{"id":137976,"date":"2009-07-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2"},"modified":"2018-08-10T23:28:59","modified_gmt":"2018-08-10T17:58:59","slug":"d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"D L Nanjaraj S\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">D L Nanjaraj S\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Kumar And Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IE REK 998:\"O6\n\nIN \"ma HIGH COURT 9? KARNATAKA AT Bgi\ufb01\ufb02-\u00a7lX\u00a7\u00a7_\u00a7'}:R'\u00a7 \" LT '\n\nQATE9 THIS THE 293' am QF\"'3uL~:i, 299%\"   \n\npaessrsxfr A T A 4\nTHE HOWBLE MR.Jtis*\ufb01i:\u00a3 N .xm'_4A\u00e9;  \n   . \n<\/pre>\n<p>ms aowsze MR.JU5T&#8217;I f:E._A \u00a7:V%{?\u00a3N\u00a7iLG\u00a3}:?}s%zA aowm<\/p>\n<p>BETWEEN: &#8221;  &#8216;A %% \u00e9  4% V%<\/p>\n<p>9 L Nanja\u00e9faj _ .      .\n<\/p>\n<p>S10 iate C&gt;.&#8217;?~\u00a3.\u00a3;\u00e9n\u00a7ia\u00a7_ah~.V&#8221;&#8211;_   &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>63 yrs, r\/a N&#8217;o_.2s&#8217;3  &#8220;<\/p>\n<pre>\nBrunton Road \n\nBangalafe-2_S     Appeiiant\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>. E&#8217; (F3\u00a7r~S _ri V &#8216;;\u00a54;\u00e9&#8221;r9&amp;akaram, Sr. Advocate)<\/p>\n<p>A559;\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;:3 L s:\u00a7ia:1anna~  *T<\/p>\n<p>S&#8217;\/22 me E}. \u00a5\u00a5\u00a3ALfr:gaia%1<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; ~ -. i:&#8217; &#8216;3?4&#8243;&#8216;3,*rs,, rfa N\u00e9.1089<br \/>\n1  12$&#8217;? :&#8217;~\u00bb\u00a73\u00b0;g, HAL II stage<br \/>\n  Efsd\u00a5m*nag&#8217;ar<br \/>\n Ba7*ng&#8217;;\u00a7\u00a5ore~38  Respondent<\/p>\n<p>(By Sri P H&#8217;Rama\u00a7ingam, A\u00e9vccate}<\/p>\n<p>\\\/<\/p>\n<p>Q&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>2 RFA i398f&#8217;\u20ac)\u00e9\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\u00a5&#8217;\u00a71is appeal is \ufb01ied under Section 96 CPC ag.a~i&#8211;.*z$t. 1_t;ir-:3:_._&#8217;\u00bb..<br \/>\njucfgment and decree dated 3?-$-2006 passed'&lt;.&quot;En_&quot;&quot;: &#039;<br \/>\nO.S..N0.?892;&#039;1991 an the \ufb01\u00a3e of the XXII ;5K.dd\u00a7;C:ity..:&quot;C\u00a73i\u00a7&#039;\u00a7<br \/>\nJudge, Bangaiora ciecraeing the s;3\u00a7.t.._f;or .&#039;par&#039;t\u00a5i:\u00a7&#8211;\u00a2n &quot;am <\/p>\n<p>separate possession.\n<\/p>\n<p>Thus appeai canning cm for acim\u00e9sicn t[fi.\u00a7&#8217;\u00e9;. \u00e9a&#8217;y, V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>KUMAR 1., deiivared tha fo!fow\u00a3&#8217;:1\u00a7:&#8212;.V.. <\/p>\n<p>This is defen\u00e9:=mt&#8217;s Zapgrr\ufb01afi&#8217; \ufb01\ufb01gmezwt and<\/p>\n<p>decree sf \u00a3he.tf:\u00a5;*s\u00a3v&#8217;.&#8217;C6\u00e9;3rt v\ufb02\ufb01icii &#8216;\u00a717a:;~::\u00e9%creed the suit of the<br \/>\nplaintiff \u20ac\u00e9&#8221;r p&#8217;a%titi\u00a7r{j&#8217;a.\u00a7\u00a7d.