{"id":137565,"date":"2008-12-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008"},"modified":"2018-02-05T03:26:32","modified_gmt":"2018-02-04T21:56:32","slug":"citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>              IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n\n                             CHANDIGARH\n\n\n\n                                     Civil Writ Petition No.17495 of 2007\n                                            Date of Decision: 16.12.2008\n\n\n\n\nCitizens for Public Causes (Regd).\n\n                                                                 Petitioner\n                                  Versus\n\nThe State of Punjab and others\n                                                              Respondents\n\n\n\nCORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE\n        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH\n\n\n\nPresent:    Mr.M.L.Sareen, Senior Advocate with\n            Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate for the petitioner\n            Mr.Amol Rattan Singh, Addl.A.G. Punjab\n            for respondents No.1 and 4\n            Mr.Saurabh Goel, Advocate for\n            Mr.Govind Goel, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3\n            Mr.Ashwani Prashar and Mr.Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocates\n            for the interveners\n                                    .....\n<\/pre>\n<p>T.S.Thakur, C.J. (Oral)<\/p>\n<p>            This petition has been filed in public interest. It prays for a<\/p>\n<p>mandamus directing the respondents to take possession of the land acquired<\/p>\n<p>by them under notifications dated 12.5.2003 and 13.5.2003 in connection<\/p>\n<p>with the construction of a road proposed to connect Ferozepur road with<\/p>\n<p>southern by-pass in Ludhiana. A mandamus directing the respondents to start<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No.17495 of 2007                                  2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>construction of the missing link road for which the land has already been<\/p>\n<p>acquired in terms of the above notifications and to complete the same within<\/p>\n<p>a specified period has also been prayed for.\n<\/p>\n<p>            In response to a notice issued by this Court, the Government of<\/p>\n<p>Punjab has, through Shri S.R.Kaler, Land Acquisition Collector, Additional<\/p>\n<p>Chief Administrator, Greater Ludhiana Area Development Authority, filed an<\/p>\n<p>affidavit inter-alia stating that the proposed road meant to connect the<\/p>\n<p>Ferozepur road with southern by-pass has two missing links marked on the<\/p>\n<p>map, enclosed with the counter affidavit, Annexure R1\/1 between points D<\/p>\n<p>and E and F and G. Insofar as the missing link between D and E marked on<\/p>\n<p>the site plan is concerned, it is common ground that acquisition proceedings<\/p>\n<p>in respect of the said portion of the road have already been completed and the<\/p>\n<p>challenge to the said proceedings stands repelled upto the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p>As regards missing link between F and G shown in the site plan is concerned,<\/p>\n<p>the Government at one stage, did not propose to construct the said link which<\/p>\n<p>decision appears to have been now reviewed on 3.10.2008 with the result that<\/p>\n<p>the said link also is now proposed to be constructed to complete the entire<\/p>\n<p>road link between A and G in the site plan connecting Ferozepur road and<\/p>\n<p>southern by-pass. In paragraph No.4 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf<\/p>\n<p>of the State Government, the facts and the decisions relating to the proposed<\/p>\n<p>construction of the missing links have been stated as under:-<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;4.    That keeping in view the above factual position, until and<\/p>\n<p>            unless, the land for completing 2nd Phase is acquired, no useful<\/p>\n<p>            purpose would be served just by constructing 0.75 Km road for<\/p>\n<p>            connecting Pakhowal road within Urban Estate Dugri.<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No.17495 of 2007                                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>           Therefore, in the affidavit dated 29.5.2008 on behalf of<\/p>\n<p>           respondent No.3, it was specifically mentioned that there is no<\/p>\n<p>           further connectivity between Dhandran road and road along the<\/p>\n<p>           Sidhwan canal and one has to take a circuitous route to reach<\/p>\n<p>           the southern bye pass. Thus, in fact there are two missing links<\/p>\n<p>           and not one and the aforesaid missing link will not serve the<\/p>\n<p>           intended purpose in any case. It is because of this reason that<\/p>\n<p>           the Government had dropped the scheme vide Memo<\/p>\n<p>           No.6\/7\/2003-1HD1\/1504 dated 26.2.2008.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                 Now the government has approved the construction of<\/p>\n<p>           second missing link (phase II) from Dhandra Road to Southern<\/p>\n<p>           Bye Pass (4.5 Kms) shown in Annexure R-1\/1 as brown colour<\/p>\n<p>           point FG on 3.10.2008 thereby revising the earlier decision<\/p>\n<p>           dated 26.2.2008 whereby the project had been dropped.