{"id":137201,"date":"2009-07-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2"},"modified":"2014-11-06T21:42:10","modified_gmt":"2014-11-06T16:12:10","slug":"smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
E 1 1\nIN TI-E HIGH COURT OF KARRATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 29\"' DAY OF JULY 2009\n\nBEFORE\n\n \n\n1. SMT. RADHA G. RAO\nAGED 73 YEARS \nw\/o um: B. aummamayao \n\n2. SR! PREMANANDBAINRJR,      \nszowrs aovmnam  _   L\nAGEDABCXITSOYEARS   -  \n\n3. 8MT.DEV\ufb01{A  V  '\n13\/0 UTE .1?-50:\" \nAGED ABOUT 44-f'\u00a3EAIi?s, & \n\n2%\n\u00a7\n@\ng\nx\n\u00a7\n3\n\u00a7\nEE\n2\n%\n\u00a7\n\u00a7\u00a7\n@\n\u00a7\ufb01\ng\n3\nat\nQ\nm\nE?\nx\nE\nE\nz\nX\n\u00a7\n$\nQ\n\u00a7\n3\nQ\nas\nx\n\u00a7\n3\n\u00a7\n\u00a7\n3\n\n4. DR. naxnmsawna  \nSf0MTE 3- WJTRIIHATH RP-0\u00bb\n  % AGED ABSDUT 48 YEARS\nFVREPRMENTED BY HIS\n\n\"  ifGFA__HOLDER 2w DEFENDANT\n\n \n\n\"  P33 RIAT Ho.1os.\n G0-OPERATIVE\n,._*HC,!'JSmG socnmr L'l'D.,\n,% 750.68, 15m cram, mammmm\n -- 560 055.\n\nE5'?-\ufb01WAT&%& H\u00e9\ufb02\ufb01 mm\"; WW \n\n \n\n PET1'I'IQTE\u00abR8\n\n(BY mu VIVEKARAHD, ADVIBGEE FOR\nVGA.NG\ufb01BM. )\n\nWsmm WW4: \u20acfm\u00a7R\"f\u00a5T&w$ \n\n    \n\nget\n$5\nE3\n3\n$\n:3\n\nTHE Hc:m'BLz me. .ms'r1c:Is Aaacnc B. HINCHIGI9E3:-V ii    AL\n\n\n\nwmmwma Wu: mmmmmwmm mwm m.wmmA ?\u00bbJf,i';:' \ufb01\ufb02\ufb02wf\ufb01\ufb02w\ufb01 mmm mwum\" KW-M amammmm. Mt\ufb01iv\u00e9 QQEWY Q? \u00a7\u20ac&@lM&\"?&K& H\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01 QKEQRY 0? %&\u00a7@N&\"E'&%% WEQH \ufb01\ufb02\ufb02\ufb02\n\nma'. caamnmwn-n R. mm\nw\/o SR1 R.s. max,\n\nAGED ABOUT 84 YEARS,\nRIATAIII2, mrramasw.\nmm mm, mausswmam,\nmncmom -- 560 cm.\n\nDR. smniaaauma V.V'KAI\u00a7i1%NP{FR   \nvim um um. xALYAnm\u00a3\u00a2aao,   A  \nmznszvmns,     '  %\nNo.12 RUBAIK. w-=4  Rom. % %   \n\nKI-IAR (wssn naumauaxg-n 400 A052;  \n\nPRESE1fI'LYR_iAT1\"\u00a7a.264,V \n\nSI-M \nHOUSEG SOCIETY I-2'11).  I4   \n39.53, 151\u00bb cieosa. \n '#4  055-  ' \n\n    \n AGED.-AB_L3(TF..?4,.YE&RS,\nNa.1o4 \n\nisracnoss, \n\n  955\n\n.   Mammma,\n  wm%am mm.  ,\n . _\"-AC2-E13)  79 males,\n% RiA39Io.7o7, SI-IRI cnnmwn\n,\"'..<\u00a7-_+,0PERA1'1VE Housnm seem? Lm..\n   lmes, 15m moss, musswmm,\n"  - sec 955.\n\n RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
  (BY am 3.10′. wmnmcmnnna, Amvocam<\/p>\n
ma c\/121-41<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
nnswmmnnm mmn tmmn Anmns ms
\nAm3227o1′-“mm consrmmon CF INDIA PRAYING
\nmo c.ALLmR’nm meow xx os.no.2oaa{199s &
\nam’ Am THE onnzn D’l’.25.6.09, [IN m1im,1s}
\nPnssm BY TI-E HONBLE vm Am…\n<\/p>\n
VEAHH-G.\n<\/p>\n
nus mmm comm cm FOR ”\n<\/p>\n
order, dated  C9urt<:ft1:n vm<\/p>\n
I.A.No.  %<\/p>\n
g
\n3<\/span>
\n.3′
\n8;\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7
\n\u00e9
\n:\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7
\nE
\nK
\n2<\/span>
\nK
\nE
\nSaks;\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7
\n:5″\n<\/p>\n
Q
\n3<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\n\u00a7
\ng
\nQ
\n3<\/span>
\nE
\na
\n2<\/span>
\n%
\nE
\n\ufb01n
\n@
\nP9
\ng
\n3<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\n9<\/span>
\nX
\n\u00a7
\n:\n<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a7*
\n\u00a7<\/p>\n
  dam in brief are than me<\/p>\n
respondeazt\ufb01”   1995 against
\n    Cooperative Housing
\nvLt’;:3..:;,.’:\u00a7\u00a2=;4.;:*\u20aci}ri:\u00a71g the relief of declaration mm: the<\/p>\n
 \u00e9\ufb01i\ufb01f\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01ii\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01”? QW <\/p>\n
 the sole legal hdrs of Law:
\n  and for aonsaquential permanent<\/p>\n
  Earlier to that, they had also \ufb01led 0.5.
