{"id":136951,"date":"2009-07-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-01-17T22:05:22","modified_gmt":"2018-01-17T16:35:22","slug":"ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V … vs M\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V … vs M\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
IN Tim mm\u00bb: COURT 0? \ncmcvrr BENCH AT nrmaazw   % % \n\nmvmn Tiils TEE 15*' DAY eF.k;r:;;,Y,%Aj29a9_%  \u00ab '.   \n\nTm I-m2~t*BLE :sm..rtrs*:?:tc.g \ufb01vksHYm\u00b01\u00a7*mzA1xU$An\nTI-m \u00a7ION'*BLE MR.3'&_S'f*I\u00a7Eiv if \u00a7{EESHAVANARAYANA\n\n  g; wkna.3m;2m2m;\n\nRP:Rr1EJ.}1BI 'f\u00a7iZ*\u00a7\\?I~.EiAJ ESAB\nALIAS 2! 'i\\EATAR)\u00ab'*\u00bba}AN\" %\ns\/:3 VELU ;\u00bb'~'gCH;ARi\u00ab.MESTRI\n&GEZ' L:y1;wOR, 'OEZCF NIL\n_ 79';\/O 133' LAMA CAMP TEBETIAN\n_.% ACQLO NY,\" \"kill N13 GOD\n  _  N'C3:'i,'sf\":*\u00a7T KHUNNUR JANATA PLOT\n%   \u00bb .TQ;'$gr1:GGAoN, DIST I'-\u00a3A's\/ER},\n\n gy%_ ~., ,\u00bb KHAFPELLANT\ngm' sR:,Lc;;KEsH MALAVALLI, &DV.)\n\n  -.A.ND:\" \n\nA'   j;vI,!S DELUXE ROAELINES\n\" NQ69 4TH CROSS N.R.ROAD\nBANGALQRE 2\nOWNER OF TRUCK NO.KA~01\/A\u00ab5057\n\n\n\nNATEQNAL INSURANCE CO LTD\nBY ITS EEVISIONAL MANAGER\nSLEJRTHA TALK} ES CGME\"-'LEX\nHUBLI\n\nINSURER GP' .KA~w0i~A--505\"i\n\nSURESH DA'}\"TA.TREYA DEV.A;KAfi*f}'V'\"\"'57.\";\"   \n\nAGE MAJOR occ: DRIVER O1?' ; \n'TRUCK NO.KA~\u00bb~OI.--A-5057f  *\nR\/O C\/O RESPONDE':\";N_'__I' 1  *\n\nPADMARAJ P CHYABBI  \nAGE MAJOR c:v::<: D(}C'}'GR \nR\/C) C\/O v1JAY;;r\u00bbCL2N::::%   %\nMUNDGQD <w  i \u00bb%-\nms? UTTAR KAgNN\u00a7'-;}}"}.A'  \n{OWNER Q1? 'CAR z~I; IvI\"'f.A4--4'4-\u20ac33}\n\nT133 a71T2i:jEt:%':*;a,L%%::%\u00e9$UkRANcE CG LTD\nBY'~.\u00a3TS E}\u00a3\u00a7\u00ab'i\u00a7$jI{3P%g\u00a7;';E=.E\u00a2\u00a3AN,%G\u00a7',R\nENE{?\u00ab..__Y' <::oM P}_;E\u00a7X'_.'~KE$HWAPU Eli\n\n_I-fUBi \ufb01zszsu;-2332 <3? CAR NQMYA-~44C13)\n\nA. \u00e9\u00a7iE5%LEjV%';%CH1\u00a7;Rmf\u00ab\u00abS\/Q NATARAJAN @\n k .\u00a7\u20ac';%N\u00a7\u00a3gE\u20acAJAN ACHARY\n\n"  .AGE.\/VMAJGR OCC BUSINESS\n\n" * =\u00bb._A\u00a3'~\u00a7S FATHER 0? macgasgm\n\n %%%'%R;Q';.;x.MA CAMP MUNDGOD\n\nNFZQR OF CAR NQvMYA"%4\ufb023\n33%? FATHER IN LAW C)?' \ufb01PPELLAN'I'\n\n RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(BY SRLLAXMAN BMANNODHAIQ, ADV. FDR<\/p>\n
  sR1.s.s.JosH:, ADV. FUR R5}<\/p>\n
THIS MFA IS FILED U\/S 173(1) OF M’v’__AC’I’
\nAGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND mam
\nDA’I”ED:4,3.02 PASSED IN MVC NO.63f\u00a3’f’i3.’\u20ac;:..4..j:’;:.5’\u00a7\u00a7I:j’~~.’
