{"id":136900,"date":"2009-03-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009"},"modified":"2014-03-22T13:54:38","modified_gmt":"2014-03-22T08:24:38","slug":"v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational … on 11 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational … on 11 March, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 9636 of 2005(V)\n\n\n1. V.P.JASEELA, W\/O.ABDUL JALEEL,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE MANAGER,\n\n3. THE HEADMASTER,\n\n4. P.BAVA HAJI, S\/O.LATE ABDU HAJI,\n\n5. K.ABUBACKER @ BAPPU,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID\n\n Dated :11\/03\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                        HARUN-UL-RASHID,J.\n                 ---------------------------\n                    W.P.(C).NO.9636 OF 2005\n                 ----------------------------\n             DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2009\n\n                              JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
           Petitioner is an Assistant Teacher in the M.M.L.P.<\/p>\n
School. This writ petition is filed seeking to quash Exts.P2, P3 and<\/p>\n
P4 and for a direction commanding the lst respondent to approve<\/p>\n
the petitioner’s appointment as P.D. Teacher in the said school.<\/p>\n
Petitioner is aggrieved by the orders issued by respondents 3 and 4<\/p>\n
stating that she would not be permitted to rejoin duty in the school<\/p>\n
on the expiry of the leave.        M.M.L.P. School is managed by<\/p>\n
Maslahathul Muslimeen Eucational                & Charitable Trust,<\/p>\n
Nellissery. By the terms of the trust deed, the President of the trust<\/p>\n
shall be elected from the trust members and the President shall be<\/p>\n
the Manager of the Educational Institutions run by the trust. Sri<\/p>\n
K.Aboobacker alias Bappu continued as the President of the Trust<\/p>\n
till the expiry of his term of office i.e. 19\/3\/2003. According to the<\/p>\n
4th respondent, a meeting of the Trust Members held on 21\/4\/2003<\/p>\n
                               -2-<\/span>
\nW.P.(C).No.9636\/2005<\/p>\n
elected Sri Bava Haji , the 4th respondent herein as the President<\/p>\n
of the Trust and therefore he continued as the Manager of the<\/p>\n
Schools under the Trust. According to him, his appointment as<\/p>\n
the Manager of the schools was approved by the Assistant<\/p>\n
Educational Office, Edappal as per order No.C\/2594\/03 dated<\/p>\n
4\/11\/2003 with effect from 25\/4\/2003. The 5th respondent, the<\/p>\n
erstwhile Manager, filed an appeal before the Director of Public<\/p>\n
Instruction, Trivandrum challenging the approval of the 4th<\/p>\n
respondent and the appeal stands dismissed by order dated<\/p>\n
3\/1\/2004 upholding the order passed by the Assistant Educational<\/p>\n
Officer.  The 5th respondent preferred a revision before the<\/p>\n
Government, which was dismissed by the Government by order<\/p>\n
dated 8\/5\/2004. Exts.R3 (a), (b) and ) are the aforesaid orders in<\/p>\n
respect of U.P. Schools. Some time later, the 4th respondent’s<\/p>\n
appointment as the Manager of M.M.L.P. School, Nellissery was<\/p>\n
approved as per order dated on 3\/1\/2005. Exts.R3(d) is the afore-<\/p>\n
said order in respect of L.P. School. Exts.R3(a) to R3(d) orders<\/p>\n
are challenged by the 5th respondent before this Court in W.P.(C)<\/p>\n
                               -3-<\/span>
\nW.P.(C).No.9636\/2005<\/p>\n
19464\/2004.\n<\/p>\n
           2. The 5th respondent in the said writ petition contended<\/p>\n
that since the registration of the school was in 1983, the<\/p>\n
petitioner therein continued as the President of the Trust from<\/p>\n
1983, that he was elected from time to time and that on the expiry<\/p>\n
of his term on 19\/3\/2003, he convened a meeting of the members<\/p>\n
of the Trust on 2l7\/4\/2003. In the meeting of the Trust he was<\/p>\n
elected as the President of the Trust and therefore he moved the<\/p>\n
A.E.O. for approving him as the Manager of the School on<\/p>\n
28\/4\/2003. It is also stated in the writ petition        that the 4th<\/p>\n
respondent herein, who claimed to be the elected President of the<\/p>\n
Trust, approached the A.E.O. for approval of his appointment,<\/p>\n
that the A.E.O. considered the rival claims of the petitioner and<\/p>\n
the 4th respondent (respondents 4 and 5 herein) and by Ext.R1(a)<\/p>\n
order dated 4\/11\/2003 approved the 4th respondent as the<\/p>\n
Manager of the School with effect from 25\/4\/2003. The appeal<\/p>\n
and the revision preferred before the Director of public<\/p>\n
instruction and the Government were dismissed by the respective<\/p>\n
                               -4-<\/span>
\nW.P.(C).No.9636\/2005<\/p>\n
orders, which are produced in this case as Ext.R3(b) and ). The<\/p>\n
4th respondent herein, who is the 4th respondent in W.P.(C).<\/p>\n
No.19464\/2004 contended that pursuant to the Trust meeting<\/p>\n
held on 21\/4\/2003, he was elected as the President of the Trust<\/p>\n
and that he assumes charge as the Manager of the School under<\/p>\n