\n %mn1i+93\/1995 mm: the petitioner Noa.1 to 3 an-\n<\/p>\n
% %:he nmcmon of aooountgggua potitioners hasrein had<\/p>\n
ii’<\/p>\n
g ~ \u00ab.,,
\n3<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a7<\/p>\n
4;;\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7<\/p>\n
g
\nE<\/p>\n
a<\/p>\n
\u00a7
\n2<\/span><\/p>\n
E
\nii:\n<\/p>\n
5%<\/p>\n
W:\n<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
3%<\/p>\n
{M3<\/p>\n
JUEm.BA1lG:ALCRE tccn-151 IR os.no.293a;1995,<\/p>\n
Imam THIS DAY.\n<\/p>\n
wwwm\ufb01 My mmmmmwwmm WGWW %m@mum\u00a3>.>J\u00a3%%\ufb02:’7\u20acm’?’\u00a5_\ufb01 mmwmamm W\ufb01w\ufb02 mmm W? mmmmm H\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb02\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01”? Q? mmmmm W\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01 iZ\u20ac3UW”@\u00a7 K\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01a M\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01\ufb02ifm<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
\ufb01led 0.8. 110.218\/1997 sucking the relief of
\ndeclaration that may are the legal mp  of
\nSmt.Krish11aba.i and etc.,  <\/p>\n
3. The Trial Court by murder,  zia.-mm:\n<\/p>\n
a1.m..ea the W      <\/p>\n
o.s.No.149a\/1995.\n<\/p>\n
12.3.5, He.947\/2ot::.,&  R.F.A.
\nNo.52\/2002,   to be pending
\n   peiitionen who
\nam the    %’hsj\u00a7i%%d,${w\u00a7.2o3a\/1995 \ufb011cdI.A.No.4
\n  for stay of the
\n  or o.s.No.1+93\/1995.
\n said   holding that it is premsjzure.
\n% L  the petitioners \ufb01led I.A.No.15 and
\n oftm  . The ‘I’ria.1Court,byi’es<\/p>\n
L   %  L. dated 25.5.2009 dismissed the said LA. mimy
\n.’  on the ground that aimi1arI.A. (I.A.No.4) was already<\/p>\n
mjwtm owe.\n<\/p>\n
RBK<\/p>\n
:;:mm”%” W?’ i\u20ac\ufb01\u00a7%N%L”E”?&%\ufb02 E\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01 QWUQV  %\ufb01%W%\u00b0\u00a7\ufb013\u20ac#\u00a7 M\u00a7@\u00a7*’\u00a7 \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01’? Q\ufb01ix mmgmim MEQM mmgaw  \ufb01\u20ac.&%%M’E”&.%& mam \u20ac;.”\u20acL\ufb01M\u00a7M’ W? \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01m\ufb02\u00e9\ufb01\ufb02wt mam mwmmi<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
5.Am-icvmbytheaatnc,thiapetitionia
\npresented. S1-i Vivekananda, the Iearmd counsel<\/p>\n
appearing for Sri V\ufb02angabai Ear the <\/p>\n
submit: that the Trial Court has erred by  Q  %
\nthe second applica\ufb01on is not     K V’
\nthe \ufb01rst application was not  oti’.\n<\/p>\n
support of hi
\njudment of the I-Ion’bit=;   of
\nunmrrn  reported in
\nAm (1909; V1′  relied on the
\n%   it is clear that the
\n  [opined thm before at<\/p>\n
 _be held to be mum: by rm<\/p>\n
 page must have bum. heard
\n dacimbnbyaommomcldberm\ufb01xwcata,
\n it be statutory under 311, am
\n m&w mammw
\nofpubwpoliqtonwfzidxtiaearzt\ufb01edootrbme
\nrum. Byers m  decision oar: be<\/p>\n
%E
\n3<\/span>
\nQ
\nu
\nx
\nE?\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