\nTHE FILE OF THE E ADDL. MST. J1j:3i<3?Ei%;%\u00a2.}mD%\u00ab%
\nMACT, DHARWAD, SITTING Afi' "1A'\u00a5{U'BL2\u00a7,_
\nTHE CLAIM PETITION FOR cOr\u00bb4%P:?,:\u00a7%sAT:QN.  <\/p>\n
'I'HIS MFA QQMING "\u00a3E\u00a7V:1Vf\u00e9.FC\u00a7.R*.O'R\u20ac?=I\u00a7%\ufb01SVVVT'HIS k
\nDAY, SHYLENDRAV .~K}JM,{–'gR –  ""D.ELI'\u00e9?'ERED THE
\nFOLLOWING:    L   %  <\/p>\n
T'-.his_ –   -the claimant in MVC<\/p>\n
M637\/:%99%6 \ufb01'.v\u00a5VZ'}:?'_' V1;%_\u00a7'..1'#.':';::':f3'fL'\u00a3\u00a5'3V of the Clear: Qf the First<\/p>\n
Ad\u00a7i'\u00a7::\u00a7.\u00a7{:a}Vv D\u00a3s:r\u00a7\u00a2:&a.nd Sessians Jaclge and MAST,<\/p>\n
  '_3i:t\ufb021:i-zig at Hubii, whasa claim for payment<\/p>\n
0if\\' \u00ab\u00a2 \u00e911*1p;e:ii':\u00a7faEtion at: the \u00e9eath of one Rajesab <\/p>\n
"ve._'_"'-..V.Nai:\u00e9a:f\u00a7%jan asaci as his '\u00a5i?'iCiC2'W was rejecteci by the<\/p>\n
  : i;1'i\u00a5:;.t\u00a7.nal fer the reasen that a like shim had aireadfg<\/p>\n
   ..}::\u00e9en put fart}: by the tribunai ix: MVC ?\\\u00a7<:)-55E\/ IQQQ<\/p>\n
V \ufb01ieci by 0113 skmbika Devi and her children and that<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
claim ha\u00e9 a.1re3.d;\u00a7.2' been settled before th\u00a2.__  Lek
\nAdaiath and an amount 0f Rs.2,90,00G\/-
\nbeen cemputed as compensation
\niegal heirs of the deceased pezf\u00e9\u00e9i\u00e9'
\npaid by the insurance  fa\u00a5\u00bbggr:'a;:VfV':a'f
\npersons' Therefore,  the
\npresent appelianty    there
\ncarmet be pa\u00a7?men\u00a7..\u00ab–:*.;zig';\u00a7 of the same<\/p>\n
1\u00a7a'm1\u00a7:;,;_ _  <\/p>\n
2. ” ‘ Cir: ‘f\u00a7efus:\u00e9;}.T.__V\u00e9f_’both the MVC cases, we<\/p>\n
have z1\u00e9’t:i–r.’:M\u00e9<i  t:if:a_A'i,~, b"%.i.:iie1:1 the s0–ca}.1ed settiemenf:<\/p>\n
   A' ibef-:1-srve the Lek Adalath in B\/EVC<\/p>\n
 mg.%5s:%;;&:4;%,% the mic Na\ufb01\ufb01?'\/1\u00a796 was very<\/p>\n
mag\u00e9h 'befare the tribunai aizci mare<\/p>\n
 ir:1pG.f*{:.:3i1'1'\u00a3\u00a3y, the second respandantwingurarice<\/p>\n
' "'Cferripar2y which is party in both the ciairri petitions<\/p>\n
 served and represented ii} berth cases and it<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
was incumbent cm the part 9? the Insufance
\nCompanj; to bring it ':9 tha rmtice of the
\nthat there are two claim petitions and
\nare cempet\ufb01\ufb02g to claim as xxriffg \\\u20ac'5t""'1:},A"!~?.5"
\nquestion sheuld have been_ regs-1\u00a7;e-Ci
\nwas made to any one    mczssthgr'
\nhan\u00e9, Insurance  i'1:;AaQ #1a1"tisatn
\nmanner and enabigd.  to receive
\nthe    the armmrit
\nand t}t*:.at'– put against the present
\n not be a proper.\n<\/p>\n
  .__Th$v”‘ivn–$ur3.nce Company which has to<\/p>\n
_ x*v31’\u00a7:i;bi;:.:f$c%”A’ evmer of the Vehicie should have<\/p>\n
ta}-{erg  during the penciency of twa alaim<\/p>\n
pe\ufb01t: dn.\u00a7 in “respect vary accident and bath ia&ie3<\/p>\n
   to be legal heirs 0f the deceased and it is<\/p>\n