\u00a7e.g\u00a7{\u00e9:f\u00a7t\u00e9 possession of the suit<br \/>\ns&lt;:hedu\u00a5e prcpf\u00e9r\ufb01g\/.v.   &quot; A&#039;<\/p>\n<p> _2 ;~&#8211; :\u00a7&#039;-&quot;ci-z&quot;&quot;At\u00a5i:a__pL:rg\ufb01\u00a76$\u00e9 of convenience, parties wi\u00a7E be<\/p>\n<p>r\u00e9fer?ad&#039;Vtc referred to in their er\ufb01gmai suit.<\/p>\n<p>3:&quot;Ff.ia&quot;\u00a7\u00a7;ti&#039;ff.V is aider bmther 9? the \ufb01efere\u00e9arzt. &quot;fheir<\/p>\n<p>Vf:::i&quot;}t;&#039;1:e&#039;\u00a3&quot; name S.f~\u00a3.LEngaiah. &quot;fhe giaintiff, \u00e9efendant<\/p>\n<p> \u00e9mfather canstituted a Hindz} tirzdivided Famiiy. In<\/p>\n<p> t&#039;\u00a7i:\u00e9&quot;&quot;f\u00e9m\u00a7\u00a5y&#039;f there was a partiiinn an 29~&#8211;3-193? which is<\/p>\n<p> \u00e9iki\ufb01enced by registered partition seed. The jaint famiiy<\/p>\n<p>V,<\/p>\n<p>8 Km 9%2_8\u00a7{3\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>1} &#039;Whether the p\u00a3a\u00e9ni:ifF ,prQvesV&#039;t?ia&#039;f:&#039;_&#039;ic\u00bb\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9&#039;<br \/>\nscheduie property is the join&#039;; f&#039;amiiy.__p&#039;m;g:sgrty_j j<br \/>\nand he has ha\u00a3f share?&#039; ii? &#039;    _ ~  <\/p>\n<p>2} Whether the dref-m\u00a7dant&#039;v&#8211; p:&quot;:3v\u00e9::; &#039;shai&#8230; the<br \/>\npiaintiff has receivea\u00e9&quot;i?s.?5,f3{}(3;..A.g;hr&lt;\u00e9;:gh his<br \/>\nrepresentatives E.e,,&quot;-wif5\u00a7_ and &#039;gsacvn, {awards<br \/>\nhis a\u00a5:}and9&#039;::aa_d arzd ;*ei\u00e9j;:qu\u00e9shed his fights in<br \/>\nthe suit sc&#039;he=a&quot;dui&#039;e $ir&#039;c%p&#039;a:&#039;ty_ \u00a352.. favour of the<br \/>\ndefendant? [     <\/p>\n<p>3) whes\u00a5;%:e.r t\u00a55\u00a7_e :\u00a7\u00a3\u00e9f&#8217;en&#8217;dA\u00e9&#8217;r{t_&#8221;&#8211;pfo\u00a7*e&#8217;s that the suit<\/p>\n<p>:51,vne\u00a7:T&#8217;L&#8217;Vp_roper!y&lt;.ya!.\u00a7\u00a3a\u00a7:!. ar;d &quot;&#039;Court fee paid is<\/p>\n<p> not&quot;&#8211;pro&#039;p\u00a7:e.r?&quot;&#8211;.ij&#039;j*&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>..i}s\u00a3\u00a7j3\u00e9\u00a7t;i\u00e9:;&#8221;&#8211;th*\u00e9'&#8221;&#8216;;\u00a7laE\u00a7\u00e9ii\u00a3ff is entities? to mesne<br \/>\n_ .pf&#8217;or&#8217;2;*;ssf?&#8221;\u00ab.  &#8212; I<\/p>\n<p>;.\n<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;f~\u00a7i.iii:&#8217;?V  &#8216; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Sf&#8217;: 3vVh\u00e9th&#8217;\u00e9f;v..t\u00a7i\u00e9&#8221;&#8216;e&#8217;\u00a7 i&#8217;\u00e9&#8217;.causa of actier: to fits the<br \/>\n  xWhaA\u20ac&#8221;&#8216;d-:.=a::..ree or order?\n<\/p>\n<p>   65&#8242;;?&#8221;:;.::\u00a7g:;;\u00a7Vs{$V:3.\u00a7i\u00a3ate his ciaimg piainrtiff exammed mmsezf<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;&#8221;:~&#8217;=:$ ?.%:&#8217;%:&#8217;;.3. am gc\u00e9\u00e9io\u00e9uced registered part\u00e9tiez\u00e9 \u00abdead as Ex.P-1.