{"id":13786,"date":"2002-08-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-08-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002"},"modified":"2016-04-06T01:45:22","modified_gmt":"2016-04-05T20:15:22","slug":"process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002","title":{"rendered":"Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through &#8230; on 8 August, 2002"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through &#8230; on 8 August, 2002<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 99 (2002) DLT 625, 2002 (95) FLR 981, (2002) IIILLJ 856 Del<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V Jain<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: V Jain<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>  Vijender  Jain,  J.  <\/p>\n<p> 1. The short question involves in this writ petition ia that as to whether the impugned order is a speaking order for the purpose of assessing damages under Section 14B of The Employees&#8217; Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as &#8220;Act&#8221;) by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. Mr. D.N.    Vohra    has  contended  that    the    impugned order,     inter  alia,   states  that  the  end  of  justice     would be    met     if  damages  are  levied  in  terms  of     the    enclosed statement.       That     order  cannot   be  termed  as     a     speaking order     for   assessing  damages  as  no  basis  for  agreeing     to the     rates     as  levied  and  mentioned  in  the  statement     has been    given  by  the  Regional  Provident  Fund    Commissioner. To     support    of  his  contentions,   learned  counsel  for     the petitioner     has  cited   <a href=\"\/doc\/1672252\/\">Organo Chemical Industries and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.<\/a> 1979  Lab I.C. 1261.     Mr. Vohra has further contended that as per the Scheme mentioned in Section 32-A of the Act rate of damages and percentage thereof has been provided although from the statement which has been taken into consideration by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, no basis has been adverted to and, therefore, the order becomes non-speaking, arbitrary and without basis.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. On the other hand, Mr. R.C. Chawla, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, has contended that the impugned order is a speaking order as would be evident from the order if read as a whole. He has further contended that levy of damages could be 100% of the amount of default in terms of Section 14B of the Act. He has contended that this question is no more res integra in view of the authority of the Supreme Court as well    of    this    Court  and  he  has  cited   <a href=\"\/doc\/859161\/\">M\/s Birla Cotton  Spinning &amp; Weaving Mills Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.<\/a> 2nd  (1984)  II  Delhi   60.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. I have given my careful consideration to the arguments advanced by the learned counsel appearing for both the parties. The provisions of Act as well as of the Scheme have been indicated for the benefit of the workers and it must bear a beneficial construction. In  Birla Cotton Spinning &amp; Weaving Mills Ltd.&#8217;s case (supra) the Division Bench of this Court held that :\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;&#8230;..It is correct that in imposing damages broadly the slab given in the table have been made the basis. But there is no mechanicality about it. Mind has been applied to each case. In many cases though proposed damages were indicated 100 per cent of arrears but after the hearing the same have been reduced to 25 per cent. . . . . &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<pre> 5. Quoting    from      Associated  Journals    Ltd.       v. the RPFC. CWP  362\/1978  Their  Lordships  of  the  Division  Bench further  observed  that   :-  \n  \"No doubt in some other cases the proposed damages and the ultimate damages imposed are the same. But from this it does not follow that there has been no application, of mind. Simply because the broad parameters have been laid down for the imposition of damages does not mean that this is an inflexible rule.....\"  \n \n\n 6. Although    this  observation  was  with  regard  to  the Circular       issued       by     the         Central       Provident       Fund Commissioner.        It     also  holds  good  in  the  case   in     hand. The    Regional     Provident     Fund  Commissioner     decided     the matter,     applied  his  mind  and  that  is  why  he had  observed that     it  would  be  too  harsh  to  levy  damages  equal  to    the amount    in  arrears  as  provided  under  Section  14B  of    the Act    and  after  seeing  the  statement  agreed  with  the     levy of  rates  and  the  percentage  which  has  been   imposed  by  the Provident  Fund  authorities.     I   have  perused  the  Scheme  as provided     in    paragraph  32A  of  the  Scheme.     The     highest percentage   is  37%  though  rate  of  damages  for  a  default  of more     than  6  months  and  above  whereas  rate  of     percentage for     six     months    and    above     in    the    present    case     the authorities     have  fixed  55%  but  after  perusing   the  table it     is     clear   that  though  the  Provident  Fund     authorities could     have  imposed  rate  of  17%  for  a  period  of   less  than two    months,  yet  in  the  instant  case  they  have  imposed  2% for     the     said    period.     Taking  all     these     factors     into consideration     the     impugned  order   cannot  be  termed  as     a non-speaking    order     or  order  passed  mechanically.     I     do not    see  any  fault  with  the  impugned  order.     The  case    of   Organo Chemical Industries and Anr. (supra)     cited    by Mr. Vohra  does  not  support  the  case  of  the  petitioner.  \n\n \n\n 7. I do not see any infirmity with the impugned order. Writ petition, therefore, stands dismissed with no order as to costs. \n \n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through &#8230; on 8 August, 2002 Equivalent citations: 99 (2002) DLT 625, 2002 (95) FLR 981, (2002) IIILLJ 856 Del Author: V Jain Bench: V Jain JUDGMENT Vijender Jain, J. 1. The short question involves in this writ petition ia that as to whether the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13786","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through ... on 8 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through ... on 8 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2002-08-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-05T20:15:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through &#8230; on 8 August, 2002\",\"datePublished\":\"2002-08-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-05T20:15:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002\"},\"wordCount\":466,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002\",\"name\":\"Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through ... on 8 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2002-08-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-05T20:15:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through &#8230; on 8 August, 2002\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through ... on 8 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through ... on 8 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2002-08-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-05T20:15:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through &#8230; on 8 August, 2002","datePublished":"2002-08-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-05T20:15:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002"},"wordCount":466,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002","name":"Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through ... on 8 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2002-08-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-05T20:15:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/process-syndicate-vs-central-board-of-trustee-through-on-8-august-2002#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Process Syndicate vs Central Board Of Trustee, Through &#8230; on 8 August, 2002"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13786","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13786"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13786\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13786"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13786"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13786"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}