{"id":136875,"date":"2008-01-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008"},"modified":"2014-02-11T02:31:21","modified_gmt":"2014-02-10T21:01:21","slug":"ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008","title":{"rendered":"Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nAS No. 43 of 2000(D)\n\n\n\n1. ANSARUL ISLAM EDUCATIONAL ASSN.\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. MRS.P.V.KUNHIBI\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI G. UNNIKRISHNAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.AVM.SALAHUDIN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID\n\n Dated :18\/01\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n               KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID,JJ.\n\n              ----------------------------------------------------------------\n\n                            A..S. NOS. 43 & 104 OF 2000\n\n              ----------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n                      Dated this the 18th day of January, 2008.\n\n\n                                      JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Harun-Ul-Rashid, J.\n<\/p>\n
        These   appeals   are   filed   against   the   judgment   and   decree   in   O.S.\n<\/p>\n
No.589   of   1992   on   the   file   of   the   1st  Additional   Sub   Court,   Kozhikode.\n<\/p>\n
A.S. No.43 of 2000 is filed  by the plaintiffs  and A.S. No.104 of 2000  is<\/p>\n
filed by the additional second defendant in the suit.   The suit was filed for<\/p>\n
a decree directing the first defendant to vacate and surrender possession of<\/p>\n
the  properties detailed   in the plaint schedule, for damages to the tune of<\/p>\n
Rs.50,000\/-, for mense profits, past and future and  other ancillary reliefs.\n<\/p>\n
The trial court by the impugned judgment held that Ext.A2 deed does not<\/p>\n
constitute a valid Wakf, that the provision in the deed for appropriating the<\/p>\n
income by the Wakif is repugnant to  Mohammedan  Law since the   Wakif<\/p>\n
belongs   to   the   Shafi   Sect.   and   that   the   Wakif   himself   was   enjoying   the<\/p>\n
property  while he was acting as Muthavalli.  The trial court also held that<\/p>\n
Ext.A2 deed was invalid because  of the repugnant provisions contained in<\/p>\n
it   and   that   the   plaintiff\/society   does   not   acquire   any   right   in   the   Wakf<\/p>\n
properties.       On   the   basis   of   the   finding   recorded,   the   court   below<\/p>\n
dismissed the suit.\n<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                         2<\/span><\/p>\n
        2.    The   first  plaintiff   is  a  society   registered  under  the  Registration<\/p>\n
Act.     According   to   the   plaintiffs,   under   a   registered   Wakf   deed<\/p>\n
No.281\/1927,  executed  by deceased  Khan  Bahadur  Valiyakath  Hajee Ali<\/p>\n
Barami,   the   plaint   schedule   property   stood   dedicated   by   way   of   Wakf.\n<\/p>\n
There is a clause in the Wakf deed that  in case the family of Ayishabi and<\/p>\n
Pathummabi   becomes extinct, the beneficiaries   of the Wakf shall be the<\/p>\n
plaintiff’ school and the Madrassas under it.  It was also made clear that the<\/p>\n
trustees of the said school shall become the Muthavalli.  According to the<\/p>\n
first plaintiff,  since  the  last  Muthavalli  died  on  8.4.1992  without  leaving<\/p>\n
any   issues,   the     plaintiff\/society   has   become   the   sole   beneficiary   of   the<\/p>\n
Wakf and that the defendant has no manner of title, claim, interest or rights<\/p>\n
whatsoever in the Wakf properties.   The first plaintiff, therefore, instituted<\/p>\n
the suit for the aforementioned reliefs.\n<\/p>\n
        3.   The first defendant who is in possession    of the plaint schedule<\/p>\n
properties and acting as the present Muthavalli resisted the suit  inter alia<\/p>\n
contending that the   plaintiff\/society has no right or authority   to file   the<\/p>\n
suit   and   that   it   is   not   correct   to   say   that   the   family   of   Ayishabi   and<\/p>\n
Pathummabi   became extinct.     The defendant also contended that   she is<\/p>\n
the senior most member who has been accepted, adopted and treated by the<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                        3<\/span><\/p>\n
