{"id":137793,"date":"2011-01-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011"},"modified":"2017-08-29T16:52:23","modified_gmt":"2017-08-29T11:22:23","slug":"p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRL.A.No. 28 of 2011()\n\n\n1. P.RADHAKRISHNAN\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. ANTO KUNJAPPA, S\/O.KUNJAPPA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.JIJO PAUL\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT\n\nThe Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA\n\n Dated :21\/01\/2011\n\n O R D E R\n                          K.HEMA, J.\n        -----------------------------------------------\n              Criminal Appeal No.28 of 2011\n        -----------------------------------------------\n                Dated 21st January, 2011.\n\n                       J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>          This appeal is filed against an order of acquittal.<\/p>\n<p>          2.  The appellant is the complainant.       He filed a<\/p>\n<p>complaint before the Magistrate Court against first respondent,<\/p>\n<p>alleging offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable<\/p>\n<p>Instruments Act on the allegation that Rs.5,50,000\/- was due<\/p>\n<p>from first respondent       to the complainant and towards<\/p>\n<p>repayment of the said amount, he issued Ext.P1 cheque for the<\/p>\n<p>said amount. The cheque, on presentation was dishonoured<\/p>\n<p>and a lawyer notice was issued. The notice was accepted by<\/p>\n<p>accused, but no reply was sent and no payment was made.<\/p>\n<p>Hence, the complaint.\n<\/p>\n<p>          3.   To prove the prosecution case, PW1 was<\/p>\n<p>examined and Exts.P1 to P6 were marked. The accused took up<\/p>\n<p>a contention that he was a subscriber in the chitty conducted<\/p>\n<p>by Kausthubham Kuries. He gave a blank cheque as security to<\/p>\n<p>the said company, but it is misused by complainant.           No<\/p>\n<p>amount is due from the accused to the complainant, it is<\/p>\n<p>submitted.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.Appeal No.28\/11                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>             4. The trial court, on an analysis of the evidence in<\/p>\n<p>detail found that the solitary evidence of PW1 was not sufficient<\/p>\n<p>to prove the case against accused. The trial court found that<\/p>\n<p>execution is not proved.          It was observed that PW1 had no<\/p>\n<p>special relationship with accused and he did not remember<\/p>\n<p>even the date on which the huge amount was allegedly given to<\/p>\n<p>accused. Further, the loan was advanced without obtaining any<\/p>\n<p>security. It was also found that PW1 had no source of income to<\/p>\n<p>advance an amount of Rs.5,50,000\/-. The relevant findings in<\/p>\n<p>paragraphs 12 and 13 are extracted hereunder :<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                   &#8220;If the evidence of PW1 is to be believed, he allegedly<\/p>\n<p>            advanced a huge amount of Rs.5,50,000\/- as loan to the<\/p>\n<p>            accused     without  obtaining  any  security.     No   special<\/p>\n<p>            relationship between the parties which might have resulted in<\/p>\n<p>            such a transaction has been brought out. PW1 stated in his<\/p>\n<p>            cross examination that the accused had supplied metal to the<\/p>\n<p>            hollow brick institution run by PW1. At that time, the accused<\/p>\n<p>            was having a quarrel. However, PW1 has no case that there<\/p>\n<p>            had been any previous loan transaction between himself and<\/p>\n<p>            the accused. It is not believable that the alleged supply of<\/p>\n<p>            metal by the accused to PW1 would have persuaded PW1 to<\/p>\n<p>            part with a huge amount of Rs.5,50,000\/- without obtaining<\/p>\n<p>            any security.    Further, going by the evidence of PW1, the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.Appeal No.28\/11                    3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            accused allegedly issued Ext.P1 at a time when PW1 was not<\/p>\n<p>            having any document to prove the alleged loan transaction<\/p>\n<p>            and at a time when the funds were insufficient in the account<\/p>\n<p>            of the accused. Such a case is inherently improbable.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   The source of PW1 to advance Rs.5,50,000\/- is under<\/p>\n<p>            challenge. PW1 stated in his cross examination that he gets<\/p>\n<p>            income of Rs.25,000\/- from business. However, he is not an<\/p>\n<p>            income tax payee. He tried to explain that he had received<\/p>\n<p>            amounts from 5 persons in his business and the said amounts<\/p>\n<p>            were advanced to the accused. At the same time, he admitted<\/p>\n<p>            that the said alleged receipt of amounts are not shown in the<\/p>\n<p>            accounts of his institution.       He further stated that the<\/p>\n<p>            collections of the company were also advanced to the<\/p>\n<p>            accused. The above versions of PW1 are not proved by any<\/p>\n<p>            documentary evidence. The conclusion to be drawn is that the<\/p>\n<p>            source of PW1 to advance Ext.P1 amount has not been proved.<\/p>\n<p>            It is yet another reason to reject the case of the complainant.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>             5.    Learned     counsel     for   appellant     vehemently<\/p>\n<p>contended that the accused did not send any reply to the<\/p>\n<p>lawyer notice. He did not deny the transaction nor execution of<\/p>\n<p>the cheque at the earliest opportunity.                 He also did not<\/p>\n<p>probabilise his case and this fact is found by the trial court<\/p>\n<p>itself. In such circumstances, the appeal may be admitted, it is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.Appeal No.28\/11                4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>submitted.\n<\/p>\n<p>             6. On hearing appellant&#8217;s counsel and on going<\/p>\n<p>through the order, I am not satisfied that this is a fit case to<\/p>\n<p>admit the appeal on the grounds advanced. The mere failure to<\/p>\n<p>send a reply notice may not be sufficient to interfere in the<\/p>\n<p>findings entered into by the trial court on the relevant aspects.<\/p>\n<p>The source of income itself is under challenge and evidence of<\/p>\n<p>PW1 was not sufficient to conclude that he had sufficient<\/p>\n<p>income to give a huge amount of Rs.5,50,000\/- to the accused,<\/p>\n<p>that too, with whom he had no special relationship. I do not<\/p>\n<p>find any reason to interfere in the findings of the trial court or<\/p>\n<p>admit the appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>             This appeal is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                              K.HEMA, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\ntgs<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRL.A.No. 28 of 2011() 1. P.RADHAKRISHNAN &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. ANTO KUNJAPPA, S\/O.KUNJAPPA &#8230; Respondent 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY For Petitioner :SRI.JIJO PAUL For Respondent :SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT The Hon&#8217;ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA Dated [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-137793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-29T11:22:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-29T11:22:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":783,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011\",\"name\":\"P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-29T11:22:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-29T11:22:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-29T11:22:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011"},"wordCount":783,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011","name":"P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-29T11:22:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-radhakrishnan-vs-anto-kunjappa-on-21-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.Radhakrishnan vs Anto Kunjappa on 21 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137793","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=137793"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137793\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=137793"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=137793"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=137793"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}