{"id":137335,"date":"2011-06-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011"},"modified":"2016-12-02T11:30:00","modified_gmt":"2016-12-02T06:00:00","slug":"smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>(By Sri. i\\iiS,Sanjay Gpwda; Adv.)\n\nThis MFA is filed under section 23(1) ofV.s.i\u00a7ail}aa'=,: \nClaims Tribunal Act against the ;iudgme_ri%; \n23.03.2009<\/pre>\n<p> passed in GA No.76\/2007 on the &#8216;file eji&#8217;..t&#8217;nei&#8217;&#8230;i<br \/>\nRailway Claims Tribunal, Bangalore, disn\ufb01is-si&#8217;ng&#8221;~i.thse<br \/>\napplication filed under section 1670f&#8221;the7;RET._}ix::_t_&#8217;for <\/p>\n<p>payment of compensation&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>This appeal coming on f0&#8217;r_i&#8217;i*nal dispdsal tih:isli.d&#8217;a.\u00a7;,VVVti#e %<\/p>\n<p>Court delivered the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellants filed a cAlAai_nl&#8217;1_ 16 of<br \/>\nthe Railways before the<br \/>\nRailway Clairns  VBench,. (hereinafter<br \/>\nreferred  wife and children of<\/p>\n<p>one M.Ana&#8217;iid,&#8217; wh&#8217;0\u00bb_dVie&#8217;d ti&#8217;i2\u00ab&#8211;._&#8217;:Q&#8217;?&#8217;}&#8217;.O2.2OO7, while travelling as<\/p>\n<p>a passenger: &#8216;-inV_V&#8221;&#8216;traii&#8217;i TNo.283 from R.Nulenur to<\/p>\n<p> The clalirn petition having been contested by<\/p>\n<p>tine  dismissed, being aggrieved by which,<\/p>\n<p> _ the a&#8217;p.plic_arit.s&#8221;&#8221;have filed this appeal.<\/p>\n<p>  In the claim application it was stated that, the<\/p>\n<p> &#8230;_'&#8221;&#8216;del::eased was traveliing from R.Nuieni..ir ta \ufb02avanagere by<\/p>\n<p>emf<br \/>\nf<br \/>\nz&#8217;;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>10. Awe: is the mother of the deceased M.A.h__and.<\/p>\n<p>she has deposed that, herseif and her son Ahahd &#8220;tt&#8217;e\u00a7*&#8217;eiTled<\/p>\n<p>in train No.283 from R.Nuienur to Dax~iehaVg.er&#8217;e&#8221;&#8221;i &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>0?.O2.2DO&#8217;?, on a II Ciass ticket and&#8221;whiie-&#8216;_;trat}eii.i&#8217;;f:d ihjthe V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>train, the deceased was thirsty   <\/p>\n<p>was aiighting from the  .dr\u00abi._nk-._trteww\ufb01ki\/a&#8217;te&#8217;t ate<\/p>\n<p>Kodaganur Raiiway Sta&#8217;t.izdn, w\u00a7&#8221;1ete&#8217;-hie&#8217;-\u00bbfe|l ddwn. and died at<br \/>\nthe spot. According td&#8221;he&#8217;r,t&#8217;he train moved<br \/>\non her son, vxihetdil-ed   <\/p>\n<p>    is the inquest report<br \/>\nand  Mln the crossexaminationg.\n<\/p>\n<p>AW1 haisstated  to alight at Davangere and<\/p>\n<p>thetmcidenti o\u00bbc,cu&#8221;r&#8217;red&#8217;V&#8217;at.Kodaganoor, where the train was<\/p>\n<p> stdbpeidi:&#8217;Afo:Vr&#8221;a.b0ut  3 minutes. Sgidghas further deposed<\/p>\n<p> the_t,.iA son getting down from the train, even<\/p>\n<p>thdt:gh__&#8221;she&#8221; was sitting in her seat and after drinking<\/p>\n<p>  water,&#8221;her son boarded the train and due to the jerk of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;;t&#8217;r&#8217;aih:, he siipped and feti down and thereafter she shouted<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; ~~ehd the train was stopped and that, she gave a complamt<\/p>\n<p>2:\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2:\n<\/p>\n<p>to the Raifway officiais. She has stated that, <\/p>\n<p>lying outside the track after the incident  M<br \/>\nnot observe whether the neck was sepectat-eo&#8217;~..troVm.Athe<\/p>\n<p>body. She has denied the so_gge.st\u00e9iA.on\u00e9&#8217;-_tha&#8217;t;.4iw.e-tiistoni<\/p>\n<p>committed suicide. Presence of AW&#8221;: in thettrain as &#8216;$3 <\/p>\n<p>passenger has not been disputed and&#8217;et\/&#8217;en:.