<\/p>\n<p>           Accordingly GLADA has started the preliminary survey through<\/p>\n<p>           Remote Sensing Centre, PAU, Ludhiana regarding land<\/p>\n<p>           acquisition. Approximately 200 Nos. structures are involved in<\/p>\n<p>           the 2nd Missing Link in Phase II of the scheme. About 68.00<\/p>\n<p>           acres of land has to be acquired for the construction of phase II.<\/p>\n<p>           The entire link between Ferozepur Road and Southern Bye Pass<\/p>\n<p>           has been shown on the plan prepared by Remote Sensing Centre<\/p>\n<p>           and attached as Annexure R-1\/1. The work for completion of<\/p>\n<p>           the missing links for connecting Ferozepur Road with Dhandra<\/p>\n<p>           Road (i.e. between Pakhowal road to Dugri Phase III) and<\/p>\n<p>           Dhandra Road to Sidhwan Canal (Southern bye pass) road can<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No.17495 of 2007                                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>             be taken up after completion of the acquisition proceedings.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>             (emphasis supplied).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>             Mr.Sareen learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>submits that in the light of the decision now taken by the State Govenrment,<\/p>\n<p>nothing further survives for consideration in this petition except that a<\/p>\n<p>direction ought to be issued to the government to expedite the process of<\/p>\n<p>construction of the road and to complete the same within a specific time<\/p>\n<p>frame.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Mr.Amol Rattan Singh, counsel appearing for respondents No.1<\/p>\n<p>and 4, however, submits that the process of acquisition of the land required<\/p>\n<p>for the second link between F and G in the site plan has not yet started as the<\/p>\n<p>authority is still in the process of preparing a site plan for the same, no time<\/p>\n<p>frame can be truly realistic at this stage.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Learned counsel appearing for some of interveners, who happen<\/p>\n<p>to be owners of the land between missing link No.1 marked D to E in the site<\/p>\n<p>plan submitted that their houses have yet to be demolished in case the said<\/p>\n<p>link was to be constructed. It is not, however, disputed that challenge to the<\/p>\n<p>acquisition proceedings in relation to the said land has already been repelled<\/p>\n<p>by the Courts and all that remains to be done is to carry out the construction<\/p>\n<p>work in that area.\n<\/p>\n<p>             In the circumstances, therefore, nothing really survives for our<\/p>\n<p>consideration in these proceedings. The writ petition is accordingly disposed<\/p>\n<p>off with the observations that the authorities concerned would be well<\/p>\n<p>advised to expedite the process of construction of the road so that substantial<\/p>\n<p>expenditure already incurred on construction of the two stretches that have<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No.17495 of 2007                                   5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>already been constructed does not go infructuous. All pending applications<\/p>\n<p>shall also stand disposed off in light of the above order. No costs.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\n\n                                             (T.S.THAKUR)\n                                            CHIEF JUSTICE\n\n\n16.12.2008                                   (JASBIR SINGH)\ngk                                              JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17495 of 2007 Date of Decision: 16.12.2008 Citizens for Public Causes (Regd). Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others Respondents CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-137565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-04T21:56:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-04T21:56:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":944,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-04T21:56:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-04T21:56:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-04T21:56:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008"},"wordCount":944,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008","name":"Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-04T21:56:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/citizens-for-public-causes-regd-vs-the-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-16-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Citizens For Public Causes (Regd) vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=137565"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137565\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=137565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=137565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=137565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}