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8211; .l&#8217;i;&#8217;v\u00a7_;?-3&#8243;&#8221;heizaif&#8217;  the defendant, \u00e9efendani: was e:x&#8217;am\u00a7n&amp;\u00a7 33<\/p>\n<p> E*,:\u00e9f\u00a3.,Vi,&#8211;.._&#8217;L\u00e9xam\u00a7ne\u00e9 fzwa witnesses as D.Ws.2 8: 3 and<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;f;:.?2&#8217;:;ags,av*,i_:_%:\u00a7c&#8221;:ed $2 ascurraents which are markes as \u00a7x,$-3. to E\u00bb:<\/p>\n<p>1?} REA 9\u00a7*9\u00a2&#8217;a&#8217;3tf\u00a3<\/p>\n<p>in the year 1960; in fam\u00e9iy arrangerfjgnt, piai\ufb01tif&#8217;Ei:\u00a7f;va\u00a7&#8221;b\u00e9eVn   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>paid xsaiue of mi? share in the \u00a7ifQ\u00a7:=_;\u00a3\u00a7rt3;!&#8217; \u00e9&#8217;r:. ;2&#8242;<br \/>\nRs.&#8217;?S,OG9,\u00bb&#8217;&#8211; by way 9? cheque:~&#8217;:V_&#8217;\u00a3n_V..the &#8220;n\u00e9imes  AV;5;f::a.\u00a7.:*;Vt%%&#8221;&#8217;53&#8243;sV<br \/>\nwife am son. Theraafterhe ga~g*_}ve_1 ;:&#8217;..:E:ett;uer&#8217;E\u00e9\u00a7i&#8217;%\u00a7;ji;Aisf\u00a7f\u00e9ng h\u00e9s<br \/>\nrights 9*: the property ta   Corporatien cm<br \/>\nthe basis cf which..i&lt;atha -~v.:\u00a7.5ff&#039;ihe name of<br \/>\niiefendant. Frcgg\ufb01   in exciusive<br \/>\npossession af\u20ac\u20ac&#8211;%3V.e&#039;::.;.\u00a7e&#039;g_\u00a7:tv   Gray in the year<br \/>\n199:1 pEain_j1&#039;:i3\u00b0f_&#039;Vg:Aa \u00a7\u00a5;&#039;vjhvivsA.V_\u00a7;:a.?ne:..V\u00a7Ar\u00a5&#039;serte\u00a7d to \u00a7ay daim an tha suit<br \/>\nscheduie \ufb01fap\u00e9rty; was cha\ufb01enged by the<\/p>\n<p>defendagw\u00e9sfz. as \u00a7\u00a7I:&#039;\u00a7thpe\u20acEtid\u00b0n x\u00e9mich was aiiewed setting aside<\/p>\n<p> sa&#039;\u00a7t\u00a5&#039; o\u00a7~\u00e9je;fV%&#039;aAf:d d\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9ted the parties to estab\ufb01sh their<\/p>\n<p>ri\ufb01ht\u00e9~.;ir:V &#039;av.:V&#039;\u00a2V:\u00a7v;*rs;$&#039;&amp;t.\u00e9nt CM; Caurt. Even etherw\u00e9se, when<\/p>\n<p>&#039; &quot;&quot;&#039;a\u00a7m\u00a7tte:j\u00a7y,___\u00bb9Ea;\u00a7.\u00a7*ti\u00a7t&#039;*f in gettiement cf his ma\u00e9m left the suit<\/p>\n<p>&quot; * 5i.&#039;j&#039;;~:a::VE&#039;:&quot;e\u00a7;.;\u00a3e \ufb01rzt\u00e9e\ufb01y 38 &#039;years back, grior to the date 9? suit, in<\/p>\n<p> \u00a7&#039;as\u00a7$:V&#039;\u00ab.ii&#039;ar%f.\u00a7-iearzts muster an\ufb01 defendant has perfected his t\u00e9tie<\/p>\n<p>  _ar.\u00a7s:erse pessessien. The pragerty taxes are paid hy the<\/p>\n<p>&#039; &#039;\u00ab. : &#039;\ufb01\u00e9ferz\u00e9ant. E\u00a3ect:*ic\u00a5ty, water connectians stand in the name<\/p>\n<p>&quot; cf \u00e9efenciant, In the Weaith ?ax Returns and Irzcame Tax<\/p>\n<p>15 RFA 9\u00a78(-&#039;:06<\/p>\n<p>p\u00a3aintEff&#039;s wife and Rs.3G,800\/- in favour G? p\u00a7aini:\u00abf:ff&#039;sv j{r1&#039;i\ufb01&quot;:\u00a7r&#039; M<\/p>\n<p>59:: aged about 2 years on 28&#8212;3-19;\u00e932&quot; r*:sg_f:,iy .;a\u00a5\u00a7\u00a7}\u00a7!