original   Wakif     and   the   other   female   descendants   as   the   Muthavalli   and<\/p>\n
that she is in absolute possession and management of the Wakf properties.\n<\/p>\n
She further contended that she and her children are entitled to continue the<\/p>\n
line of succession and are legally and rightfully entitled to   be the trustee<\/p>\n
and   beneficiary   of   the   Wakf.     According   to   the   defendant,   deed<\/p>\n
No.281\/1927 is not a Wakf deed, that the deed attaches  more importance<\/p>\n
to   the   maintenance   of   the   family   members   by   appropriating   the   income<\/p>\n
than   for   charitable   or   other   purpose   and   that   without   any   permanent<\/p>\n
dedication of the properties, the deed is invalid.  It is also contended that in<\/p>\n
the subsequent  deeds  executed  in 1951, 1958 and 1961,  the status  of the<\/p>\n
defendant as the trustee of the tharwad is asserted, affirmed and accepted<\/p>\n
by   the   original   Wakif.       The   defendant   also   contended   that   the<\/p>\n
plaintiff\/society has no manner of right over the plaint  schedule property<\/p>\n
and   nor   are   they   entitled   to   get   recovery   of   possession   of   the   properties<\/p>\n
and, therefore, prayed for dismissal of the suit.  The Wakf Board also filed<\/p>\n
a written  statement supporting the  claim of the defendant  and  prayed for<\/p>\n
dismissal of the suit.\n<\/p>\n
        4.   The court below interpreted the various clauses in Ext.A2 Wakf<\/p>\n
deed.  The court below noticed that Ext.A2 would show that the settlor had<\/p>\n
made  it  clear   in   the   deed  that   recital   of   Quran,   reading   of   Moulood   and<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                                4<\/span><\/p>\n
providing   food   to   the   poor   on   the   day   of   Moulood   should   be   from   the<\/p>\n
income from the property.   Referring to Section 3 of the Mussalman Wakf<\/p>\n
Validating  Act, 1913, the  court  below  observed  that  there  cannot be  any<\/p>\n
valid   Wakf     since     Ext.A2   contains   a   provision   for   appropriation   of   the<\/p>\n
property   by   the   Wakif   himself.       According   to   the   learned   Judge,     the<\/p>\n
recitals    in Ext.A2 clearly show that there is a provision in the said deed<\/p>\n
that the Wakif could enjoy his property.     This provision  is repugnant to<\/p>\n
the  provisions   of  the   Mussalman   Wakf  Validating   Act   and   hence   it   was<\/p>\n
held that no valid Wakf was created by Ext.A2 deed.\n<\/p>\n
       5.   We have gone through the different clauses in Exts.A2, B1 and<\/p>\n
B2  deeds.    For  the  creation   of  a   valid   Wakf,   there   should   be   permanent<\/p>\n
dedication by a Muslim of   his properties for any purposes  recognized  by<\/p>\n
Muslim Law as religious, pious   or charitable.   To constitute a Wakf, not<\/p>\n
only should the object be religious, it should be charitable as well.  Unless<\/p>\n
a   permanent   dedication   to   charity   is   ascertainable   from   a   document,   it<\/p>\n
would  not  be  proper to  declare  it  as  Wakf deed.    We have  noticed      the<\/p>\n
following   recitals   at   pages   2   and   3   of   Ext.A2:\n<\/p>\n
                                   .            In   page   3   of   Ext.A2   it   is   recited   that\n\n\nA.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                                5<\/span>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n                                                             .      In  page   4   of   Ext.A2\n\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
deed, there is a provision for right of residence of tarwad members.   The<\/p>\n
recitals in page 4 of the deed would again go to show that the properties<\/p>\n
shall not be alienated or encumbered by any members of the tarwad.  It is<\/p>\n
also   recited   at     pages   4   and   5   of   Ext.A2   that   Ayishabi   followed   by<\/p>\n
Pathummabi   and their descendants    shall act as Muthavallis  and shall in<\/p>\n
their   capacity   as   Muthavallis,   after   remitting   the   tax   and   expenses   for<\/p>\n
repair   and   maintenance,   utilise   the   balance   amount   for   religious   and<\/p>\n
charitable   purposes.     At   page   7,   there   is   a   provision   for   vesting   the<\/p>\n
