{"id":137936,"date":"2010-08-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010"},"modified":"2019-01-23T16:07:19","modified_gmt":"2019-01-23T10:37:19","slug":"shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Mukta Gupta<\/div>\n
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\n\n\n+             LPA 2030\/2006\n\n%                                        Reserved on: July 16, 2010\n\n                                         Decided on:    August 25, 2010\n\n\nSHRI SHYAM BABU                                         ..... Petitioner\n                         Through:    Mr. V.P.Tripathi, Advocate\n\n                   versus\n\n\nGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI                                ..... Respondent\n                   Through:          Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate\n\n\nCoram:\n\nHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN\nHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA\n\n\n1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may\n   be allowed to see the judgment?                      No\n\n2. To be referred to Reporter or not?                   No\n\n3. Whether the judgment should be reported\n   in the Digest?                                       No\n\nMUKTA GUPTA, J.\n<\/pre>\n
CM No.11830\/2010 (Exemption)<\/p>\n
    Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.\n<\/p>\n
CM No.11829\/2010 (Delay)<\/p>\n
     For the reasons stated in the Application the delay of 78 days in<\/p>\n
filing the Review Petition is condoned. Application is allowed.<\/p>\n
LPA No.2030\/2006                                                       Page 1 of 6<\/span>
\n Review Petition No. 275\/2010<\/p>\n
1.      The Appeal filed by the Petitioner was disposed of vide order<\/p>\n
dated 14th January, 2010 passed by this Court with the directions to the<\/p>\n
Respondent to make payment of `.1 lakh to the Petitioner as<\/p>\n
compensation in lieu of reinstatement within six weeks failing which<\/p>\n
the amount would carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum.         The<\/p>\n
Petitioner was working as Beldar (Daily Wager) with Respondent<\/p>\n
sometime since October, 1982 and on 12th March, 1984 he made an<\/p>\n
Application to the Respondents seeking regularization and a regular<\/p>\n
pay scale. While the matter was still pending before the Conciliation<\/p>\n
Officer, his services were terminated with effect from 1st August, 1984.<\/p>\n
The Petitioner made an Application under Section 33A of the Industrial<\/p>\n
Disputes Act, 1947 alleging that his services were illegally terminated<\/p>\n
and a reference was made by the appropriate Government to the<\/p>\n
Industrial Tribunal with respect to his claim of regularization and<\/p>\n
termination        from   service.   Though   the    Respondent   claimed<\/p>\n
abandonment of service, however no reference was made on this issue.<\/p>\n
The two issues before the Industrial Tribunal were of regularization<\/p>\n
and illegal termination of service of the Petitioner. The Industrial<\/p>\n
Tribunal awarded in favour of the Petitioner and directed reinstatement<\/p>\n
with continuity of service and back wages.          On a challenge by the<\/p>\n
Respondent, the learned Single Judge, set aside the two awards<\/p>\n
following the decision in Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi<\/p>\n
LPA No.2030\/2006                                                   Page 2 of 6<\/span>
\n and others, 2006 (4) SCC 1 and held that the regularization cannot<\/p>\n
be directed if the initial entry itself is not against any sanctioned<\/p>\n
vacancy.\n<\/p>\n
2.      Impugning the order dated 5th September, 2006 passed by the<\/p>\n
learned Single Judge the Petitioner filed the Appeal wherein this Court<\/p>\n
held that the Industrial Tribunal was correct in holding that the<\/p>\n
services of the Petitioner has been illegally and unjustifiably terminated<\/p>\n
in violation of the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes<\/p>\n
Act. With regard to the other relief it was held that the Petitioner was<\/p>\n
a daily wager who had worked for less than two years and even if it was<\/p>\n
concluded that the services were illegally terminated on 1st August,<\/p>\n
1984, the Petitioner has no right to retain the post being a daily wager.<\/p>\n
This Appeal was heard at length on 13th and 14th January, 2010. On 14th<\/p>\n
January, 2010 learned counsel for the Petitioner made a statement not<\/p>\n
pressing his claim for regularization in view of the decision of the<\/p>\n
Hon’ble Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka vs. Uma<\/p>\n
Devi & others (supra), in our view rightly so as the law laid down by<\/p>\n
the Hon’ble Supreme Court clearly enunciates that a daily wager has<\/p>\n
no right to be regularized if the recruitment is bypassing the<\/p>\n
constitutional scheme of public employment. This Court thus granted<\/p>\n
compensation of `. 1 lakh in lieu of reinstatement to the Petitioner.<\/p>\n
3.    By way of this Review Petition the Petitioner seeks to contend that<\/p>\n
the Petitioner should have been regularized and the action of the<\/p>\n
LPA No.2030\/2006                                                    Page 3 of 6<\/span>
\n Respondent is violative of Article 14 and 16. It is contended that the<\/p>\n
Petitioner never intended to give up his claim of regularization and the<\/p>\n
counsel authorized by the Petitioner has wrongly submitted this fact<\/p>\n
before the Court. It is further stated that no copy of the policy change<\/p>\n
had been placed by the Respondent and in any case the compensation<\/p>\n
of ` 1 lakh is on the lower side and the Petitioner is entitled to<\/p>\n
reinstatement in services with continuity and full back wages.<\/p>\n
4.      The scope of a Review Petition is very limited. The Petitioner is<\/p>\n
required to show either an error apparent on the face of the record or<\/p>\n
discovery of new and important fact or evidence which, after the<\/p>\n