&#8217;.=oti;;ert%{1ise is V<\/p>\n<p>well established.\n<\/p>\n<p>12. AW&#8211;.2,v B.K:.L&#8211;ath:a~ town, who has<br \/>\nstated that,&#8217;    and situation<br \/>\nshe concIu\u20acd..edi:.4.tVhatit&#8217;isiiastiiVi:&#8221;c&#8217;i&#8217;de\ufb02;:a&#8217;se. She has admitted<br \/>\nthat, ggh\u00e9iihagttino ntedic&#8217;a1.V:_knovi)iedVQe and her opinion is not<br \/>\nbased  the  To a question, whether<\/p>\n<p>Station Master&#8217;  that the person has died due to<\/p>\n<p> ansi}ve*:****&#8217;is &#8216;No&#8217;. She has admitted the ticket<\/p>\n<p> the packet of the deceased. It has been<\/p>\n<p>ma_de c\u00a7ea&#8217;r&#8217;3.th}at; she recorded the statement of AW&#8211;1, To<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;a__a spectf\u00a7_c question, whether there was any statement<\/p>\n<p>A   with regard to act of suicide by the deceased, the<\/p>\n<p>S  answer is &#8216;No&#8217;. id}\/,6<\/p>\n<p>at&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>13, RW~\u00bb1; Station Master, Kodagano_r&#8221;v:&#8217;t2-ays&#8217;d.ebo::ed\u00ab:<\/p>\n<p>that, on 07.02.2002? white he was:V&#8217;onV dotygpa-:sse_h&#8217;g_e.r:train&#8217;:<\/p>\n<p>No.283 arrived at 8:40 hours after&#8217;g&#8217;d*eba0Vr&#8217;t'{ire;&#8217;~.<\/p>\n<p>immediateiy the train was  and-theeiofi the 0&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>train informed through&#8217;.yyaikige&#8217;+&#8217;taa!-{i&#8217;e that, on&#8217;e&#8221;~pe&#8217;rson was<\/p>\n<p>ran over by the train on .;o&#8217;r&#8217;f&#8221; of&#8221;&#8221;p!_atform and he<br \/>\nwent to the spot and_f.ou_n~d one maie&#8221;~-dead body, aged<\/p>\n<p>about 25 yeaiisy&#8217;eutintogtx\u00e9io&#8221;bie&#8217;Ces&#8217;:*aridtying on the side of<br \/>\nthe piatforhn   taken by him with<br \/>\nregarddvtoivhagyiingiviysent and a case being<br \/>\nregistered. &#8211;  report has been marked as<\/p>\n<p>Ex.RV&#8211;_lu. RW3 Vhasdadrn_itte&#8217;d that, he was not an eyewitness<\/p>\n<p>*&#8217;~..,_to  \u00a7_n:&lt;:idr_ent tyhieh&#8211;\u00ab&#039;occurred on 07.02.2007 and that he<\/p>\n<p> \u00ab::am.e t-oV4&#039;i&lt;n:o.yii&quot;&#039;of the incident when he was informed by the<\/p>\n<p>.g*i:e&#039;r.d th&#039;re.:\u00a7gh:=.yyaikie&#8211;takie.<\/p>\n<p> RW~2; Syed Mukhtar, passenger guard in train<\/p>\n<p>0&#039;   from Arsikere to Hubii on 07.02.2007, has deposed<\/p>\n<p>.\u00ab:_yV_t_hat, the train ieft Arsikere at 5:30 hours and reached<\/p>\n<p>Kodaganur at 8:39 hours and the scheduie stoppage of the<\/p>\n<p>,9<\/p>\n<p>*5<br \/>\n\/to<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>train is one minute. Due to ASP in Coach  _<\/p>\n<p>he got down from the train immediateiy   <\/p>\n<p>ACP and peopie came running anti\u00bb info,rn&#8217;i:e&#8221;cio_t&#8217;hat-.one~-.,_\u00a3:o:;{oit<\/p>\n<p>had faiien on the off side. He _found&#8211;.tfje<br \/>\ndied on the spot, which he  to the<br \/>\nStation Master through beiinov told by<br \/>\nthe Station Master to  started at<br \/>\n8:49 hours. journal. In the<br \/>\ncross~examii\u00a7ati&#8217;o_hH.he&#8221;&#8216;has&#8217;:&#8217;aoVn1&#8217;itt&#8217;eo&#8221;\u00a7th&#8217;at, he came to know<br \/>\nof the  train taking motion.