properties    in  favour  of Madrassaul  Muhamadiya  school  of madrassa  for<\/p>\n
the purpose of educating the orphans.  It is further recited therein that the<\/p>\n
trustees of the said school shall manage and spend the income  for the said<\/p>\n
charitable purposes.\n<\/p>\n
       6.  On 25.9.1958, the Wakif executed  Ext.B2 deed in which the first<\/p>\n
defendant   who   is   the  niece  of   the   Wakif   and   her   descendants   were<\/p>\n
authorised   to   act   as   Muthavallis   of   the   Wakf   properties   and   that   the<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                        6<\/span><\/p>\n
defendant   and   her   descendants,   as   members   of   the   family,   shall   act   in<\/p>\n
succession and continue to manage the property and do the acts stated in<\/p>\n
Ext.A2  Wakf  deed.        Again,   the  Wakif  on  20.10.1961  executed  another<\/p>\n
settlement deed marked as  Ext.B1  clarifying and explaining the duties of<\/p>\n
the Muthavalli.\n<\/p>\n
        7.     Learned   counsel   appearing   for   the   Mohammedan   Educational<\/p>\n
Association in A.S. No.43 of 2000,   referring to the clauses stated above,<\/p>\n
submitted that  a valid Wakf was  created  by Ext.A2   deed  and, therefore,<\/p>\n
the   interpretation   of   Ext.A2   by   the   court   below   is   incorrect.       He<\/p>\n
particularly   referred   to  the   recitals   at   pages   2   and  3   which   are   extracted<\/p>\n
above.     According   to   him,   going   by   the   object   for   which   Ext.A2   was<\/p>\n
executed, the basic requisite is that there should be a permanent dedication<\/p>\n
of   property   for   religious   or   charitable   purposes.     The   various   purposes<\/p>\n
enunciated   in   Ext.A2   and   the   object   for   which   Ext.A2   was   executed,<\/p>\n
according to counsel, would show that  there is  a permanent dedication of<\/p>\n
property for  the  purposes  recognised  by Mohammedan  Law as  religious,<\/p>\n
pious  or charitable.    According  to him, this  is  not  a case  where the  only<\/p>\n
object  is recital of Quran  and observing  Moulood.  Therefore, according<\/p>\n
to him,  the contention of the first defendant that these are not the objects<\/p>\n
for  which   Ext.A2  was   created   cannot  stand.       Besides     recital   of   Quran,<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                       7<\/span><\/p>\n
reading   of   Moulood   and   feeding   the   poor,  there   are   other   recitals   in   the<\/p>\n
Wakf   deed   which   would   go   to   show   that     the   income   from   the   Wakf<\/p>\n
properties   shall   be   utilised   for   other   charitable   purposes,   contended<\/p>\n
counsel.\n<\/p>\n
       8.     Learned   counsel   appearing   for   the   first   respondent\/defendant<\/p>\n
brought to our notice Section 3(a) of the Mussalman Wakf Validating Act,<\/p>\n
1913 and canvassed the position that it shall be lawful for a Mussalman to<\/p>\n
create   a   Wakf   for   the   purpose   of   maintenance   and   support   wholly   or<\/p>\n
partially   of   his   family,   children   and   descendants   and,   therefore,   the<\/p>\n
provision in Ext.A2 deed making provision for maintenance of the family<\/p>\n
members is not repugnant to Mohammedan Law.   Counsel also referred to<\/p>\n
the   definition   of   Wakf   deed   under   Section   3(s)   of   the   Wakf   Act,   1995<\/p>\n
which reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n
                “wakf   deed”   means   any   deed   or   instrument   by<\/p>\n
                which a wakf  has been  created and includes any<\/p>\n
                valid   subsequent   deed   or   instrument   by   which<\/p>\n
                any of the terms of the original   dedication have<\/p>\n
                been varied.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n
According   to   the   learned   counsel,   the   provision   in   Ext.A2   regarding<\/p>\n
dedication of property as a family Wakf is made intact and is not violated<\/p>\n
in  Exts.B1 or B2  deeds.    Exts.B1  and  B2  deeds  are created  only for the<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                       8<\/span><\/p>\n
purpose of appointing subsequent Muthavallis and for laying down duties<\/p>\n