n\u00bb%e\u00a25″‘%i9W%\u00a53 WW mmmmmwmm wnsmw %…MmmiAw@_*:\u00b0 mwmmmmmm Hum UQUKF Q? KKRNAIRKA HIGW mmm” U? \ufb01\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01w\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01 HQGW C\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02? 0? %%%N%(‘E%\\, IV<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
aonsidwadas msju\ufb01aarta theswraezmzst
\nPnavebeanheardw:d)’i1*:a\ufb02yde#%.’<\/p>\n
5. While may eoncecung mm:\n<\/p>\n
delay can the part of the
\napplication as: stay, he      <\/p>\n
(application am\u00bb stay)
\npreliminary  of   buttmaa
\nCalcutta     of the urn
\n  urn, v. sums.\n<\/p>\n
 1911 cumrm
\n  aha read some of the<\/p>\n
1;sue\u00a7%%iuc;.s,1ao;:w23\/1995 and 0.S.No.2038\/1995<\/p>\n
  show,’  in issue ‘a substantially the
\n    ” ‘  mitt.\n<\/p>\n
  app\u00a2a1iaon1yaea::tinuax1oaao;;’theauitprocma1:;g
\n.’  The11a+fa’e, thepemoners are wtledto the stay of<\/p>\n
1:hcprooeed1ngsinthenubo%auittiIlthn
\n8%<\/p>\n
\u00a7.;WU\ufb01%”i” W?” %\ufb01WNA’\u00a7%K\ufb01 WWW’? Kl\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02f WV; K\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01f\ufb01a\ufb01\ufb01 WWW’? amwm” Q? KARMAVQKQ \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 CQUR? OF Kk\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 HEG-H \u00a32038? K)!’ KARNA”W\ufb02\u00abK.% W\u00a5\u20ac.I23iN {JUNK<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
8ection1Oareclca1;dcnni!:a.t1dmanda1aory.Itia<\/p>\n
\ufb01xrtherheld thereinthatacourtinwhinh subsequent
\nmitts <\/p>\n
trialcf that sun in ” ~–T   <\/p>\n
10. ‘mm the ma;\n<\/p>\n
I.A.No.15 in not propu-3′  ‘    <\/p>\n
onbehalf of the  the
\nthaxwen  in the two suits
\n New to 4 auunm mat<\/p>\n
  ‘  is only for readtion at amounts
\n    in mpwt of the withdrmm amounts.
\nA  mm, o.s.Ho.mas\/1995 1. a. . more<\/p>\n
 X  suit. He also mbmita thatthe par\ufb01ca
\n atleast they are diment.\n<\/p>\n
598%<\/p>\n
warms-‘w\u00bbm\u00bb<\/p>\n
w W5 mmmwwmammm mm\u00bb-2 \u00abyummy Vkwgf zsmnm\u00e9u\ufb01mm maul”; uuwxx {W KARWRTMCA i-EIGH COURT 3? K\ufb01\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01f\ufb01a\ufb02\ufb01 W\ufb01\ufb01 Q\ufb02\ufb02m” \u20ac13? mmmzam HIQH 3&3}?\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
12. He also bring to my name that issue No.1
\nin O.8.Ho.1493\/1995 in net answered by  Trial<\/p>\n
o.s.No.2oas\/1995; therefore, he
\nin no question of the:   T\n<\/p>\n
0.S.No.2038[1995 ooIz1ingV     L  <\/p>\n
judgnmnt ,,,.,.,d byjm.   ii,
\no.s.1vo.1493;1999.5_&  cjw
\nR.F.A.N’o.52\/2002 1993.
\n    ‘the artist in question
\n   reasons; the reason
\n  or may not bc correct. But
\n  at in dismissing the I.A.No.15<\/p>\n
 =  V’ the peti\ufb02cncra have made similar<\/p>\n
 in the pending R.F.Ap \ufb01ar stay of the<\/p>\n
”    in O.8.No.2038f1995 and
\n.’  O.S.No.2l8\/1997. The pat\ufb01ioners could not persuade<\/p>\n
this Court to grantazzirxterimorder ofstay.