\n<\/p>\n<p>He has adtnitted&#8217;  not an eyewitness to the<\/p>\n<p>incident _Vand4&#8243;&#8216;th_eit=hve is  a technician. He has also<\/p>\n<p>:_f&#8217;S&#8221;admi&#8217;tte4d:,,,thathe havsmnot given any statement before the<\/p>\n<p>i3oii&#8217;:;ef&#8217;<\/p>\n<p> B3\/referring to ,oara~117 of E&gt;&lt;,A-2, the Ttihunai<\/p>\n<p> =heAidVV&#039;that, the deceased has committed suicide by<\/p>\n<p>.&#039;.scoi*n:ing&quot;AAacross train No.283, as he was disgusted in iife, as<\/p>\n<p>&quot;..:;oe&#039;t&quot;the opinion of the panchas.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">11<\/span><\/p>\n<p>16. In my opinion, the Tribunal has erred. in<\/p>\n<p>holding that the applicants are not entitled <\/p>\n<p>compensation under S.124A of the Act.  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Railway Administration was that,_.~l&#8217;\u00bbt.._ls  2<\/p>\n<p>negligence of the deceased the acc&#8217;\u00e9\u00abdeh_tl<\/p>\n<p>is also contended that, it ls a<br \/>\nneither RW-1 nor RW~2 were tVhe.ue$,re\u00a5&#8221;e\u00ab1?ltness&#8221;tether fall of<br \/>\nthe deceased from the   isabsolutely no<br \/>\nevidence to suppdrt,__thetease:.\u00a7;fl.l?all;lsr\u00a7ar\u00a7.?s~th&#8217;a&#8217;t the accident<br \/>\ntook place    it in its reply<\/p>\n<p>statement.___ AVW1ll\u00ab1.:s5___an:&#8221;e\u00a7\/ed&#8217; witeness and her evidence<\/p>\n<p>p roba bl lses -thee u&#8221;nt.&#8217;:m_!a rd&#8217;  n_c&#8217;l&#8217;den&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>17, Chap_:ter.&#8217;.XIi&#8217;I. the Railways Act, 1989 deals<\/p>\n<p>:_v:&#8221;V \\y&#8217;,,\\%\/E_tI&#8217;}  ggabv\u00e9lclty o&#8217;l&#8217;A&#8217;l5ia&#8217;iltxvay Admlnistratlon for Death and<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Ilnjuryte due to Accidents. &#8220;Unteward \u00e9hciderst&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>as d&#8217;e\u00a7inedV.th&#8217;ejz:eln, also means and includes the accidental<\/p>\n<p>dd&#8217;-,.\u00ab.4_fa.lllng at&#8217; .a_ny passenger from a train carrying passengers.<\/p>\n<p>  I:5%&#8217;d\u00e9~spd&#8217;tably, train l\\ld.283 is a passenger train. 3,124.6. is<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;J i <\/p>\n<p>with regard :0 Compensation olii a;:,::o:;in{:\u00bb&#8217;&#8212;s,mte~igva.{{l.l<\/p>\n<p>incident.\n<\/p>\n<p>18. There is no ;.denlal:o%&#8217;&#8211;  fa.e_t that&#8217;th.e..deceased<br \/>\nhad a valid ticket (Exf\\&#8217;&#8211;Zl_}-a&#8217;n_d3ljrav&#8217;ell_led&#8217;from R.Nulenur<br \/>\nupto Kodaganurg&#8217;Thereitolfeiiii\u00e9ej  plassenger as defined<\/p>\n<p>under S.2(2.9)&#8217;l&#8217;e.f   ithe purpose of 8.12-4A<\/p>\n<p>as clarified.bv&#8217;~.the&#8217;*lE;&lt;.pla&#8211;nation &#039;i1?t.h\u00e9reunder.