_t f\ufb01Q~r <\/p>\n<p>yeats prim&#8217; tcs the date of gartitiengit&#8217;ri\ufb02e._nsaid&#8217; &#8220;g3\u00a7cE&#8217;atfa\u00a3:\u00a7$fu~ &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>states that on acceunt cf iovew a&#8221;:&lt;24:&#039;:dT&quot;&#039;&#8211;affe;&#039;\u00a7t\u00e9&#039;&lt;:~;&#039;jV&#039; &#039;-ashjE&#039;y,VV \ufb01\u00a7vi&#039;i?ic;&#039;at<br \/>\nany ccnsicieration :21&#039; money&#039; or\u00abvAVr&#039;2*\u00a7eA..&quot;\u00a7s_:&#039;ej}&#039;*V&#039;V\u00a7LA.y*\u00a7orf&#039;h*&quot;&#039;def\u00e9ndaat<br \/>\nhas gifted Rs.&#039;.?5,809;&#039;~ fogsoigdanaes and<br \/>\nunrestricted anjqyr%\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7&#039;\u00a71t  of the<br \/>\ndonation i.e.,:&#039; this payment 91&#039;<br \/>\nRs.7S,\u00a70Cg:f;&#039;\u00a7\u00a7&#039;\u00a73f can be construed<br \/>\nas 59% &lt;3z;&#039;t\u00a7f&#039;:2&#039;e&#039; \\}a\u00a7=.1: \u00e9&#039; A\u00a7&#039;f_\u00bbti{\u00a7&quot;&#039;\u00e9&#039;c&#039;heduEe prcperty which wag<\/p>\n<p>paid to the ;3\u00a5aai&quot;r&#039;;t\u00a7 ff fa?&#039; f\u00e9i\u00e9a\u00e9\ufb01uishment of his interest in the<\/p>\n<p>I- &#039;v\u00e9.&#039;&lt;:\u00e9*:\u00bb.eAd:&#039;\u00a7L\u00a7.$&#039; p:.rcap\u00ab&#039;erj;y. krnraa evidence on record skews that<\/p>\n<p> &#039;v\u00a3}3\u00a7:;:&quot;\u00a7v&lt;i in the year 1%? at &#039;R.s.i,5\u20ac\/3,398,\/~.<\/p>\n<p> ,_;&amp;dm\u00a7ti:\u00a7\u20ac!\u00a7y,..&#039;a:f\u00a7e\u00a7 \u00e9ivisien, no ameunt is mid by tha<\/p>\n<p>_._jf]f &#8211; \u00e9efendarit_\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9 the giaintiff, The afsresai\u00e9 payment is fem&#039;<\/p>\n<p> *-.v7e\u00a7 \u00e9gAAs-&#039;s_&#039;pu%f\u00a7&#039;or ta the \u00e9am af partitizm. Theagh piea sf fam\u00e9igs<\/p>\n<p>&#039;VT&quot;&#039;&#8212;.\u00e9;9:&#039;ar%ge:&#039;nent, partition, gift, adverse pmsessicra, CiEJSt\u20ac?&quot; is<\/p>\n<p>&#039;V&quot;V&#039;A\u00bb\u00bb..4f.73Ecendit4i&#8217;e;1i&#8221;-erecetieaf\ufb01vtot&#8217;<br \/>\nproved in respect of piea of advei*\u00abe\u00a7&#8221;&#8216;.pesee$si_\u00a2n<br \/>\nowner er joint owner of&#8217;:&#8217;~s\u00a7a_aid  iiivv\u00e9&#8217; \u00e9tiit fer<\/p>\n<p>partition. Therefore, piea Oi&#8217;VGiJASt&#8217;\u00e9&#8217;i&#8221;E?}\u00a23S_.l&#8217;\u00a7\u00a5'&#8221;i;1&#8217;i;&#8217;:\u00a7%iE.&#8217;d a piea and<\/p>\n<p>not supp{\u00a7rted&#8221;rA  evii;i&#8217;ence;&#8217;V'&#8221;\ufb02&#8221;Fhe piea sf adverse<br \/>\npessessicriciearly  of title cf the piairitiff in<\/p>\n<p>the suit sxghedijie \u00a7:&#8217;op&#8217;erty_,  negates the case of partition<\/p>\n<p>    z   &#8230;.. V&#8217; V<\/p>\n<p> ._   as course esf con\u00e9uct of the parties far<\/p>\n<p>V it 6.. perid\u00e9 of&#8211;..