\n58+!<\/p>\n
mw\ufb01am\u00e9 M9?” W\ufb01mw\ufb02\u00e9\ufb01m\ufb02 H\ufb02zi\ufb02 %.1U&3R’E f’\u00a35.W’ %%KW&”$%.K& W\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb02iw 0? mawnmm mam \u20acW\u00a5.JK’%” U?’ KARNA7f&i\u20ac.A i\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 KZQKJKF WE” mawzmm M%%\u00a7'”\u00a7 QQUW<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
14. 81-1 Pranhanth Chi, the ieamed counsel
\nfor the mspomicnt submm that he takes exceptipn to<\/p>\n
the conduct of the petmonexs. He submits <\/p>\n
petitioners have cram-examined the
\nthat am is \ufb01led. Ho submits
\nto the suit are above 75    <\/p>\n
prays for the early\n<\/p>\n
15.  : ‘  sf .   counsel
\nm. I s’e\u00a7”\u00e9b:i\u00a7i\ufb01\u00a7rabie–: ::’ force in the subunits’ ions
\nd’ Sri  counsd 121- the<\/p>\n
_ the  stay on the grouni msxthc
\nV   not diaposcdof en me:-la, it
\nV  of holding that it in pte–mmu1e, as thc<\/p>\n
  ‘  .  cane suitwem mt yet \ufb01amd.\n<\/p>\n
698}!<\/p>\n
“–j ~ L%’c5’1;$;H\u00a7;5zi\u00ab3\/ 1997.\n<\/p>\n
mwwm\ufb01 WWW mmmm\ufb01mwmmm mwm mwmma: m.~a;\u00a71* EWWWMQWRM mmm mmxi Q? KARNAYAKA Wi\ufb01\ufb01 $05.33? {W K\ufb01.R.N&”f\ufb01\ufb01& mmg mm? Q5 mmmmm HIGH cam”:\n<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
17. But then, the question that arises in
\nwhathcr the proceeding in O.S.No.2038\/1995 are
\nrequired to be stayed. As pointed oum:y%sn<\/p>\n
Praahanth Chandra, some of the
\nproceedings are di\ufb01erent.
\ncommhensive than the    ‘ J<\/p>\n
O.S..No.1493f1995.\n<\/p>\n
15. The    10 in ca\n\nprevent   Jwwction M\n\n  suits in respect of\nthe same      in issue which\nis   and\n<\/pre>\n
0.S.No.2Q3_8[i9i95 ‘  ‘thee plainti\ufb01is pram:
\n[   of deceased m-ismmbara
\n   dispoaingof c>.s.Na.1+93\/ 1995<\/p>\n
   the ham: in View of the
\n Z 1 of cs.Na.2o3s[1995 and<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
19.’rha1@art,Iaminformeda1t11eba1-thatm
\ninterim order’mgra:1tedinthependingR.F.As__te stay
\nthe proceeding in the suit. No  is<\/p>\n
conaclusion    3
\nmm mst3\u00a5jAisno%aeea\ufb01;t foreeeuiim-rexunce in the<\/p>\n
ma.tter:;  ” ‘<\/p>\n
gmemmm \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 CQMRY Q? KARNAVAKA REQH \u20acC\u00a7%JR\u00a7’ OF B(.a%%MA’E’AK\ufb01u E\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01mi QQMR”\n<\/p>\n
    mm, of mm at<\/p>\n
‘  ‘rm: Court has refused. to
\nimei ”    the material issue in<\/p>\n
% ]e\u00a7;;.s.Ho.149a\/1995 leaving it to be
\n  in o.s.No.2oas; 199:5.\n<\/p>\n
 ..  ab}: The parties to the twa proceedings are<\/p>\n
partly di\ufb01emm.\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01g}!<\/p>\n
a,..w%.m$ WE” wwwmwazm WEWM %C\u00a33&\u00a7%”\u00a7 7%? %%\ufb01M&Y%\ufb01%. \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 K\ufb01b\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01” $5?\n<\/p>\n
forthcoming as to why there was at   4_
\nyears in making the applice1:a::’ rs.  ;  4<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri E 1 1 IN TI-E HIGH COURT OF KARRATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 29″‘ DAY OF JULY 2009 BEFORE 1. SMT. RADHA G. RAO AGED 73 YEARS w\/o um: B. aummamayao 2. SR! PREMANANDBAINRJR, szowrs […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-137201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-11-06T16:12:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-06T16:12:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":1130,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-06T16:12:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-11-06T16:12:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-06T16:12:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2"},"wordCount":1130,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2","name":"Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-06T16:12:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-radha-g-rao-vs-smt-chandramathi-r-trasi-on-29-july-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Radha G Rao vs Smt Chandramathi R Trasi on 29 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=137201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137201\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=137201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=137201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=137201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}