
Samajam       is  not   a   registered  society   or<\/p>\n
association and petitioners are       President and<\/p>\n
Secretary of the Samajam and loan was disbursed<\/p>\n
Crrp 1478\/05
\n                           4<\/span><\/p>\n
not to the individual members          but to the<\/p>\n
petitioners and it is their responsibility       to<\/p>\n
disburse the amount and also to collect     it and<\/p>\n
re-pay the same and when there was default, for<\/p>\n
the amount due Ext.P2 cheque was issued and as<\/p>\n
it      was    dishonoured   and   all    statutory<\/p>\n
formalities were complied with, the      conviction<\/p>\n
is perfectly     legal.\n<\/p>\n
            5. Though learned    counsel appearing<\/p>\n
for the       petitioners argued that PW1, who was<\/p>\n
examined      for     first   respondent,  has   no<\/p>\n
authority      to give evidence and the complaint<\/p>\n
was filed not by PW1 but by the then power of<\/p>\n
attorney        holder     Bhuvanendran,  who   was<\/p>\n
examined by the defence as DW2, and therefore,<\/p>\n
evidence of PW1 should not      have been accepted.<\/p>\n
Ext.P1 is the power of attorney executed by the<\/p>\n
Director of Mithranikethan, authorising PW1 to<\/p>\n
Crrp 1478\/05
\n                           5<\/span><\/p>\n
prosecute the case stating that though power of<\/p>\n
attorney      was earlier given to DW2 Bhuvanendran<\/p>\n
he expressed his difficulty to continue it and<\/p>\n
therefore, PW1 was authorised to prosecute the<\/p>\n
case further.       The evidence of DW2 establish<\/p>\n
that      he  instituted the     complaint on  the<\/p>\n
strength of the power of attorney executed in<\/p>\n
his      favour  when   he  was   an  employee   of<\/p>\n
Mithranikethan     and   subsequently  he  resigned<\/p>\n
from that post         and in such circumstances,<\/p>\n
Ext.P1 was executed by the Director authorising<\/p>\n
PW1 to prosecute the case further. Evidence of<\/p>\n
PW1 shows that he has personal knowledge with<\/p>\n
regard       to    the   transaction.    In    such<\/p>\n
circumstances,      evidence  of   PW1  cannot   be<\/p>\n
ignored and on that ground conviction cannot be<\/p>\n
interfered.\n<\/p>\n
            6. Ext.P10 ledger extract with Ext.P11<\/p>\n
Crrp 1478\/05
\n                            6<\/span><\/p>\n
specimen      signature  furnished,  establish  that<\/p>\n
the account was opened in Poovachal Branch of<\/p>\n
State       Bank  of  Travancore  in  the   name of<\/p>\n
Priyadarshini        Mahila    Samajam   by    first<\/p>\n
petitioner       as   the   President   and   second<\/p>\n
petitioner as the Secretary. Ext.P11 specimen<\/p>\n
signature       furnished   by   them   conclusively<\/p>\n
establish that fact. Though petitioners would<\/p>\n
contend that they have no personal liability,<\/p>\n
evidence       establish  that   Mithranikethan  had<\/p>\n
furnished       funds    to   Priyadarshini   Mahila<\/p>\n
Samajam, for disbursing loan to its members and<\/p>\n
petitioners as         President and Secretary had<\/p>\n
undertaken the liability and the burden to re-<\/p>\n
pay the same by collecting the amount from the<\/p>\n
members.        It  cannot   be  disputed  that the<\/p>\n
liability was on the petitioners, though in<\/p>\n
their capacity as the President and Secretary.<\/p>\n
Crrp 1478\/05
\n                           7<\/span><\/p>\n
Though      learned  counsel   argued that there is<\/p>\n
no evidence to prove that Ext.P2 cheque was<\/p>\n
issued towards the amount due and in fact it<\/p>\n
was entrusted as a signed blank cheque, when<\/p>\n
instalments were defaulted as security and it<\/p>\n
was     furnished  evidenced  by  Exts.D1  and  D2,<\/p>\n
Ext.D1      only shows  that    apart  from  Ext.P2<\/p>\n
cheque,       another cheque which is the subject<\/p>\n
matter in Crl.R.P.3188\/2006, was also received<\/p>\n
by       DW2    for   Mithranikethan,   from    the<\/p>\n
petitioners.       It will not show that      those<\/p>\n
cheques were blank cheques or tht it was as<\/p>\n
security.      Petitioners examined DW4 who was an<\/p>\n
employee      of   Mithranikethan  to  prove   that<\/p>\n
handwriting in Ext.P2 cheque is that of DW4.<\/p>\n
DW4       deposed that it was she who had written<\/p>\n
Ext.P2       cheque.    But    evidence   of    DW4<\/p>\n