the Trust on 25\/4\/2003. Taking into account the fact that he was<\/p>\n
the elected President, the A.E.O. approved his appointment,<\/p>\n
which was confirmed by the Director of Pubic Instruction and the<\/p>\n
Government.\n<\/p>\n
      3. The main contention raised by Sri Aboobacker, the<\/p>\n
petitioner in the said writ petition, is that the Educational<\/p>\n
Authorities under the K.E.R. has no power or authority to decide<\/p>\n
the correctness of the election of the President of the Trust, that<\/p>\n
they exceeded their jurisdiction while passing the impugned<\/p>\n
orders and therefore requested this Court to set aside the<\/p>\n
impugned orders     and to issue a direction to the A.E.O. to<\/p>\n
approve the appointment of the petitioner therein as the validly<\/p>\n
elected Manager. This Court, after considering the rival<\/p>\n
                                -5-<\/span>
\nW.P.(C).No.9636\/2005<\/p>\n
contentions set up by the parties, held that when there is a<\/p>\n
dispute concerning election of office bearers in the educational<\/p>\n
agency, the said dispute has to be settled by the civil court. But,<\/p>\n
in this case, by virtue of the provisions of the Trust deed, the<\/p>\n
president of the Trust is the ex-officio Manager of the school.<\/p>\n
This Court observed that        the educational officer, who is<\/p>\n
enquiring about the validity of appointment of Manager<\/p>\n
incidentally has to look into the election of the President also.<\/p>\n
That is what has been done in this case. Without looking into the<\/p>\n
rival claims concerning the election as President, the Educational<\/p>\n
Officer cannot take a decision. So, I find nothing illegal in the<\/p>\n
procedure followed by the Educational Officer and higher<\/p>\n
authorities. But the question as to whether the 5th respondent or<\/p>\n
the 4th respondent was elected is a matter which has to be decided<\/p>\n
by the civil court. The findings of the Educational Officer, the<\/p>\n
D.P.I. and the Government will be subject to the decision of the<\/p>\n
civil court in the suit, if any, filed by the parties. This Court<\/p>\n
dismissed the writ petition without prejudice to the contentions of<\/p>\n
                                -6-<\/span>
\nW.P.(C).No.9636\/2005<\/p>\n
both sides. This Court also held that if the civil court passes any<\/p>\n
interim or final order regarding the election of the President,<\/p>\n
needless to say that the Assistant Educational Officer shall<\/p>\n
correspondingly modify the approval order to make the same in<\/p>\n
tune with the decision of the civil court. Thus, the dispute as to<\/p>\n
who is the ex-officio Manager of the Schools of the Trust is a<\/p>\n
matter, which the civil court has to decide. It is submitted at the<\/p>\n
bar that O.S.No.44\/2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Tirur is<\/p>\n
pending decision, in which Aboobacker is the plaintiff and Sri<\/p>\n
Bava Haji is the contesting defendant. The civil court passed an<\/p>\n
order of status quo. Ext.P6 is the said order.\n<\/p>\n
      4. The 4th respondent and the Educational Authorities took<\/p>\n
the stand that the appointment of the petitioner cannot be<\/p>\n
approved, since the appointment has been done by the 5th<\/p>\n
respondent after the expiry of his term as Manager. The learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the 4th respondent submitted that the appointment of<\/p>\n
the petitioner as Assistant Teacher was done in violation of<\/p>\n
Exts.R3(a) to (c) orders and the appointment made subsequent to<\/p>\n
                                -7-<\/span>
\nW.P.(C).No.9636\/2005<\/p>\n
the approval of appointment of the 4th respondent as Manager<\/p>\n
confirmed in appeal and revision is illegal. Exts.R3(a) to (c) are<\/p>\n
the approval orders in respect of U.P. School and Ext.R3(d) is the<\/p>\n
approval order in respect of the newly started L.P. School.<\/p>\n
      5. During the pendency of this writ petition this Court by an<\/p>\n
interim order dated 30\/3\/2005 directed respondents 1 to 4 to<\/p>\n
permit the petitioner to rejoin duty as P.D. Teacher forthwith and<\/p>\n
further directed the 3rd respondent to file an affidavit reporting<\/p>\n
compliance of the above direction on or before 8\/4\/2005. It is<\/p>\n
submitted that the petitioner is continuing in service as an<\/p>\n
Assistant Teacher.\n<\/p>\n
      6. The petitioner was appointed as L.P. School Assistant on<\/p>\n
20\/10\/2004. The appointment was made by the 5th respondent.<\/p>\n
According to the 5th respondent, the election of the 4th respondent<\/p>\n
as President of the Trust is not in order and that he is the duly<\/p>\n
elected President of the Trust. From Ext.R3(a) to Ext.R3(d), it is<\/p>\n
clear that the Educational Authorities approved the appointment<\/p>\n
of the 4th respondent as the Manager. The issue as to who is the<\/p>\n
                               -8-<\/span>
\nW.P.(C).No.9636\/2005<\/p>\n
duly elected President of the trust is pending before the civil<\/p>\n
court. The question as to whether the 4th respondent or the 5th<\/p>\n
respondent can continue as the Manager of the institution<\/p>\n