for   the   purpose   of   management.     The   dedication   in   Ext.A2   deed   has<\/p>\n
neither changed nor varied in Exts.B1 and B2.  According to counsel, such<\/p>\n
execution   of   subsequent   deeds   are   permissible   under   the   Wakf   Act   and<\/p>\n
that such subsequent deeds form part of the original deed.     Counsel also<\/p>\n
contended   that   the   Wakf   is   not   valid   because   it   contains   provisions   for<\/p>\n
appropriation   of   the   property   by   the   Wakif   himself   and     that   the   settlor<\/p>\n
himself   can   enjoy   the   property   is   repugnant   to     the   Mussalman   Wakf<\/p>\n
Validating  Act.   According to  him, such an appropriation  of property   is<\/p>\n
permissible only if the Wakif is a Hanafi Mussalman.\n<\/p>\n
       9.     Learned   counsel   appearing   for   the   appellant   in   A.S.   No.43   of<\/p>\n
2000 also contended that if the Wakf is created with a condition that the<\/p>\n
whole or part of it shall be for himself while he lives and after him for the<\/p>\n
poor  is  strictly in  consonance  with  the  principles  of  Mohammedan  Law,<\/p>\n
that   it   is   permissible   to   create   wakf-alal-aulad   under   which   a   trust   in<\/p>\n
perpetuity   can   be   created   for   the   maintenance   and   support   wholly   or<\/p>\n
partially   of   the   family   of   the   settlor,   his   children   or   descendants   from<\/p>\n
generation  to  generation  and  thereafter  for  the  benefit  of the  poor  or for<\/p>\n
any other purpose recognized by Mohammedan Law as religious, pious or<\/p>\n
charitable purposes of a permanent character.\n<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                       9<\/span><\/p>\n
       10.  Learned counsel appearing for the Kerala Wakf Baord\/appellant<\/p>\n
in A.S. No.104 of 2000 submitted that the Wakf in question was registered<\/p>\n
in 1968 before the  Wakf Board at a time when the Wakif was alive and<\/p>\n
that   the   Muthavallis   from   time   to   time   had   understood     and   accepted<\/p>\n
Ext.A2 as a valid Wakf and submitted annual returns and paid contribution<\/p>\n
to the Wakf Board and, therefore, they cannot now turn round and say that<\/p>\n
no valid Wakf was created   by Ext.A2.  Counsel also pointed out that the<\/p>\n
first defendant had submitted an application  on 8.3.1993 before the Board<\/p>\n
to  enter her  name as  Muthavalli  of  the  Wakf on  the  death  of the  former<\/p>\n
Muthavalli, Valiyakath Pathummabi on  8.4.1991  and  that  the conduct  of<\/p>\n
the first defendant is proof positive to show that Ext.A2 is a valid Wakf.\n<\/p>\n
       11.   On the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view<\/p>\n
that a reading of Exts.A2, B1 and B2 as a whole, to spell out the contents<\/p>\n
and   manner   of   its   terms   is   necessary   for   the   proper   adjudication   of   the<\/p>\n
respective   contentions   raised   by   the   parties   to   the   suit.       The   first<\/p>\n
respondent in A.S. No.43 of 2000 filed I.A. No.4146 of 2007   praying to<\/p>\n
receive Annexure R1 document, which is the register of Wakf relating to<\/p>\n
Barami   Valiyakam   Charitable   and   Family   Wakf,   as   an   additional<\/p>\n
document.  It is stated in Annexure R1 that the register pertains to the suit<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                       10<\/span><\/p>\n
properties  and  that the  same was registered  with  the  Wakf Board  by the<\/p>\n
then  trustee of the  properties.      According  to  the  petitioner  in  the  above<\/p>\n
application the suit properties are family trust properties and the petitioner<\/p>\n
is the present trustee of the said properties and that the trust was created<\/p>\n
predominantly  for  the  welfare  of  the  family members  of the  person  who<\/p>\n
executed it. The petitioner prayed that she and her children may be held to<\/p>\n
be the beneficiaries of the properties in the event of this Court finding that<\/p>\n
Exts.A2, B1 and B2 are family Wakf properties.\n<\/p>\n
       12.  Since Annexure-R1 is a document produced only in the appeal,<\/p>\n
the learned counsel for the appellants pray that the matter may be remitted<\/p>\n
to the  court  below, so  that the parties  will  get  an opportunity to take all<\/p>\n