&#8217;3U&lt;\u00a7ears prior to fiiing ef the suit is concerned,<\/p>\n<p>&quot;&quot;&#039;.4e?rij&#039;whiitc_h great reliance is placed, materiai on record shews<\/p>\n<p>  ef piaintiff and defendant died in the year 1963;<\/p>\n<p>it .:}:\u20ac\u00a7}&#039;3*i?&amp;?i was made eut \u00a7\u00a5&quot;i the name of the eeferieant oreiy in<\/p>\n<p>i\u00b0*. &quot;&#039;t&#039;he year 195?. The defendant&#039;s witness D.W.3 has deposed<\/p>\n<p>:8  998iG&lt;:&#039;i<\/p>\n<p>that in the year 1969 khata of the preperty ceuid-.r:\u00a7r\u00a7&#039;__&#039;__\ufb01&#039;e: &#039;<\/p>\n<p>entered in the name ofjoint owners and eccorc\u00a3j.in\u00a7&#039;;&#039;g\u20ac.Vpiieii\ufb02iffj&#039;   &#039; <\/p>\n<p>has ghren ietter re the Ccrporaticrz &#039;c;h&#039;*e__n&#039;aAr&#8211;n:e&#039;ef<br \/>\ndefendant in the katha. Heweyer, in \u00a2:}*reV.year,_.\u00a7;*3&#039;\u00a7&#039;1&quot;3o\u00a73r\u00a3i&quot;vr &#039;V<br \/>\nKatha was effected m the names efu\u00e9ieintiff &#039;a\ufb01_d&quot;&#039;6efe\ufb01earit.<\/p>\n<p>Merely because after the&#039;::&#039;deatriV&quot;efe~?\u00a7\u00a3fgeV&quot;&#039;e&#039;father; khA\u00e9tha is<br \/>\nmade eut in the name of oneT-ef&#039;f;&#039;i1e:&#039;vci3~ii.\u00e9:%;ggg~; _f$ no proof of<\/p>\n<p>exciusive titie cf \u00a7rhe.TA,p1rep\u00e9rrty irr&#039;:whA\u00a7&#039;s%e&#8211;nrar\ufb01e the khathe is<\/p>\n<p>made   efvfrre defendant that after<\/p>\n<p>receiving P\u00a7s\u00ab.}75,.Q0&amp;,.{-j-&quot;&#039;\u00a7bx\u00bb$?ar{\u00a7s&#039;.*:he vaiue of the he}? share,<\/p>\n<p>&#039;the pla\u00a3_;n.t%ff g aTare &#039;a7\u00a5etter  relinquishing his right and<\/p>\n<p>I-&#039;: &#039;ret;-2-:;es&#039;r:\u00a7rIgi.the&#039;&quot;autherifiee to make out khatha. The said<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7e&#039;i&#039;:_e!*_.eE:S&#039;*&#039;eVi;Vr:r;r3.3ened. Infect the piaintiff has arse<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  *\u00bbadmittee% Er:v.\u00a7*:ie&quot;:eir&#039;idence that he has given rte oiagiect\u00e9ee for<\/p>\n<p>.._\/A\/&#039;.:A:V&quot;V&#039;\u00a7&#039;\ufb01VE-ki\ufb02g e\u00a35tV__V;:he ichatha in the name 9? the defendant but<\/p>\n<p> h\u00e9&#039;g:&quot;_&quot;r*:~q%_:&quot;jife\u00a5EngL:ishee his right in the property, after taking 9?&quot;<\/p>\n<p> fazhathe in the name of the defendant he started<\/p>\n<p>&#039;V&quot;&quot;r\u00bb\u00bb.;$:Seer\u00a3ing his titieg the pieintiiff gave 3 ietter is the<\/p>\n<p> Cerporatien ta make eat his name am: in the khatha MEG<\/p>\n<p>{Z<\/p>\n<p>19 REJA 998\u00a7i}\u00a3\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>accordirsgiy the Cerporat\u00e9on made eut khatha<br \/>\nname of both the piaintiff and d_efen_dan$;4&#039;..V&quot; V&quot;&#039;&quot;&#039;a;,.;.?7% was<br \/>\ncha\ufb01enged by the defendant in  &#039;f\u00e9isevfefere<br \/>\nmaking ef khathe in the name o?