\u00a7\/<\/p>\n
0111}: thereafter, the payment shcuid have Egeen
\nmade. V ‘<\/p>\n
4. Though Sri;.Laxmar’1
\nleanized Ccsunsel appeamirig
\nCompany submits that the
\ngo t0 a. Civil Court to   claim
\nthe amount, we firlvcig-._..ifi1;s’3.tA.V: cgf action<\/p>\n
will be an exercise iI1A”fu%;i:1\u00a7.i’f\u00a7f”  I}.niefss the present<\/p>\n
ap\u00a7e11;\u00e9%’i\u00a3Tv _cc;fi\u00a7 ;3ensation payable by<\/p>\n
the owrieg’ E-and il:1′  {he Insurance Company.<\/p>\n
    ;:2r\u20ac:.sent appellant is asked to gc ta<\/p>\n
 tth\u00e9’ ‘\u20ac[i*;i’ii_”\u00a3’.;:c;V:g\u00a7’t., there can be three possibilities, 0118<\/p>\n
 Eable to estabi\ufb01h that she algae is the<\/p>\n
T “\u00bb~’4\u00ab___V”Wife, ir3,__ *\u00a7vh\u00a7Tch event, she gets the ccmpensation, if<\/p>\n
  .\u00a3na}; not be able ta establish as wife, in which<\/p>\n
  .,.a’s’}e:t\u00b01t, she wi\ufb01 net get 8.11}? compensatio\ufb02 and if the<\/p>\n
Civi} Court cames ta the cenciusian that bath the<\/p>\n
es\/<\/p>\n
ciaimarats have to share, may be arnaunt has to be
\nappznrtioneci betwgen mic: sf them. in any View cf
\nthe matter, the present appellant
\nmm part of the amount sf compe:1sat\u00a7{3:%;.f:}i\u00a7_\u00a7%
\ninsurance Cempany has to <\/p>\n
as the ciaimaxits in oth’:_~3r_  p\u00e9ii\ufb01l\u00e9n’
\nreceived, the entirg    more<\/p>\n
avaiiabie beferte thi\u00e9   :  ‘4 V<\/p>\n
 H “it; 5ig  \u00e9;’Mcii\u00a3’sput& Qf this nature
\nsaE’1o:.1}&7be  Civil Caurt and not by<\/p>\n
Mam’. gt %isk%%:~;g1:::g,z% g\ufb01bmgtted by Sri.Ma.n:{meddar,<\/p>\n
 C\ufb02unsel appearing fer the ingurance<\/p>\n
 have paid the amsm: eniy after<\/p>\n
V -V th\u00e9k’ 1fef;\u00e9a9:I:: i:t\u00e90:1 :3? the \u00e9ispwie by 3; Civii Csuri<\/p>\n
V’ ‘. r.\u00a3i1s”‘\u00e9::s.=\u00a7ad; of acting in a greemptiva manner and thai:<\/p>\n
‘  i\u00e9g {\ufb01e mason Wh}_; we partly 311011;?’ this appeal with<\/p>\n
\u00e9\/A<\/p>\n
settiement. E1: is only after these deveiczrpments, the
\nInsurance Company has filed its objections to MVC:
\nNo.63?\/1999 0:1 15.02.2001 seeking far
\n3f the ciaim petitioni  ‘\u00bb   A4\n<\/p>\n
8. Rpart fram Eegal\u00a3ty_,,\u00bb~th;eA ”
\nIrzsurance Company is not  :’V’bAc;.:’1’1_=:V3’_”
\npoirim to an ac’: cf  ‘t\u00a7)\u00bb:”_;fzV\u00a7iix\u00a7f@\u00a7i1’r’V:QI1e <\/p>\n
ciaimant,<\/p>\n
9, –. ‘H\u00e9L%\u00a7i1g4’Ar:\u00e9gg;fd ‘ta the circumstances, we<\/p>\n
era in\u00a21i&;.e d.,tc\u00a7 .di:fe’c:\u00a7f..’L’the insurance Company to<\/p>\n
  \u00a3\u00a7f\u00ab.I\u00a7’f..s;],,50,()00\/– E9 the credit of the<\/p>\n
 ‘pVr4\u00e93eAr:vi: \u00a3;.Emz:I1″–:-int by way of a terrn clepesit in any<\/p>\n
r”:$J;i\u00e9na_3_i2,ei.gi ‘Qar:}{ i:1itia..I;1y far 3. periecl cf five y\u00e9ars.<\/p>\n
 is \u00e9;;#;_\u00a7-in to the present appellant ta appmach the<\/p>\n
   and astabiish her rights, base& on her<\/p>\n
-.vsiatus as the Wife of the deceased Rajesab <\/p>\n