contentions   centering   round   the   said   document.     The   counsel   for   the<\/p>\n
respondents   also   submitted   that   in   view   of   the   contentions   taken   by   the<\/p>\n
parties in both the appeals, some of which are referred to by us  above and<\/p>\n
which   have   not   been   considered   by   the   court   below,   the   cases   may   be<\/p>\n
remanded to the court below with opportunity to adduce evidence, if any.\n<\/p>\n
Having regard to the nature of the contentions, we are of the view that it is<\/p>\n
only appropriate that such an opportunity is given to the parties  before the<\/p>\n
court   below   in   which   case   the   said   court   being   the   court   at   the   first<\/p>\n
instance will get an opportunity to adjudicate all those issues.\n<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                       11<\/span><\/p>\n
          Accordingly,   we   set   aside   the   judgment   and   decree   under   appeal.\n<\/p>\n
Under the Wakf Act, 1995, any question relating to Wakf property shall be<\/p>\n
decided   by   the   Tribunal   and   the   jurisdiction   of   the   civil   court   is   barred<\/p>\n
under Section 85 of the Act.   Therefore we remand O.S. No.589 1992 to<\/p>\n
the Wakf Tribunal, Kozhikode for denovo consideration.   The parties are<\/p>\n
at liberty to adduce fresh evidence, if  any.   There will  be no  order as  to<\/p>\n
costs.\n<\/p>\n
                                            KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)<\/p>\n
                                           (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE)<\/p>\n
sp\/<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000    12<\/span><\/p>\n
                                  KURIAN JOSEPH &<\/p>\n
                                  HAURN-UL-RASHID, JJ.\n<\/p>\n
                                  A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000<\/p>\n
                                      JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
                                  18TH JANUARY, 2008<\/p>\n
A.S.NOS.43 & 104 OF 2000                                       13<\/span><\/p>\n
                                        .\n<\/p>\n
                                                                  .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM AS No. 43 of 2000(D) 1. ANSARUL ISLAM EDUCATIONAL ASSN. … Petitioner Vs 1. MRS.P.V.KUNHIBI … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI G. UNNIKRISHNAN For Respondent :SRI.AVM.SALAHUDIN The Hon’ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH The Hon’ble MR. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136875","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAnsarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-01-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-10T21:01:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-01-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-10T21:01:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2345,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008\",\"name\":\"Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-01-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-10T21:01:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-01-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-10T21:01:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008","datePublished":"2008-01-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-10T21:01:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008"},"wordCount":2345,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008","name":"Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-01-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-10T21:01:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-islam-educational-assn-vs-mrs-p-v-kunhibi-on-18-january-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ansarul Islam Educational Assn vs Mrs.P.V.Kunhibi on 18 January, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136875","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136875"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136875\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136875"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136875"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136875"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}