<\/p>\n<p>19;  In zA.idiij.EtA&#039;ia;&quot;e*i*HERs (supra), the liability of<\/p>\n<p>the R,ai.lvvays&quot;  respeitt \u00abelf passengers falling down from<\/p>\n<p>ll&quot;running3-T&quot;=l:rai.n while&#039; travelling on valid ticket was<\/p>\n<p>e::oln.sildete&#039;dJ.vvvlthiiieference to provisions under S4123; 124A<\/p>\n<p>and-1lS4v_.ofth~&#039;elAct and it was held as follows:<\/p>\n<p> manner in which the accident is sought to be<br \/>\nV &quot;reconstructed by the Railway, the deceased was<br \/>\n&quot;standing at the open door of the train Compartment<br \/>\nfrom where he fell down, is Called by the railway itself<br \/>\nas negligence. New negligence of this kind which is not<br \/>\nvery uncommon on Indian trains is not the same thing<br \/>\nas a criminal act mentioned in clause (C) to the previso<br \/>\nto section 124A. A criminal act envisaged under Clause<\/p>\n<p>{C} must have an element of malicious: intent or rnens<br \/>\n%<br \/>\n\u00e9xxx&#039;<\/p>\n<p>4!&#039;<br \/>\n,9\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">15<\/span><\/p>\n<p>fault on the part of the Railways and it is a case of suicide<\/p>\n<p>or the fall was on account of carelessness and oe.gllg4ei2;:e<\/p>\n<p>of the deceased is based on total misconceptio..ri:&#8221;of&#8221;l%_a&#8217;E~l:y;ra&#8217;g{_&#8221;&#8216; .<\/p>\n<p>and is not supported by any e\\{idenCe,.'&#8221;be&#8211;slcles::b-eingu it<\/p>\n<p>contrary to E&gt;&lt;.R~1,<\/p>\n<p>In the result, the appea.il:.&#039;i&#039;si\u00bballowed&#039; wti:l:_hsand V<\/p>\n<p>the impugned Ol&#039;d\u20acl&#039;\/aW8.lfVCl is<\/p>\n<p>The application j&#039;~.befQi\ufb01e:ai:he&quot;5lf\ufb01ibunal stands<br \/>\nallowed. The3._.tes:pohde:i*1t isllltllrecteldlutolpay Rs.4,00,000\/-<br \/>\nwith 60\/; inteVifs\u00a7;*.t;&quot;&#039;fton5&#039;thV\u00e9&#039;:.Vl_date&#039;l&#039;oft\ufb01filing of the application<\/p>\n<p>before the T_tibo_haVl_Vtilal th:e&quot;&#039;d__ate of payment.<\/p>\n<p>% Sd\u00a7\/..<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda (By Sri. i\\iiS,Sanjay Gpwda; Adv.) This MFA is filed under section 23(1) ofV.s.i\u00a7ail}aa&#8217;=,: Claims Tribunal Act against the ;iudgme_ri%; 23.03.2009 passed in GA No.76\/2007 on the &#8216;file eji&#8217;..t&#8217;nei&#8217;&#8230;i Railway Claims Tribunal, Bangalore, disn\ufb01is-si&#8217;ng&#8221;~i.thse application filed under section [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-137335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-02T06:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-02T06:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1435,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-02T06:00:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-02T06:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-02T06:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011"},"wordCount":1435,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011","name":"Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-02T06:00:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-p-mahanteshwari-vs-union-of-india-on-6-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt M P Mahanteshwari vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=137335"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137335\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=137335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=137335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=137335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}