exercise of due diligence, was not within his knowledge or could not be<\/p>\n
produced when the judgment was passed. The ground now being raised<\/p>\n
that four employees junior to the Petitioner have been regularized, and<\/p>\n
thus, is violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, has<\/p>\n
not been urged in the Appeal. In a Review Petition the Petitioner is not<\/p>\n
entitled to raise fresh pleas unless it is shown that the Petitioner was<\/p>\n
not in possession of the relevant material, despite due diligence.      The<\/p>\n
contention that the Petitioner had given no instructions to the earlier<\/p>\n
counsel to give up the claim of regularization is also untenable. The<\/p>\n
Appeal was heard on 13th January, 2010 and then on 14th January, 2010.<\/p>\n
It was only after going through the legal position in view of the decision<\/p>\n
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka vs.<\/p>\n
Uma Devi and others (supra) learned counsel on instructions from<\/p>\n
LPA No.2030\/2006                                                     Page 4 of 6<\/span>
\n the Petitioner made the statement on the next day. It may be noted<\/p>\n
that the Petitioner is in the habit of making such allegations. Earlier<\/p>\n
also vide order dated 15th April, 2009 this Court had felt that this was a<\/p>\n
case which could be settled between the parties and had requested the<\/p>\n
parties to consider this aspect. When the matter came up for hearing<\/p>\n
on 26th May, 2009 learned counsel for the Petitioner on instructions<\/p>\n
from the Petitioner stated that without prejudice to the rights and<\/p>\n
contentions in the Appeal in order to arrive at a settlement the<\/p>\n
Petitioner is willing to give up the claim of back wages, continuity in<\/p>\n
service and seniority provided he is treated in a similar fashion as other<\/p>\n
persons of his vintage who remained in service. Learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
Respondents took time to look into this aspect of the matter and in<\/p>\n
pursuance thereto filed an Affidavit of Shri H.S. Bhardwaj, Executive<\/p>\n
Engineer, CD-V, Irrigation and Flood Control Department, Government<\/p>\n
of NCT of Delhi stating that the matter was considered and it was felt<\/p>\n
that according temporary status to one workman, may result into<\/p>\n
opening of flood gate for other similarly placed casual\/daily wager who<\/p>\n
had at one time or the other worked\/engaged by the department. It<\/p>\n
was also stated that accepting this proposal would amount to creation<\/p>\n
of posts which could not be done without undergoing all other<\/p>\n
necessary formalities. The Affidavit also states that the appointment of<\/p>\n
daily wagers has been stopped long back since 1988 and that time also<\/p>\n
daily wagers were engaged as per exigency of work. The Respondent<\/p>\n
LPA No.2030\/2006                                                    Page 5 of 6<\/span>
\n offered to get the Petitioner engaged as unskilled worker through<\/p>\n
outsourcing agency, which offer was not acceptable to the Petitioner. In<\/p>\n
the present review petition the Petitioner has filed copy of the<\/p>\n
complaint against the learned counsel who had made the statement on<\/p>\n
26th May, 2009. In our view, the withdrawal of the claim for<\/p>\n
regularization was reasonable and fair on the part of the learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the Petitioner in view of the decision of the Hon’ble<\/p>\n
Supreme Court.\n<\/p>\n
5.     The contention that the monetary compensation being on the<\/p>\n
lower side is also untenable as this Court granted the compensation of<\/p>\n
1 lakhs in lieu of reinstatement following the precedent laid by the<\/p>\n
Hon’ble     Supreme   Court   in   Jasbir   Singh   vs.    Haryana   State<\/p>\n
Agricultural Marketing Board and<\/a> another, JT 2009 (9) SC 396.<\/p>\n
6.     We find no ground to interfere with the order dated 14th January,<\/p>\n
2010. The Review Petition is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                          (MUKTA GUPTA)
\n                                                             JUDGE<\/p>\n
                                                    (VIKRAMAJIT SEN)
\n                                                         JUDGE
\nAUGUST 25, 2010
\nmm<\/p>\n
LPA No.2030\/2006                                                     Page 6 of 6<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010 Author: Mukta Gupta * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 2030\/2006 % Reserved on: July 16, 2010 Decided on: August 25, 2010 SHRI SHYAM BABU ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. V.P.Tripathi, Advocate versus GOVT. OF […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-137936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-23T10:37:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-23T10:37:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1265,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-23T10:37:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-23T10:37:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-23T10:37:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010"},"wordCount":1265,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010","name":"Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-23T10:37:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shyam-babu-vs-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-25-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Shyam Babu vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137936","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=137936"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137936\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=137936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=137936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=137936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}