V.Nata.ra_}:an 313$ than thereafter, the amcunt can be<\/p>\n
Ii}<\/p>\n
accordingly ordered to be released either ir1V.i’z.,=1\u00a7\u00a7o_;.1r<\/p>\n
0f the claimant, if she shoulci aucceed <\/p>\n
suit :31″ ta be returned ta the,\u00a3\u00bb;\u00b0:s11:*a:\u00e9\u00a3:es*–:\u00a7f3.e3f2=:pa:1\u00a7g%  ‘<\/p>\n
depending on the out game of:”t}1e’:_AS1;:iit <\/p>\n
the present appe\ufb01ant. i\ufb013:1\u00a7;zanc\u00e9’  \ufb01eld ”<\/p>\n
Eiabie to make goo\u00e9 fahe _.2eim.\u20ac\u00a7’L3\u00a79i’Aft?._.of iicnap\u00e9nsatian
\npayabie to the appell\u00e9i”-&’h’e:I’\u00a7\u00e9%’i1 _.i:1fi”i’i3\u00a71 $’_$F%ver:t sf their
\nsuccess bef{}1’ei2gi:;;}1e  -.C0’z.;:{ff’–1_’a;_r:\u00a7,T’nothing beyond<\/p>\n
and can v{;’c:r1+;_”cut.”it,::\u00a7_’f\u00a7\u00e9’m:e’e.ti\u00a7f \u00e9zggwper iaw against the<\/p>\n
othgr   ,,  A  I’  .\n<\/p>\n
 ‘}”G2.  a\ufb01gwed ta this extent.\n<\/p>\n
1″\n<\/p>\n
sd\/5..\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
Sg\/..\n<\/p>\n
‘ JUDGE<\/p>\n
E33<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V … vs M\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar K.N.Keshavanarayana IN Tim mm\u00bb: COURT 0? cmcvrr BENCH AT nrmaazw % % mvmn Tiils TEE 15*’ DAY eF.k;r:;;,Y,%Aj29a9_% \u00ab ‘. Tm I-m2~t*BLE :sm..rtrs*:?:tc.g \ufb01vksHYm\u00b01\u00a7*mzA1xU$An TI-m \u00a7ION’*BLE MR.3’&_S’f*I\u00a7Eiv if \u00a7{EESHAVANARAYANA g; wkna.3m;2m2m; RP:Rr1EJ.}1BI ‘f\u00a7iZ*\u00a7\\?I~.EiAJ ESAB ALIAS […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRamejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V ... vs M\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V ... vs M\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-17T16:35:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V … vs M\\\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-17T16:35:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1082,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V ... vs M\\\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-17T16:35:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V … vs M\\\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V ... vs M\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V ... vs M\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-17T16:35:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V … vs M\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-17T16:35:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009"},"wordCount":1082,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009","name":"Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V ... vs M\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-17T16:35:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramejabi-kom-rajesab-alias-v-vs-ms-deluxe-roadlines-on-1-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramejabi Kom Rajesab Alias V … vs M\/S Deluxe Roadlines on 1 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}