depends upon the decision of the civil court. Since the 4th<\/p>\n
respondent’s appointment as Manager was approved by the<\/p>\n
Educational Authorities, the authorities rightly passed Ext.R3(c)<\/p>\n
order rejecting the proposal for approval of appointment of the<\/p>\n
petitioner as L.P. School Assistant. In the light of Ext.P5<\/p>\n
judgment passed by this Court directing the parties to abide by<\/p>\n
the decision of a civil court in the matter of Managership, the<\/p>\n
appointment of the petitioner as L.P.S.A by the 5th respondent<\/p>\n
also depends upon the decision of the civil court as to who is the<\/p>\n
President of the Trust and who is duly elected as the Manager of<\/p>\n
the school. It is made clear that if the civil court finds that the 4th<\/p>\n
respondent is the duly elected President of the trust, the<\/p>\n
appointment of the petitioner as LPSA by the 5th respondent is<\/p>\n
illegal and not liable to be approved. On the other hand, if the<\/p>\n
civil court finds that the 5th respondent is the duly elected<\/p>\n
                               -9-<\/span>
\nW.P.(C).No.9636\/2005<\/p>\n
President of the Trust and duly appointed Manager of the School,<\/p>\n
then the Educational Authorities shall approve the appointment<\/p>\n
of the petitioner as LPSA.\n<\/p>\n
      7. So long as the Educational Authority has approved the<\/p>\n
Managership of the 4th respondent, the appointment of the<\/p>\n
petitioner by the 5th respondent prima facie is illegal.<\/p>\n
      8. Since this Court issued         interim order directing<\/p>\n
respondents 1 to 4 to permit the petitioner to rejoin duty as P.D.<\/p>\n
Teacher and for the reason that she is continuing as a Teacher in<\/p>\n
the said school,     in the interest of justice, I direct    the lst<\/p>\n
respondent-A.E.O. to provisionally approve the appointment of<\/p>\n
the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of<\/p>\n
receipt of a copy this judgment, till a final decision is taken in<\/p>\n
O.S.No.44\/2007 by the Sub Court. The respondents 1 to 3 on<\/p>\n
provisional approval of the appointment, shall disburse the salary<\/p>\n
and other benefits due to the petitioner including arrears till date.<\/p>\n
The salary shall be paid regularly and the arrears shall be<\/p>\n
disbursed within a period of two months from the date of<\/p>\n
                                -10-<\/span>
\nW.P.(C).No.9636\/2005<\/p>\n
approval of her appointment. It is made clear that in case the<\/p>\n
civil court finds that the 5th respondent is the duly elected<\/p>\n
President of the Trust, the petitioner cannot continue as a Teacher<\/p>\n
from the date of judgment in O.S.No.44\/2007. The Sub Court<\/p>\n
shall dispose of the suit, O.S.No.44\/2007 within a period of six<\/p>\n
months from today.\n<\/p>\n
     Writ Petition is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                         Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                                              HARUN-UL-RASHID,
\n                                                    Judge.\n<\/p>\n
kcv.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational … on 11 March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 9636 of 2005(V) 1. V.P.JASEELA, W\/O.ABDUL JALEEL, … Petitioner Vs 1. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, … Respondent 2. THE MANAGER, 3. THE HEADMASTER, 4. P.BAVA HAJI, S\/O.LATE ABDU HAJI, 5. K.ABUBACKER @ BAPPU, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nV.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational ... on 11 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational ... on 11 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-22T08:24:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational … on 11 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-22T08:24:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1837,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009\",\"name\":\"V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational ... on 11 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-22T08:24:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational … on 11 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational ... on 11 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational ... on 11 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-22T08:24:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational … on 11 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-22T08:24:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009"},"wordCount":1837,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009","name":"V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational ... on 11 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-22T08:24:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-p-jaseela-vs-the-assistant-educational-on-11-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"V.P.Jaseela vs The Assistant Educational … on 11 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136900"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136900\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}