__\u00a7i&#039;:e_ defenean\ufb01,&#039;aj\ufb01geeauegnt %<br \/>\njo\u00e9m: khatha, subsequent fiiing of..aVV&#039;:Av\u00a7.rEt&#039;..;:;et\u00a7i\u00a7dn&#8211;ibefcgie this<br \/>\nCourt in :13 way ass\u00e9st the &quot;eeE:a:f3i.\u00a7sVhEng his case<\/p>\n<p>of exclusive titie ef_=tf_1_e p{ope&#8211;ft}&#039;.v_&quot;  eiectr\u00e9city<br \/>\nmeter, water  the defendant,<br \/>\nthat $3 \u00e9ea\u00e9eadants 5 ever the<br \/>\nproperty. vv&#039;A1&#039;nfe&quot;ctV  was in eccupation ef the<\/p>\n<p>propertyf.-. _It &#039;is&#039;   to pay the tax. Pfaint\u00e9ff<\/p>\n<p>5 a&#039;c$7&#039;rr3Etj\u00a3:&quot;eci\u00ab\u00a5yVisae\ufb01at A;:v\u00bbe&#039;i\u00a7A taxes ail these years and the<\/p>\n<p>de&#039;feri:\u00a7_a\ufb01i   the preperty and he has paid taxes.<\/p>\n<p> &#039;~=&#039;~The narzf\u00e9e Q?&#039;  Eiefendant is enteree \u00e9n the register of the<\/p>\n<p>~f&#039;.j&#039;;-Vi7je:=poratEee.,__1 It enly means he whose name is ente-tee \ufb01e<\/p>\n<p> \u00a3.f\u00a7eV&#039;.Areg_i.$i;er $3 iiabie ta pay taxee and eefeneant has pai\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>.  &#039;t&#039;\u00a7ii;e_Vv;t_exes and eeyonzi that, it \u00e9oes net cenfer any right en<\/p>\n<p> %&#039;\u00a7ii.:*r\u00b0:. Strarzgeiy, the gift tax paid in this case &#039; negates the<\/p>\n<p> case of the defendant. The expiaraatio\u00e9w effered by him E5<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">52<\/span><\/p>\n<p>23% Rii\ufb01.  Ga<\/p>\n<p>shown to be faise. Infant on the date at&#8217; the g\u00a5ft du\u00e9eci &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>year 1962 M was hardiy aged abQ:.:tw24Ay\u00a3\u00a7$1;\u00a7,&#8221;&#8216;<br \/>\ngiven a gift of Rs.48,0:&#8217;;}0\/- an\u00e9 &#8216;\u00a30<br \/>\nwife and his son was aged abct\ufb01V2:&#8221;;%.ear:\u00a7.A.&#8221;&#8216;   %<br \/>\nreiationship was very cord.i\u00a7i in ptV?2\u00e9i&#8217;\u00a7{ea&#8217;r..LAf;9t.S.\u00bb2&#8243;&#8216;b;zec&amp;R:E\u00a7e the<br \/>\npiaintiff has Eeft the entif\u00e9&#8217;;:;fqp\u00e9:;\u00a7}. \u00e9s:%}\u00a7g&#8211;Vj&#8217;,}f\u00e9:fsas moved out<br \/>\nat&#8217; the house. Tak\u00e9nig ,\u00a7dv2\u00a7h&#8217;E&#8217;ag;\u00e9;\u00a5 \u00a7f..g:\ufb01.g$\u00e9&#8217;-  &#8216;\u00e9zaymenits by<br \/>\nway :3!&#8217; chgqug.\u00e9imj;i};h_pwi:f;\u00a7i_1&#8242; gift, a case of<\/p>\n<p>partition gs sQ\u00a7J_&#8217;\u00a7k&#8217;\u00a7;\u00a3_-\u00bbte__:vA3b.ie  .o&#8217;_:.2t. If the defendant has<br \/>\nShawn thi\u00e9&#8221;p{dperty._.\u00aba\u00a7.&#8217;A&#8217;t?\u00a74e~.,j:?\u00a7:*Trai evidence are record has rightiy he\ufb01d the<\/p>\n<p> n$\u00a2hedu}:$ pmperty is a jeint farniiy preperty. &#8216;fhere is<\/p>\n<p>acggsisition cf titia by adverse pessessien. The<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;j&#8217;*r\u00e9i_iVn__r\u00a7;u\u00e9shment of right of the piainti\ufb01&#8217; in the suit scfsedme<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;&#8212;.p:\u00e9*epe:*ty is \ufb01at estabiisheci arsd accerdingiy has decreed the<\/p>\n<p>= 12: e&#8217; :~:.a;;s  A<\/p>\n<p>2% RFA \u00a79S:&#8221;&#8216;{)\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>suit. The saici judgment and decree is just and iegai. No<\/p>\n<p>merits&#8217; D\u00e9smisse\u00e9.