establishes that cheque was       filled up by DW4<\/p>\n
Crrp 1478\/05
\n                           8<\/span><\/p>\n
after       verifying  the   account   and   it  is<\/p>\n
thereafter      petitioners  signed   the  cheques.<\/p>\n
Therefore, in the light of the evidence of DW4,<\/p>\n
petitioners      cannot  contend  that  they  issued<\/p>\n
blank cheque, as security. On the other hand,<\/p>\n
evidence of DW4 establishes that it was issued<\/p>\n
towards the amount due by the petitioners.<\/p>\n
            7. Learned  Sessions Judge  appreciated<\/p>\n
the     evidence   in  the  proper  perspective  and<\/p>\n
rightly found that though petitioners are not<\/p>\n
personally       benefited by the loan, they are<\/p>\n
responsible and liable for the repayment of the<\/p>\n
amount and it is in discharge of that liability<\/p>\n
they issued Ext.P2 cheque      and therefore Ext.P2<\/p>\n
cheque was issued      towards discharge of a legal<\/p>\n
enforceable      liability.  That   finding  is   in<\/p>\n
accordance       with   the    evidence.   Evidence<\/p>\n
establishes that cheque was presented within<\/p>\n
Crrp 1478\/05
\n                           9<\/span><\/p>\n
the statutory period and first respondent had<\/p>\n
complied      with all  the  statutory  formalities<\/p>\n
provided      under  Sections   138  and   142   of<\/p>\n
Negotiable Instruments Act. Hence conviction of<\/p>\n
the petitioner for the offence under Section<\/p>\n
138 of      Negotiable Instruments Act is perfectly<\/p>\n
legal.\n<\/p>\n
            8. Then the only question  is regarding<\/p>\n
the sentence. Learned Additional Sessions Judge<\/p>\n
modified      the  sentence  to  imprisonment  till<\/p>\n
rising       of   court    and   compensation    of<\/p>\n
Rs.75,788\/-,      the  amount     covered  by   the<\/p>\n
dishonoured      cheque  and   in  default   simple<\/p>\n
imprisonment for three months each.         Learned<\/p>\n
counsel submitted that direction was to pay<\/p>\n
compensation      of  Rs.75,788\/-    each  by   the<\/p>\n
petitioners and it will be double the amount<\/p>\n
covered by the dishonoured cheque. I find that<\/p>\n
Crrp 1478\/05
\n                         10<\/span><\/p>\n
there is no direction to pay compensation of<\/p>\n
Rs.75,788\/- each by the petitioners.      Instead<\/p>\n
on default they were directed to undergo simple<\/p>\n
imprisonment for three months each. In order to<\/p>\n
avoid       confusion, it   is   clarified   that<\/p>\n
petitioners      need  to  pay   compensation   of<\/p>\n
Rs.75,788\/- jointly viz. Rs.37,894\/- each.<\/p>\n
            Revision is disposed clarifying  that<\/p>\n
compensation payable by each of the petitioners<\/p>\n
is Rs.37,894\/-.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                             M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,
\n                                        JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
\nuj.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1478 of 2005() 1. P.GIRIJA, AGED 47 YEARS, … Petitioner 2. R.RAMANI, AGED 42 YEARS, Vs 1. S.BUVANENDRAN, … Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY For Petitioner :SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR For Respondent :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN The Hon’ble MR. Justice […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nP.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-03T12:35:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-03T12:35:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1163,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010\",\"name\":\"P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-03T12:35:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-03T12:35:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-03T12:35:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010"},"wordCount":1163,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010","name":"P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-03T12:35:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-girija-vs-s-buvanendran-on-10-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.Girija vs S.Buvanendran on 10 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13675\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}