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd     <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court D L Nanjaraj S\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009 Author: N.Kumar And Gowda IE REK 998:&#8221;O6 IN &#8220;ma HIGH COURT 9? KARNATAKA AT Bgi\ufb01\ufb02-\u00a7lX\u00a7\u00a7_\u00a7&#8217;}:R&#8217;\u00a7 &#8221; LT &#8216; QATE9 THIS THE 293&#8217; am QF&#8221;&#8216;3uL~:i, 299%&#8221; paessrsxfr A T A 4 THE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-137976","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>D L Nanjaraj S\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"D L Nanjaraj S\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-10T17:58:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"D L Nanjaraj S\\\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\\\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-10T17:58:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":1941,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2\",\"name\":\"D L Nanjaraj S\\\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\\\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-10T17:58:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"D L Nanjaraj S\\\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\\\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"D L Nanjaraj S\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"D L Nanjaraj S\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-10T17:58:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"D L Nanjaraj S\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-10T17:58:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2"},"wordCount":1941,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2","name":"D L Nanjaraj S\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-10T17:58:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-l-nanjaraj-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-vs-d-l-shivanna-so-late-d-n-lingaiah-on-29-july-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"D L Nanjaraj S\/O Late D N Lingaiah vs D L Shivanna S\/O Late D N Lingaiah on 29 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137976","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=137976"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137976\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=137976"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=137976"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=137976"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}